Sosyal Kimliğin Görünür Temsili: Giyim ve Moda

Year 2018, , 1389 - 1397, 27.09.2018

Nihan Akdemir

https://doi.org/10.21547/jss.411181

Cited By: 7

Abstract

Bu araştırma makalesi sosyal kimlik ile giyim ve moda
arasındaki ilişkiyi kapsamaktadır. Bu ilişki,
giysinin ve modanın geçmiş çağlardan günümüze kimliğin ve sosyal statünün bir
göstergesi olması dolayısıyla, görsel anlatım üzerinden ele alınmıştır. Yazıda
giysinin ve modanın görsel temsili Antik Mısır’dan günümüze alınmıştır. Sonuçlar
giysinin kumaştan renge her bir biriminin sosyal kimliğin ifadesi noktasından
görsel anlam taşıdığını göstermiştir. 

Keywords

Giyim, Moda, Görsel Temsil, Kimlik, Görsel Anlam

Visible Expression of Social Identity: the Clothing and Fashion

Abstract

This paper includes the investigation about the relation between social
identity and clothing and also fashion. And this relationship has been taken
into consideration over the visual expression because even during the ancient
times, the cloths were the basic and simple way of representing the identity and
social classes. The visible expression of identity over clothing from Ancient
Egypt to today’s clothing and fashion has been researched in this article. And
the results have showed that every pieces of clothing from fabric to colouring
have visual significations about social identity.

Keywords

Identity, Clothing, Fashion, Visual Expression, Visual Signification

References

• Adams, E.C. (1990). White-Blouse and White Collar: Work,Culture and Gender. Gender and History, Vol.2, No.3 Autumn, 343-348.
• Akdemir, N. (2017). Gender and Its Representation in Contemporary Arts. European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies. Sep.-Dec. 2017, Vol.6, Nr.2, 11-22.
• Akdemir, N. (2017). Moda Sektöründe Toplumsal Cinsiyet Kavramının Varlığı, Sobider, Year: 4, Number: 12, August 2017, 249-267.
• Argyle, M. (1992). The social psychology of everyday life. London and New York: Routledge
• Aşkın, M. (2007). Kimlik ve Giydirilmiş Kimlikler. Atatürk Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt 10, Sayı 2, 213-220.
• Barnard, M. (2002). Sanat, tasarım ve görsel kültür. Ankara: Ütopya.
• Barnard, M.. (2002). Fashion as communication. New York: Routledge.
• Barthes, R. (1983). The fashion system. London: University of California Press, Ltd.
• Baudrillard, J. (1984). La Mode ou la féerie du code. Paris : Gallimard.
• Brehm, S. ve Kassin, S. M. (1993). Social Psychology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
• Calhoun, C. (ed.) (1994) Social Theory and the Politics of Identity. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Calefato, P .(2004). The Clothed Body. Oxford: Berg Publishers.
• Castells, M.(2010). The power of identity with a new preface, Second edition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
• Davis,F.(1992). Fashion, culture, and identity. Chicago,IL:The University of Chicago Press.
• Demirtaş, H. A. (2003). İletişim Aaraştırmaları, 1(1): p. 123-14.
• Dökmen, Z.Y. (2016) Toplumsal cinsiyet, sosyal psikolojik açıklamalar, İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.
• Erinç, S. M. (2004). Kültür sanat, sanat kültür. Ankara: Ütopya Yayınevi.
• Goffman, E.(1959).The presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: Doubleday.
• Güvenç, B. (1996). Türk kimliği. İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.
• Hebdidge, D. (1979). Subculture: the meaning of style. New York: Methuen.
• Hebdige, D. (1981). Subculture: the meaning of style. New York: Routledge.
• Hogg, M. A. ve Abrams, D. (1988). Social identifications: a social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. London and New York: Routledge.
• Kawamura, Y. (2016). Moda-loji: moda çalışmalarına giriş. İstanbul: Ayrıntı
• Kelly L. Reddy-Best & Elaine L. Pedersen (2015) The relationship of gender expression, sexual identity, distress, appearance, and clothing choices for queer women, International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 8:1, 54-65
• Kroeber, A.L. and Kluckhohn, C. (1952) Culture: a critical review of concepts and definitions. Cambridge, Mass., The Museum.
• Lurie, A. (2000). The language of clothes. New York: Owl Books.
• Owyong, Y. S. M. (2009) Clothing semiotics and the social construction of power relations, Social Semiotics, 19:2, 191-211.
• Rath, M.P., Peterson, J., Greensley, P., Gill, P. (1994). Introduction to fashion merchandising. New York: Delmar Pub.
• Rice, F.P. (1996). Intimate relationships, marriages and families. California: Mayfield Pub.
• Saucier, P. K. (2011) Cape Verdean Youth Fashion: Identity in Clothing, Fashion Theory, 15:1, 49-66.
• Singer, M. (2017). Gigi Hadid and Zayn Malik are part of a new generation who don’t see fashion as gendered. https://www.vogue.com/article/gigi-hadid-zayn-malik-august-2017-vogue-cover-breaking-gender-codes uploaded July 13, 2017 1:00 PM.
• Sproles, G.B., and L.D. Burns (1994) Changing appearances: understanding dress in contemporary society. New York: Fairchild Publications.
• Steele, V. (1997) Anti-Fashion: The 1970s, Fashion Theory, 1:3, 279-295.
• Subbaraman, S. (1999) Catalog-ing ethnicity, Interventions, 1:4, 572-589.
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1985) The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
• Tortora P., and K. Eubank. 1989. A survey of historic costume. New York: Fairchild Publications.
• Turner, J. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Basil Blakcwell.
• Waquet, D. and Laporte, M. (2011). Moda. Ankara: Dost Kitabevi.
• Wilson, E. (1988) Adorned in dreams: fashion and modernity, Berkeley: University of California Press.
• Woolf, V. (1956). Orlando: a biography, U.S.A.: A Harvest Book Harcourt, Inc.