Abstract
Bu
makale devletin tanınmasıyla ilgilidir. Devletin tanınmasına ilişkin tarihsel
gelişmeler çerçevesinde, neden bazı devletlerin tanındığı neden bazılarının
tanınmadığı sorusunun yanıtı aranacaktır. Bu çalışmada kurucu tanıma ile
açıklayıcı tanıma arasında eskiden beri var olan çelişkiler analiz edilmektedir.
Ayrıca, çalışma 1933 Montevideo Sözleşmesine giden süreçte Montevideo
Konferansında devlete ilişkin kriterler ile devletin tanınmasına dair
kodifikasyon çalışmaların yapılmasına dair kararın ardındaki gerekçeler analiz
edilmektedir.
References
- AKİPEK , Ömer İ.,(1975), Devletler Hukuku, C.2, 2.baskı, Ankara.
- ALEXANDROWICZ- ALEXANDER, Charles Henry(1952) , “ The Quasi- Juridical Function in Recognition of States and Goverments”, American Journal of International Law,46(4),ss634.
- AUFRICHT, Hans ( 1949), “ Principles and pratices of Recognition by International Organization”, American Journal of International Law, 43(4),679.
- BARSH, Russel L ( 1989 ), “ Ethnocidal Character of The State and International Law”,Journal of Etnic Study, 16(4 ), ss.15.
- BECK, Robert and AMBROSIO Thomas ( 2002 ), International Law and The Rise of Nations, Seven Bridges Press, New York.
- BERDAHI, Clarence A. ( 1920 ), “ The Power of Recognition”, American Journal of International Law,14,ss.519.
- BİLSEL, Cemil (1941), Devletler Hukuku, C.1,İstanbul.
- BRIGGS, Herbert W.( 1940 ), “ Non-Recognition of Title by Conquest And Limitation of Doktirine”, American Society of International Law, 34(3),114.
- BROWN, Philip Marshall, “ Cognition and Recognition”, American Journal of International Law 47(1),87.
- BROWNLIE, Ian ( 2003) , Priniciples of Public International Law, Sixth Edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Abstract
This
article is about state recognition. Rahter than merely providing an analysis of
the historical development of state’s recognition, it ask the question of why
certain entities are recognized and others are not. It analyzes the old
paradigms of constitutive and declarative theories. It is analyzes the Montevideo Convention of 1933, the evens
that led up to the Montevideo conference and the reasons behind the decision to
codify statehood criteria and state recognition at that particular moment in
history.
References
- AKİPEK , Ömer İ.,(1975), Devletler Hukuku, C.2, 2.baskı, Ankara.
- ALEXANDROWICZ- ALEXANDER, Charles Henry(1952) , “ The Quasi- Juridical Function in Recognition of States and Goverments”, American Journal of International Law,46(4),ss634.
- AUFRICHT, Hans ( 1949), “ Principles and pratices of Recognition by International Organization”, American Journal of International Law, 43(4),679.
- BARSH, Russel L ( 1989 ), “ Ethnocidal Character of The State and International Law”,Journal of Etnic Study, 16(4 ), ss.15.
- BECK, Robert and AMBROSIO Thomas ( 2002 ), International Law and The Rise of Nations, Seven Bridges Press, New York.
- BERDAHI, Clarence A. ( 1920 ), “ The Power of Recognition”, American Journal of International Law,14,ss.519.
- BİLSEL, Cemil (1941), Devletler Hukuku, C.1,İstanbul.
- BRIGGS, Herbert W.( 1940 ), “ Non-Recognition of Title by Conquest And Limitation of Doktirine”, American Society of International Law, 34(3),114.
- BROWN, Philip Marshall, “ Cognition and Recognition”, American Journal of International Law 47(1),87.
- BROWNLIE, Ian ( 2003) , Priniciples of Public International Law, Sixth Edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Details
| Subjects | Law in Context |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Law |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | October 28, 2016 |
| Submission Date | November 12, 2016 |
| Acceptance Date | September 7, 2016 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2016 Volume: 15 Issue: 4 |
