Saldırganlık ve Sosyal Davranış Ölçeği Uyarlama Çalışması

Year 2022, Volume: 4 Issue: 3, 242 - 252, 27.09.2022

Seda Erzi

Abstract

Bu çalışma, farklı örneklemlerde, Saldırganlık ve Sosyal Davranış Ölçeği’nin (SSDÖ) uyarlamasının psikometrik özelliklerini incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu çalışmada, SSDÖ’nün psikometrik özelliklerini test etmek için yetişkin örneklemi (n = 781) ve öğrenci (n = 446) örneklemi olmak üzere iki ayrı ve bağımsız örneklem kullanılmıştır. SSDÖ’nün yapı geçerliliğini test etmek için Çalışma 1'deki yetişkin örnekleminde açımlayıcı faktör analizi yapılmıştır. Çalışma 2'deki öğrenci örneklemi üzerinde ise doğrulayıcı faktör analizi yapılmıştır. Ölçeğin güvenirliği, iç tutarlılık ve madde- toplam korelasyon katsayıları incelenmiştir. SSDÖ’nün, ölçüt geçerliliği, Saldırganlık, Mağduriyet, Prososyal Davranış ve Ayrıcalık alt ölçeklerinin dürtüsellik, duygusal ihmal ve istismar, perspektif alma, fiziksel ve sözel saldırganlık, düşmanlık ve öfke değişkenleri ile anlamlı düzeyde korelasyonların ortaya konmasıyla desteklenmiştir. Dört faktörlü çözüm modeli öğrenci örneği için yeterli uyumu ortaya koymaktadır. Çalışmanın sonuçları ilgili literatür kapsamında tartışılmıştır. Gelecekteki çalışmalar için önerilerden ve mevcut çalışmanın sınırlılıklarından bahsedilmektedir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: saldırganlık, mağduriyet, olumlu sosyal davranış, geçerlik, güvenirlik

Keywords

saldırganlık, mağduriyet, olumlu sosyal davranış, geçerlik, güvenirlik

AdaptationStudy of the Self-Report Aggression and Social Behavior Measure (SRASBM)

Abstract

This study aims to examine psychometric properties of adapted version of the Self-Report Aggression and Social Behavior Measure (SRASBM) in different Turkish samples. In order to test the psychometric properties of the SRASBM two separate and independent samples are used in this study, namely community sample of adults (n = 781) and student sample (n = 446). For testing the construct validity of SRASBM, exploratory factor analysis is performed on community sample of adults in Study 1. Further, confirmatory factor analysis is performed on student sample in Study 2. Concerning the reliability of the scale, internal consistency and item-total correlation coefficients have been examined. Concurrent validity of the scale is supported by revealing the significant associations of Aggression, Victimization, Prosocial Behavior and Exclusivity subscales of SRASBM with impulsivity, emotional neglect and abuse, perspective taking, physical and verbal aggression, hostility and anger. Four-factor solution model reveals adequate fit for the student sample. Results of the study are discussed within the scope of relevant literature. Limitations and suggestions for future studies are mentioned.
Keywords: aggression, victimization, prosocial behavior, validity, reliability

Keywords

aggression, victimization, prosocial behavior, validity, reliability

References

• Arnett, J. J. (2003). Conceptions of the transition to adulthood among emerging adults in American ethnic groups. New directions for child and adolescent development, 2003(100), 63-76. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.75
• Austrian, S. G. (Ed.). (2008). Developmental theories through the life cycle. Columbia University Press.
• Bailey, C. A. ve Ostrov, J. M. (2008). Differentiating forms and functions of aggression in emerging adults: Associations with hostile attribution biases and normative beliefs. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37(6), 713-722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-007-9211-5
• Bayraktar, F., Kindap, Y., Kumru, A. ve Sayıl, M. (2010). Olumlu Sosyal ve Saldırgan Davranışlar Ölçeği'nin ergen örnekleminde psikometrik açıdan incelenmesi. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 13 (26), 1-13.
• Bellmore, A. D. ve Cillessen, A. H. (2006). Reciprocal influences of victimization, perceived social preference, and self-concept in adolescence. Self and Identity, 5(3), 209-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860600636647
• Bennett, D. C., Guran, E. L., Ramos, M. C. ve Margolin, G. (2011). College students’ electronic victimization in friendships and dating relationships: Anticipated distress and associations with risky behaviors. Violence and victims, 26(4), 410-429. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.26.4.410
• Bernstein, D. P., Stein, J. A., Newcomb, M. D., Walker, E., Pogge, D., Ahluvalıa, T.,…... Zule, W. (2003). Development and validation of a brief screening version of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire. Child abuse ve neglect, 27(2), 169-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(02)00541-0
• Blakely-Mcclure, S. J. ve Ostrov, J. M. (2016). Relational aggression, victimization and self concept: Testing pathways from middle childhood to adolescence. Journal of youth and adolescence, 45(2), 376-390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0357-2
• Boxer, P., Tisak, M. S. ve Goldstein, S. E. (2004). Is it bad to be good? An exploration of aggressive and prosocial behavior subtypes in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 33(2). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOYO.0000013421.02015.
• Buhs, E. S. ve Ladd, G. W. (2001). Peer rejection as antecedent of young children’s school adjustment: An examination of mediating processes. Developmental Psychology, 37, 550–560. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.37.4.550
• Buss, A. H. ve Perry, M. (1992). The aggression questionnaire. Journal of personality and social psychology, 63(3), 452-459.
• Cima, M., Raine, A., Meesters, C. ve Popma, A. (2013). Validation of the Dutch Reactive Proactive Questionnaire (RPQ): Differential correlates of reactive and proactive aggression from childhood to adulthood. Aggressive Behavior, 39(2), 99-113. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21458
• Costello, A. B. ve Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical assessment, research, and evaluation, 10(1), 1-9.
• Crick, N. R. ve Dodge, K. A. (1996). Social information processing mechanisms in reactive and proactive aggression. Child development, 67(3), 993-1002. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01778.x
• Çelik, H. ve Kocabıyık, O. O. (2014). Genç yetişkinlerin saldırganlık ifade biçimlerinin cinsiyet ve bilişsel duygu düzenleme tarzları bağlamında incelenmesi. Trakya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(1), 139-155.
• Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113– 126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113
• Dodge, K. A., Coie, J. D. ve Lynam, D. (2006). Aggression and antisocial behavior in youth. W. Damon ve R. M. Lerner, (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (6. Baskı, s. 718- 788 ) içinde. New York: John Wiley.
• Dodge, K. A., Lochman, J. E., Harnish, J. D., Bates, J. E. ve Pettit, G. S. (1997). Reactive and proactive aggression in school children and psychiatrically impaired chronically assaultive youth. Journal of abnormal psychology, 106(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.106.1.37
• Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A. ve Spinrad, T. L. (2006). Prosocial development. W. Damon ve R. M. Lerner, (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (6. Baskı, s. 646-718 ) içinde. New York: John Wiley.
• Goldstein, S. E., Chesir-Teran, D. ve Mcfaul, A. (2008). Profiles and correlates of relational aggression in young adults’ romantic relationships. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37(3), 251-265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-007-9255-6
• Grotpeter, J. K. ve Crick, N. R. (1996). Relational aggression, overt aggression, and friendship. Child development, 67(5), 2328-2338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 8624.1996.tb01860.x
• Hanish, L. D. ve Guerra, N. G. (2002). A longitudinal analysis of patterns of adjustment following peer victimization. Development and psychopathology, 14(1), 69-89. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579402001049
• Hu, L. ve Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cut off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis:Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
• Kawabata, Y., Youngblood, J., ve Hamaguchi, Y. (2014). Preadolescents' borderline personality features in a nonWestern urban context: Concurrent and Longitudinal associations with physical and relational aggression, friendship exclusivity and peer victimization. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 17(3), 219-228. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12067
• Kumru, A., Carlo, G. ve Edwards, C. P. (2004). Relational, cultural, cognitive, and affective predictors of prosocial behaviors. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 19, 109-125.
• Kumru, A., Carlo, G., Mestre, M. V. ve Samper, P. (2012). Prosocial moral reasoning and prosocial behavior among Turkish and Spanish adolescents. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 40(2), 205-214. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2012.40.2.205
• Kurtyılmaz, Y., Can, G. ve Ceyhan, A. A. (2017). Üniversite öğrencilerinin ilişkise saldırganlık ile benlik saygısı, sosyal bağlılık ve sosyal kaygı düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkiler. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 7(47), 33-52
• Leadbeater, B. J., Banister, E. M., Ellis, W. E. ve Yeung, R. (2008). Victimization and relational aggression in adolescent romantic relationships: The influence of parental and peer behaviors, and individual adjustment. Journal of youth and adolescence, 37(3), 359-372.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-007-9269-0
• Linder, J. R., Crick, N. R. ve Collins, W. A. (2002). Relational aggression and victimization in young adults' romantic relationships: Associations with perceptions of parent, peer, and romantic relationship quality. Social Development, 11(1), 69-86. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00187
• Madran, H. A. D. (2012). Buss-Perry saldırganlık ölçeği’nin Türkçe formunun geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 24(2), 1-6.
• Morales, J. R. ve Crick, N. R. (1998). Self-report measure of aggression and victimization. Unpublished measure.
• Murray-Close, D., Ostrov, J. M. ve Crick, N. R. (2007). A short-term longitudinal study of growth of relational aggression during middle childhood: Associations with gender, friendship intimacy, and internalizing problems. Development and Psychopathology, 19(1), 187-203. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579407070101
• Murray-Close, D., Ostrov, J. M., Nelson, D. A., Crick, N. R. ve Coccaro, E. F. (2010). Proactive, reactive, and romantic relational aggression in adulthood: measurement, predictive validity, gender differences, and association with Intermittent Explosive Disorder. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 44, 393–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2009.09.005
• Onur, B. (1997). Gelişim Psikolojisi Yetişkinlik Yaşlılık Ölüm. 4.Baskı. İmge Kitapevi. Ankara.
• Ostrov, J. M. (2008). Forms of aggression and peer victimization during early childhood: A short-term longitudinal study. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-007-9179-3
• Ostrov, J. M. (2010). Prospective associations between peer victimization an aggression. Child Development, 81(6), 1670-1677. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01501.x
• Ostrov, J. M., Hart, E. J., Kamper, K. E. ve Godleski, S. A. (2011). Relational aggression in women during emerging adulthood: A social process model. Behavioral Sciences ve the Law, 29(5), 695-710. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.1002
• Ostrov, J. M. ve Houston, R. J. (2008). The utility of forms and functions of aggression in emerging adulthood: Association with personality disorder symptomatology. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37(9), 1147-1158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-008-9289-4
• Patton, J. H., Stanford, M. S. ve Barratt, E. S. (1995). Factor structure of the Barratt impulsiveness scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51,768-774. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679
• Santrock, J. (2017). Ergenlik (14. Basım). (D. M. Siyez, çeviri edtörü: Prof. Dr. Didem Müge SİYEZ, Nobel Yayınevi, Ankara.
• Shaffer, D. R. (2009). Social and Personality Development. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. Cengage learning.
• Storch, E. A., Bagner, D. M., Geffken, G. R. ve Baumeıster, A. L. (2004). Association between overt and relational aggression and psychosocial adjustment in undergraduate college students. Violence and victims, 19(6), 689-700. https://doi.org/10.1891/vivi.19.6.689.66342
• Tabachnick, B. G. ve Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th Ed.), New Jersey: Pearson Education.
• Tamam, L., Güleç, H. ve Karataş, G. (2013). Barratt Dürtüsellik Ölçegi Kisa Formu (BIS-11- KF) Türkçe Uyarlama Çalismasi/Short Form of Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11SF) Turkish Adaptation Study. Noro-Psikyatri Arsivi, 50(2), 130-137.
• Thompson, M. P., Swartout, K. M. ve Koss, M. P. (2013). Trajectories and predictors of sexually aggressive behaviors during emerging adulthood. Psychology of violence, 3(3), 247-259. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030624
• Werner, N. E. ve Crick, N. R. (1999). Relational aggression and social-psychologica adjustment in a college sample. Journal of abnormal psychology, 108(4), 615-623. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.108.4.615
• Yeung, R. S. ve Leadbeater, B. J. (2007). Does hostile attributional bias for relational provocations mediate the short-term association between relational victimization and aggression in preadolescence? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36(8), 973-983. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-006-9162-2