Kalite Yönetimi Uygulamalarının Firma Performansı Üzerindeki Etkisinde İnovasyonun Aracı Rolü İle Çevresel Dinamizmin Moderatör Rolü

Year 2019, Volume: 14 Issue: 56, 489 - 506, 31.10.2019

Bülent Yıldız , Mehmet Aytekin

Abstract

Bu
çalışmada TKY uygulamalarının inovasyon ve firma performansı üzerindeki etkisi
ile bu etkideki çevresel dinamizmin moderatör rolü araştırılmıştır. Ayrıca TKY
uygulamalarının firma performansı üzerindeki etkisinde inovasyon performansının
aracı rolü analiz edilmiştir. Bu amaçla İstanbul Sanayi Odası’nın 2015 yılında
ilan etmiş olduğu ilk 1000 sanayi firması araştırmanın ana kütlesi olarak
belirlenmiştir. 203 firmadan elde edilen veriler analiz edildikten sonra TKY
uygulamalarının inovasyon ve firma performansını pozitif yönde anlamlı olarak
etkilediği; inovasyon performansının da firma performansını pozitif yönde
anlamlı olarak etkilediği bulgularına ulaşılmıştır. Aracılık testi sonucu TKY
uygulamalarının firma performansı üzerindeki etkisinde inovasyon performansının
aracı rolü bulunduğu tespit edilmiştir. Moderatör testi sonucunda ise TKY
uygulamalarının inovasyon performansı üzerindeki etkisinde çevresel dinamizmin
moderatör rolü bulunduğu bulgusuna ulaşılmıştır.

Keywords

Kalite yönetimi uygulamaları, inovasyon

References

• Ahire, S. L. ve Dreyfus, P. (2000). The impact of design management and process management on quality: an empirical investigation. Journal of Operations Management, 18(5), 549–575.
• Ahire, S. L. ve Ravichandran, T. (2001). An innovation diffusion model of TQM implementation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 48(4), 445–464.
• Alegre, J., Lapiedra, R. ve Chiva, R. (2006). A measurement scale for product innovation performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, 9(4), 333–346.
• Azadegan, A., Patel, P. C., Zangoueinezhad, A. ve Linderman, K. (2013). The effect of environmental complexity and environmental dynamism on lean practices. Journal of Operations Management, 31(4), 193–212.
• Azizi, R., Maleki, M., Moradi-Moghadam, M. ve Cruz-Machado, V. (2016). The impact of knowledge management practices on supply chain quality management and competitive advantages. Management and Production Engineering Review, 7(1), 4–12.
• Baird, K., Jia Hu, K. ve Reeve, R. (2011). The relationships between organizational culture, total quality management practices and operational performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 31(7), 789–814.
• Baron, R. A. ve Tang, J. (2011). The role of entrepreneurs in firm-level innovation: Joint effects of positive affect, creativity, and environmental dynamism. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(1), 49–60.
• Benavides-Velasco, C. A., Quintana-García, C. ve Marchante-Lara, M. (2014). Total quality management, corporate social responsibility and performance in the hotel industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 41, 77–87.
• Camisón, C. ve Puig-Denia, A. (2016). Are quality management practices enough to improve process innovation? International Journal of Production Research, 54(10), 2875–2894.
• Cheng, T. C. E. ve Choy, P. W. (2013). A study of the relationships between quality management practices and organizational performance in the shipping industry. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 15(1), 1–31.
• Chong, V. K. ve Rundus, M. J. (2004). Total quality management, market competition and organizational performance. The British Accounting Review, 36(2), 155–172.
• Conti, T. (2012). Building total quality: a guide for management. Springer Science & Business Media.
• Corrigan, J. P. (1994). Is ISO 9000 the path to TQM? USA: Quality Progress.Çakır, S. Y. ve Eğinli, A. T. (2010). Memnun çalışanlar memnun müşteriler (1. bs.). Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
• Dahlgaard, J. J., Khanji, G. K. ve Kristensen, K. (2008). Fundamentals of total quality management. Routledge.
• Damanpour, F. ve Schneider, M. (2006). Phases of the adoption of innovation in organizations: Effects of environment, organization and top Managers1. British Journal of Management, 17(3), 215–236.
• De Guimarães, J. C. F., Severo, E. A., Dorion, E. C. H., Coallier, F. ve Olea, P. M. (2016). The use of organisational resources for product innovation and organisational performance: a survey of the Brazilian furniture industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 180, 135–147.
• De Marchi, V. (2012). Environmental innovation and R&D cooperation: Empirical evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms. Research Policy, 41(3), 614–623.Deming, W. E. (2000). The new economics: for industry, government, education. MIT press.
• Dunne, T. C., Aaron, J. R., McDowell, W. C., Urban, D. J. ve Geho, P. R. (2016). The impact of leadership on small business innovativeness. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 4876–4881.
• Ensley, M. D., Pearce, C. L. ve Hmieleski, K. M. (2006). The moderating effect of environmental dynamism on the relationship between entrepreneur leadership behavior and new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(2), 243–263.
• Enzing, C. (2009). Product innovation in the Dutch food and beverage industry A study on the impact of the innovation process, strategy and network on the product’s short- and long-term market performance (1. bs., C. Innovation and sustainability series – Volume 5). The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers.
• Fernandes, A. A. C. M., Lourenço, L. A. N. ve Silva, M. J. A. M. (2014). Influence of quality management on the innovative performance. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, 16(53), 575–593.
• Fernandes, A. C., Sampaio, P., Sameiro, M. ve Truong, H. Q. (2017). Supply chain management and quality management integration: A conceptual model proposal. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 34(1), 53–67.
• Ferreira, V. H. D. S. ve Cardoso, R. (2014). The relation between quality management and innovation performance in the textile sector in Portugal. Journal of Global Business and Technology, 10(2), 13.
• Foster, S. T. (2008). Towards an understanding of supply chain quality management. Journal of Operations Management, 26(4), 461–467.
• Glick, W. H., Miller, C. C. ve Huber, G. P. (1993). The impact of upper-echelon diversity on organizational performance. Organizational change and redesign: Ideas and insights for improving performance, 176, 214.
• Gu, Q., Jiang, W. ve Wang, G. G. (2016). Effects of external and internal sources on innovation performance in Chinese high-tech SMEs: A resource-based perspective. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 40, 76–86.
• Hall, L. A. ve Bagchi-Sen, S. (2002). A study of R&D, innovation, and business performance in the Canadian biotechnology industry. Technovation, 22(4), 231–244.
• Hoonsopon, D. ve Ruenrom, G. (2012). The impact of organizational capabilities on the development of radical and incremental product innovation and product innovation performance. Journal of Managerial Issues, 250–276.
• Hwang, D., Yang, M. G. M. ve Hong, P. (2015). Mediating effect of IT-enabled capabilities on competitive performance outcomes: An empirical investigation of ERP implementation. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 36, 1–23.
• Ilori, A. B., Lawal, A. ve Simeon-Oke, O. O. (2017). Innovations and innovation capability in palm kernel processing industry in southwestern Nigeria. International Journal of Innovation Science, 9(1), 102–114.
• Ingenbleek, P., Frambach, R. T. ve Verhallen, T. M. (2013). Best Practices for new product pricing: impact on market performance and price level under different conditions. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(3), 560–573.
• Ivanov, C.-I. ve Avasilcăi, S. (2014). Performance measurement models: an analysis for measuring innovation processes performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 124, 397–404.
• Izvercian, M., Radu, A., Ivascu, L. ve Ardelean, B.-O. (2014). The impact of human resources and total quality management on the enterprise. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 124, 27–33.
• Jajja, S. S. M., Ali Brah, S., Zahoor Hassan, S. ve R. Kannan, V. (2014). An examination of product innovation and buyer-supplier relationship in Pakistani firms. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 63(8), 1031–1045
• Jiao, H., Alon, I. ve Cui, Y. (2011). Environmental dynamism, innovation, and dynamic capabilities: the case of China. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 5(2), 131–144.
• Judge, W. Q. ve Miller, A. (1991). Antecedents and outcomes of decision speed in different environmental context. Academy of Management Journal, 34(2), 449–463.
• Kafetzopoulos, D., Gotzamani, K. ve Gkana, V. (2015). Relationship between quality management, innovation and competitiveness. Evidence from Greek companies. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 26(8), 1177–1200.
• Kafetzopoulos, D., Gotzamani, K. ve Psomas, E. (2013). Quality systems and competitive performance of food companies. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 20(4), 463–483.
• Katila, R. ve Shane, S. (2005). When does lack of resources make new firms innovative? Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 814–829.
• Kaynak, H. (2003). The relationship between total quality management practices and their effects on firm performance. Journal of Operations Management, 21(4), 405–435.
• Kim, D. Y. (2010). The impact of quality management practices on innovation. (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Carleton University.
• Kim, D.-Y., Kumar, V. ve Kumar, U. (2012). Relationship between quality management practices and innovation. Journal of Operations Management, 30(4), 295–315.
• Kongpichayanond, P. (2013). Penceived relationship among knowledge management, total quality management, and organization innovation performance: a Thai study. (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). University of Minnesota.
• Lakhal, L. Pasin, F. ve Limam, M. (2006). Quality management practices and their impact on performance. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 23(6), 625–646.
• Lee, H.-H. ve Lee, C.-Y. (2014). The effects of total quality management and organisational learning on business performance: evidence from Taiwanese insurance industries. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 25(9-10), 1072–1087.
• Lo, V. H. Y., Sculli, D. ve Yeung, A. H. W. (2006). Supplier quality management in the Pearl River Delta. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 23(5), 513–530.
• Löfsten, H. (2014). Product innovation processes and the trade-off between product innovation performance and business performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, 17(1), 61–84.
• Madhikermi, M., Kubler, S., Robert, J., Buda, A. ve Främling, K. (2016). Data quality assessment of maintenance reporting procedures. Expert Systems with Applications, 63, 145–164.
• Maistry, K., Maistry, K., Hurreeram, D. K., Hurreeram, D. K., Ramessur, V. ve Ramessur, V. (2017). Total quality management and innovation: Relationships and effects on performance of agricultural R&D organisations. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 34(3), 418–437.
• Martínez-Costa, M. ve Martínez-Lorente, A. R. (2008). Does quality management foster or hinder innovation? An empirical study of Spanish companies. Total Quality Management, 19(3), 209–221.
• Mucuk, İ. (2012). Pazarlama ilkeleri (19. bs.). İstanbul: Türkmen Kitabevi.
• Pakdil, F. (2004). Kalite kültürünü etkileyen faktörler üzerine bir derleme. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 6(3), 171.
• Parvadavardini, S., Vivek, N. ve Devadasan, S. R. (2016). Impact of quality management practices on quality performance and financial performance: evidence from Indian manufacturing companies. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 27(5-6), 507–530.
• Patyal, V. S. ve Koilakuntla, M. (2017). The impact of quality management practices on performance: an empirical study. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 24(2), 511–535.
• Prajogo, D. I. ve Sohal, A. S. (2006). The integration of TQM and technology/R&D management in determining quality and innovation performance. Omega, 34(3), 296–312.
• Prajogo, D. I. ve Sohal, A. S. (2006). The relationship between organization strategy, total quality management (TQM), and organization performance—-the mediating role of TQM. European Journal of Operational Research, 168(1), 35–50.
• Prasad, B. ve Junni, P. (2016). CEO transformational and transactional leadership and organizational innovation: The moderating role of environmental dynamism. Management Decision, 54(7), 1542–1568.
• Prajogo, D. I. (2016). The strategic fit between innovation strategies and business environment in delivering business performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 171, 241–249.
• Prajogo, D. I. ve Sohal, A. S. (2003). The relationship between TQM practices, quality performance, and innovation performance: An empirical examination. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 20(8), 901–918.
• Prajogo, D. I. ve Brown, A. (2004). The relationship between TQM practices and quality performance and the role of formal TQM programs: an Australian empirical study. The Quality Management Journal, 11(4), 31.
• Priem, R. L., Rasheed, A. M. ve Kotulic, A. G. (1995). Rationality in strategic decision processes, environmental dynamism and firm performance. Journal of Management, 21(5), 913–929.
• Rainey, D. L. (2008). Product innovation: leading change through integrated product development. Cambridge University Press.
• Raphael, P. (2010). Maximizing innovation using total quality management. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). California State University, USA.
• Saraph, J. V., Benson, P. G. ve Schroeder, R. G. (1989). An instrument for measuring the critical factors of quality management. Decision Sciences, 20(4), 810–829.
• Sobel M.E. (1982). A symptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardth (Ed.). Sociological Methodology, ss.290-312. Wahington D.C.: American Sociological Association.
• Sohal, A. S. ve Terziovski, M. (2000). TQM in Australian manufacturing: factors critical to success. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 17(2), 158–168.
• Salomo, S., Weise, J. ve Gemünden, H. G. (2007). NPD planning activities and innovation performance: the mediating role of process management and the moderating effect of product innovativeness. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24(4), 285–302.
• Samson, D. ve Terziovski, M. (1999). The relationship between total quality management practices and operational performance. Journal of Operations Management, 17(4), 393–409.
• Santos-Vijande, M. L. ve Alvarez-Gonzalez, L. I. (2007). TQM and firms performance: an EFQM excellence model research based survey. International Journal of Business Science and Applied Management, 2(2), 21–41.
• Santos-Vijande, M. L. ve Álvarez-González, L. I. (2007). Innovativeness and organizational innovation in total quality oriented firms: The moderating role of market turbulence. Technovation, 27(9), 514–532.
• Severo, E. A., de Guimarães, J. C. F. ve Dorion, E. C. H. (2017). Cleaner production and environmental management as sustainable product innovation antecedents: a survey in Brazilian industries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 87–97.
• Shan, A. W., Ahmad, M. F. ve Nor, N. H. M. (2016). The mediating effect of innovation between total quality management (TQM) and business performance. IOP conference series: materials science and engineering (C. 160, s. 012011). IOP Publishing.
• Silva,M. G., J. Gomes, P., Filipe Lages, L. ve Lopes Pereira, Z. (2014). The role of TQM in strategic product innovation: an empirical assessment. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 34(10), 1307–1337.
• Sumarjan, N. (2011). Exploration of quality management practices in malaysian hotels: an equilibrium approach. (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi).
• Şimşek, M. (2007). Toplam kalite yönetimi (5. bs.). İstanbul: Alfa Yayınları.
• Şimşek, H. (2013). Toplam kalite yönetimi kuram, ilkeler, uygulamalar (2. bs.). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Tari, J. J., Molina, J. F. ve Castejon, J. L. (2007). The relationship between quality management practices and their effects on quality outcomes. European Journal of Operational Research, 183(2), 483–501.
• Thai Hoang, D., Igel, B. ve Laosirihongthong, T. (2006). The impact of total quality management on innovation: Findings from a developing country. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 23(9), 1092–1117.
• Wallace, J. C., Little, L. M., Hill, A. D. ve Ridge, J. W. (2010). CEO Regulatory Foci, Environmental Dynamism, and Small Firm Performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 48(4), 580–604.
• Wilkinson, A., Redman, T., Snape, E. ve Marchington, M. (1998). Managing with total quality management. Theory and practice. McMillan Business, Hong-Kong.
• Zhang, Q., Feng, X. ve Xiang, X. (2016). The impact of quality management practices on innovation in China: the moderating effects of market turbulence. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 6(03), 291.
• Zhang, D., Linderman, K. ve Schroeder, R. G. (2012). The moderating role of contextual factors on quality management practices. Journal of Operations Management, 30(1), 12–23.