Bu makalede, Vergi Usul Kanunu ve 21447(M) sayılı ve 26 Aralık 1992 tarihli Resmî Gazete’de yayımlanarak yürürlüğe giren 1 sıra no.lu Muhasebe Sistemi Uygulama Genel Tebliği ile Uluslararası Muhasebe Standardı 19 uyarınca hesaplanan çalışanlara sağlanan faydaların karşılaştırılması amaçlanmıştır. İki yöntem arasında büyük farklılıklar mevcuttur. Bu çalışmada söz konusu farklılıklar Türkiye Sermaye Piyasaları Birliği tarafından yayınlanan aracı kurumların konsolide mali tablolarında her iki yöntemin sonuçları üzerinde bağımsız örneklem Mann-Whitney U testi uygulanarak incelenmiştir. İnceleme dönemi 2002’den 2019’in son çeyreği arasındaki her çeyrek dönemi kapsamaktadır. Analiz sonuçlarına göre farklı yöntemlerin uygulanması finansal tablolarda istatistiksel olarak anlamlı düzeyde fark yaratmaktadır. Bu sebepten dolayı finansal raporlama yöntemi seçiminde yöneticiler, muhasebeciler ve yatırımcılar tarafından söz konusu durum dikkate alınmalıdır.
This article aims to compare the benefits provided to employees calculated in accordance with the Tax Procedure Law and the General Statement of Account-ing System Application No. 1 Communiqué, which was published in the Official Gazette No. 21447 (M) dated 26 December 1992, and the International Accounting Standard 19. There are big differences between the two methods. In this study, financial data of intermediary institutions provided by the Turkey Capital Markets Institutions Association are compared as independent samples by applying the Mann-Whitney U test. The review period covers every quarter period from 2002 to the last quarter of 2019. According to the results of the analysis, the application of different methods creates a statistically significant difference in the financial statements. For this reason, this situation should be taken into consideration by managers, accountants and investors in the selection of financial reporting method.
Primary Language | Turkish |
---|---|
Journal Section | Research Articles |
Authors | |
Publication Date | January 24, 2020 |
Submission Date | June 20, 2019 |
Acceptance Date | January 21, 2020 |
Published in Issue | Year 2020 Volume: 4 Issue: 1 |
Lectio Socialis is a prestigious, international, and peer-reviewed journal that aims to provide a platform for scholars and researchers to share their work and ideas on policy-relevant topics related to social sciences. The journal welcomes high-quality articles from a wide range of disciplines, including economics, political science, public administration, business administration, international relations, urban planning, sociology, psychology, history, jurisprudence, and philosophy. The primary objective of Lectio Socialis is to maintain a vibrant, independent, and unbiased environment for scholars and researchers from different parts of the world to present their research, exchange ideas, and contribute to the advancement of knowledge in their respective fields.