Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2021, Issue: 2, 1 - 15, 25.10.2021

Abstract

Theatricality, as a methodological basis of Deleuze’s theory, insinuates a new thought of Being/beings by emancipating philosophy from its anthropological orientation. Despite the fact that the phenomenological methodologies attempted to link the transcendental with the empirical domain, the source of reflexivity was still the subject. Deleuze’s ontological repetition maintains the infinite reflection of the transcendental and the empirical domains into each other, yet it posits the symbolic order as the third order where the infinite reflexive expansion between concept and matter becomes immanently transcended. By taking this formulation as its point of departure, this article analyzes how Deleuze’s notion of theatricality operates as the self-reflexive and excessive origin of thought.

Keywords: Philosophical Architectonics, Theatricality, Onto-TopologActiony, Action-Thought, Repetition

References

  • Badiou, A. (1994). Gilles Deleuze, The Fold: Leibniz and the Baroque. In C. V. Boundas & D. Olkowski (Eds.), Gilles Deleuze and the Theater of Philosophy (pp. 51-69). New York, NY: Routledge Press.
  • Badiou, A. (2006). Being and Event (O. Feltham, Trans). London: Continuum.
  • Brewer, M. M. (1985). Performing theory. Theatre Journal, 37, 13-30.
  • Cache, B. (1995). Earth Moves (A. Boyman, Trans). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  • Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and Repetition. (P. Patton, Trans). New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Deleuze, G. (1997). One Less Manifesto. In T. Murray (Ed.), Mimesis, Masochism, and Mime: The Politics of Theatricality in Contemporary French Thought (pp. 239-259). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
  • Deleuze, G. (2004). How Do We Recognize Structuralism? In D. Lapoujade (Ed.), Desert Islands and Other Texts. (pp. 170-193). Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).
  • Deleuze, G. (1986). The Movement-Image (H. Tomlinson & B. Habberjam, Trans). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Deleuze, G. (1989). The Time-Image (H. Tomlinson & R. Galeta, Trans). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Deleuze, G. (2009). Foucault (S. Hand, Trans). Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.
  • Deleuze, G. (1992). The Fold: Leibniz and the Baroque (T. Conley, Trans). Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.
  • Deleuze, G. (1967). The method of dramatization. Bulletin de la Société française de Philosophie, LXII, 89-118.
  • Foucault, M. (1997). Theatrum Philosophicum. In T. Murray (Ed.), Mimesis, Masochism, and Mime: The Politics of Theatricality in Contemporary French Thought (pp. 216-239). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
  • Hegel, G. W. F. (2010). The Science of Logic (G. Giovanni, Trans). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Karatani, K. (1995). Architecture as Metaphor: Language, Number, Money (S. Kohso, Trans). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  • Murray, T. (1997). Introduction: The Mise-en-Scene of the Cultural. In T. Murray (Ed.), Mimesis, Masochism, and Mime: The Politics of Theatricality in Contemporary French Thought (pp. 1-27). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
  • Rodowick, D.N. (1997). Gilles Deleuze`s Time Machine. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

Philosophical Architectonics and Theatricality in Gilles Deleuze’s Theory

Year 2021, Issue: 2, 1 - 15, 25.10.2021

Abstract

Theatricality, as a methodological basis of Deleuze’s theory, insinuates a new thought of Being/beings by emancipating philosophy from its anthropological orientation. Despite the fact that the phenomenological methodologies attempted to link the transcendental with the empirical domain, the source of reflexivity was still the subject. Deleuze’s ontological repetition maintains the infinite reflection of the transcendental and the empirical domains into each other, yet it posits the symbolic order as the third order where the infinite reflexive expansion between concept and matter becomes immanently transcended. By taking this formulation as its point of departure, this article analyzes how Deleuze’s notion of theatricality operates as the self-reflexive and excessive origin of thought.
Keywords: Philosophical Architectonics, Theatricality, Onto-TopologActiony, Action-Thought, Repetition

References

  • Badiou, A. (1994). Gilles Deleuze, The Fold: Leibniz and the Baroque. In C. V. Boundas & D. Olkowski (Eds.), Gilles Deleuze and the Theater of Philosophy (pp. 51-69). New York, NY: Routledge Press.
  • Badiou, A. (2006). Being and Event (O. Feltham, Trans). London: Continuum.
  • Brewer, M. M. (1985). Performing theory. Theatre Journal, 37, 13-30.
  • Cache, B. (1995). Earth Moves (A. Boyman, Trans). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  • Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and Repetition. (P. Patton, Trans). New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Deleuze, G. (1997). One Less Manifesto. In T. Murray (Ed.), Mimesis, Masochism, and Mime: The Politics of Theatricality in Contemporary French Thought (pp. 239-259). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
  • Deleuze, G. (2004). How Do We Recognize Structuralism? In D. Lapoujade (Ed.), Desert Islands and Other Texts. (pp. 170-193). Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).
  • Deleuze, G. (1986). The Movement-Image (H. Tomlinson & B. Habberjam, Trans). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Deleuze, G. (1989). The Time-Image (H. Tomlinson & R. Galeta, Trans). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Deleuze, G. (2009). Foucault (S. Hand, Trans). Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.
  • Deleuze, G. (1992). The Fold: Leibniz and the Baroque (T. Conley, Trans). Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.
  • Deleuze, G. (1967). The method of dramatization. Bulletin de la Société française de Philosophie, LXII, 89-118.
  • Foucault, M. (1997). Theatrum Philosophicum. In T. Murray (Ed.), Mimesis, Masochism, and Mime: The Politics of Theatricality in Contemporary French Thought (pp. 216-239). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
  • Hegel, G. W. F. (2010). The Science of Logic (G. Giovanni, Trans). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Karatani, K. (1995). Architecture as Metaphor: Language, Number, Money (S. Kohso, Trans). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  • Murray, T. (1997). Introduction: The Mise-en-Scene of the Cultural. In T. Murray (Ed.), Mimesis, Masochism, and Mime: The Politics of Theatricality in Contemporary French Thought (pp. 1-27). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
  • Rodowick, D.N. (1997). Gilles Deleuze`s Time Machine. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
There are 17 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Özüm Hatipoğlu 0000-0002-9532-6745

Publication Date October 25, 2021
Published in Issue Year 2021 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Hatipoğlu, Ö. (2021). Philosophical Architectonics and Theatricality in Gilles Deleuze’s Theory. Kilikya Felsefe Dergisi(2), 1-15.
AMA Hatipoğlu Ö. Philosophical Architectonics and Theatricality in Gilles Deleuze’s Theory. KFD. October 2021;(2):1-15.
Chicago Hatipoğlu, Özüm. “Philosophical Architectonics and Theatricality in Gilles Deleuze’s Theory”. Kilikya Felsefe Dergisi, no. 2 (October 2021): 1-15.
EndNote Hatipoğlu Ö (October 1, 2021) Philosophical Architectonics and Theatricality in Gilles Deleuze’s Theory. Kilikya Felsefe Dergisi 2 1–15.
IEEE Ö. Hatipoğlu, “Philosophical Architectonics and Theatricality in Gilles Deleuze’s Theory”, KFD, no. 2, pp. 1–15, October 2021.
ISNAD Hatipoğlu, Özüm. “Philosophical Architectonics and Theatricality in Gilles Deleuze’s Theory”. Kilikya Felsefe Dergisi 2 (October 2021), 1-15.
JAMA Hatipoğlu Ö. Philosophical Architectonics and Theatricality in Gilles Deleuze’s Theory. KFD. 2021;:1–15.
MLA Hatipoğlu, Özüm. “Philosophical Architectonics and Theatricality in Gilles Deleuze’s Theory”. Kilikya Felsefe Dergisi, no. 2, 2021, pp. 1-15.
Vancouver Hatipoğlu Ö. Philosophical Architectonics and Theatricality in Gilles Deleuze’s Theory. KFD. 2021(2):1-15.