KAMU YÖNETİMİ İNCELEMELERİNDE BİR ALT DİSİPLİN: KARŞILAŞTIRMALI KAMU YÖNETİMİ (KKY)

Year 2020, Issue: 46, 271 - 301, 10.06.2020

Cantürk Caner

https://doi.org/10.17498/kdeniz.728481

Abstract

Bu makalenin amacı, Kamu Yönetimi incelemeleri içinde önemli bir alt disiplin olarak kabul edilen Karşılaştırmalı Kamu Yönetimi (KKY)’nin ortaya çıkışını, geçirdiği aşamaları, bu aşamalara katkısı olan bazı önemli düşünürleri ve kuramlarını ortaya koymaktır. Kamu Yönetimi yaklaşık iki yüzyıllık modern tarihinde disiplinler arası bir mahiyette gelişmiştir. Kamu Yönetimi bu özelliğini kuşkusuz karşılaştırmalı analiz yeteneğine sahip olmasına borçludur. Kamu Yönetiminin karşılaştırmalı yönü esasen doğasında var olan bir olgudur. Kamu Yönetiminin modern anlamda ele alınmaya başladığı ilk dönemlerden günümüze kullanılan karşılaştırma yöntemi, bir yandan disiplinin kurumsal yönüne katkıda bulunmuş, diğer yandan da dünyadaki emsallerinin benzeyen ya da ayrışan yönlerini ortaya koyarak analiz edilmesini kolaylaştırmıştır. Kamu Yönetimi biliminin karşılaştırmalı bir yöntemle incelenebilmesi de KKY ile mümkün olmuştur. Bu yönüyle KKY, geleneksel Kamu Yönetimi çalışmalarını destekleyen bir alt disiplini olarak görülmektedir. Metodolojik olarak ilk defa İkinci Dünya Savaşından sonra ele alınmaya başlayan KKY çalışmaları, Soğuk Savaş Döneminde olgunlaşmıştır. Teori ve disiplinin geliştirildiği Soğuk Savaş dönemi, aynı zamanda refah devletine yönelik düzenlemelerin de gerçekleştiği yıllar olarak hatırlanmaktadır. Dolayısıyla KKY çalışmaları bu yönde gelişme göstermiştir. Soğuk Savaş dönemde KKY çalışmalarının genellikle gelişmiş ülkelerin yönetim yapılarına odaklandığı görülmektedir. Soğuk Savaş sonrasındaysa Yeni Kamu Yönetimi Hareketi (YKH) çerçevesinde Küresel yönetişim ve liberalizm disipline damgasını vurmuştur. Küreselleşmenin de etkisiyle alana ait çalışmalar genişleme göstermiş, disiplinler arası bir mahiyet kazanarak bütün dünyada kullanılabilir hale gelmiştir. KKY çalışmalarının gelişimini tarihsel süreci içinde “Erken Dönem”, “Klasik Dönem”, “Modern Dönem” ve “Günümüz” olmak üzere dört döneme ayırarak ele almak mümkündür.

Keywords

Sosyal Bilimler, Kamu Yönetimi, Karşılaştırmalı Kamu Yönetimi

A SUB-DISCIPLINE IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH: COMPARATIVE PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION (CPA)

Abstract

Tha main aim of this paper is to determine the emergence of Comparative Public Administration (CPA), which is regarded as an important sub-discipline in Public Administration research, to examine the phases it has undergone, and to discuss the prominent thinkers in this field as well as their theories. Public Administration has developed as interdisciplinary in character in its two-hundred span of growth. It obviously owes this characteristic to its talents in comparative analysis. The comparative aspect of Public Administration is an inherent characteristic. The comparative method that have been used since the acceptance of Public Administration as a discipline in the modern sense has contributed to its intistutional aspects, and it has also made it easier to analyse by determining the similarities to and differences from its counterparts in the world. The analysis of Public Administration through comparative methods has become possible through CPA. In this regard, CPA is accepted as a sub-discipline, supporting research in Public Administration. CPA research, held methodologically for the first time following World War II, achieved maturation during Cold War era. The Cold War era, when theories of the discipline were mainly developed, is remembered as a period when regulations towards the welfare state were also made. Therefore, studies in CPA mainly followed a path of development in this direction. It can be seen that CPA studies during Cold War era were generally centered upon the administration structures of developed countries. Following the period, global management and liberalism came to the fore in line with New Public Administration Movement (NPAW). With the influence of globalisation, studies in the field expanded and became valid worldwide by attaining a comparative dimension. It is possible to handle research in CPA in its consequential development as “Early Period”, “Classical Period”, “Modern Period”, and “Contemporary”.

Keywords

Social Sciences, Comparison, Public Administration, Comparative Public Administration, History

СРАВНИТЕЛЬНЫЙ МЕНЕДЖМЕНТ, КАК СУБ- ДИСЦИПЛИНА ПРИ АНАЛИЗЕ СИСТЕМЫ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОГО УПРАВЛЕНИЯ

Abstract

Целью данной статьи является показать значение сравнительного менеджмкнта, которое считается важной дисциплиной в исследованиях государственного управления, Наряду с этим, указывать на этапы его развития, принципы и теории. Государственное управление развивалось на междисциплинарной основе в течении двухсот лет наряду с современной истории развития общества. В этом смысле, государственное управление, как дисциплина обязана методу сравнительного анализа. Сравнительный анализ при государственном управлении, по сути является его неотъемлемой частью. Сравнительный метод, использованный с первых же периодов государственного управления начал применятся в современном понятии, способствующий на институциональные аспекты дисциплины, С другой стороны, он облегчил анализ характера похожих и разных явлении, происходящих в мире. Методами сравнительного менеджмента возможно проанализировать науку о государственном управлени. В этом отношений сравнительный менеджмент рассматривается как вспомогательная дисциплина, которая поддерживает традиционные исследования в области государственного управления. Исследования по сравнительному менеджменту, более серьёзно начались методологически обрабатываться впервые после Второй мировой войны. Они стали более зрелыми в период холодной войны. В эпохе холодной войны, когда разрабатывались разные теории и дисциплины, среди них имело место теория по созданию государства всеобщим благосостоянием. Таким образом, исследования по направлению сравнительного менеджмента начались развиваться в этом направлении. В период холодной войны видно, что исследования по сравнительному менеджменту в основном были сосредоточены на структурах управления в развитых странах. После холодной войны, в рамках нового движения государственного управления, глобальное управление и либерализм отличились дисциплиной. Благодаря влиянию глобализации исследования в этой области расширились и стали доступными во всём мире, приобретая междисциплинарный характер. Само развитие сравнительного менеджмента, как дисциплины с его историческим процессом, можно разделить на четыре периода: “ранний период”, “классический период”, “современный период” и “настоящее время”.

Keywords

общественные науки, сравнение, государственное управление, сравнительный менеджмент, история

References

• Azarian, R. (2011), Potentials and Limitations of Comparative Method in Social Science, International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, Vol. 1 No. 4; April, s.113-125 Bapuji, M. ve Rao, M. K. (2001), Revisiting Comparative Public Administration in the Changed Context, The Indian Journal of Political Science, Vol. 62, No. 4 (December), (574-584) Burgess J.W. (1891), Political Science And Comparative Constitutional Law, The Universitiy Faculty of Political Science in Columbia Collage, Vol:II, Boston, USA Caiden, G.(1981), Public Maladministration And Bureaucratic Corruption, Hong Kong Journal of Public Administration, Vol:3, No:1 (56-71) Caiden, G. and Caiden, N. (1990), Toward The Future of Comparative Public Administration, (Ed.O.P.Dwivedi and Keith Henderson), Public Administration in World Perspective , Iowa State University Press, USA Demirel, D. (2013), Max Weber’in Sosyoloji Kuramı, Turkish Studies - International Periodical For The Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic Volume 8/12 Fall, (361-369) Dereli, E. (1988), Toplumun Kültürel Değerlerinin İdari Performans Üzerindeki Etkileri, İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Mecmuası, Cilt:46, (259-266) Dr. Lakshmaiah IAS Study (2019), Public Administration, https://drpvlakshmaiah.com/uploads/comparative-public-administration%20.pdf (E.T. 12.12.2019) Farazmand, A. (1996), Development And Comparative Public Administration: Past, Present, And Future, Public Administration Quarterly, Vol. 20, No. 3 (Fall), (343-364) Farazmand, A. (1999), Globalization and Public Administration, Public Administration Review, Vol. 59, No. 6 (Nov-Dec), (509-522) Farazmand, A. (2001), “Handbook of Comparative and Development Public Administration”, Marcel Dekker Inc, USA Farazmand, A. (2006), The New World Order And Global Public Administration: A Critical Essay, (701-728), Comparative Public Administration Essential Readings, (Ed. Eric Otenyo&Nancy Lind), Elsevier Press, USA Fisch, S. (2018), German, American and European Roots of International Cooperation in Administrative Sciences. ‘The Speyer Conferences’ and the Origins of EGPA/GEAP up to 1975, Public Administration in Europe: The Contribution of EGPA”, (11-17), (Ed. Edoardo Ongaro), IIAS Series by Palgrave Macmillan, UK Fitzpatrick, J. Goggin, M. Heikkila, T. Klinger, D. Machado, J. and Martell, C. (2011), A New Look at Comparative Public Administration: Trends in Research and an Agenda for the Future, Public Administration Review, Vol:71, No:6, November- December, (821-830) Frederickson, G. Smith K. Larimer, C. and Licari, M. (2012), “The Public Administration Theory Primer”, Westview Press, USA Goodnow, F. J. (1893), Comparative Administrative Law: An Analysis of the Administrative Systems-National and Local of the United States, England, France and Germany, G.P. Puttams Son’s New York and London, The Knickerbocker Press Goodsell, C.T. (1981), The New Comparative Administration: A Proposal, Journal of Public Administration, 3(2), (143-155) Heady, F. (1959), Bureaucratic Theory and Comparative Administration, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 3, No. 4 (March), (509-525) Heady, F. (1989), Issues in Comparative and International Administration, (571-594), (Ed: J.Rabin, W.B. Hildret, G.J. Miller), Handbook of Public Administration, Second Edition, Marcel Dekker Press, USA Heady, F. (1998a), Comparative and International Public Administration: Building Intellectual Bridges, Public Administration Review, Vol. 58, No. 1 (Jan. – Feb), (32-39) Heady, F. (2001), Public Administration: A Comparative Perspectives, 6th Edition, CRC Press, USA, Heady, F. (2006), Comparision in the Study of Public Administration (61-128), Comparative Public Administration Essential Readings, (Ed. Eric Otenyo&Nancy Lind), Elsevier Press, USA Henderson, K..M. (1964), Emerging Synthesis in American Public Administration, Asia Publishing House, USA Henderson, K.M. (1969), Comparative Public Administration: The Identiy Crisis, Journal of Comparative Administration, Volume: 1 Issue: 1, (65-84) Ibietan, J. and Florin S. (2013), Conceptual and Methodological Approaches to Comparative Public Administration, International Journal of Innovative Social Sciences & Humanities Research 1(2, (49-58), September Jreisat, J. E. (2005), Comparative Public Administration Is Back In, Prudently, Public Administration Review, March/April Vol. 65, No.2 (231-242) Jun, J.S. (1976), Renewing the Study of Comparative Administration: Some Reflections on the Current Possibilities, Public Administration Review, Vol. 36, No. 6 (Nov. - Dec), (641-647) Keskin N. (2003), Karşılaştırmalı Kamu Yönetiminde Kuram Denemeleri ve Ana Yaklaşımlar”, Ankara Üniversitesi SBE Yönetim Bilimleri Anabilim Dalı Lisansüstü Programı, Kamu Yönetimi Çalışmaları 2002-2003, Disiplin Sorunları – YL/01 Ödev Notları, https://www.academia.edu/2963546/Kar%C5%9F%C4%B1la%C5%9Ft%C4%B1rmal%C4%B1_Kamu_Y%C3%B6netiminde_Kuram_Denemeleri_ve_Ana_Yakla%C5%9F%C4%B1mlar (E.T.02.12.2014) Laxmikanth, M (2011), “Public Administration”, Tata McGraw Hill Education Private Limited, New Delhi, India Lepawsky, A.(1949), Administration the Art And Science Of Organization And Management, Knopf Inc. New York, USA Loveman, B.(2006), The Comparative Administration Group, Development Administration And Antidevelopment, (286-296), Comparative Public Administration Essential Readings, (Ed. Eric Otenyo&Nancy Lind), Elsevier Press, USA Lowell, A. L. (1896), Governments and Parties in Continental Europe, The Riverside Press, Cambridge Mass, USA Lowell, A. L. (1908), The Government of England, Vol:1, The Mac Millian Company, New York, USA Lowell, A. L. (1922), Greater European Governments, Cambridge Harvard University Press, USA Marume S. M. J. R.R. and Namusi C.W. (2016), Comparative Public Administration, International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), Vol.5, Issue 1, (January), (1025-1031) Marx, F. M. (1969), The Administrative State: An Introduction To Bureaucracy, The University of Chikago Press, USA Otenyo, E. E. and Nancy S.L. (2015), Comparative Public Administration, Part I: Comparative Public Administration: Growth, Method, and Ecology" In Comparative Public Administration. Published Online: (09 March), (1-7) Özgür, H. ve Öztepe Ciğercioğlu, M. (2015), Amerikan Yeni Kamu Yönetimi Hareketi (YKYH): Sosyal Adalet ve Hakkaniyet Odaklı Bir Kamu Yönetimi Arayışı, (97-127), Kamu Yönetiminde Paradigma Arayışları (Editör: Özer Köseoğlu ve Zahit Sobacı), Dora Yayınları, Bursa Peng, W.-S. (2008), A Critique of Fred W. Riggs’ Ecology of Public Administration, International Public Management Review - electronic Journal at http://www.ipmr.net Vol: 9, Issue: 1 (213-226) Peters, G.B (1981), The Problem of Bureaucratic Government, The Journal of Politics, Vol. 43, No. 1 (February), (56-82) Pollitt, C. (2011), Not Odious But Onerous: Comparative Public Administration, Public Administration, Vol:89, Issue:1, (114-127) Rathod, P. B. (2007), Comparative Public Administration, ABD Publishers, India Riggs, F. W. (1961), “The Ecology of Public Administration”, Asia Publishing, London Riggs, F. W. (1962), Trends in the Comparative Study of Public Administration, International Review of Administrative Sciences, Vol:28, No.1, (9-15) Riggs, F. W. (1980), The Ecology and Context of Public Administration: A Comparative Perspective, Public Administration Review, Vol. 40, No. 2 (Mar. - Apr.), (107-115) Riggs, F.W. (2006), The Prizmatic Model: Conceptializing Transitional Societies, (17-61), Comparative Public Administration Essential Readings, (Ed. Eric Otenyo&Nancy Lind), Elsevier Press, USA San, C. (1993), Karşılaştırma Yönteminde Zaman, Mekan ve Boyutlar”, Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, Cilt:48, Sayı:1, s.155-159 Sapru, R.(1979), Comparative Public Administration: Retrospect and Prospect, The Indian Journal of Political Science, Vol. 40, No. 3 (September), (466-477) Savage, P. (1976), Optimism and Pessimism in Comparative Administration, Public Administration Review, Vol. 36, No. 4 (Jul. - Aug.), (415-423) Savcı, B. (1961), Mukayeseli Devlet İdaresi ve Türkiye Üzerine Bir Seminer, Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, Cilt:16, Sayı:4, s.189-203 Snellen, I.Th.M ve Van de Donk, W.B.H.J. (1998), “Public Administration in an Information Age”, IOS Press, Amsterdam Siffin, W. J. (1956), Toward the Comparative Study of Public Administration, Indiana University Press, USA UN (2008), “Contribution of the United Nations to the Improvement of Public Administration A 60-Year History”, UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs Division for Public Administration and Development Management, New York, USA http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/UN/UNPAN030594.pdf (E.T.22.02.2019) Yourarticlelibrary, “Comparative Public Administration: Definition, Sources and Problems” http://www.yourarticlelibrary.com/public-administration/comparative-public-administration-definition-sources-and-problems/63439 (10.08.2018) Waldo, D. (1963), Comparative Public Administration: Prologue, Performance, Problems, And Promise, The Indian Journal of Political Science, Vol. 24, No. 3, (177-216) Van DeWalle., S. and Brans, M. (2018), Where Comparative Public Administration And Comparative Policy Studies Meet, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 20(1), (101-113) Wart, M.V. and Cayer, J. (1990), Comparative Public Administration: Defunct, Dispersed, or Redefined?, Public Administration Review, Vol. 50, No. 2 (Mar- Apr), (238-248) Wilson, W. (1887), The Study of Administration, Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 2, No. 2 (Jun), s.197-222