Natural Resources in terms of its Effect on Economic Growth: A Dynamic Panel Data Analysis

Year 2020, , 840 - 852, 01.07.2020

Hüseyin Ağır , Sena Türkmen

https://doi.org/10.21547/jss.717099

Cited By: 12

Abstract

Natural resources state that pastures, forests, renewable (sun, wind, hydroelectric, etc.) and non-renewable resources (oil, natural gas and mineral resources) which are spontaneously formed underground and above ground in nature. It is seen that natural resources are important factor that directly affects the production process such as labor and capital. Therefore, in the analysis of economic growth, the effect of renewable and non-renewable energy production as a natural resource factor on growth is of great importance. The aim of this study is to analyze the effect of renewable and non-renewable energy resources on economic growth in emerging market economies for the period 1990-2015 with up-to-date econometric methods. The empirical results show that renewable energy production negatively affects economic growth and non-renewable energy production positively affects growth in emerging market economies.

Keywords

Natural Resources, Energy, Economic Growth, Panel Data Anaysis

Ekonomik Büyümeye Etkisi Bakımından Doğal Kaynaklar: Dinamik Panel Veri Analizi

Abstract

Doğal kaynaklar, meraları, ormanlık alanları, doğada kendiliğinden oluşmuş yer altı ve yer üstünde yer alan yenilenebilir (güneş, rüzgâr, hidroelektrik vb.) ve yenilenemez kaynakları (petrol, doğal gaz ve mineral kaynaklar) ifade etmektedir. Geleneksel üretim fonksiyonunda doğal kaynakların emek ve sermaye gibi doğrudan üretim sürecini etkileyen önemli bir faktör olduğu görülmektedir. Bu yüzden, ekonomik büyümenin analizinde, doğal kaynak faktörü olarak yenilenebilir ve yenilenemez enerji üretiminin büyümeye etkisi büyük önem arz etmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, yükselen piyasa ekonomilerinde yenilenebilir ve yenilenemez enerji kaynaklarının ekonomik büyümeye etkisini güncel ekonometrik yöntemlerle 1990-2015 dönemi için analiz etmektir. Ampirik bulgular, yükselen piyasa ekonomilerinde yenilenebilir enerji üretiminin ekonomik büyümeyi negatif, yenilenemez enerji üretiminin ise büyümeyi pozitif etkilediği yönündedir.

Keywords

Doğal Kaynaklar, Enerji, Ekonomik Büyüme, Panel Veri Analizi

References

• Akça, E. E., Bal, H., & Demiral, M. (2015). Dogal Kaynak Zenginliği ve Ekonomik Büyüme Iliskisinde Yönetisim Göstergelerinin Aracilik Etkisi: MENA ve Hazar Ülkelerinden Ampirik Bulgular/Mediation Effect of the Governance Indicators in the Natural Resources Abundance and Economic Growth Relationship: Empirical Evidence from the MENA and Caspian Countries. Ege Akademik Bakis, 15(3), 301-312.
• Apergis, N., Payne, J. E. (2010a). Renewable Energy Consumption And Economic Growth: Evidence From a Panel of OECD Countries. Energy Policy, 38(1), 656–660.
• Apergis, N., Payne, J. E. (2010b). Renewable Energy Consumption And Growth in Eurasia. Energy Economics, 32(6), 1392-1397.
• Apergis, N., Payne, J. E. (2011). The Renewable Energy Consumption-Growth Nexus in Central America. Applied Energy, 88(1), 343-347.
• Apergis, N., Payne, J. E. (2012), Renewable And Non-Renewable Energy Consumption-Growth Nexus: Evidence From A Panel Error Correction Model. Energy Economics, 34(3), 733-738.
• Baltagi, B. (2008). Econometric analysis of panel data. John Wiley & Sons.
• Başol, K., (1991). Doğal Kaynaklar Ekonomisi, Aklıselim Basımevi, İzmir.
• Bayar, G., Güloğlu B. ve Selman T.S. (2011). “Sanayi Sektörü İstihdamının Temel Belirleyicileri ve Dış Ticaret: Türkiye Örneği”, Ekonomik Yaklaşım Kongreler Dizisi: Vıı,15,1-22.
• Bayraktutan, Y., Yılgor M., Ucak S. (2011). “Renewable Electricity Generation And Economic Growth: Panel-Data Analysis For Oecd Members”, International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 66, Ss. 59-66.
• Breusch, T. S., And Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange Multiplier Test and its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics. The Review Of Economic Studies, 47(1), Pp. 239-253.
• Çınar, S. (2010). OECD Ülkelerinde Kişi Başına Gsyih Durağan Mı? Panel Veri Analizi, Marmara Üniversitesi İ.İ.B.F Dergisi, 29(2), Ss. 591-601.
• Çınar, S. (2015). Doğal Kaynaklar ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi: Gelişmekte Olan Ülkeler Örneği. Marmara University Journal Of Economic & Administrative Sciences, 37(2).
• Çınar, S., & Yılmazer, M. (2015). Yenilenebilir Enerji Kaynaklarının Belirleyicileri ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi: Gelişmekte Olan Ülkeler Örneği. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(1), 55-78.
• Destek, M. A., & Aslan, A. (2017). Renewable And Non-Renewable Energy Consumption And Economic Growth in Emerging Economies: Evidence From Bootstrap Panel Causality. Renewable Energy, 111, 757-763.
• Di Iorio, F., & Fachin, S. (2008). A Note On The Estimation Of Long-Run Relationships in Dependent Cointegrated Panels.
• Gazel, S. (2016). The Relationship Between Financial Development and Economic Growth: An Analysis on Troubled Ten Countries 1990-2014, Business and Economics Research Journal, 7 (3), pp. 39-52.
• Gylfason, T. (2001) “Natural Resources, Education, and Economic Development” European Economic Review, 45(2001): 847-859.
• Lederman, D. ve Maloney, W. F. (2007). Natural Resources: Neither Curse Nor Destiny. Palo Alto, Stanford University Press.
• Magnani, N., Vaona, A. (2013), Regional Spillover Effects Of Renewable Energy Generation İn Italy, Energy Policy, 56, 663-671.
• Masih, A. M. M., Masih, R., “Energy Consumption, Real Income and Temporal Causality: Results from A Multi-Country Study Based on Cointegration and Error-Correction
• Modelling Techniques”, Energy Economics, 18, 1996, s. 165-183.
• Nazlıoğlu, Ş. (2010). Makro iktisat politikalarının tarım sektörü üzerindeki etkileri: Gelişmiş ve gelişmekte olan ülkeler için bir karşılaştırma. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, TC Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Kayseri.
• Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General Diagnostic Tests For Cross Section Dependence In Panels. Cambridge: University Of Cambridge,Working Paper.
• Pesaran, M. H. (2006). Estimation And Inference in Large Heterogeneous Panels with a Multifactor Error Structure, Econometrica, 74 (4), Ss. 967–1012.
• Pesaran, M. H. And Yamagata, T. (2008). Testing Slope Homogeneity in Large Panels, Journal of Econometrics, Sayı:142, Ss. 50–93.
• Pesaran, M. H., Ullah, A. And Yamagata, T. (2008). A Bias-Adjusted LM Test of Error Cross-Section Independence. Econometrics Journal, 11, Pp. 105-127.
• Reese, S. And Westerlund, J. (2016). Panicca: Panic on Cross‐Section Averages, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 31 (6), Pp. 961-981.
• Sachs, J. D. ve Warner, A. M. (1997) “Natural Resource Abundance and Economic Growth” NBER Working Paper Series, No. 5398. Sachs, J. D. ve Warner, A. M. (1999) “The Big Push, Natural Resource Booms and Growth” Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 59: 43-76.
• Sachs, J. D. ve Warner, A. M. (2001) “The Curse of Natural Resources” European Economic Review, 45(4-6): 827-838
• Salim, R.A., Rafiq, S. (2012). Why Do Some Emerging Economies Proactively Accelerate The Adoption of Renewable Energy? Energy Economics, 34, 1051- 1057.
• Shahbaz, M., Zeshan, M. And Afza, T. (2012) Is Energy Consumption Effective to Spur Economic Growth in Pakistan? New Evidence From Bounds Test To Level Relationships And Granger Causality Tests, Economic Modelling, 29, 2310-2319.
• Shahbaz, M., Zeshan, M., Tıwarı, A.K. (2011), “Analysis of Renewable Energy Consumption, Real Gdp And Co2 Emissions: A Structural Var Approach İn Romania”, Mpra Paper No. 34066.
• Stern, D. I., “Energy Use and Economic Growth in the USA: A Multivariate Approach”, Energy Economics, 15, 1993, s. 137-150.
• Stiglitz, J. (1974). Growth with exhaustible natural resources: efficient and optimal growth paths. The review of economic studies, 41, 123-137.
• Westerlund, J. (2008). Panel Cointegration Tests of The Fisher Effect. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 23(2), 193-233.