Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

7. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Uzamsal Yönelim Becerilerini Geliştirmeye Yönelik Tasarlanan Öğrenme Ortamının Değerlendirilmesi

Year 2018, , 83 - 92, 15.01.2018
https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.348100

Abstract

Bu çalışmayla, üç boyutlu
dinamik geometri yazılımı Cabri 3D ile zenginleştirilmiş bir öğrenme ortamının
7. sınıf öğrencilerinin uzamsal yönelim becerileri üzerindeki etkisi ve 7.
sınıf öğrencilerinin uzamsal yönelim becerileri ile matematik başarıları ve
geometri anlama seviyeleri arasındaki ilişkilerin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır.
Yarı deneysel olarak tasarlanan çalışma 41 deney 45 kontrol grubu öğrencisiyle
birlikte yürütülmüştür. Deney grubu çok küplü geometrik cisimlere yönelik
dersleri 2 hafta boyunca bilgisayar laboratuvarında Cabri 3D kullanarak
işlerken, kontrol grubu geometri derslerini sınıf ortamında geleneksel yolla
almıştır. Her iki gruptaki öğrencilere uygulama öncesinde ve sonrasında uzamsal
yönelim becerisi testi ve uygulama sonrasında van Hiele geometri anlama sınavı
uygulanmıştır. Araştırma sonuçları deney grubu için oluşturulan öğrenme
ortamının öğrencilerin uzamsal yönelim becerilerini geliştirmede daha etkili
olduğunu göstermiştir. Ayrıca uzamsal yönelim becerisi ile matematik başarısı
ve van Hiele geometri anlama seviyesi arasında pozitif yönde ve orta düzeyde
anlamlı bir ilişki çıkmıştır. Öğrencilerinin uzamsal yönelim becerilerini geliştirmek
isteyen öğretmenlerin derslerinde bu çalışmada oluşturulan öğrenme ortamlarına benzer
öğrenme ortamları tasarlamaları önerilmektedir.

References

  • Akgül, A. ve Çevik, O. (2003). İstatistiksel analiz teknikleri, Emek Ofset, Ankara.
  • Baki, A. ve Bell A. (1996). Ortaöğretim matematik öğretimi,YÖK-Dünya Bankası Milli Eğiti-mi Geliştirme Projesi, Ankara.
  • Baki, A. (2008). Kuramdan uygulamaya matematik eğitimi. Ankara: Harf Eğitim Yayıncılığı.
  • Battista, M. T. (1990). Spatial visualization and gender differences in high school geometry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(1), 47-60.
  • Ben-Chaim, D., Lappan, G. ve Houang, R. T. (1988). The effect of instruction on spatial visua-lization skills of middle school boys and girls. American Educational Research Journal, 25, 51–71.
  • Boyraz, S. (2008). The effects of computer based instruction on seventh grade students’ spatial ability, attitudes toward geometry, mathematics and technology. Unpublished masters’ thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
  • Brandimonte, M. A., Coluccia E. ve Losue, G. (2007). The relationship between map drawing and spatial orientation abilities: A study of gender differences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 135–144.
  • Braukmann, J. ve Pedras, M. J. (1993). A comparison of two methods of teaching visualization skills to college students. National Association of Industrial and Technology Teacher Educa-tors, 30(2), 65-80.
  • Burnet, S. A. ve Lane, D. M. (1980). Effects of Academic Instruction on Spatial Visualization. Intelligence, 4(3) 233-242.
  • Clements, D. H., Battista, M. T., Sarama, J. ve Swaminathan, S. (1997). Development of stu-dents' spatial thinking in a unit on geometric motions and area. The Elementary School Jour-nal, 98 (2), 171-186
  • Chen, C. M., Lin, C. H. ve Lou, Y. C. (2014). Developing spatial orientation and spatial me-mory with a treasure hunting game. Educational Technology & Society, 17 (3), 79–92.
  • Çepni, S. (2005). Araştırma ve proje çalışmalarına giriş. Trabzon: Üçyol Kültür Merkezi.
  • Domino, G. ve Domino, M. L. (2006). Psychological testing: An introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Ekiz, D. (2009). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Anı Yayınları, Ankara.
  • Elliot, J. ve Smith, I. M. (1983). An International Dictionary of Spatial Tests. The NFER-Nelson Publishing Company, Windsor, United Kingdom.
  • Eryaman, Z. (2009). A study on sixth grade students’ spatial reasoning regarding 2d represen-tations of 3D objects. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Middle East Technical University, Anka-ra.
  • Güven, B. ve Karataş, İ. (2002). Dinamik Geometri Yazılımı Cabri ile Geometri Öğrenme: Öğrenci Görüşleri. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2(2), 67-78.
  • Güven, B. ve Kösa, T. (2008). The Effect of Dynamic Geometry Software on Student Mathe-matics Teachers’ Spatial Visualization Skills. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 7(4), 100-107.
  • Hartman, N. W. ve Bertoline, G. R. (2005). Spatial abilities and virtual technologies: Examining the computer graphics learning environment. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conferen-ce on Information Visualisation. Web: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=01509193
  • Karakuş, F. ve Peker, M. (2015). The effects of dynamic geometry software and physical mani-pulatives on pre-service primary teachers’ van Hiele levels and spatial abilities, Turkish Jour-nal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 6(3), 338-265.
  • Karrass, M. (2012). Diagrammatic reasoning skills of pre-service mathematics teachers (Order No. 3493651). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (919522981). Retri-eved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/919522981?accountid=15333
  • Kayhan, E. B. (2005). Investigation of high school students’ spatial ability. Unpublished Mas-ter’s Thesis. Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
  • Kösa, T. (2011). Ortaöğretim öğrencilerinin uzamsal berecilerinin incelenmesi. Yayımlanma-mış doktora tezi, Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Trabzon.
  • Kösa, T. (2016). Matematik eğitiminde teoriler. Erhan Bingölbali, Salahattin Arslan, İsmail Özgür Zembat (Eds.), Uzamsal Yetenek: Tanımı ve Bileşenleri (s.325-339). Ankara.
  • Kurt, M. (2002). Görsel-uzamsal yeteneklerin bileşenleri. Klinik Psikiyatri, 5(2), 120-125.
  • Kurtuluş, A. (2011). Effect of computer-aided perspective drawings on spatial orientation and perspective drawing achievement. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(4), 138-147.
  • Lee, W. (2000). The relationship between students’ proof-writing ability and van hiele levels of geometric thought in a college geometry course. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Northern Colorado, Colorado.
  • Linn, M. C. ve Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: a-meta analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479-1498.
  • Lord, T. R. (1985). Enhancing the visuo-spatial aptitude of students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22, 395–495.
  • Lohman, D. F. (1979). Spatial Ability: Individual Differences in Speed and Level (Technical Report No:9). Stanford, CA: Aptitude Research Project, School of Education, Stanford Uni-versity.
  • Lohman, D. F. (1993). Spatial ability and G. Paper presented at the First Spearman Seminar, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom.
  • Maccoby, E. E. ve Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The Psychology of Sex Differences. Stanford Univer-sity Press, . Stanford, CA.
  • Maier, P. H. (1996). Developments in mathematics education in germany. Selected papers from the Annual Conference on Didactics of Mathematics, Regensburg, 69-81.
  • Mazman, G. Z. ve Altun, A. (2013). Individual differences in spatial orientation performances: an eye tracking study. World Journal on Educational Technology, 5(2), 266-280.
  • McGee, M. G. (1979). Human spatial abilities: Psychometric studies and environmental, gene-tic, hormonal and neurological ınfluences. Psychological Bulletin, 86(5), 889-918.
  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [NCTM] (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics, Reston, VA.
  • Okagaki, L. R., ve Frensch, P. A. (1996). Effects of Video Game Playing on Measures of Spatial Performance: Gender Effects in Late Adolescents. Eds: P. Greenfield ve R. Cocking, Interacting with video, s.115-140. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Corporation.
  • Olkun, S. ve Altun, A. (2003). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin bilgisayar deneyimleri ile uzamsal düşünme ve geometri başarıları arasındaki ilişki. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2(4), 1-7.
  • Patkin, D. ve Dayan E. (2013). The Intelligence of Observation: Improving High School Stu-dents' Spatial Ability by Means of Intervention Unit. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 44(2), 179-195.
  • Pellegrino, J. W, Alderton, D. L. ve Shute, V. J. (1984). Understanding Spatial Ability. Educa-tional Psychologist, 19(3), 239-253.
  • Rafi, A., Samsudin, K. A. ve Ismail, A. (2006). On improving spatial ability though computer-mediated engineering drawing instruction. Educational Technology & Society, 9(3), 149-159.
  • Smyser, E. M. (1994). The effects of the geometric supposers: Spatial ability, van Hiele levels and achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University. (UMI No. 9427802).
  • Şimşek, E. B. (2012). Dinamik geometri yazılımı kullanmanın ilköğretim 6. sınıf öğrencilerinin matematik dersindeki akademik başarılarına ve uzamsal yeteneklerine etkisi. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  • Tartre, L. A. (1990). Spatial orientation skill and mathematical problem solving. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(3), 216–229.
  • Turğut, M. (2007). İlköğretim II. kademede öğrencilerin uzamsal yeteneklerinin incelenmesi. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, İzmir.
  • Uygan, C. (2011). Katı cisimlerin öğretiminde google sketchup ve somut model destekli uygu-lamaların ilköğretim matematik öğretmeni adaylarının uzamsal yeteneklerine etkisi. Yayım-lanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi, Eskişehir.
  • Usiskin, Z. (1982). Van Hiele Levels and Achievement in Secondary School Geometry. Final Report, Cognitive Development and Achievement in Secondary School Geometry Project. Chicago: University of Chicago.
  • Yıldız, B. (2009). Üç boyutlu ortam ve somut materyal kullanımının uzamsal görselleştirme ve zihinde döndürme becerilerine etkileri. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Hacettepe Üni-versitesi, Ankara.

Evaluation of The Learning Environment Designed for Developing 7th Grade Students’ Spatial Orientation Skills

Year 2018, , 83 - 92, 15.01.2018
https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.348100

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to present the effect of using Dynamic
Geometry Software Cabri 3D on spatial orientation skills of the 7th
grade student while teaching the geometry subject of multiple cubical objects.
It is also aimed to investigate the correlations among spatial orientation
skill, mathematics achievement and level of geometry understanding of the
students. The quasi-experimental model was used in the study. There were 41
students in experimental group and 45 students in control group. Experiment
group students took the course with the assistance of Cabri 3D while the control
group students received traditional instruction for two weeks. Both group
students took spatial orientation test before and after the implementation and
van Hiele geometry understanding test only after the study. The results of the
study showed that the learning environment designed for the experimental group
was more effective for developing students’ spatial orientation skills. In
addition, a positive and significant correlation was found between achievement
in mathematics and spatial orientation skills as geometry understanding levels
and spatial orientation skills. Teachers who want to improve their students’
spatial orientation skills could design such an environment as in the present
study.

References

  • Akgül, A. ve Çevik, O. (2003). İstatistiksel analiz teknikleri, Emek Ofset, Ankara.
  • Baki, A. ve Bell A. (1996). Ortaöğretim matematik öğretimi,YÖK-Dünya Bankası Milli Eğiti-mi Geliştirme Projesi, Ankara.
  • Baki, A. (2008). Kuramdan uygulamaya matematik eğitimi. Ankara: Harf Eğitim Yayıncılığı.
  • Battista, M. T. (1990). Spatial visualization and gender differences in high school geometry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(1), 47-60.
  • Ben-Chaim, D., Lappan, G. ve Houang, R. T. (1988). The effect of instruction on spatial visua-lization skills of middle school boys and girls. American Educational Research Journal, 25, 51–71.
  • Boyraz, S. (2008). The effects of computer based instruction on seventh grade students’ spatial ability, attitudes toward geometry, mathematics and technology. Unpublished masters’ thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
  • Brandimonte, M. A., Coluccia E. ve Losue, G. (2007). The relationship between map drawing and spatial orientation abilities: A study of gender differences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 135–144.
  • Braukmann, J. ve Pedras, M. J. (1993). A comparison of two methods of teaching visualization skills to college students. National Association of Industrial and Technology Teacher Educa-tors, 30(2), 65-80.
  • Burnet, S. A. ve Lane, D. M. (1980). Effects of Academic Instruction on Spatial Visualization. Intelligence, 4(3) 233-242.
  • Clements, D. H., Battista, M. T., Sarama, J. ve Swaminathan, S. (1997). Development of stu-dents' spatial thinking in a unit on geometric motions and area. The Elementary School Jour-nal, 98 (2), 171-186
  • Chen, C. M., Lin, C. H. ve Lou, Y. C. (2014). Developing spatial orientation and spatial me-mory with a treasure hunting game. Educational Technology & Society, 17 (3), 79–92.
  • Çepni, S. (2005). Araştırma ve proje çalışmalarına giriş. Trabzon: Üçyol Kültür Merkezi.
  • Domino, G. ve Domino, M. L. (2006). Psychological testing: An introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Ekiz, D. (2009). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Anı Yayınları, Ankara.
  • Elliot, J. ve Smith, I. M. (1983). An International Dictionary of Spatial Tests. The NFER-Nelson Publishing Company, Windsor, United Kingdom.
  • Eryaman, Z. (2009). A study on sixth grade students’ spatial reasoning regarding 2d represen-tations of 3D objects. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Middle East Technical University, Anka-ra.
  • Güven, B. ve Karataş, İ. (2002). Dinamik Geometri Yazılımı Cabri ile Geometri Öğrenme: Öğrenci Görüşleri. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2(2), 67-78.
  • Güven, B. ve Kösa, T. (2008). The Effect of Dynamic Geometry Software on Student Mathe-matics Teachers’ Spatial Visualization Skills. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 7(4), 100-107.
  • Hartman, N. W. ve Bertoline, G. R. (2005). Spatial abilities and virtual technologies: Examining the computer graphics learning environment. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conferen-ce on Information Visualisation. Web: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=01509193
  • Karakuş, F. ve Peker, M. (2015). The effects of dynamic geometry software and physical mani-pulatives on pre-service primary teachers’ van Hiele levels and spatial abilities, Turkish Jour-nal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 6(3), 338-265.
  • Karrass, M. (2012). Diagrammatic reasoning skills of pre-service mathematics teachers (Order No. 3493651). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (919522981). Retri-eved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/919522981?accountid=15333
  • Kayhan, E. B. (2005). Investigation of high school students’ spatial ability. Unpublished Mas-ter’s Thesis. Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
  • Kösa, T. (2011). Ortaöğretim öğrencilerinin uzamsal berecilerinin incelenmesi. Yayımlanma-mış doktora tezi, Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Trabzon.
  • Kösa, T. (2016). Matematik eğitiminde teoriler. Erhan Bingölbali, Salahattin Arslan, İsmail Özgür Zembat (Eds.), Uzamsal Yetenek: Tanımı ve Bileşenleri (s.325-339). Ankara.
  • Kurt, M. (2002). Görsel-uzamsal yeteneklerin bileşenleri. Klinik Psikiyatri, 5(2), 120-125.
  • Kurtuluş, A. (2011). Effect of computer-aided perspective drawings on spatial orientation and perspective drawing achievement. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(4), 138-147.
  • Lee, W. (2000). The relationship between students’ proof-writing ability and van hiele levels of geometric thought in a college geometry course. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Northern Colorado, Colorado.
  • Linn, M. C. ve Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: a-meta analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479-1498.
  • Lord, T. R. (1985). Enhancing the visuo-spatial aptitude of students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22, 395–495.
  • Lohman, D. F. (1979). Spatial Ability: Individual Differences in Speed and Level (Technical Report No:9). Stanford, CA: Aptitude Research Project, School of Education, Stanford Uni-versity.
  • Lohman, D. F. (1993). Spatial ability and G. Paper presented at the First Spearman Seminar, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom.
  • Maccoby, E. E. ve Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The Psychology of Sex Differences. Stanford Univer-sity Press, . Stanford, CA.
  • Maier, P. H. (1996). Developments in mathematics education in germany. Selected papers from the Annual Conference on Didactics of Mathematics, Regensburg, 69-81.
  • Mazman, G. Z. ve Altun, A. (2013). Individual differences in spatial orientation performances: an eye tracking study. World Journal on Educational Technology, 5(2), 266-280.
  • McGee, M. G. (1979). Human spatial abilities: Psychometric studies and environmental, gene-tic, hormonal and neurological ınfluences. Psychological Bulletin, 86(5), 889-918.
  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [NCTM] (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics, Reston, VA.
  • Okagaki, L. R., ve Frensch, P. A. (1996). Effects of Video Game Playing on Measures of Spatial Performance: Gender Effects in Late Adolescents. Eds: P. Greenfield ve R. Cocking, Interacting with video, s.115-140. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Corporation.
  • Olkun, S. ve Altun, A. (2003). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin bilgisayar deneyimleri ile uzamsal düşünme ve geometri başarıları arasındaki ilişki. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2(4), 1-7.
  • Patkin, D. ve Dayan E. (2013). The Intelligence of Observation: Improving High School Stu-dents' Spatial Ability by Means of Intervention Unit. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 44(2), 179-195.
  • Pellegrino, J. W, Alderton, D. L. ve Shute, V. J. (1984). Understanding Spatial Ability. Educa-tional Psychologist, 19(3), 239-253.
  • Rafi, A., Samsudin, K. A. ve Ismail, A. (2006). On improving spatial ability though computer-mediated engineering drawing instruction. Educational Technology & Society, 9(3), 149-159.
  • Smyser, E. M. (1994). The effects of the geometric supposers: Spatial ability, van Hiele levels and achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University. (UMI No. 9427802).
  • Şimşek, E. B. (2012). Dinamik geometri yazılımı kullanmanın ilköğretim 6. sınıf öğrencilerinin matematik dersindeki akademik başarılarına ve uzamsal yeteneklerine etkisi. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  • Tartre, L. A. (1990). Spatial orientation skill and mathematical problem solving. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(3), 216–229.
  • Turğut, M. (2007). İlköğretim II. kademede öğrencilerin uzamsal yeteneklerinin incelenmesi. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, İzmir.
  • Uygan, C. (2011). Katı cisimlerin öğretiminde google sketchup ve somut model destekli uygu-lamaların ilköğretim matematik öğretmeni adaylarının uzamsal yeteneklerine etkisi. Yayım-lanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi, Eskişehir.
  • Usiskin, Z. (1982). Van Hiele Levels and Achievement in Secondary School Geometry. Final Report, Cognitive Development and Achievement in Secondary School Geometry Project. Chicago: University of Chicago.
  • Yıldız, B. (2009). Üç boyutlu ortam ve somut materyal kullanımının uzamsal görselleştirme ve zihinde döndürme becerilerine etkileri. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Hacettepe Üni-versitesi, Ankara.
There are 48 citations in total.

Details

Subjects Studies on Education
Other ID 1639
Journal Section Review Article
Authors

Temel Kösa

Hilal Kalay This is me

Publication Date January 15, 2018
Acceptance Date June 6, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2018

Cite

APA Kösa, T., & Kalay, H. (2018). Evaluation of The Learning Environment Designed for Developing 7th Grade Students’ Spatial Orientation Skills. Kastamonu Education Journal, 26(1), 83-92. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.348100