Research Article
Tilki (Vulpes vulpes) Cervical Vertebrae'nın Morfometrik Özelliklerinin Üç Boyutlu Rekonstrüksiyon Kullanarak İncelenmesi
Abstract
Bu
çalışmanın amacı, multidedektör bilgisayarlı tomografi (MDBT) görüntüleri
kullanarak üç boyutlu bilgisayar programı aracılığı ile elde edilen üç boyutlu
(3B) rekonstrüksiyonlara dayanarak tilki cervical vertebrae’nın morfometrik özelliklerinin
belirlenmesidir. Farklı zamanlarda trafik kazasında elde edilen toplam 6 erkek
tilki (Vulpes vulpes) kullanıldı. Yüzüstü
pozisyonda genel bir diagnostik MDBT kullanılarak cervical vertebrae’nın yüksek çözünürlüklü
görüntüleri elde edildi ve görüntüler 3B bir modelleme programı (Mimics) olan
bir bilgisayara aktarıldı. Her bir
vertebrae’nın (atlas hariç) corpus vertebrae uzunluğu, corpus vertebrae’nın transvers ve
sagital çapı, foramen vertebrae’nın transvers ve sagittal çapları, oluşturulan
3B modelden ölçüldü ve indeksler hesaplandı. Her
bir ölçüm değerlerinin ortalamaları hesaplandı. Corpus vertebrae uzunluğunun
C2'den C7'ye azaldığı, transvers çapının C2'den C4'e azaldığı, ancak C5'ten
C7'ye arttığı, sagittal çapı transvers çapın aksine C2'den C4'e artarken,
C5'ten C7'ye azaldığı, foramen vertebrae’nın
transvers ve sagital çapları C5'ten C7'ye arttığı görülmüştür. Bu çalışma tilki
cervical vertebrae üzerinde yapılan ilk 3B rekonstrüksiyondur ve
sonuçlar bu türün anatomi bilgisine katkıda bulunabilir. Ayrıca bu teknik,
diğer vahşi hayvanlara zarar vermeden anatomilerini anlamak için de
kullanılabilir.
References
- Refernas1. Aroeira1 RMC, Antônio Pertence EM, Kemmoku DT, Greco1 M. Three-dimensional geometric model of the middle segment of the thoracic spine based on graphical images for finite element analysis. Research on Biomedical Engineering 2017; 33 (2): 97-104.Referans2. Arthertya JS, Poonguzhali S. 3d image reconstruction of the vertebral column. ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel5/…/06206812.pdf?.. 2012.Referans3.Başaloğlu H, Turgut M, Başaloğlu H. K. Lumbal canalis vertebralıs'in sagittal ve transvers çaplarının incelenmesi morfometrik ve radyolojik bir çalışma. Ege Tıp Dergisi 2002; 41 (2): 63 – 66.Referans4.Bisaillon A, DeRoth L. Morphology and morphometry of the appendicular skeleton of the red fox (Vulpes vulpes). Canadian Journal of Zoology 2011; 57 (11): 2089-2099.Referans5. Bohl MA, Morgan CD, Mooney MA, et al. Biomechanical Testing of a 3D-printed L5 Vertebral Body Model. Cureus 2019; 11(1): e3893. DOI 10.7759/cureus.3893Referans6. . Clogenson M, Duff JM, Luethi M, Levivier M, Meuli R, Baur C, Henein S.. A statistical shape model of the human second cervical vertebra. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery 2014; DOI 10.1007/s11548-014-1121-xReferans7.Demirsoy A. Yaşamın Temel Kuralları. Omurgalılar/Amniyota (Sürüngenler, Kuşlar 277 ve Memeliler) Cilt-III/Kısım-II. 5. Baskı. Meteksan A.Ş. 2003. p. 745-750.Referans8. Desdicioğlu K, Öztürk Erdoğan K, Çizmeci G, Malas MA. Morphometric Investigation of Anatomic Structures of Vertebras and Clinical Evaluation: An Anatomical Study. SDÜ Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 2017; 8 (1). DOI: 10.22312 / sdusbed.224963Referans9.Dursun N. Veteriner Anatomi III. Medisan Yayınev. 2010. p. 96.Referans10. Dyce KM, Sack WO, Wensing CJG. Textbook of Veterinary Anatomy Fourth Edition. (Turkish version). 2018. p. 36.Referans11. Fu M, Lin L, Kong X, Zhao W, Tang L, Li J, Ouyang J. Construction and Accuracy Assessment of Patient- Specific Biocompatible Drill Template for Cervical Anterior Transpedicular Screw (ATPS) Insertion: An In Vitro Study. PLoS ONE 2013; 8(1): e53580. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0053580Referans12. Ince A, Eken E. Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Columna Vertebralis Images of Elite Male Weightlifters Taken by a Multi-Detector Computerized Tomography (MDCT). International Journal of Morphology 2014; 32(4):1184-1189.Referans13. Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, Hamberg LM, Blake MA, Shepard J, Saini S. Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology 2004; 230: 619-28.Referans14. Li Y, Li Z, Ammanuel, Gillan D, Shah V. Efficacy of using a 3D printed lumbosacral spine phantom in improving trainee proficiency and confidence in CT-guided spine procedures. BMC 2018; 4:7 https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-018-0031-xReferans15. Malas MA, Salbacak A., Şeker M., Büyükmumcu M., Köylüoğlu B. SDÜ Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 1996; 3(2): 61-65. Referans16. Munkhzul T, Reading RP, Buuveibaatar B, Murdoch JD.Comparative Craniometric Measurements of Two Sympatric Species of Vulpes in Ikh Nart Nature Reserve, Mongolia. Mongolian Journal of Biological Sciences 2018; 16 (1): 19- 28. Referans17. Onar V, Belli O, Owen PR. Morphometric Examination of Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes) from the Van-Yoncatepe Necropolis in Eastern Anatolia. International Journal of Morphology 2005; 23(3):253-260.Referans18. Ozkadif S, Korkmaz T. Yeni zelanda tavşanı (oryctolagus cuniculus l.)’nda boyun ve göğüs omurlarının morfometrik özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Ahmet Keleşoğlu Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi Sayı 2010; 30: 01-23.Referans19. Özkadif S, Eken E, Dayan MO, Beşoluk K. Determination of sex-related diff erences based on 3D reconstruction of the chinchilla (Chinchilla lanigera) vertebral column from MDCT scans. Veterınarnı Medıcına 2017; 62: 204-210.Referans20.Özkadif S, Haligür A, Eken E. A three-dimensional reconstruction of the scapula in the red fox (Vulpes vulpes). Indıan Journal of Anımal Research 2019; 53: 336-340.Referans21.Prokop M. General principles of MDCT. European Journal of Radiology 2003; 45: 4-10.Referans22.Rehm J, Germann T, Akbar M, Pepke W, Kauczor HU, Weber MA, Spira D. 3D-modeling of the spine using EOS imaging system: Inter-reader reproducibility and reliability. PLOS ONE 2017; DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0171258 Referans23.Sunar M, Kapakin S. Morphometric evaluation of craniocervical junction by magnetic resonance imaging method. Asian Journal of Neurosurgery 2019; 14: 702-9.Referans24.Yen C, Su HR, Lai SH. Reconstruction of 3D vertebrae and spinal cord models from CT and STIR-MRI Images. 2013 Second IAPR Asian Conference on Pattern Recognition 2013; 150-154.Referans25.Zatoń-Dobrowolska M, Moska M, Mucha A et al. Variation in fur farm and wild populations of the red fox, Vulpes vulpes (Carnivora: Canidae). Part II: Craniometry. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 2017; 98 (4). DOI: 10.1139/CJAS-2017-0015Referans26.Zatoń-Dobrowolska M, Moska M, Mucha A, Wierzbicki H, Przysiecki P, Dobrowolski M. Variation in fur farm and wild populations of the red fox, Vulpes vulpes (Carnivora: Canidae)- Part I: Morphometry. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 2016; 96: 589– 597.
Year 2019,
Volume: 4 Issue: 2, 57 - 61, 31.12.2019
Abstract
References
- Refernas1. Aroeira1 RMC, Antônio Pertence EM, Kemmoku DT, Greco1 M. Three-dimensional geometric model of the middle segment of the thoracic spine based on graphical images for finite element analysis. Research on Biomedical Engineering 2017; 33 (2): 97-104.Referans2. Arthertya JS, Poonguzhali S. 3d image reconstruction of the vertebral column. ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel5/…/06206812.pdf?.. 2012.Referans3.Başaloğlu H, Turgut M, Başaloğlu H. K. Lumbal canalis vertebralıs'in sagittal ve transvers çaplarının incelenmesi morfometrik ve radyolojik bir çalışma. Ege Tıp Dergisi 2002; 41 (2): 63 – 66.Referans4.Bisaillon A, DeRoth L. Morphology and morphometry of the appendicular skeleton of the red fox (Vulpes vulpes). Canadian Journal of Zoology 2011; 57 (11): 2089-2099.Referans5. Bohl MA, Morgan CD, Mooney MA, et al. Biomechanical Testing of a 3D-printed L5 Vertebral Body Model. Cureus 2019; 11(1): e3893. DOI 10.7759/cureus.3893Referans6. . Clogenson M, Duff JM, Luethi M, Levivier M, Meuli R, Baur C, Henein S.. A statistical shape model of the human second cervical vertebra. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery 2014; DOI 10.1007/s11548-014-1121-xReferans7.Demirsoy A. Yaşamın Temel Kuralları. Omurgalılar/Amniyota (Sürüngenler, Kuşlar 277 ve Memeliler) Cilt-III/Kısım-II. 5. Baskı. Meteksan A.Ş. 2003. p. 745-750.Referans8. Desdicioğlu K, Öztürk Erdoğan K, Çizmeci G, Malas MA. Morphometric Investigation of Anatomic Structures of Vertebras and Clinical Evaluation: An Anatomical Study. SDÜ Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 2017; 8 (1). DOI: 10.22312 / sdusbed.224963Referans9.Dursun N. Veteriner Anatomi III. Medisan Yayınev. 2010. p. 96.Referans10. Dyce KM, Sack WO, Wensing CJG. Textbook of Veterinary Anatomy Fourth Edition. (Turkish version). 2018. p. 36.Referans11. Fu M, Lin L, Kong X, Zhao W, Tang L, Li J, Ouyang J. Construction and Accuracy Assessment of Patient- Specific Biocompatible Drill Template for Cervical Anterior Transpedicular Screw (ATPS) Insertion: An In Vitro Study. PLoS ONE 2013; 8(1): e53580. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0053580Referans12. Ince A, Eken E. Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Columna Vertebralis Images of Elite Male Weightlifters Taken by a Multi-Detector Computerized Tomography (MDCT). International Journal of Morphology 2014; 32(4):1184-1189.Referans13. Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, Hamberg LM, Blake MA, Shepard J, Saini S. Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology 2004; 230: 619-28.Referans14. Li Y, Li Z, Ammanuel, Gillan D, Shah V. Efficacy of using a 3D printed lumbosacral spine phantom in improving trainee proficiency and confidence in CT-guided spine procedures. BMC 2018; 4:7 https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-018-0031-xReferans15. Malas MA, Salbacak A., Şeker M., Büyükmumcu M., Köylüoğlu B. SDÜ Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 1996; 3(2): 61-65. Referans16. Munkhzul T, Reading RP, Buuveibaatar B, Murdoch JD.Comparative Craniometric Measurements of Two Sympatric Species of Vulpes in Ikh Nart Nature Reserve, Mongolia. Mongolian Journal of Biological Sciences 2018; 16 (1): 19- 28. Referans17. Onar V, Belli O, Owen PR. Morphometric Examination of Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes) from the Van-Yoncatepe Necropolis in Eastern Anatolia. International Journal of Morphology 2005; 23(3):253-260.Referans18. Ozkadif S, Korkmaz T. Yeni zelanda tavşanı (oryctolagus cuniculus l.)’nda boyun ve göğüs omurlarının morfometrik özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Ahmet Keleşoğlu Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi Sayı 2010; 30: 01-23.Referans19. Özkadif S, Eken E, Dayan MO, Beşoluk K. Determination of sex-related diff erences based on 3D reconstruction of the chinchilla (Chinchilla lanigera) vertebral column from MDCT scans. Veterınarnı Medıcına 2017; 62: 204-210.Referans20.Özkadif S, Haligür A, Eken E. A three-dimensional reconstruction of the scapula in the red fox (Vulpes vulpes). Indıan Journal of Anımal Research 2019; 53: 336-340.Referans21.Prokop M. General principles of MDCT. European Journal of Radiology 2003; 45: 4-10.Referans22.Rehm J, Germann T, Akbar M, Pepke W, Kauczor HU, Weber MA, Spira D. 3D-modeling of the spine using EOS imaging system: Inter-reader reproducibility and reliability. PLOS ONE 2017; DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0171258 Referans23.Sunar M, Kapakin S. Morphometric evaluation of craniocervical junction by magnetic resonance imaging method. Asian Journal of Neurosurgery 2019; 14: 702-9.Referans24.Yen C, Su HR, Lai SH. Reconstruction of 3D vertebrae and spinal cord models from CT and STIR-MRI Images. 2013 Second IAPR Asian Conference on Pattern Recognition 2013; 150-154.Referans25.Zatoń-Dobrowolska M, Moska M, Mucha A et al. Variation in fur farm and wild populations of the red fox, Vulpes vulpes (Carnivora: Canidae). Part II: Craniometry. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 2017; 98 (4). DOI: 10.1139/CJAS-2017-0015Referans26.Zatoń-Dobrowolska M, Moska M, Mucha A, Wierzbicki H, Przysiecki P, Dobrowolski M. Variation in fur farm and wild populations of the red fox, Vulpes vulpes (Carnivora: Canidae)- Part I: Morphometry. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 2016; 96: 589– 597.
There are 1 citations in total.
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Health Care Administration |
| Journal Section | Research Articles |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | December 31, 2019 |
| Submission Date | October 4, 2019 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2019 Volume: 4 Issue: 2 |
