Generalize demodikozisli köpeklerde deri pH’sı önemli bir biyofiziksel belirteç olabilir mi?

Year 2019, Volume: 4 Issue: 2, 90 - 94, 31.12.2019

Gizem Gül , Kerem Ural , Songül Erdoğan

https://doi.org/10.24880/maeuvfd.516280

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Demodikozis uzun zamandır deri hastalıkları arasında önemli
bir hastalık olarak kabul edilmiştir. Bu çalışmadaki yazarlara göre, demodeks
etkenine sahip köpeklerde daha önce biyofiziksel deri analizi yapılmamıştır. Bu
çalışmada generalize demodikozis ile enfekte olmuş köpeklerin retrospektif
olarak deri korneometrik analizlerinin değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Callegari
Soft Plus korneometrik sistemi kullanılarak enfekte olmuş toplam 7 köpek ve 6
sağlıklı köpekte korneometrik analizler yapılmıştır. Enfekte köpeklerde epidermal pH 5 ila 5.8 arasında değişirken sağlıklı
köpeklerde pH değişimi 6.1 ila 7.4 olarak bulunmuştur. Demodeks istilasının deri pH'ını değiştirebileceği ya
da tam tersi epidermal pH’ ya özel bir sağaltım protokolünün oluşturulması düşünülmelidir.

Keywords

demodikozis, deri, ph

Can the pH of the skin be an important biophysical marker in dogs with generalized demodicosis?

Abstract

Demodicosis
has long been recognized as an important disease with skin disorders. To the
present authors knowledge biophysical skin analysis has not been performed in
dogs with demodex infestation. In the present study the aim was to
retrospectively evaluate selected corneometric analysis to those of dogs
infested with generalized demodicosis. In a total of 7 infected dogs were
compared to 6 other entirely healthy ones, corneometric analysis were deemed
available by use of Callegari Soft Plus corneometric system. In infected dogs
epidermal pH ranged between 5 to 5.8, whereas healthy dogs showed pH variation
as 6.1 to 7.4. It should not be unwise to draw conclusion that demodex infestation
might change skin pH or vice versa, which should be promptly treated with
speical reference to epidermal pH.

Keywords

demodicosis, skin, ph

References

• Referans 1. Scott DW, Miller WH, Griffin CE. Parasitic skin disease. In: Muller& Kirk’s Small Animal Dermatology. 6th ed. p. 423-516. Philadelphia: WBSaunders; 2001.
• Referans 2. Tater KC, Patterson AC. Canine and feline demodicosis. Veterinary Medicine 2008; 444-461.
• Referans 3. Mueller RS. Treatment protocols for demodicosis: an evidence-based review. Veterinary Dermatology 2004;15(2):75-89.
• Referans 4. Gortel K. Update on canine demodicosis. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice 2006;36(1):229-241.
• Referans 5. Ural K. Köpeklerde paraziter dermatozlar. p. 58-84. Ankara: Uzerler Matbaacılık Sanayi Ltd. Şti. ; 2014.
• Referans 6. Schmid-Wendtner MH, Korting HC. The pH of the skin surface and its impact on the barrier function. Skin pharmacology and physiology 2006; 19(6): 296-302.
• Referans 7. Surber C, Humbert P, Abels C, Maibach H. The Acid Mantle: A Myth or an Essential Part of Skin Health?. In: pH of the Skin: Issues and Challenges Vol 54, p. 1-10. Karger Publishers; 2018.
• Referans 8. Draize JH. The determination of the pH of the skin of man and common laboratory animals. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 1942; 5(2):77-85.
• Referans 9. Kim MK, Choi SY, Byun HJ, Huh CH, Park KC, Patel RA, Youn SW. Comparison of sebum secretion, skin type, pH in humans with and without acne. Archives of Dermatological Research 2006; 298(3):113.
• Referans 10. Meyer W, Neurand K. Comparison of skin pH in domesticated and laboratory mammals. Archives of Dermatological Research 1991; 283: 16–18.
• Referans 11. Forton F, Seys B. Density of Demodex folliculorum in rosacea: a case‐control study using standardized skin‐surface biopsy. British Journal of Dermatology 1993;128(6):650-659.
• Referans 12. Bonnar E, Eustace P. and Powell FC. The Demodex Mite Population in Rosacea. Journal American Academy of Dermatology 1993;28(3):443-448.
• Referans 13.Youn SW, Kim SJ, Hwang IA, Park KC. Evaluation of facial skin type by sebum secretion: discrepancies between subjective descriptions and sebum secretion. Skin Research and Technology 2002;8(3):168-172.
• Referans 14. Greenman J. Follicular pH and the development of acne. International journal of dermatology 1981; 20(10):656-658.
• Referans 15. Hachem JP, Crumrine D, Fluhr J, Brown BE, Feingold KR, Elias PM. pH directly regulates epidermal permeability barrier homeostasis, and stratum corneum integrity/cohesion. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 2003;121(2):345-353.
• Referans 16. Sarangua T, Gurbadam A, Enkhtur Y. Correlation Demodex folliculorum and skin biophysical parameters. Journal of Cosmetics, Dermatological Sciences and Applications 2013; 3(03): 222.
• Referans 17. Greenman J, Holland KT, Cunliffe WJ. Effects of pH on biomass, maximum specific growth rate and extracellular enzyme production by three species of cutaneous propionibacteria grown in continuous culture. Microbiology 1983;129(5):1301-1307.
• Referans 18. Pierard-Franchimont C, Pierard GE, Saint-Leger D, Leveque JL, Kligman AM. Comparison of the kinetics of sebum secretion in young women with and without acne. Dermatology 1991;183(2):120-122.
• Referans 19. Korting HC, Kerscher M, Schäfer-Korting M, Berchtenbreiter U. Influence of topical erythromycin preparations for acne vulgaris on skin surface pH. The clinical investigator 1993;71(8):644-648.
• Referans 20. Zlotogorski A. Distribution of skin surface pH on the forehead and cheek of adults. Archives of dermatological research 1987;279(6):398-401.
• Referans 21. Wendling PA, Dell'Acqua G. Skin biophysical properties of a population living in Valais, Switzerland. Skin Research and Technology 2003;9(4):331-338.
• Referans 22. Turan N, Kapıcıoğlu Y, Saraç G. The Effect of Skin Sebum, pH, and Moisture on Demodex Infestation in Acne Vulgaris and Rosacea Patients. Türkiye Parazitoloji Dergisi 2017;41(3):143.
• Referans 23. Ural K, Erdoğan H, ATEŞ DS. Köpek Epidermisinin pH Seviyesi: Gelişigüzel İnsan Ürünleri Pet Hayvanlarda Kullanılabilir mi?. Kocatepe Veteriner Dergisi 2018;11(4):491-494.