Abstract
Bu çalışma, Mintzberg’ün (1980) tanımladığı bürokrasi
türleri ile Lawrence ve Lorsch’un (1967) açıkladığı örgütsel yapı unsurları
arasındaki ilişkiyi çağdaş üretim tekniklerine sahip bir işletmede yapılan
örnek olay çalışmasıyla açıklayabilmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Araştırma, Çukurova
bölgesinde faaliyet gösteren ve plastik atıkları geri dönüştürerek yeniden
plastik üreten bir işletmede yapılmıştır. Araştırma bulgularına işletmede
yapılan yüz yüze görüşmelerle toplanan verilerin analiziyle ulaşılmıştır.
Araştırma bulguları çağdaş üretim teknikleri kullanan işletmenin bazı
unsurlarda basit, bazı unsurlarda ise mekanik bürokrasi özelliğini taşıdığını
göstermektedir. Sonuç olarak Lawrence ve Lorsch’un (1967) açıkladığı şekilde
belirsizlik seviyesi yüksek birimlerde biçimselleşmenin ve merkezileşmenin
azaldığı, belirsizlik seviyesi düşük birimlerde ise arttığı görülmüştür.
Keywords
References
- Ansoff, H.I. ve Brandenburg, R.G. (1971a). A Language for Organization Design: Part I. Management Science, 17(12), B705-B716.Ansoff, H.I. ve Brandenburg, R.G. (1971b). A Language for Organization Design: Part II. Management Science, 17(12), B717-B731.Burns, T. ve Stalker, G.M. (1961). The Management of Innovation. London: Tavistock Publications. 119-125.Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Approach. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.Hage, J., Aiken, M. ve Marrett, C.B., (1971). Organization Structure and Communications. American Sociological Review, 36(5), 860-871.Kalagnanam, S.S. ve Lindsay, R.M. (1998). The Use of Organic Models of Control in JIT Firms: Generalising Woodward’s Findings to Modern Manufacturing Practices. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 24, 1-30.Lawrence, P.R. ve Lorsch, J.W. (1967). Differenctiation and Integration in Complex Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(1), 1-47.Milgrom, P. ve Roberts, J. (1995). Complementarities and fit Strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 19, 179-208.Mintzberg, H. (1980). Structure in 5’S: A Synthesis of the Research on Organization Design. Management Science, 26(3), 322-341.Morton, N.A. ve Hu, Q., (2008). Implications of the fit between organizational structure and ERP: A Structural Contingency Theory Perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 28, 391-402.Sargut, A.S. (2007). Yapısal Koşul Bağımlılık Kuramının Örgütsel Çevre Kuramlarındaki Yeri. İçinde (Derleyen: Ali Selami Sargut ve Şükrü Özen), Örgüt Kuramları, (ss.35-75), Ankara: İmge Kitabevi. Van de Ven, A.H. ve Delbecq, A.L. (1974). A Task Contingent Model of Work-Unit Structure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19(2), 183-197.Van de Ven, A.H., Delbecq, A.L. ve Koenig, R. (1976). Determinants of Coordination Modes within Organizations. American Sociological Review, 41(2), 322-338.
Abstract
References
- Ansoff, H.I. ve Brandenburg, R.G. (1971a). A Language for Organization Design: Part I. Management Science, 17(12), B705-B716.Ansoff, H.I. ve Brandenburg, R.G. (1971b). A Language for Organization Design: Part II. Management Science, 17(12), B717-B731.Burns, T. ve Stalker, G.M. (1961). The Management of Innovation. London: Tavistock Publications. 119-125.Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Approach. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.Hage, J., Aiken, M. ve Marrett, C.B., (1971). Organization Structure and Communications. American Sociological Review, 36(5), 860-871.Kalagnanam, S.S. ve Lindsay, R.M. (1998). The Use of Organic Models of Control in JIT Firms: Generalising Woodward’s Findings to Modern Manufacturing Practices. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 24, 1-30.Lawrence, P.R. ve Lorsch, J.W. (1967). Differenctiation and Integration in Complex Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(1), 1-47.Milgrom, P. ve Roberts, J. (1995). Complementarities and fit Strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 19, 179-208.Mintzberg, H. (1980). Structure in 5’S: A Synthesis of the Research on Organization Design. Management Science, 26(3), 322-341.Morton, N.A. ve Hu, Q., (2008). Implications of the fit between organizational structure and ERP: A Structural Contingency Theory Perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 28, 391-402.Sargut, A.S. (2007). Yapısal Koşul Bağımlılık Kuramının Örgütsel Çevre Kuramlarındaki Yeri. İçinde (Derleyen: Ali Selami Sargut ve Şükrü Özen), Örgüt Kuramları, (ss.35-75), Ankara: İmge Kitabevi. Van de Ven, A.H. ve Delbecq, A.L. (1974). A Task Contingent Model of Work-Unit Structure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19(2), 183-197.Van de Ven, A.H., Delbecq, A.L. ve Koenig, R. (1976). Determinants of Coordination Modes within Organizations. American Sociological Review, 41(2), 322-338.
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Articles |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | June 30, 2020 |
| Acceptance Date | June 10, 2020 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2020 Volume: 11 Issue: 21 |
KAUJEASF is the corporate journal of Kafkas University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences Journal Publishing.
KAUJEASF has been included in Web of Science since 2022 and started to be indexed in the Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI ), a Clarivate product.
2025 June issue article acceptance and evaluations are ongoing.