Üniversitelerin Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitülerindeki Akademik ve İdari Sürecin Değerlendirilmesi

Year 2021, Volume: 29 Issue: 4, 261 - 272, 30.11.2021

Gürcü Erdamar , Serap Nur Duman

https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.901167

Abstract

Bu araştırmada, eğitim bilimleri enstitülerinin akademik ve idari süreçlerinin işleyişini anlamak ve bu süreçlerde yaşanan sorunları ortaya koymak amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaca dayalı olarak Türkiye’de bulunan 23 eğitim bilimleri enstitüsüne ulaşılmıştır. Tarama modelinde gerçekleştirilen araştırmanın evrenin tamamı araştırmaya dahil edilmiştir. 23 eğitim bilimleri enstitüsünde bulunan 24 enstitü yöneticisi (müdür ve müdür yardımcısı) ile 74 bölüm / anabilim dalı başkanı olmak üzere toplam 98 yönetici araştırmanın çalışma grubunu oluşturmuştur. Araştırmanın verileri, araştırmacılar tarafından hazırlanan anket ile toplanmıştır. Anket formunda yönetim, danışmanlık hizmetleri, resmi yazışma ve duyurular, personel, fiziki olanaklar, öğrenci, iş birliği ve enstitünün çekiciliği başlıklarında toplam 64 madde yer almaktadır. Yaklaşık iki ay içinde toplanan verilerin analizinde SPSS analiz programından yararlanılmıştır. Elde edilen bulgulara dayalı olarak yöneticilerin en çok katıldığı maddeler; enstitü yazışmalarında elektronik bilgi ve bilişim sistemlerinden yararlanılması, enstitü müdürü ve yardımcılarının öğretim üyeleri için ulaşılabilir olması, danışman atamalarının yönetmeliklere uygun gerçekleştirilmesi, enstitülerin daha fazla bütçe desteğine ihtiyaç duyduğu ve enstitü müdürlerinin üniversite yönetim kurulunda temsil edilmesi ile ilgilidir. Yöneticilerin en az katıldığı maddeler ise, enstitülerin lisansüstü dersler için ayrı dersliklerinin ve akademik etkinlikler için uygun fiziki koşulların bulunması, öğrencilerin lisansüstü yönetmelikler hakkında bilgi sahibi olması, diğer üniversitelerin eğitim bilimleri enstitüleri ile işbirliği yapılması, enstitü programlarına olan ilginin azalması ve enstitülerin tek bir çatı altında toplanmasıdır.

Keywords

Eğitim bilimleri, Enstitü, Lisansüstü eğitim, Akademik ve idari süreç

Supporting Institution

Herhangi bir kurum tarafından desteklenmemiştir.

Project Number

Herhangi bir proje tarafından desteklenmemiştir.

Thanks

Dergide emeği geçen tüm hakemlere ve editörlere teşekkür ederim. Saygılarımla

Evaluation of the Academic and Administrative Process in the Institutes of Educational Sciences of Universities

Abstract

This study aims to understand the course of the academic and administrative processes in the institutes of educational sciences and reveal the problems encountered in these processes. Based on this objective, 23 institutes of educational sciences located in Turkey were reached. The entire population was included in the study conducted in survey research design. The study group consisted of a total of 98 administrators including 24 institute administrators (director and deputy directors) and 74 heads of division / heads of department in 23 institutes of educational sciences. The research data were collected by a questionnaire prepared by the researchers. The questionnaire contained a total of 64 items under the titles of administration, advisory services, official correspondence and announcements, personnel, physical facilities, student, cooperation, and the attractiveness of the institute. The analysis program SPSS was used in the analysis of data that were collected in approximately two months. Based on the findings obtained, the use of electronic information and information technology systems in institute correspondence, the accessibility of the institute director and deputy directors by faculty members, the actualization of advisor assignments in accordance with the regulations, the need for more support to the institute budget, and the representation of institute directors in the university administrative committee are the items with which the administrators agree most. However, the items with which the administrators agree least are the availability of separate classrooms for postgraduate programs and of appropriate physical conditions for academic activities in institutes, students’ knowledge of postgraduate regulations, cooperation with the institutes of educational sciences of other universities, the decrease in the interest in the institute programs, and gathering institutes under one roof.

Keywords

educational sciences, institute, postgraduate education, academic and administrative process.

Project Number

Herhangi bir proje tarafından desteklenmemiştir.

References

• Abiddin, N. Z. & Ismail, A. (2011). Attrition and completion issues in postgraduate studies for student development. International Review of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(1), 15–99.
• Aitken, L., Currey, J., Marshall, A., & Elliott, D. (2008). Discrimination of educational outcomes between differing levels of critical care programmes by selected stakeholders in Australia: A mixed method approach. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 24(2), 68-77. Doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2007.09.001.
• Aktan, O. (2020). Evaluation of postgraduate education for the teachers’ career development. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 10(3), 596-607.
• Alabaş, R., Kamer, T. & Polat, Ü. (2012). Master’s degree education in the career development of teachers: Reasons for preference and the problems that they face throughout the process. E-International Journal of Educational Research, 3(4), 89-107.
• Alhas, A. (2006). The interpretation on post-graduate education of the state employed teachers receiving postgraduate education (The Case of Ankara Province). Master’s Thesis, Gazi University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
• Arabacı, İ.B. & Akıllı, C. (2013, May). Student problems in postgraduate education. VI. Symposium of National Postgraduate Education, Sakarya, 124-133.
• Arı, E., Pehlivanlar, E. & Çömek, A. (2005). Determining the opinions and expectations of postgraduate students about the education that they receive. Dokuz Eylül University, Journal of Buca Faculty of Education, 17, 231- 235.
• Arıcı, H. (2001). Scholars training-postgraduate education in social sciences. Scholars Training-Postgraduate Education. TUBA Publication, Scientific Meetings Series No 7, 53-64.
• Aydemir, S. & Çam, Ş. (2015). Opinions of graduate students about postgraduate education. Turkish Journal of Education, 4(4), 4-16.
• Aydın, E. & Hayal, M.A. (2014, June). Opinions of teachers receiving postgraduate education on postgraduate education. Proceedings of 3rd Educational Research Congress in Sakarya, Sakarya.
• Barnes, J. & Shirley, I. (2007). Strangely familiar: cross-curricular and creative thinking in teacher education. Improving Schools, 10(2), 162-179.
• Baş, G. (2013). Expectations of teachers from postgraduate education: A qualitative study (The Case of Niğde Province). Journal of Higher Education, 3(2). 67-68.
• Başer, N., Narlı, S. & Günhan, B. (2005). Views of teachers regarding problems encountered in the fields of postgraduate education and solution proposals. Dokuz Eylül University, Journal of Buca Faculty of Education, 1, 129-135.
• Başer, N., Narlı, S., & Günhan, B. (2010). Views of teachers regarding problems encountered in receiving postgraduate education and solution proposals. Dokuz Eylül University, Journal of Buca Faculty of Education, 17, 129-135.
• Bayar, A. & Duran, E. (2019). The issue of quality in postgraduate education. EUROASIA Journal of International Research, 7(20), 219-240.
• Borich, G. D. (2004). Effective teaching methods. NJ: Pearson.
• Buluç, B. & Gelişli, Y. (2014). Determination of the problems of graduate students according to students’ viewpoints. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3317-3321.
• Bülbül, T. (2003). Opinions of faculty members in Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences on the process of student selection for postgraduate education. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 36(1), 167-174.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. & N. Köklü (1999). Opinions of faculty members on the scientific research competency of postgraduate students in educational sciences. Education and Science, 23(112), 18-28.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011). Manual of data analysis for social sciences (15th Ed.). Ankara: Pegem
• CoHE (1981). Higher Education Law numbered 2547. (RG: 06. 11. 1981-17506). Retrieved from https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/MevzuatMetin/1.5.2547.pdf.
• CoHE (2021). Higher education information management system. Ankara. Retrieved from https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr/.
• Creswell, J. W. (2017). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (H. Ekşi, Trans. Ed.). Istanbul: EDAM.
• Cruikshank, D. R., Jenkins, D. B. & Metcalf, K. K. (2003). The act of teaching. New York: McGraw Hill.
• Çıkrıkçı Demirtaşlı, N. (2002). A survey on the use of postgraduate education entrance exam (LES) result and other criteria for entry to postgraduate education programs. Ankara University Journal of Educational Sciences, 35(1-2), 61-70.
• Çoruk, A., Çağatay, Ş. M. & Öztürk, H. (2016). Registration and attendance issues in postgraduate education. Uşak University Journal of Social Sciences, 9(1), 165-178.
• Dilci, T. & Gürol, M. (2012). The reflections of postgraduate education to living area with the perspective of academic staff (A Case in Educational Sciences), Kastamonu Journal of Education, 20(3), 1073-1090.
• Ekinci, C. E. (2011). Impact of some socio-economic factors on higher education participation in Turkey. Education and Science, 36(160), 281-297.
• Er, H. & Ünal, F. (2017). Evaluation of social studies pre-service teachers’ opinions on postgraduate education. Kırşehir Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 18(2), 687-707.
• Erdem A.R. (2007). Faculty member’s responsibility to train scholars and the professional ethics required by this responsibility. Journal of Academic Design, 1(2), 77-81.
• Ertem, H.Y. (2020). Structure and process in postgraduate education: organizational climate and postgraduate experiences in research universities. Mersin University Journal of Faculty of Education, 16(2): 464-483.
• Etzkowitz, H. (2003). The European entrepreneurial university: an alternative to the US model. Industry and Higher Education, 17(5), 325-335.
• Gök M. (2015). Postgraduate education in Turkey: number of researchers, problems of research associates and solution recommendations. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 5(2), 57–64.
• Gömleksiz, M. N. & Yıldırım, F. (2013). Opinions of graduate students on postgraduate education. VI. Symposium of National Postgraduate Education, Sakarya, 68-74.
• Günay, D. (2018). Postgraduate education in Turkey and a philosophical perspective on postgraduate education. Journal of University Research, 1(2), 71-88.
• Hulse, B. & Hulme, R. (2012). Engaging with research through practitioner enquiry: the perceptions of beginning teachers on a postgraduate initial teacher education programme. Educational Action Research, 20(2), 313-329.
• Humphrey, R. & McCarthey, P. (1999). Recognizing difference: providing for graduate students. Studies in Higher Education, 24(3), 371–386.
• İbiş, E. (2014). Problems of postgraduate education. Journal of Higher Education, 4(3), 117–123.
• İbret, B. Ü. (2013). Quality of postgraduate education in social sciences in Turkey. Symposium Proceedings, Bartın, 37-53.
• İlhan, M., Öner Sünkür, M. & Yılmaz, F. (2012). Analysis of primary teacher candidates' attitudes towards postgraduate education (The Case of Dicle University). Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Faculty of Education, 12(23), 22-42.
• İnce, M. L. & Korkusuz, F. (2006). Student-faculty interaction in developing postgraduate education goals: Project report of the status of one discipline at different universities and different disciplines at a university. The Scientific Technological Research Council of Turkey. TUBITAK Project No: 104K093.
• İnel-Ekici, D., Ekici, M. & Can, İ. (2020). The examination of pre-service teachers’ views, expectations, and awareness about postgraduate education. SDU International Journal of Educational Studies, 7(2), 212-227. Doi: 10.33710/sduijes.676425
• Karadağ, N. & Özdemir, S. (2017). The views of faculty members and PhD students on the processes of doctoral education in Turkey. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 7(2), 267-281.
• Karakütük, K. (2001). Teaching staff and scientist training: Postgraduate education planning Ankara: Anı.
• Karakütük, K. (2006). Turkey postgraduate education system. Karakütük, K. (Ed.), Postgraduate teaching systems in some countries. Ankara: Ankara University Publications of Faculty of Educational Sciences.
• Karakütük, K., Aydın, A., Abalı, G. & Yıldırım, S. (2008). Views of postgraduate institute administrators of the universities in Ankara on the problems of postgraduate education. Education and Science, 33(147), 42-53.
• Karaman, S. & Bakırcı, F. (2010). Postgraduate education in Turkey: problems and solution proposals. Social Sciences Research Journal, 2, 94–114.
• Kaya, S. (2014). Evaluation of postgraduate education in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction. International Journal of Human Sciences, 11(2), 802-826.
• Köksalan, B., İlter, İ. & Görmez, E. (2010). A study on socio-cultural characteristics and postgraduate education willingness of the classroom teachers (The case of Fırat, Erzincan and Inönü universities classroom teaching department). Ahi Evran University Journal of Faculty of Education, 11(3), 277–299.
• Kurnaz, M.A. & Alev, N. (2009). Primary and secondary postgraduate students' ways of selecting courses and encountered problems. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 6(3), 38-52.
• Mete, Y. A. (2013). Teacher training and appointment policies in South Korea, Japan, New Zealand and Finland. International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 8(12), 859–878.
• Moore, K.D. (2005). Effective instructional strategies. CA: Sage.
• Nachiappan, S., Shukor, A. A. A., Veeran, V. P. & Andi, H. K. (2012). Differences in cognitive process among primary school teacher. Current Research Journal of Social Sciences, 4(3), 256-260.
• Oluk, S. & Çolak, F. (2005). Some problems encountered by postgraduate students working as state teachers. Journal of Buca Faculty of Education, 17, 141- 144.
• Orer, H. S. (2011, May). Scientific publication performance of Turkey. 26th Ankem Congress of Antibiotics and Chemotherapy, Kızılağaç/Manavgat, 134-138.
• Ören, F., Yılmaz, T. & Güçlü, M. (2012). Analysis of teacher candidates' views on postgraduate education. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 1(2), 189-201.
• Özer, Y. E. (2011). Entrepreneurial university model: A proposal for Turkey. Uludağ University Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 30(2), 85-100.
• Öztemel, E. (2013). Building a research and innovation culture in higher education institutions. Journal of Higher Education, 3(1), 22-29.
• Rust, F. (2009). Teacher research and the problem of practice. Teachers College Record, 111(8), 1882-1893.
• Sasaki, D. G. G. & Mällinen, S. (2018). Developing student-centered assessment for a postgraduate course designed for Basic Education Teachers. Revista Ibero-Americana de Estudos em Educação, 13(1), 520-525.
• Sevinç, B. (2001). Postgraduate education practices, challenges and implementations in Turkey. DEU Journal of Faculty of Education, 34(1), 25–40.
• Şahin, Ç., Demir, M. K. & Arcagök, S. (2015). Prospective teachers' opinions towards postgraduate education. Journal of Theory & Practice in Education, 11(1), 304- 320.
• Şaşmaz-Ören, F. & Karapınar, A. (2016). Teacher candidates' professional competency perceptions and attitudes towards postgraduate education and the relationship between these variables. Journal of Higher Education, 6(3), 105-116.
• Şen, Z. (2012). Criticism and recommendations on the postgraduate education system in Turkey. Journal of Higher Education, 2(1), 1-9.
• TEDMEM (2019). TALIS 2018 results and evaluations on Turkey. TEDMEM Analysis Series, 6. Retrieved from https://tedmem.org/yayin/talis-2018-sonuclariturkiye-uzerine-degerlendirmeler.
• Türker, K. (1997). Scientist training: Postgraduate education in Turkey and the World, TÜBA Scientific Meetings Series, 7, 21-34.
• Tonbul, Y. (2017). Role of institutes of social sciences in enhancing the quality of postgraduate education. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 7(1), 150-162.
• Topal, M., Sağlam, H.İ. & Akgün, Ö.E. (2017, May). Problems experienced in postgraduate education through the eyes of postgraduate students and lecturers and solutions. Proceedings of 8th Symposium of International Postgraduate Education, Sakarya, 109-117.
• Toprak, E. & Taşğın, Ö. (2017). Examining the reasons for teachers not to pursue postgraduate education. International Journal of Society Researches, 7(13), 599-615.
• Ünal, Ç. & İlter, İ. (2010). Primary teacher candidates' attitudes towards postgraduate education (The case of Fırat, Erzincan and Inönü universities classroom teaching department). Atatürk University Journal of Institute of Social Sciences, 14(2), 1–18.
• Varol, A. & Şeker, S. (2008, March) Ethical Violations of Academic Staff. Workshop on the Evaluation of Education in the Republic of Turkey with Contemporary Values from the Perspective of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
• Yıldız, O. (2019). Conceptual framework of entrepreneurial universities. Journal of University Research, 2(1), 25-34.
• Yıldız, C. & Göl, R. (2016). Perspectives of undergraduate students about postgraduate education. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational & Social Sciences, 4, 499-507.