Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

TÜKETİCİ YENİLİKÇİLİĞİNİN BOYUTLARI VE YENİLİKÇİLİĞİ ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLER ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİLER

Year 2016, Volume: 7 Issue: 14, 499 - 517, 07.07.2017

Abstract

İşletmelerin rekabetle baş edebilmek için izlediği önemli stratejilerden
biri de yenilik yapmaktır. Yeniliklerin anlam kazanması ise tüketicilerin bu
yenilikleri kabul etmesi ve benimsemesi ile mümkündür. Tüketicilerin yeni ürünleri
benimsemesi ve daha sık satın alması tüketici yenilikçiliği kavramını ifade
etmektedir. Tüketici yenilikçiliği temel olarak kişisel ve ürün temelli olmak
üzere iki boyutla açıklanmaktadır ve davranışsal bir süreçtir. Buradan
hareketle bu çalışmada cep telefonu için tüketici yenilikçiliğin temel
boyutları ve boyutları etkileyen faktörler arasındaki ilişkilerin
değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre kişisel
yenilikçilik tüketicilerin öz saygı ve risk alma özelliklerinden; ürün temelli
yenilikçilik düzeyleri ise fikir liderliği ve uzmanlık faktörlerinden
etkilenmektedir. Ayrıca tüketicilerin kişisel yenilikçilik düzeyleri ürün
temelli yenilikçilik düzeylerini etkilemektedir

References

  • AYDIN, S. (2009), “Kişisel Ve Ürün Temelli Yenilikçilik: Cep Telefonu Kullanıcıları Üzerine Ampirik Bir Uygulama”, Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 10 (2),188-203
  • BOMMER, M., JALAJAS, D.S. (1999), “The Threat of Organizational Downsizing on the Innovative Propensity of R&D Professionals”, R&D Management, 29(1), 27-34
  • CHARLES W.L, Joseph F. H., CARL, M. (2011), Essentials of Marketing, Cengage Learning.
  • CITRIN, A. D. (2000), “Adoption of Internet Shopping: The Role of Consumer Innovativeness”, Industrial Management and Data Systems, 100(July), 294-300
  • CLARK, R. A. , GOLDSMITH, R. E. (2005), “Market Mavens: Psychological Influences”, Psychology and Marketing, 22, 289–312
  • DHAR, R.,WERTENBROCH, K. (2000), “Consumer Choice Between Hedonic and Utilitarian Goods”, Journal of Marketing Research, (February), 60-71.
  • DOYLE, P. (2003), Değer Temelli Pazarlama: Şirketinizi Büyütmek ve Hissedar Değeri Yaratmak İçin Pazarlama Stratejileri (Çev. G. Barış). İstanbul: Mediacat.
  • GATIGNON, H. , ROBERTSON, T. S. (October 1985), “A Prepositional Inventory of New Diffusion Research”. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(March), 849-867
  • GOLDSMITH R. E., HOFACKER, C. F. (1991), “Measuring Consumer Innovativeness”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 19 (3), 209-221
  • GOLDSMITH, R. E. (1984), “Personality Characteristics Associated with Adaption-Innovation”, Journal of Psychology, 117, 159-165
  • GOLDSMITH, R. E., NEWELL, S. J. (1997), “Innovativeness and Price Sensitivity: Managerial, Theoretical and Methodological Issues”, Journal of Product and Brand Management, 6(3), 163-174
  • GOLDSMITH, R.E, FOXALL, G.R. (2003), The International Handbook of Innovation, edit. Larisa V.Shavinina, Elseiver.
  • GOLDSMITH, R.E., FLYNN, L.R. (1993), “Models Of Enduring Product Involvement And Opinion Leadership in Swift”. Association of Marketing Theory and Practice Proceedings, 2, 378-386
  • GREWAL, R., MEHTA, R. ve KARDES, F. R. (2000), “The Role of The Social-Identity Function of Attitudes in Consumer Innovativeness and Opinion Leadership”, Journal of Economic Psychology, 21(3), 233-252
  • HIRUNYAWIPADA, T., PASWAN, A. K. (2006), “Consumer Innovativeness and Perceived Risk: Implications For High Technology Product Adoption”, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(4), 182-198
  • KANTER, R. M. (1983), The Change Masters: Innovation for Productivity in the American Corporation, New York: Simon & Schuster.
  • KARABULUT, M. (1981), Tüketici Davranışları, Yeniliklerin Kabulü ve Yayılışı, İstanbul: Minnetoğlu Yayınları.
  • KIRIM A. (2006). Kârlı Büyümenin Reçetesi İnnovasyon, İstanbul: Sistem Yayıncılık.
  • KIM, Y.H. (2008), An Empirical Examination of Consumers’ Innovation Adoption: The Role of Innovativeness, Fashion Orientation, And Utilitarıan And Hedonic Consumers Attitudes, (Master of Science)., The Faculty of the Graduate School at The University of North Carolina, Greensboro.
  • LEAVITT, C., WALTON, J. (1975), “Development of A Scale For Innovativeness”. Advances in Consumer Research, 2(1), 545-55
  • MIDGLEY, F. D., DOWLING, G. R. (1978), “Innovativeness: The Concept and Its Measurement, ”Journal of Consumer Research, 4 , 229-242
  • ODABAŞI, Y., BARIŞ, G. (2002), Tüketici Davranışları. İstanbul: Mediacat Kitapları.
  • RAJU, P. S. (1980), “Optimum Stimulation Level: Its Relationship to Personality, Demographics, And Exploratory Behavior”, Journal of Consumer Research, 7, 272-282
  • ROBERTSON, R. (1984), “Innovation Management”, Management Decision Monograph, 12 (6).
  • ROGERS, E, SHOEMAKER, F. (1971), Communication of Innovations: A Cross Cultural Approach, New York: Free Press.
  • ROGERS, E. M. (1983), Diffusion of innovations (3rd ed.), New York: Free Press.
  • ROGERS, E. M. (1995), Diffusion of innovation, 4th Ed. New York: The Free Press.
  • STEENKAMP, E. M., BAUMGARTNER, H. (December 1992),“The Role of Optimum Stimulation Level in Exploratory Consumer Behavior”, Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 434-438.
  • STEENKAMP, J., BENEDICT E.M., HOFSTEDE, F. ve WEDEL, M. (1999), “A Cross National Investigation into The Individual and National Cultural Antecedens of Consumer Innovativeness”, Journal of Marketing, 63 (2), 55
  • THORELLI, HB., ENGLEDOW, JL. (1980), “Information Seekers and Information System: a Policy Perspective”, Journal of Marketing, 44, 9-27
  • VENKATRAMAN, M. P., PRICE, L. P. (1990), “Differentiating Between Cognitive and Sensory Innovativeness: Concepts, Measurement And Their Implications”, Journal of Business Research, 20, 293-315
  • WORKMAN J.E., STUDAK, C. M. (2006), “Fashion Consumers And Fashion Problem Recognition Style”. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30(1), 75-84
Year 2016, Volume: 7 Issue: 14, 499 - 517, 07.07.2017

Abstract

References

  • AYDIN, S. (2009), “Kişisel Ve Ürün Temelli Yenilikçilik: Cep Telefonu Kullanıcıları Üzerine Ampirik Bir Uygulama”, Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 10 (2),188-203
  • BOMMER, M., JALAJAS, D.S. (1999), “The Threat of Organizational Downsizing on the Innovative Propensity of R&D Professionals”, R&D Management, 29(1), 27-34
  • CHARLES W.L, Joseph F. H., CARL, M. (2011), Essentials of Marketing, Cengage Learning.
  • CITRIN, A. D. (2000), “Adoption of Internet Shopping: The Role of Consumer Innovativeness”, Industrial Management and Data Systems, 100(July), 294-300
  • CLARK, R. A. , GOLDSMITH, R. E. (2005), “Market Mavens: Psychological Influences”, Psychology and Marketing, 22, 289–312
  • DHAR, R.,WERTENBROCH, K. (2000), “Consumer Choice Between Hedonic and Utilitarian Goods”, Journal of Marketing Research, (February), 60-71.
  • DOYLE, P. (2003), Değer Temelli Pazarlama: Şirketinizi Büyütmek ve Hissedar Değeri Yaratmak İçin Pazarlama Stratejileri (Çev. G. Barış). İstanbul: Mediacat.
  • GATIGNON, H. , ROBERTSON, T. S. (October 1985), “A Prepositional Inventory of New Diffusion Research”. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(March), 849-867
  • GOLDSMITH R. E., HOFACKER, C. F. (1991), “Measuring Consumer Innovativeness”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 19 (3), 209-221
  • GOLDSMITH, R. E. (1984), “Personality Characteristics Associated with Adaption-Innovation”, Journal of Psychology, 117, 159-165
  • GOLDSMITH, R. E., NEWELL, S. J. (1997), “Innovativeness and Price Sensitivity: Managerial, Theoretical and Methodological Issues”, Journal of Product and Brand Management, 6(3), 163-174
  • GOLDSMITH, R.E, FOXALL, G.R. (2003), The International Handbook of Innovation, edit. Larisa V.Shavinina, Elseiver.
  • GOLDSMITH, R.E., FLYNN, L.R. (1993), “Models Of Enduring Product Involvement And Opinion Leadership in Swift”. Association of Marketing Theory and Practice Proceedings, 2, 378-386
  • GREWAL, R., MEHTA, R. ve KARDES, F. R. (2000), “The Role of The Social-Identity Function of Attitudes in Consumer Innovativeness and Opinion Leadership”, Journal of Economic Psychology, 21(3), 233-252
  • HIRUNYAWIPADA, T., PASWAN, A. K. (2006), “Consumer Innovativeness and Perceived Risk: Implications For High Technology Product Adoption”, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(4), 182-198
  • KANTER, R. M. (1983), The Change Masters: Innovation for Productivity in the American Corporation, New York: Simon & Schuster.
  • KARABULUT, M. (1981), Tüketici Davranışları, Yeniliklerin Kabulü ve Yayılışı, İstanbul: Minnetoğlu Yayınları.
  • KIRIM A. (2006). Kârlı Büyümenin Reçetesi İnnovasyon, İstanbul: Sistem Yayıncılık.
  • KIM, Y.H. (2008), An Empirical Examination of Consumers’ Innovation Adoption: The Role of Innovativeness, Fashion Orientation, And Utilitarıan And Hedonic Consumers Attitudes, (Master of Science)., The Faculty of the Graduate School at The University of North Carolina, Greensboro.
  • LEAVITT, C., WALTON, J. (1975), “Development of A Scale For Innovativeness”. Advances in Consumer Research, 2(1), 545-55
  • MIDGLEY, F. D., DOWLING, G. R. (1978), “Innovativeness: The Concept and Its Measurement, ”Journal of Consumer Research, 4 , 229-242
  • ODABAŞI, Y., BARIŞ, G. (2002), Tüketici Davranışları. İstanbul: Mediacat Kitapları.
  • RAJU, P. S. (1980), “Optimum Stimulation Level: Its Relationship to Personality, Demographics, And Exploratory Behavior”, Journal of Consumer Research, 7, 272-282
  • ROBERTSON, R. (1984), “Innovation Management”, Management Decision Monograph, 12 (6).
  • ROGERS, E, SHOEMAKER, F. (1971), Communication of Innovations: A Cross Cultural Approach, New York: Free Press.
  • ROGERS, E. M. (1983), Diffusion of innovations (3rd ed.), New York: Free Press.
  • ROGERS, E. M. (1995), Diffusion of innovation, 4th Ed. New York: The Free Press.
  • STEENKAMP, E. M., BAUMGARTNER, H. (December 1992),“The Role of Optimum Stimulation Level in Exploratory Consumer Behavior”, Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 434-438.
  • STEENKAMP, J., BENEDICT E.M., HOFSTEDE, F. ve WEDEL, M. (1999), “A Cross National Investigation into The Individual and National Cultural Antecedens of Consumer Innovativeness”, Journal of Marketing, 63 (2), 55
  • THORELLI, HB., ENGLEDOW, JL. (1980), “Information Seekers and Information System: a Policy Perspective”, Journal of Marketing, 44, 9-27
  • VENKATRAMAN, M. P., PRICE, L. P. (1990), “Differentiating Between Cognitive and Sensory Innovativeness: Concepts, Measurement And Their Implications”, Journal of Business Research, 20, 293-315
  • WORKMAN J.E., STUDAK, C. M. (2006), “Fashion Consumers And Fashion Problem Recognition Style”. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30(1), 75-84
There are 32 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Arzu Deniz

Aysel Erciş

Publication Date July 7, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2016 Volume: 7 Issue: 14

Cite

APA Deniz, A., & Erciş, A. (2017). TÜKETİCİ YENİLİKÇİLİĞİNİN BOYUTLARI VE YENİLİKÇİLİĞİ ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLER ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİLER. Kafkas Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(14), 499-517.

KAUJEASF is the corporate journal of Kafkas University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences Journal Publishing.

KAUJEASF has been included in Web of Science since 2022 and started to be indexed in the Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI ), a Clarivate product.

2025 June issue article acceptance and evaluations are ongoing.