Lojistik ve Taşımacılığın Karbon Ayak İzi: Sistematik Bir Literatür İncelemesi

Year 2022, Volume: 15 Issue: 2, 916 - 930, 15.06.2022

Aslıhan Turgut , Tamer Budak

https://doi.org/10.35674/kent.1071319

Cited By: 2

Abstract

Hızlı sanayileşmeyle yıllar içinde, sera gazı emisyonlarının büyük ölçüde artması ve bu gazlar içinde karbondioksitin en yüksek orana sahip olması karbon ayak izinin moda bir kavram değil, bir gerçeklik olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Karbon ayak izi, bir faaliyetin ya da ürünün doğrudan ya da dolaylı olarak sebep olduğu karbondioksit (CO2) emisyonlarının kümülatif miktarı olup, birçok sektörde karbon emisyonlarını belirlemek için bu kavram kullanılmaktadır. Lojistik ve taşımacılık, dünyada en fazla CO2 üreten sektörlerin başında gelmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, kapsamlı ve sistematik bir literatür taraması yoluyla lojistik ve taşımacılık karbon ayak izinin yapısına, sınırlarına ve gelişim eğilimine yönelik kavramsal bir çerçeve sunmaktır. Sistematik literatür çalışmaları bir veya birkaç veri tabanı dikkate alınarak yapılmakta olup, bu çalışmada Web of Science (WoS) veri tabanında yer alan makaleler kullanılmıştır. Çalışma kapsamında WoS veri tabanından ilk arama sonucu 373 makaleye ulaşılmış, bu çalışmanın dahil etme ve hariç tutma kriterleri olan başlık, özet ve anahtar kelimelerin incelenmesi sonucunda, 24 çalışma örnekleme dahil olmuştur. İncelenen çalışmaların sonucunda lojistik ve taşımacılık karbon ayak izi konusunun 2010'dan itibaren çalışıldığı, çalışmaların çoğunun gelişmiş ülkelerde yayınlandığı, çalışmalarda nicel yöntemlerin daha fazla tercih edildiği ve ağırlıklı olarak vaka analizleri, model ya da yöntem geliştirilerek karbon ayak izinin hesaplanmaya çalışıldığı, konunun yeni olması ve maliyetlerinin nispeten yüksek olması nedeniyle karbon ayak izinin uygulama kısmının sektörde tam olarak oluşturulamadığı, uluslararası lojistik ve taşımacılığın karbon ayak izi ve gelişmekte olan ülkelerde sürdürülebilir lojistik ve taşımacılık karbon ayak izi ile ilgili sınırlı sayıda çalışma olduğu, lojistik ve taşımacılık karbon ayak izinin sosyal etkilerini inceleyen çalışmaların olmadığı bulgusuna varılmıştır. Bu çalışma, araştırma alanındaki üretilen mevcut bilgi ve bulgular hakkında sistematik bir şekilde fikir verebilecek ve gelecekteki araştırmalar için bir rehber görevi görebilecektir.

Keywords

Lojistik, taşımacılık, karbon ayak izi, karbondioksit, sera gazı

Supporting Institution

YOKTUR

Project Number

YOKTUR

Thanks

YOKTUR

Carbon Footprint Of Logistics and Transportation: A Systematic Literature Review

Abstract

The fact that greenhouse gas emissions have greatly increased over the years with rapid industrialization and that carbon dioxide has the highest rate among these gases has revealed that carbon footprint is not a fashionable concept but a reality. Carbon footprint is the cumulative amount of direct or indirect carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from an activity or product, and this concept is used in many industries to determine carbon emissions. Logistics and transportation are among the sectors producing the most CO2 in the world. The purpose of this research is to present a conceptual framework for the structure, limits and development trend of the carbon footprint in logistics and transportation through a comprehensive and systematic literature review. Systematic literature studies are carried out by considering one or more databases, and articles in the Web of Science (WoS) database are used in this study. Within the scope of the study, 373 articles were reached as a result of the first search from the WoS database, and as a result of the examination of the inclusion and exclusion criteria of this study, title, abstract and keywords, 24 studies were included in the sample. As a result of the studies examined, the subject of logistics and transportation carbon footprint has been studied since 2010, most of the studies have been published in developed countries, quantitative methods are preferred more in studies and mainly trying to calculate the carbon footprint by developing case studies, models or methods, since the subject is new and its costs are relatively high, the application part of the carbon footprint could not be fully formed in the sector, there is a restricted edition of studies on the carbon footprint of international logistics and transportation and the carbon footprint of sustainable logistics and transportation in developing countries, it has been found that there are no studies examining the social effects of logistics and transportation carbon footprints. This study will systematically give an idea about the current knowledge and findings produced in the research field and serve as a guide for future research.

Keywords

: Logistics, transportation, carbon footprint, carbon dioxide, greenhouse gas

Project Number

YOKTUR

References

• Amiruddin, S. Z., Hishamuddin, H., Darom, N. A., & Naimin, H. H. (2021). A Case Study of Carbon Emissions from Logistic Activities During Supply Chain Disruptions. Jurnal Kejuruteraan, 33(2), 221-228.
• Aseel, S., Al-Yafei, H., Kucukvar, M., Onat, N. C., Turkay, M., Kazancoglu, Y., ... & Al-Hajri, A. (2021). A model for estimating the carbon footprint of maritime transportation of Liquefied Natural Gas under uncertainty. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 1602-1613.
• Bermeo, J. F., Rodríguez, V. M., & Alvarez, M. J. (2018). Carbon footprint in corporate logistics operations in the food sector. Environmental Quality Management, 27(3), 135-146.
• Bin, L., Jiawei, L., Aiqiang, C., Theodorakis, P. E., Zongsheng, Z., & Jinzhe, Y. (2021). Selection of the cold logistics model based on the carbon footprint of fruits and vegetables in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 130251.
• Candel, J. J. (2014). Food security governance: a systematic literature review. Food Security, 6(4), 585-601.
• Carrano, A. L., Thorn, B. K., & Woltag, H. (2014). Characterizing the carbon footprint of wood pallet logistics. Forest Products Journal, 64(7-8), 232-241.
• Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., & Esposito, E. (2017). Developing the WH2 framework for environmental sustainability in logistics service providers: A taxonomy of green initiatives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 165, 1063-1077.
• Chao, C. C. (2014). Assessment of carbon emission costs for air cargo transportation. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 33, 186-195.
• Chen, R., Zhang, R., & Han, H. (2021). Where has carbon footprint research gone?. Ecological Indicators, 120, 106882.
• Cheng, Y., & Liang, H. E. (2021). Calculation and evaluation of industrial carbon footprint of cotton denim jacket. Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics, 16, 15589250211020387.
• Choudhary, A., Sarkar, S., Settur, S., & Tiwari, M. K. (2015). A carbon market sensitive optimization model for integrated forward–reverse logistics. International Journal of Production Economics, 164, 433-444.
• Craig, A. J., Blanco, E. E., & Sheffi, Y. (2013). Estimating the CO2 intensity of intermodal freight transportation. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 22, 49-53.
• Crippa, M., Guizzardi, D., Solazzo, E., Muntean, M., Schaaf, E., Monforti-Ferrario, F., ... & Vignati, E. (2021). GHG emissions of all world countries–2021 Report. Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
• Denyer, D., & Tranfield, D. (2009). Producing a systematic review.
• Dey, A., LaGuardia, P., & Srinivasan, M. (2011). Building sustainability in logistics operations: a research agenda. Management Research Review.
• Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact?. Scientometrics, 105(3), 1809-1831.
• Ercan, T., Onat, N. C., & Tatari, O. (2016). Investigating carbon footprint reduction potential of public transportation in United States: A system dynamics approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 133, 1260-1276.
• Fenner, A. E., Kibert, C. J., Woo, J., Morque, S., Razkenari, M., Hakim, H., & Lu, X. (2018). The carbon footprint of buildings: A review of methodologies and applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 94, 1142-1152.
• Ghosh, P., Jha, A., & Sharma, R. R. K. (2020). Managing carbon footprint for a sustainable supply chain: a systematic literature review. Modern Supply Chain Research and Applications.
• Guo, Y. C., & Wang, W. Y. (2014). Study on Carbon Footprint of Container Transportation System. In Advanced Materials Research, Trans Tech Publications Ltd, 869, 958-962.
• Herold, D. M., & Lee, K. H. (2017). Carbon management in the logistics and transportation sector: An overview and new research directions. Carbon Management, 8(1), 79-97.
• https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/7f8aed40-89af-4348-be19 c8a67df0b9ea/Energy_Technology_Perspectives_2020_PDF.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 10.12.2021)
• https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2021/10/20211007-7.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 17.12.2021)
• https://ourworldindata.org/co2-emissions-from-transport, (Erişim Tarihi: 08.12.2021)
• https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 13.12.2021)
• https://www.iea.org/reports/tracking-transport-2020, (Erişim Tarihi: 07.12.2021)
• Huang, H. (2010, November). A study of developing Chinese low carbon logistics in the new railway period. In 2010 International Conference on E-Product E-Service and E-Entertainment (pp. 1-4). IEEE.
• Huang, L., Liao, Q., Yan, J., Liang, Y., & Zhang, H. (2021). Carbon footprint of oil products pipeline transportation. Science of the Total Environment, 783, 146906.
• Hubacek, K., Baiocchi, G., Feng, K., Castillo, R. M., Sun, L., & Xue, J. (2017). Global carbon inequality. Energy, Ecology and Environment, 2(6), 361-369.
• Jaegler, A., & Gondran, N. (2013, May). How to reduce the carbon footprint of road freight on supply chains?. In 2013 International Conference on Advanced Logistics and Transport (pp. 104-109). IEEE.
• Kaack, L. H., Vaishnav, P., Morgan, M. G., Azevedo, I. L., & Rai, S. (2018). Decarbonizing intraregional freight systems with a focus on modal shift. Environmental Research Letters, 13(8), 083001.
• Kannan, D., Diabat, A., Alrefaei, M., Govindan, K., & Yong, G. (2012). A carbon footprint based reverse logistics network design model. Resources, conservation and recycling, 67, 75-79.
• Karwacka, M., Ciurzyńska, A., Lenart, A., & Janowicz, M. (2020). Sustainable Development in the Agri-Food Sector in Terms of the Carbon Footprint: A Review. Sustainability, 12(16), 6463.
• Konieczny, P., Dobrucka, R., & Mroczek, E. (2013). Usıng Carbon Footprınt to Evaluate Envıronmental Issues Of Food Transportatıon. LogForum, 9(1).
• Kortetmäki, T. (2016). Reframing climate justice: A three-dimensional view on just climate negotiations. Ethics, Policy & Environment, 19(3), 320-334.
• Kulkarni, S. D. (2019). A bottom up approach to evaluate the carbon footprints of a higher educational institute in India for sustainable existence. Journal of cleaner production, 231, 633-641.
• Leonardi, J., & Browne, M. (2010). A method for assessing the carbon footprint of maritime freight transport: European case study and results. International Journal of Logistics: research and applications, 13(5), 349-358.
• Lewis, A. (2016). Towards a Harmonized Framework for Calculating Logistics Carbon Footprint. In Sustainable Logistics and Supply Chains (pp. 163-181). Springer, Cham.
• Li, L., Yang, Y., & Qin, G. (2019). Optimization of integrated inventory routing problem for cold chain logistics considering carbon footprint and carbon regulations. Sustainability, 11(17), 4628.
• Li, Y., Tan, W., & Sha, R. (2016). The empirical study on the optimal distribution route of minimum carbon footprint of the retail industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 4237-4246.
• Liang, C. C., & Lee, J. P. (2018). Carbon footprint model for reverse logistics of waste disposal in interior design industry. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics.
• Liljestrand, K., Christopher, M., & Andersson, D. (2015). Using a transport portfolio framework to reduce carbon footprint. The International Journal of Logistics Management.
• Lim, S., Pettit, S., Abouarghoub, W., & Beresford, A. (2019). Port sustainability and performance: A systematic literature review. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 72, 47-64.
• Ma, F., Wang, W., Sun, Q., Liu, F., & Li, X. (2018). Ecological pressure of carbon footprint in passenger transport: Spatio-temporal changes and regional disparities. Sustainability, 10(2), 317.
• Massai, L. (2010). The long way to the Copenhagen accord: Climate change negotiations in 2009. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 19(1), 104-121.
• Matuštík, J., & Kočí, V. (2021). What is a footprint? A conceptual analysis of environmental footprint indicators. Journal of Cleaner Production, 285, 124833.
• Piecyk, M. I., & McKinnon, A. C. (2010). Forecasting the carbon footprint of road freight transport in 2020. International Journal of Production Economics, 128(1), 31-42.
• Pittaway, L., Robertson, M., Munir, K., Denyer, D., & Neely, A. (2004). Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence. International journal of management reviews, 5(3‐4), 137-168.
• Pizzol, M. (2019). Deterministic and stochastic carbon footprint of intermodal ferry and truck freight transport across Scandinavian routes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 224, 626-636.
• Qu, X., & Li, B. (2013). An Estimation Method of the Carbon Footprint in Manufacturing Logistics Systems. In LTLGB 2012 (pp. 657-663). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
• Raza, M. S., Khahro, S. H., Memon, S. A., Ali, T. H., & Memon, N. A. (2021). Global trends in research on carbon footprint of buildings during 1971–2021: a bibliometric investigation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(44), 63227-63236.
• Reddy, K. N., Kumar, A., & Ballantyne, E. E. (2019). A three-phase heuristic approach for reverse logistics network design incorporating carbon footprint. International Journal of Production Research, 57(19), 6090-6114.
• Ridhosari, B., & Rahman, A. (2020). Carbon footprint assessment at Universitas Pertamina from the scope of electricity, transportation, and waste generation: toward a green campus and promotion of environmental sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 246, 119172.
• Rizan, C., Steinbach, I., Nicholson, R., Lillywhite, R., Reed, M., & Bhutta, M. F. (2020). The carbon footprint of surgical operations: a systematic review. Annals of Surgery, 272(6), 986-995.
• Rogelj, J., Den Elzen, M., Höhne, N., Fransen, T., Fekete, H., Winkler, H., ... & Meinshausen, M. (2016). Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 C. Nature, 534(7609), 631-639.
• Saenz, J., Figliozzi, M., & Faulin, J. (2016). Assessment of the carbon footprint reductions of tricycle logistics services. Transportation Research Record, 2570(1), 48-56.
• Sarkar, B., Guchhait, R., Sarkar, M., & Cárdenas-Barrón, L. E. (2019). How does an industry manage the optimum cash flow within a smart production system with the carbon footprint and carbon emission under logistics framework?. International Journal of Production Economics, 213, 243-257.
• Shaharudin, M. S., & Fernando, Y. (2015). Low carbon footprint: The supply chain agenda in Malaysian manufacturing firms. In Promoting Sustainable Practices through Energy Engineering and Asset Management (pp. 324-347). IGI Global.
• Shaw, K., Irfan, M., Shankar, R. and Yadav, S.S. (2016), Low carbon chance constrained supply chain network design problem: a Benders decomposition based approach, Computers and Industrial Engineering, 98, 483-497.
• Shi, S., & Yin, J. (2021). Global research on carbon footprint: A scientometric review. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 89, 106571.
• Sun, Q. (2017). Research on the influencing factors of reverse logistics carbon footprint under sustainable development. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(29), 22790-22798.
• Tian, Z., Huo, L., Shen, G., & Li, Z. (2015). Analysis on the Base Model of Low Carbon Logistics. In LISS 2013 (pp. 509-514). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
• UNFCCC, F. (2015). Historic Paris Agreement on Climate Change–195 Nations Set Path to Keep Temperature Rise Well Below 2 Degrees Celsius.
• Ülkü, M. A. (2012). Dare to care: Shipment consolidation reduces not only costs, but also environmental damage. International Journal of Production Economics, 139(2), 438-446.
• Val, S., Royo, B., & Ciprés, C. (2019). Carbon Footprint Accounting in Freight Transport: Training Needs. In Towards User-Centric Transport in Europe (pp. 223-236). Springer, Cham.
• Wang, Q., & Waltman, L. (2016). Large-scale analysis of the accuracy of the journal classification systems of Web of Science and Scopus. Journal of informetrics, 10(2), 347-364.
• Wang, S., & Notteboom, T. (2014). The adoption of liquefied natural gas as a ship fuel: A systematic review of perspectives and challenges. Transport Reviews, 34(6), 749-774.
• Wang, S., Tao, F., & Shi, Y. (2018). Optimization of location–routing problem for cold chain logistics considering carbon footprint. International journal of environmental research and public health, 15(1), 86.
• Wang, Y. Q., Zhou, Y., & Zhang, R. (2017). A review of the research methods on influencing factors of carbon emissions and carbon footprint. Environmental Engineering, 35, 155-159.
• Watson, R. T. (2015). Beyond being systematic in literature reviews in IS. Journal of Information Technology, 30(2), 185-187.
• Weidema, B. P., Thrane, M., Christensen, P., Schmidt, J., & Løkke, S. (2008). Carbon footprint: a catalyst for life cycle assessment?. Journal of industrial Ecology, 12(1), 3-6.
• Wiedmann, T. (2009). Editorial: carbon footprint and input-output analysis. Economic Systems Research, 21, 175-186.
• Wiedmann, T., & Minx, J. (2008). A definition of ‘carbon footprint’. Ecological economics research trends, 1, 1-11.
• Witting, H. (2015). Standards as a controlling mechanism: Methods and effects of carbon footprinting in the logistic sector. Zeıtschrıft fur Wırtschaftsgeographıe, 59(2), 102-114.
• Wong, E. Y., Tai, A. H., & Zhou, E. (2018). Optimising truckload operations in third-party logistics: a carbon footprint perspective in volatile supply chain. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 63, 649-661.
• Zhang, C. Y., Jiang, P. Y., & Li, W. D. (2016). Sustainability Evaluation of Process Logistics Schemes in Workshop Based on Carbon Footprint and Adaptability. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management 2015 (pp. 261-272). Atlantis Press, Paris.
• Zhiyong, T., Lingyu, H., & Guicheng, S. (2014). Carbon footprint and order quantity in logistics. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management (JIEM), 7(2), 475-490.