REKLAMA YÖNELİK ŞÜPHECİLİK: ANNE-BABA VE ÇOCUKLARI ARASINDAKİ FARKLAR ÜZERİNE BİR İNCELEME

Year 2016, Volume: 24 Issue: 2, 55 - 73, 01.06.2016

Şafak Şahin , Önder Yönet Hasan Kemal Suher

Abstract

Bu çalışmada Obermiller ve Spangenberg’in 2000 yılındaki araştırmasından hareketle çocukların reklama yönelik şüphecilik düzeyleri, bu düzeylerin ebeveynlerine ve aile içi sosyalleşmeye göre değişip değişmediği incelenmiştir. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre çocukların reklama yönelik şüphecilik düzeylerinin anne ve babalarının reklama yönelik şüphecilik düzeylerine göre değiştiği gözlemlenmiştir. Reklama yönelik şüphecilik noktasında özelikle kız çocukların babaları ile etkileşime geçerken erkek çocukların anneleri ile daha fazla etkileşime geçtiği tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca sosyalleşme ve evden ayrılma durumları açısından bakıldığında çocukların reklama yönelik şüphecilik düzeylerinin anne ve babalarına göre değiştiği görülmüştür

Keywords

Reklam, reklam şüpheciliği

SKEPTICISM TOWARD ADVERTISING: A STUDY ON THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PARENTS AND CHILDREN

Abstract

In this study, acting in accordance with the research of Obermiller and Spangenberg 2000 , children’s levels of skepticism toward advertising were examined. It has also been searched whether these levels vary with their parents’ levels of skepticism toward advertising or socialization in the family. The results have shown that children’s levels of skepticism toward advertising vary with their mothers’ and fathers’ levels of skepticism toward advertising. Furthermore it has been identified that skepticism levels of female children correlate more with that of their fathers, whereas the skepticism levels of male children correlate more with that of their mothers. Besides, when socialization and time away from home are considered, children’s levels of skepticism toward advertising has also been found to vary according to their mothers’ and fathers’ levels of skepticism toward advertising

Keywords

Advertising, advertising skepticism

References

• Babbie, E. (2013). The practice of social research, 13. Baskı. Kanada: Wadsworth.
• Buss, W. C. & Schaninger, C. M. (1987). An overview of dyadic family behavior and sex roles research: a summary of findings and an agenda for future research. Michael Houston (Ed.), Review of Marketing içinde (s. 293-324). Chicago: American Marketing Association.
• Campbell, M. C. (1995). When attention-getting advertising tactics elicit consumer inferences of manipulative intent: The importance of balancing benefits and investments. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 4 (3), 225-254.
• Childers, T. & Rao, A. (1992). The influence of familial and peer-based reference groups on consumer decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(2), 198-211.
• DeVellis F. R. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Ergeç, E. N. (2006). Ad tactics and skepticism. 4th International Symposium Communication in the Millennium, Eskişehir, Türkiye, 14-16 Haziran, 154-164.
• Ergeç, E. N. (2009). Reklama şüpheci yaklaşımın incelenmesi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 18, 172-193.
• Fischer, E. & Amold, S. J. (1990). More than a labor of love: Gender roles and christmas gift shopping. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 1, 333-345.
• Friestad, M. & Wright, P. (1994). The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 1, 1-31.
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis, a global perspective, 7. Baskı. Amerika: Pearson Prentice Hall.
• Huh, J., DeLorme, D & Reid, L (2015). Skepticism toward over-the-counter drug advertising (OTCA): A comparison of older and younger consumers. Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, San Francisco, CA.
• Kanter, D. & Wortzel, L. (1985). Cynicism and alienation as marketing considerations. Some new way to approach the female consumer. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 2, 5-15.
• Lee, M., King, K. W, & Reid, L. N. (2015). Factors influencing consumers' attitudinal and behavioral responses to direct-to-consumer and over-the counter drug advertising. Journal of Health Communication, 20(4), 431-444. .
• McGuire, W. J. (1968). Personality and susceptibility to social influence. E. F. Bargatta & W. W. Lanbert (Ed.), Handbook of Personality Theory and Research içinde (s.171-196). Chicago Rand McNally.
• Moschis, G. (1987). Consumer socialization: A life-cycle perspective. Lexington, MA: DC Heath.
• Nunnally, J. C. (1974). Introduction to Statistics for Psychology and Education. Amerika: McGraw Hill.
• Obermiller, C. & Spangenberg, E. R. (1998). Development of a scale to measure consumer skepticism toward advertising. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7(2), 159-186.
• Obermiller, C. & Spangenberg, E. R. (2000). On the origin and distinctness of skepticism toward advertising. Marketing Letters, 11(4), 311-322.
• Obermiller, C., Spangenberg, E. R., & MacLachlan, D. L. (2005). Ad skepticism-the consequences of disbelief. Journal of Advertising, 34(3), 7-17.
• Pallant, J. (2013). A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS: SPSS survival manual, 5. Baskı. İngiltere: McGraw-Hill.
• Ritchie, R. J. B. (2001). The mutable meaning of ads: Advertising through the eyes of the skeptical consumer. Faculty of Commerce, University of British Columbia. Working Paper-Version.
• Rizvi, S. N. Z., Sami, M., & Gull, S. (2012). Impact of consumer involvement on advertising skepticism a framework to reduce advertising skepticism. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 4-8.
• Robinson, J. P. (1988). Who's doing the housework? American Demographics, 10, 24-28.
• Solomon, M. (1996). Consumer behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Tabachnick, B. G., & L. S. Fidell. (2014). Using multivariate statistics, 6.Baskı. Amerika: Pearson Education.
• Ward, S., Wackman, D. B., & Wartella, E. (1977). How Children Leam to Buy: The Development of Consumer Information Processing Skills. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.