İngilizceyi yabancı dil olarak öğrenen öğrencilerin algıladıkları özerklik düzeyi ve bunun akademik başarıyla ilişkisi üzerine nitel bir durum çalışması

Year 2024, Issue: 4, 14 - 23, 31.07.2024

Raşide Dağ Akbaş

Abstract

Bu vaka çalışması, yabancı dil olarak İngilizce (EFL) öğrenen öğrencilerinin kendi algıladıkları öğrenen özerkliğini ve bunun akademik başarıyla ilişkisini incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Örneklemi Türkiye'nin kuzeydoğusundaki köklü bir üniversitenin İngiliz Dili ve Edebiyatı Bölümü'nde öğrenim gören toplam 8 öğrenci oluşturmuştur. Veriler yarı yapılandırılmış yüz yüze görüşmeler yoluyla elde edilmiştir. Araştırma, özerk olduğunu düşünen öğrencilerin akademik başarılarının daha yüksek olduğuna işaret etmiştir. Bulgular ayrıca öğrencilerin, öğrenen özerkliği düzeyleri ile akademik başarıları arasında güçlü bir ilişki olabileceğinin farkında olduklarını gösterdi. Öğrencilere fırsat verildiği sürece öğrencilerin özerk ve başarılı olma potansiyeline sahip olduğu sonucuna varılmaktadır.

Keywords

Öğrenen özerkliği, akademik başarı, İngilizce, Yabancı dil

Ethical Statement

Söz konusu araştırmanın bütün aşamalarında etik ilkeler gözetilmiş ancak bu araştırma 2010-2011 yılları arasında yürütülen yazara ait yüksek lisans tezinin nitel kısımına odaklanmaktadır ve o yıllarda yürütüldüğünden etik kurul raporu bulunmamaktadır.

Supporting Institution

Yok

Thanks

Araştırmada katkı sağlayan bütün katılımcılara teşekkür ederiz.

A qualitative case study on EFL students’ self-perceived level of autonomy and its relation to academic achievement

Abstract

This case study attempts to investigate English as a foreign language (EFL) students’ self-perceived learner autonomy and its relation to academic achievement. The sample consisted of a total of 8 students attending the Department of English Language and Literature at a major university in northeastern Turkey. The data were obtained via semi-structured face-to-face interviews. The study indicated that the students who claim to be autonomous seem to have higher academic achievement. The findings also pointed out that the students were aware that there might strong relationship between their level of learner autonomy and their academic achievement. It concludes that as long as students are given an opportunity, students have the potential of being autonomous and successful accordingly.

Keywords

learner autonomy, academic achievement, English, language learner, foreign language

Ethical Statement

The current paper was produced from the Master thesis prepared by the Author in the years between 2010 and 2011 when no ethical approval form was required from the institution/publishers.

Supporting Institution

None

Thanks

The author thanks the participants of the study for their volunteer participation and contributions.

References

• Balçıkanlı, C. Promoting learner autonomy through activities at Gazi University preparatory school. (Unpublished Master Thesis). Gazi University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara. 2006.
• Bayat, Ö. The relationship between Autonomy perception and the reading comprehension achievement of English language learners. Eğitim Araştırmaları-Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 42, 2011, 15-28.
• Benson, P. Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. Malaysia: Pearson. 2001.
• Bouchard, P. Some factors to consider when designing semi-autonomous learning environments. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 7(2), 2009, 93-100.
• Camilleri, G. (Ed.) Learner autonomy, teacher autonomy and school autonomy, learner autonomy: Teachers’ views. Germany: European Center of Modern Language Council of Europe. 1999.
• Chan, V. Autonomous language learning: the teachers’ perspectives. Teaching in Higher Education, 8(1), 2003, 33-54.
• Chanock, K. Autonomy and Responsibility: same or different? In Reinders, H., Anderson, H., Hobbs, M., & Jones-Parry, J. (Eds.), (2003), Supporting independent learning in the 21st century. Proceedings of the inaugural conference of the independent learning association, Melbourne AUS. Auckland: Independent Learning Association Oceania. Retrieved from http://independentlearning.org/ILA/ila03/ila03_ chanock.pdf?q=ila03/ila03_chanock.pdf. 2004.
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. Research methods in education (6th ed.). New York: Routledge. 2007. Cotterall, S. Readiness for autonomy: Investigating learner beliefs. System, 23(2), 1995, 195-205. Çubukçu, F. Learner autonomy, self-regulation and metacognition. International Journal of Elementary Education, 2(1), 2009, 53-64.
• Dickinson, L. Self-instruction in language learning. Great Britain: Cambridge. 1987.
• Dickinson, L. Talking shop: Aspects of autonomous learning. ELT Journal, 47(4), 1993, 330-336.
• Gonzales, D., & St. Louis, R. The use of web 2.0 tools to promote learner autonomy. Independence, 43, 28-32. Retrieved from http://learnerautonomy.org/gonzalezstlouis. pdf. 2008.
• Holec, H. Autonomy in foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon. 1981.
• Lamb, T., & Reinders, H. (Eds.). Learner and teacher autonomy: Concepts, realities, and responses. Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing. 2008.
• Little, D. Learner Autonomy 1: Definitions, issues and problems, Dublin: Authentik. 1991.
• Little, D. Language learner autonomy and the European language portfolio: Two L2 English examples. Language Teaching, 42(2), 2009, 222-233.
• Macia, E. A., Ramos, C. R., Cervera, A. S., & Fuentes, C. B. Developing learner autonomy through a Virtual EAP Course at University. Retrieved from http://www.publicacions.ub.es/revistes/bells12/articulos. asp?codart=30. 2010.
• Murase, F. Operationalising the construct of learner autonomy: A preliminary study for developing a new measure of language learner autonomy. In M. Carroll, D. Castillo, L. Cooker, & K. Irie (Eds.), Proceedings of the ındependent learning association 2007 Japan conference (online): Exploring theory, enhancing practice: Autonomy across the disciplines. Chiba, Japan: Kanda University of International Studies. Retrieved from http://independentlearning.org/ILA/ila07/files/ILA2007_ 027.pdf. 2007.
• Palfreyman, D., & Smith, R. C. (Eds.). Learner autonomy across cultures: Language education perspectives. Great Britain: Palgrave Macmillan. 2003.
• Paran, A., & Sercu, L. Testing the untestable in language education. USA: Multilingual Matters. 2010.
• Reinders, H. “Do It Yourself? A Learners’ Perspective on Learner Autonomy and Self-Access Language Learning in an English Proficiency Programme”. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED477552.pdf. 2000.
• Scharle, A., & Szabo, A. Learner autonomy: A guide to developing learner responsibility. UK: Cambridge University Press. 2000.
• Schmenk, B. Globalizing Learner Autonomy. TESOL Quarterly, 39(1), 2005, 107-118.
• Spratt, M., Humphreys, G., & Chan, V. Autonomy and motivation: Which comes first? Language Teaching Research, 6(3), 2002, 245-266.
• Sugawara, H. Developing autonomy in lower proficiency students. In M. Carroll, D. Castillo, L. Cooker, & K. Irie (Eds.), Proceedings of the ındependent learning association 2007 Japan conference (online): Exploring theory, enhancing practice: Autonomy across the disciplines. Chiba, Japan: Kanda University of International Studies. Retrieved from http://independentlearning.org/ILA/ila07/files/ILA2007_ 037.pdf. 2007.
• Yen, C.J., & Liu, S. Learner autonomy as a predictor of course success and final grades in community college online courses. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 41(3), 2009, 347-367.