Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Evaluation of financial performance of paper companies traded at BIST with TOPSIS method

Year 2018, Volume: 18 Issue: 1, 92 - 98, 23.03.2018
https://doi.org/10.17475/kastorman.331279

Abstract



Aim of study: It was aimed to rank financial performance of companies in the paper industry
traded at BIST.



Material and methods: The financial performances of seven
companies in the paper industry which are traded
on the Borsa İstanbul (BIST) were determined
by using financial data in 2016. For this purpose, ten financial ratios were obtained
from the financial data of companies, each of which had its own superiority. The data
were conducted by the TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to
Ideal Solution) method which is the "Multi Criteria Decision Making"
(MCDM) method to interpret.



Main results: The results indicated that the companies were ranked
follows; ALKA, KARTN, VKING, BAKAB, TIRE, OLMIP and KAPLM based on the
financial performance scores.



Research highlights: In Turkey, production in paper industry meets nearly half of the consumption and paper demand are met by imports.
The high prices of energy and initial investment costs encourage imports of
paper products and they prevent new
investments. From this perspective, growth, development and high performance of
paper companies will keep this industry alive.



References

  • Bakırcı, F., Shiraz, S. E. and Sattary, A., 2014. Financial Performance Analysis of Iron, Steel Metal Industry Industry Companies in The Borsa İstanbul: DEA Super Efficiency and TOPSIS Methods, Ege Academic Review, 14(1), 9-19.
  • Behzadian, M., Otaghsara, S. K., Yazdani, M. and Ignatius, J., 2012. A State-of the-Art Survey of TOPSIS Applications, Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 13051-13069.
  • Çakır, S. and Perçin, S., 2013. Performance Measurement of Logistics Firms with Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods, Ege Academic Review, 13(4), 449-459.
  • Çabuk, Y., Karayılmazlar, S., Aytekin, A., Onat, S. M. and Kurt. R., 2014. The Turkish Paper and Paperboard İndustry: A Study of The Statistical Assessment, Analysis and Forecast, Journal of the Faculty of Forestry Istanbul University, 64(1). 67-79.
  • Dasthi, Z., Pedram, M. M. and Shanbehzadeh, J. (2010) “A Multi- Criteria Decision Making Based Method for Ranking Sequential Patterns”, Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, (17-19 May), Hong Kong.
  • Dumanoğlu, S., 2010, Financial Performance Evaluation of Cement Firms Trading in ISE By Using TOPSIS Method, Marmara University, Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 29(2), 232-339.
  • Ergül, N., 2014. Testing of Companies’ Financial Performance in the BIST - Tourism Industry, Journal of The Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 4(1), 325-340.
  • Feng, C. M. and Wang, R. T. 2000. Performance Evaluation for Airlines Including The Consideration of Financial Ratios, Journal of Air Transport Management, 6, 132-142.
  • Hwang, C.L., and Yoon, K., 1981. Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg,
  • Meydan, C., Yıldırım, B. F. and Senger, Ötüken, 2016. Evaluation Of The Financial Performance Of Food And Beverage Companies Traded On BIST Using Grey Relational Analyis, The Journal of Accounting and Finance, 147-167.
  • Ömürbek, N. and Mercan, Y., 2014. Performance Evaluation of Sub-manufacturing Industrys Using TOPSIS and ELECTRE Methods, Çankırı Karatekin University, Journal of The Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 4(1), 237-266.
  • Wang, Y. J. and Lee, H. S. 2007. Generalizing TOPSIS for Fuzzy Multiple-Criteria Group Decision-Making, Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 53, 1762–1772.
  • Wang, Y. J. 2014. The Evaluation of Financial Performance for Taiwan Container Shipping Companies by Fuzzy TOPSIS, Applied Soft Computing, 22, 28–35.
  • Young, J. L., Ting, Y. L. and Hwang, C. L. 1994. TOPSIS for MODM, European Journal of Operational Research, North-Holland, 76, 486-500.
  • Yousefi, A. ve Hadi-Vencheh, A. (2010) “An Integrated Group Decision Making Model and Its Evaluation by DEA for Automobile Industry“ Expert Systems with Applications, 37(8), 543-556.
  • Yorulmaz, H., 2014. Paper Industry Industry Report in East Marmara Region, Brand, East Marmara Development Agency, Series of Regional Plan Publications -16, 1-38.
  • Yurdakul, M. and İç, Y. T., 2005. Development of a Performance Measurement Model for Manufacturing Companies Using The AHP and TOPSIS Approaches, International Journal of Production Research, 43(21), 4609-4641.
  • Türkmen, S. Y. and Çağıl, G. 2012. Evaluation of Financial Performance of Information Industry Companies Traded in IMKB with TOPSIS Method, Maliye Finans Yazıları Dergisi, 26(95), 59-78.

BİST’de işlem gören kağıt sektöründeki firmaların TOPSIS yöntemiyle finansal performanslarının değerlendirilmesi

Year 2018, Volume: 18 Issue: 1, 92 - 98, 23.03.2018
https://doi.org/10.17475/kastorman.331279

Abstract

BİST’de
işlem gören kağıt sektöründeki firmaların TOPSIS yöntemiyle finansal
performanslarının değerlendirilmesi

Özet

Çalışmanın amacı: BİST’de işlem gören kağıt
sektöründeki firmaların finansal performanslarına göre sıralanması
amaçlanmıştır.

Materyal ve yöntem: Borsa İstanbul’da (BIST) işlem
gören kağıt sektöründeki 7 firmanın 2016 yılına ait verileri kullanılarak
finansal performansları belirlenmeye çalışılmıştır. Bu amaçla, şirketlere ait
finansal verilerden 10 finansal oran elde edilmiştir ve bu finansal oranların
her biri diğerlerine göre üstünlüğe sahiptir. Bütünleşik bir değerlendirme
yapılması amacıyla, veriler “Çok Kriterli Karar Verme” (ÇKKV) yöntemlerinden
olan TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution)
yöntemi ile değerlendirilmiştir.

Sonuçlar: Şirketler finansal performanslarına göre
ALKA, KARTN, VKING, BAKAB, TIRE, OLMIP ve KAPLM olarak sıralanmıştır..

Araştırma vurguları: Ülkemiz kağıt sektöründe
gerçekleştirilen üretim ile tüketimin yarısı karşılanabilmekte ve kağıt
ihtiyacı ithalatla karşılanmaktadır. Enerji fiyatlarının ve ilk yatırım
maliyetlerinin yüksek olması yeni yatırımları engellerken ithalata teşvik
etmektedir. Bu bakımdan sektörde var olan firmaların gelişmesi, büyümesi ve
performanslarının yüksek olması sektörü canlı tutacaktır.

References

  • Bakırcı, F., Shiraz, S. E. and Sattary, A., 2014. Financial Performance Analysis of Iron, Steel Metal Industry Industry Companies in The Borsa İstanbul: DEA Super Efficiency and TOPSIS Methods, Ege Academic Review, 14(1), 9-19.
  • Behzadian, M., Otaghsara, S. K., Yazdani, M. and Ignatius, J., 2012. A State-of the-Art Survey of TOPSIS Applications, Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 13051-13069.
  • Çakır, S. and Perçin, S., 2013. Performance Measurement of Logistics Firms with Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods, Ege Academic Review, 13(4), 449-459.
  • Çabuk, Y., Karayılmazlar, S., Aytekin, A., Onat, S. M. and Kurt. R., 2014. The Turkish Paper and Paperboard İndustry: A Study of The Statistical Assessment, Analysis and Forecast, Journal of the Faculty of Forestry Istanbul University, 64(1). 67-79.
  • Dasthi, Z., Pedram, M. M. and Shanbehzadeh, J. (2010) “A Multi- Criteria Decision Making Based Method for Ranking Sequential Patterns”, Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, (17-19 May), Hong Kong.
  • Dumanoğlu, S., 2010, Financial Performance Evaluation of Cement Firms Trading in ISE By Using TOPSIS Method, Marmara University, Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 29(2), 232-339.
  • Ergül, N., 2014. Testing of Companies’ Financial Performance in the BIST - Tourism Industry, Journal of The Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 4(1), 325-340.
  • Feng, C. M. and Wang, R. T. 2000. Performance Evaluation for Airlines Including The Consideration of Financial Ratios, Journal of Air Transport Management, 6, 132-142.
  • Hwang, C.L., and Yoon, K., 1981. Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg,
  • Meydan, C., Yıldırım, B. F. and Senger, Ötüken, 2016. Evaluation Of The Financial Performance Of Food And Beverage Companies Traded On BIST Using Grey Relational Analyis, The Journal of Accounting and Finance, 147-167.
  • Ömürbek, N. and Mercan, Y., 2014. Performance Evaluation of Sub-manufacturing Industrys Using TOPSIS and ELECTRE Methods, Çankırı Karatekin University, Journal of The Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 4(1), 237-266.
  • Wang, Y. J. and Lee, H. S. 2007. Generalizing TOPSIS for Fuzzy Multiple-Criteria Group Decision-Making, Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 53, 1762–1772.
  • Wang, Y. J. 2014. The Evaluation of Financial Performance for Taiwan Container Shipping Companies by Fuzzy TOPSIS, Applied Soft Computing, 22, 28–35.
  • Young, J. L., Ting, Y. L. and Hwang, C. L. 1994. TOPSIS for MODM, European Journal of Operational Research, North-Holland, 76, 486-500.
  • Yousefi, A. ve Hadi-Vencheh, A. (2010) “An Integrated Group Decision Making Model and Its Evaluation by DEA for Automobile Industry“ Expert Systems with Applications, 37(8), 543-556.
  • Yorulmaz, H., 2014. Paper Industry Industry Report in East Marmara Region, Brand, East Marmara Development Agency, Series of Regional Plan Publications -16, 1-38.
  • Yurdakul, M. and İç, Y. T., 2005. Development of a Performance Measurement Model for Manufacturing Companies Using The AHP and TOPSIS Approaches, International Journal of Production Research, 43(21), 4609-4641.
  • Türkmen, S. Y. and Çağıl, G. 2012. Evaluation of Financial Performance of Information Industry Companies Traded in IMKB with TOPSIS Method, Maliye Finans Yazıları Dergisi, 26(95), 59-78.
There are 18 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Tutku Üçüncü

Kadri Cemil Akyüz

İlker Akyüz

Bahadır Çağrı Bayram

Nadir Ersen

Publication Date March 23, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2018 Volume: 18 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Üçüncü, T., Akyüz, K. C., Akyüz, İ., Bayram, B. Ç., et al. (2018). Evaluation of financial performance of paper companies traded at BIST with TOPSIS method. Kastamonu University Journal of Forestry Faculty, 18(1), 92-98. https://doi.org/10.17475/kastorman.331279
AMA Üçüncü T, Akyüz KC, Akyüz İ, Bayram BÇ, Ersen N. Evaluation of financial performance of paper companies traded at BIST with TOPSIS method. Kastamonu University Journal of Forestry Faculty. March 2018;18(1):92-98. doi:10.17475/kastorman.331279
Chicago Üçüncü, Tutku, Kadri Cemil Akyüz, İlker Akyüz, Bahadır Çağrı Bayram, and Nadir Ersen. “Evaluation of Financial Performance of Paper Companies Traded at BIST With TOPSIS Method”. Kastamonu University Journal of Forestry Faculty 18, no. 1 (March 2018): 92-98. https://doi.org/10.17475/kastorman.331279.
EndNote Üçüncü T, Akyüz KC, Akyüz İ, Bayram BÇ, Ersen N (March 1, 2018) Evaluation of financial performance of paper companies traded at BIST with TOPSIS method. Kastamonu University Journal of Forestry Faculty 18 1 92–98.
IEEE T. Üçüncü, K. C. Akyüz, İ. Akyüz, B. Ç. Bayram, and N. Ersen, “Evaluation of financial performance of paper companies traded at BIST with TOPSIS method”, Kastamonu University Journal of Forestry Faculty, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 92–98, 2018, doi: 10.17475/kastorman.331279.
ISNAD Üçüncü, Tutku et al. “Evaluation of Financial Performance of Paper Companies Traded at BIST With TOPSIS Method”. Kastamonu University Journal of Forestry Faculty 18/1 (March 2018), 92-98. https://doi.org/10.17475/kastorman.331279.
JAMA Üçüncü T, Akyüz KC, Akyüz İ, Bayram BÇ, Ersen N. Evaluation of financial performance of paper companies traded at BIST with TOPSIS method. Kastamonu University Journal of Forestry Faculty. 2018;18:92–98.
MLA Üçüncü, Tutku et al. “Evaluation of Financial Performance of Paper Companies Traded at BIST With TOPSIS Method”. Kastamonu University Journal of Forestry Faculty, vol. 18, no. 1, 2018, pp. 92-98, doi:10.17475/kastorman.331279.
Vancouver Üçüncü T, Akyüz KC, Akyüz İ, Bayram BÇ, Ersen N. Evaluation of financial performance of paper companies traded at BIST with TOPSIS method. Kastamonu University Journal of Forestry Faculty. 2018;18(1):92-8.

Cited By













14178  14179       14165           14166           14167            14168