The Impact of Covid 19 on English Language Learners: A Qualitative Case Study

Year 2021, Volume: 4 Issue: 1, 76 - 92, 24.06.2021

Feyza Nur Ekizer

https://doi.org/10.35207/later.915969

Cited By: 2

Abstract

Appearing in early 2020, Covid 19 hit the world. It created great fear and anxiety in almost all countries including Turkey. It also caused significant social, cultural and economic changes in societies. One of the sectors experiencing these changes and difficulties in societies is undoubtedly education. Based on this reality, this study aims to reveal to what extent the distance education caused by Covid 19 affects the attitudes of the students of Necmettin Erbakan University School of Foreign Languages towards English learning and their success. The study was carried out synchronously, in which the lecturer and the 19 English Language Teaching preparatory class students were in communication all the time. It was a qualitative study, and semi-structured interview was used as the tool to collect data. The findings were analyzed in depth making use of interpretive analysis. The biggest drawback of on-line learning was found out to be not having the interaction carried out in a physical classroom. The results showed that the switch to on-line learning can seem challenging both for teachers and for students.

Keywords

covid-19, distance education, students' attitudes, english language learning

References

• Adnan, M. & Anwar, K. (2020). Online learning amid the COVID-19 pandemic: Students' perspectives. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology Volume 2, Issue 1 Bayram, H. & Köktürk, N. et al, (2020). Interference in scientific research on COVID-19 in Turkey. Correspondence Vol 396 Crawford, J., Butler-Henderson, K., Rudolph, J., & Glowatz, M. (2020). COVID-19: 20 countries' higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses. Journal of Applied Teaching and Learning (JALT), 3(1).
• Cucinotta, D., & Vanelli, M. (2020). WHO declares COVID-19 a pandemic. Acta Bio-Medica: Atenei Parmensis, 91(1), 157-160. Davies, J., and Graff, M. (2005). Performance in e-learning: online participation and student grades. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 36, 657–663. doi: 10.1111/j.1467- 8535.2005.00542.x Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research Methods in Applied Linguisitics. Quantitative, Qualitative and Mixed Methodologies, Oxford.
• Harasim, L. (2000). Shift happens: Online education as a new paradigm in learning. Internet and Higher Education, 3, 41-61.
• Kaur, G. (2020). Digital Life: Boon or bane in teaching sector on COVID-19. CLIO an Annual Interdisciplinary Journal of History, 6(6), 416-427.
• Kemp, N. & Grieve, R. (2014). Face-to-face or face-to-screen? Undergraduates' opinions and test performance in classroom vs. Online learning. Frontiers in Pschology.
• Mailizar, Almanthari, A., Maulina, S., & Bruce, S. (2020). Secondary school mathematics teachers’ views on e-learning implementation barriers during the Covid-19 pandemic: The case of Indonesia. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(7), em1860.
• Maloney-Krichmar, D., & Abras, C. (2003). History of emergence of online communities. In K. Christen- sen & D. Levinson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of community: From village to virtual world. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication, 1023-1027.
• Mclsaac, M. S., & Gunawardena, C. N. (1996). Distance education. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communication and technology: A project of the Association for Educational Communication and Technology (pp.403-437). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
• Miles, MB. and Huberman, AM. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis, Sage.
• Moore, M., & Kearsley, G. (2012). Distance education: A systems view of online learning (3rd ed.). Bel- mont, CA: Wadsworth.
• Parker, K., Lenhart, A., & Moore, K. (2011). The digital revolution and higher education: College presidents, public differ on value of online learning. Washington D.C.: Pew Research Center.
• Picciano, A.G., (2002) Beyond Student Perceptions: Issues Of Interaction, Presence and Performance In An Online Course. JALN Volume 6, Issue 1 – July
• Race, P., (2001) The Lecturer’s Toolkit: a practical guide to learning, teaching and assessment. 2nd ed, London: Kogan Page.
• Rennell, Niles. (2020). Excellent Online Teaching, The Ultimate Guide for Teachers to Prepare Successful Online Classes, Developing Strategies and Mindset, Managing Time, and Engaging Students to Achieve Effective Results. E-book.
• Stake, R. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Sage.
• Toquero, C. M. (2020). Challenges and opportunities for higher education amid the COVID-19 pandemic: The Philippine context. Pedagogical Research, 5(4).
• Wallace, R. (2003). Online learning in higher education: A review of research on interactions among teachers and students. Education, Communication & Information, 3(2), 241-280.
• Wiederman, M.W. (1999). Volunteer bias in sexuality research using college student participants. J. Sex Res. 36:59-66.
• Yıldırım, A. & Simsek, H. (2013). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Seçkin, Ankara