Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

A Comparison between Some Wood Bark Extracts: Antifungal Activity

Year 2017, Volume: 17 Issue: 3, 502 - 508, 27.11.2017
https://doi.org/10.17475/kastorman.282637

Abstract

Abstract

Aim of study: The need for eco-friendly and bio-soluble wood
preservatives has increased recently. In this study, antifungal effects of tree
barks were researched.

Area of study: The maritime (Pinus pinaster L.), iron (Casuarina
equisetifolia L.), mimosa (Acacia mollissima L.), calabrian pine (Pinus brutia
Ten.), and fir (Abies nordmanniana) tree barks were used.

Material and Methods: The the solution at two concentrations was
prepared to the substance obtained with alcohol benzene extraction method from
the tree bark according to TAPPI standard. The effectiveness of bark extracts
was evaluated against brown-rot fungus; Coniophera puteana, and white-rot
fungus; Trametes versicolor.

Main results: This study indicates that tree bark extracts have
potential to use as wood preservatives. Maritime pine and fir tree barks showed
good resistance against T. versicolor more than C. puteana. On the contrary,
iron and mimosa tree barks were more resistance against brown-rot fungus, C.
puteana. Concentration is the most important factor for inhibition of fungal
activity. Inhibition of fungal growth increased parallel with concentration.











Research highlights: It is thought that the rich structure of the
bark extract in terms of natural phenolic compounds could inhibit fungal
activity. This study indicates that tree bark extracts have potential to use as
wood preservatives. 

References

  • Fradinho D.M., Neto C.P., Evtuguin D., Jorge F.C., Irle M.A., Gil M.H., Jesus J.P. 2002. Chemical characterization of bark and of alkaline bark extracts from maritime pine grown in Portugal. Industrial Crops and Products, 16, 23-32.
  • Gao H., Shupe T.F., Eberhardt L., Hse C.Y. 2007. Antioxidant activity of extracts from the wood and bark of Port Orford cedar. J. Wood Sci, 53, 147-152.
  • Hamburger M., Hostettmann K. 1991. Bioactivity in plants: The link between phytochemistry and medicine. Phytochemistry, 30, 3864-3874.
  • Harun J., Labosky P. 1985. Antitermitic and antifungal properties of selected bark extractives. Wood and Fiber Science, 17 (3), 327-335.
  • Jerez M., Selga A., Sineiro J., Torres J.L., Nùnez M.J. 2007. A comparison between bark extracts from Pinus pinaster and Pinus radiate: Antioxidant activity and procyanidin composition. Food Chemistry, 100, 439-444.
  • Jiang G.G., Fang G.Z, Li L.L., Shi Z.X., Zhang Z.R. 2014. Study on antioxidant activity of catalyzed hydrogen degradation product of polymeric proanthocyanidins (LPPC) from Larixgmelinii bark. BioResources, 9 (1), 662-672.
  • Kartal S.N., Hwang W.J., Imamura Y., Sekine Y. 2006. Effect of essential oil compounds and plant extracts on decay and termite resistance of wood. Holz als Roh- und Werkstoff, 64 (6), 61-455
  • Kirker G.T., Blodgett A.B., Arango R.A., Lebow P.K., Clausen C.A. 2013. The role of extractives in naturally durable wood species. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, 82, 53-58.
  • Kocaefe D., Saha S. 2012. Comparison of the protection effectiveness of acrylic polyurethane coatings containing bark extracts on three heat-treated North American wood species: Surface degradation. Applied Surface Science, 258, 5283-5290.
  • Maoz M., Weitz I., Blumenfeil M., Freitag C., Morrell J.J. 2007. Antifungal activity of plant derived extracts against G. trabeum. Proceedings IRG Annual Meeting, IRG/WP 07-30433, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Mohan D., Shi J., Nicholas D.D., Pittman C.U., Steele PH., Cooper J.E. 2008. Fungicidal values of bio-oils and their lignin-rich fractions obtained from wood/bark fast pyrolysis. Chemosphere, 71 (3), 65-456.
  • Mourant D., Yang D.Q., Lu X., Roy C. 2005. Anti-fungal properties of the pyroligneus liquors from the pyrolysis of softwood bark. Wood Fiber and Technology, 37 (3), 542-548.
  • Nemli G., Gezer E.D., Yıldız S., Temiz A., Aydın A. 2006. Evaluation of mechanical, physical properties and decay resistance of particleboard made from particles impregnation with Pinusbrutia bark extractives. Bioresource Technology, 97, 2059-2064.
  • Onuorah E.O. 2000. The wood preservative potentials of heartwood extracts of Milicia excelsa and Erythrophleum suaveolens. Bioresource Technology, 75 (2), 3-171.
  • Özgenç Ö., Durmaz S., Kuştaş S., Erişir E. 2016. The determination of antifungal specialties on some tree bark extracts. Journal of Advanced Technology Sciences, 5 (1), 147-152.
  • Panshin A.J., DeZeeuw C. 1980. Textbook of wood technology. ISBN: 0070484414, 722 s, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York.
  • Saha S., Kocaefe D., Boluk Y., Pichette A. 2011. Enhancing exterior durability of jack pine by photo-stabilization of acrylic polyurethane coating using bark extract. Part 1: Effect of UV on color change and ATR-FT-IR analysis. Progress in Organic Coatings, 70, 376-382.
  • Salem M., Abdel-Megeed A., Ali H.M. 2014. Stem wood and bark extracts of Delonixregia (Boj. Ex. Hook): Chemical analysis and antibacterial, antifungal, and antioxidant properties. BioResources, 9 (2), 2382-2395.
  • Satish S., Mohana D.C., Ranhavendra M.P., Raveesha K.A. 2007. Antifungal activity of some plant extracts against important seed borne pathogens of Aspergillus sp. An International Journal of Agricultural Technology, 3 (1), 109-119.
  • Singh T., Singh A.P. 2012. A review on natural products as wood protectant. Wood Sci. Technol, 46, 851-870.
  • Tascioglu C., Yalcin M., Sen S., Akcay C., 2013. Antifungal properties of some plant extracts used as wood preservatives. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, 85, 23-28.
  • Tascioglu C., Yalcin M., Troya T., Sivrikaya H., 2012. Termiticidal properties of some wood and bark extracts used as wood preservatives. BioResources, 7 (3), 2960-2969.
  • Taylor A.M., Gartner, B.L., Morrell, J.J. 2002. Heartwood formation and natural durability: A review. Wood and Fibre Science, 34 (4), 587-611.
  • Vázquez G., Fontenla E., Santos J., Freire M.S., González-Álvarez J., Antorrena G. 2008. Antioxidant activity and phenolic content of chestnut (Castanea sativa) shell and eucalyptus (Eucalyptus globulus) bark extracts. Industrial Crops and Products, 28, 279-285.
  • Vázquez G., González-Álvarez J., Santos J., Freire M.S., Antorrena G. 2009. Evaluation of potential applications for chestnut (Castanea sativa) shell and eucalyptus (Eucalyptus globulus) bark extracts. Industrial Crops and Products, 29, 364-370.
  • Yang DQ. 2009. Potential utilization of plant and fungal extracts for wood protection. Forest Prod J., 59 (4), 97-103.
  • Wang S.Y., Wu J.H., Cheng S.S., Lo C.P., Chang H.N., Shyur L.F., Chang S.T. 2004. Antioxidant activity of extracts from Calocedrusformosana leaf, bark, and heartwood. J. Wood Sci., 50, 422-426.

Bazı odun kabuk ekstraktları arasında karşılaştırma: Anti-fungal aktivite olarak

Year 2017, Volume: 17 Issue: 3, 502 - 508, 27.11.2017
https://doi.org/10.17475/kastorman.282637

Abstract

Özet

Çalışmanın amacı: Çevre
dostu ve doğada çözünebilen odun koruma maddelerine olan ihtiyaç son yıllarda
artmıştır. Bu çalışmada, ağaç kabuklarının antifungal etkileri incelenmiştir.

Çalışma alanı:
Sahil çamı
(Pinus pinaster L.), demir (Casuarina
equisetifolia
L.), mimoza (Acacia
mollissima
L.) kızılçam (Pinus brutia
Ten.
), ve göknar (Abies nordmanniana)
ağaç kabukları kullanılmıştır.

Materyal ve
Yöntem:
TAPPI
standardına göre alkol-benzen ekstraksiyonu sonucu elde edilen ekstrakların iki
farklı konsantrasyonu hazırlanmıştır. Kabuk ekstraklarının etkinliği esmer
çürüklük mantarı Coniophera puteana, ve beyaz çürüklük mantarı; Trametes
versicolor’a karşı değerlendirilmiştir.

Sonuçlar: Sahil
çamı ve göknar ağaç kabuk ekstraktları T. Versicolor mantarına karşı, C.
puteana mantarından daha fazla dayanım göstermiştir. Bunun aksine demir ve
mimoza ağaç kabuk ekstraktları esmer çürüklük mantarı C. puteana mantarına
karşı daha dayanıklıdır. Mantar aktivitesinin engellenmesinde konsantrasyon en
önemli faktördür. Mantar gelişiminin durdurulması konsantrasyona paralel bir
şekilde artmıştır.











Araştırma
vurguları:
Doğal fenolik bileşikler bakımından zengin olan kabuk
ekstraktlarının mantar aktivitesini engellediği düşünülmektedir. Ağaç
kabuklarının odun koruma maddesi olarak kullanılabilme potansiyeline sahip
olduğu görülmüştür.

References

  • Fradinho D.M., Neto C.P., Evtuguin D., Jorge F.C., Irle M.A., Gil M.H., Jesus J.P. 2002. Chemical characterization of bark and of alkaline bark extracts from maritime pine grown in Portugal. Industrial Crops and Products, 16, 23-32.
  • Gao H., Shupe T.F., Eberhardt L., Hse C.Y. 2007. Antioxidant activity of extracts from the wood and bark of Port Orford cedar. J. Wood Sci, 53, 147-152.
  • Hamburger M., Hostettmann K. 1991. Bioactivity in plants: The link between phytochemistry and medicine. Phytochemistry, 30, 3864-3874.
  • Harun J., Labosky P. 1985. Antitermitic and antifungal properties of selected bark extractives. Wood and Fiber Science, 17 (3), 327-335.
  • Jerez M., Selga A., Sineiro J., Torres J.L., Nùnez M.J. 2007. A comparison between bark extracts from Pinus pinaster and Pinus radiate: Antioxidant activity and procyanidin composition. Food Chemistry, 100, 439-444.
  • Jiang G.G., Fang G.Z, Li L.L., Shi Z.X., Zhang Z.R. 2014. Study on antioxidant activity of catalyzed hydrogen degradation product of polymeric proanthocyanidins (LPPC) from Larixgmelinii bark. BioResources, 9 (1), 662-672.
  • Kartal S.N., Hwang W.J., Imamura Y., Sekine Y. 2006. Effect of essential oil compounds and plant extracts on decay and termite resistance of wood. Holz als Roh- und Werkstoff, 64 (6), 61-455
  • Kirker G.T., Blodgett A.B., Arango R.A., Lebow P.K., Clausen C.A. 2013. The role of extractives in naturally durable wood species. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, 82, 53-58.
  • Kocaefe D., Saha S. 2012. Comparison of the protection effectiveness of acrylic polyurethane coatings containing bark extracts on three heat-treated North American wood species: Surface degradation. Applied Surface Science, 258, 5283-5290.
  • Maoz M., Weitz I., Blumenfeil M., Freitag C., Morrell J.J. 2007. Antifungal activity of plant derived extracts against G. trabeum. Proceedings IRG Annual Meeting, IRG/WP 07-30433, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Mohan D., Shi J., Nicholas D.D., Pittman C.U., Steele PH., Cooper J.E. 2008. Fungicidal values of bio-oils and their lignin-rich fractions obtained from wood/bark fast pyrolysis. Chemosphere, 71 (3), 65-456.
  • Mourant D., Yang D.Q., Lu X., Roy C. 2005. Anti-fungal properties of the pyroligneus liquors from the pyrolysis of softwood bark. Wood Fiber and Technology, 37 (3), 542-548.
  • Nemli G., Gezer E.D., Yıldız S., Temiz A., Aydın A. 2006. Evaluation of mechanical, physical properties and decay resistance of particleboard made from particles impregnation with Pinusbrutia bark extractives. Bioresource Technology, 97, 2059-2064.
  • Onuorah E.O. 2000. The wood preservative potentials of heartwood extracts of Milicia excelsa and Erythrophleum suaveolens. Bioresource Technology, 75 (2), 3-171.
  • Özgenç Ö., Durmaz S., Kuştaş S., Erişir E. 2016. The determination of antifungal specialties on some tree bark extracts. Journal of Advanced Technology Sciences, 5 (1), 147-152.
  • Panshin A.J., DeZeeuw C. 1980. Textbook of wood technology. ISBN: 0070484414, 722 s, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York.
  • Saha S., Kocaefe D., Boluk Y., Pichette A. 2011. Enhancing exterior durability of jack pine by photo-stabilization of acrylic polyurethane coating using bark extract. Part 1: Effect of UV on color change and ATR-FT-IR analysis. Progress in Organic Coatings, 70, 376-382.
  • Salem M., Abdel-Megeed A., Ali H.M. 2014. Stem wood and bark extracts of Delonixregia (Boj. Ex. Hook): Chemical analysis and antibacterial, antifungal, and antioxidant properties. BioResources, 9 (2), 2382-2395.
  • Satish S., Mohana D.C., Ranhavendra M.P., Raveesha K.A. 2007. Antifungal activity of some plant extracts against important seed borne pathogens of Aspergillus sp. An International Journal of Agricultural Technology, 3 (1), 109-119.
  • Singh T., Singh A.P. 2012. A review on natural products as wood protectant. Wood Sci. Technol, 46, 851-870.
  • Tascioglu C., Yalcin M., Sen S., Akcay C., 2013. Antifungal properties of some plant extracts used as wood preservatives. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, 85, 23-28.
  • Tascioglu C., Yalcin M., Troya T., Sivrikaya H., 2012. Termiticidal properties of some wood and bark extracts used as wood preservatives. BioResources, 7 (3), 2960-2969.
  • Taylor A.M., Gartner, B.L., Morrell, J.J. 2002. Heartwood formation and natural durability: A review. Wood and Fibre Science, 34 (4), 587-611.
  • Vázquez G., Fontenla E., Santos J., Freire M.S., González-Álvarez J., Antorrena G. 2008. Antioxidant activity and phenolic content of chestnut (Castanea sativa) shell and eucalyptus (Eucalyptus globulus) bark extracts. Industrial Crops and Products, 28, 279-285.
  • Vázquez G., González-Álvarez J., Santos J., Freire M.S., Antorrena G. 2009. Evaluation of potential applications for chestnut (Castanea sativa) shell and eucalyptus (Eucalyptus globulus) bark extracts. Industrial Crops and Products, 29, 364-370.
  • Yang DQ. 2009. Potential utilization of plant and fungal extracts for wood protection. Forest Prod J., 59 (4), 97-103.
  • Wang S.Y., Wu J.H., Cheng S.S., Lo C.P., Chang H.N., Shyur L.F., Chang S.T. 2004. Antioxidant activity of extracts from Calocedrusformosana leaf, bark, and heartwood. J. Wood Sci., 50, 422-426.
There are 27 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Articles
Authors

Özlem Özgenç

Sefa Durmaz This is me

Ümit Cafer Yıldız

Emir Erişir

Publication Date November 27, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2017 Volume: 17 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Özgenç, Ö., Durmaz, S., Yıldız, Ü. C., Erişir, E. (2017). A Comparison between Some Wood Bark Extracts: Antifungal Activity. Kastamonu University Journal of Forestry Faculty, 17(3), 502-508. https://doi.org/10.17475/kastorman.282637
AMA Özgenç Ö, Durmaz S, Yıldız ÜC, Erişir E. A Comparison between Some Wood Bark Extracts: Antifungal Activity. Kastamonu University Journal of Forestry Faculty. November 2017;17(3):502-508. doi:10.17475/kastorman.282637
Chicago Özgenç, Özlem, Sefa Durmaz, Ümit Cafer Yıldız, and Emir Erişir. “A Comparison Between Some Wood Bark Extracts: Antifungal Activity”. Kastamonu University Journal of Forestry Faculty 17, no. 3 (November 2017): 502-8. https://doi.org/10.17475/kastorman.282637.
EndNote Özgenç Ö, Durmaz S, Yıldız ÜC, Erişir E (November 1, 2017) A Comparison between Some Wood Bark Extracts: Antifungal Activity. Kastamonu University Journal of Forestry Faculty 17 3 502–508.
IEEE Ö. Özgenç, S. Durmaz, Ü. C. Yıldız, and E. Erişir, “A Comparison between Some Wood Bark Extracts: Antifungal Activity”, Kastamonu University Journal of Forestry Faculty, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 502–508, 2017, doi: 10.17475/kastorman.282637.
ISNAD Özgenç, Özlem et al. “A Comparison Between Some Wood Bark Extracts: Antifungal Activity”. Kastamonu University Journal of Forestry Faculty 17/3 (November 2017), 502-508. https://doi.org/10.17475/kastorman.282637.
JAMA Özgenç Ö, Durmaz S, Yıldız ÜC, Erişir E. A Comparison between Some Wood Bark Extracts: Antifungal Activity. Kastamonu University Journal of Forestry Faculty. 2017;17:502–508.
MLA Özgenç, Özlem et al. “A Comparison Between Some Wood Bark Extracts: Antifungal Activity”. Kastamonu University Journal of Forestry Faculty, vol. 17, no. 3, 2017, pp. 502-8, doi:10.17475/kastorman.282637.
Vancouver Özgenç Ö, Durmaz S, Yıldız ÜC, Erişir E. A Comparison between Some Wood Bark Extracts: Antifungal Activity. Kastamonu University Journal of Forestry Faculty. 2017;17(3):502-8.

14178  14179       14165           14166           14167            14168