KARİYER SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİĞİ ÖLÇEĞİNİN TÜRKÇEYE UYARLANMASI

Year 2023, Volume: 10 Issue: 2, 1119 - 1135, 02.08.2023

Tayfun Arar , Nurcan Çetiner

https://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.1218928

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Bu çalışmada sürekli değişen çalışma ortamlarında örgüt çalışanlarının kariyerlerinin sürdürülebilirlik düzeylerini belirleyebilmek amacıyla Chin, Jawahar ve Li’nin (2021) geliştirdiği Kariyer Sürdürülebilirliği Ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlaması sunulmaktadır. Türkiye’de kamu ve özel sektör kapsamındaki sağlık, eğitim, bilişim ve enerji sektörlerindeki 18-65 yaş arasındaki 402 adet beyaz yaka çalışan ile yapılan anket verileri ile uygulanan AFA sonucunda ölçekte bulunan ifadeler 2 faktör altında toplanmış olup; ifadelerin faktör yükleri ise 0,730 ile 0,910 arasında değer almış ve açıklanan toplam varyans ise %67 olarak hesaplanmıştır. Gerçekleştirilen DFA analizi sonuçlarına göre Kariyer Sürdürülebilirliği Ölçeği’nin Türkçeye uyarlanmış halinin (ki-kare =105,153 sd = 51, p <,001; CMIN/DF= 2,062; RMSEA = ,73; NFI = 0,957; RFI = 0,945; IFI = 0,978; TLI = 0,971; CFI = 0,977) iki faktörlü 12 ifadeden oluştuğu gözlemlenmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular sonucunda Kariyer Sürdürülebilirliği Ölçeği’nin geçerliği ve güvenilirliği ispatlanmış bir ölçme aracı olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

Keywords

Kariyer Sürdürülebilirliği, Sürdürülebilir Kariyer, Ölçek Adaptasyonu

TURKISH ADAPTATION OF THE CAREER SUSTAINABILITY SCALE

Abstract

In this study, the Turkish adaptation of the Career Sustainability Scale developed by Chin, Jawahar and Li (2021) is presented in order to determine the sustainability levels of the careers of the employees in the ever-changing working environment. As a result of the EFA applied to 402 white-collar employees between the ages of 18-65 in the health, education, informatics and energy sectors within the scope of the public and private sectors in Turkey, the items in the scale were grouped under 2 factors and the factor loads of the items ranged from 0.730 to 0.910. The total variance explained was calculated as 67%. According to the results of the CFA analysis, it was validated that the Turkish version of the Career Sustainability Scale (chi-square =105.153 df = 51, p <.001; CMIN/DF= 2.062; RMSEA = .73; NFI = 0.957; RFI = 0.945; IFI = 0.978) ; TLI = 0.971; CFI = 0.977), consisted of 12 statements with two factors. As a result of the findings, it was concluded that the Career Sustainability Scale is a measurement tool with proven validity and reliability.

Keywords

career sustainability, sustainable career, scale adaptation

References

• Barthauer, L., Kaucher, P., Spurk, D. ve Kauffeld, S. (2019). Burnout and career (un)sustainability: Looking into the Blackbox o burnout triggered career turnover intentions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 117, 103334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.103334.
• Başol, O. ve Çömlekçi, M. F. (2022). Uzaktan çalışma tutumu ölçeği geçerlik-güvenirlik çalışması. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(1), 243-261. https://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.862439
• Bozionelos, N., Lin, C. H. ve Lee, K. Y. (2020). Enhancing the sustainability of employees’ careers through training: The roles of career actors’ openness and of supervisor support. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 117, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.103333.
• Chin, T., Jawahar, I. M. ve Li, G. (2021). Development and validation of a career sustainability scale. Journal of Career Development, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845321993234.
• Chin, T., Li, G., Jiao, H., Addo, F. ve Jawahar, I. M. (2019). Career sustainability during manufacturing innovation. Career Development International, 24(6), 509-528. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/CDI-02-2019-0034.
• Chudzikowski, K., Gustafsson, S. ve Tams, S. (2020). Constructing alignment for sustainable careers: Insights from the career narratives of management consultants. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 117, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.05.009.
• De Vos, A., Beatrice, I. J. M, Heijden, V. ve Akkermans, J. (2018). Sustainable careers: Towards a conceptual model. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 117, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.06.011.
• De Vos, A. ve Van Der Heijden, B. (2017). Current thinking on contemporary careers: The key roles of sustainable HRM and sustainability of careers. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 28, 41-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.07.003.
• Fang, Y.-C., Ren Y.-H., Chen J.-Y., Chin T., Yuan Q. ve Lin C.-L. (2021). Inclusive leadership and career sustainability: mediating roles of supervisor developmental feedback and thriving at work. Front Psychol. 12:671663. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.671663.
• Fornell, C. ve Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
• Heslin, P. A., Keating, L. A. ve Ashford, S. J. (2020). How being in learning mode may enable a sustainable career across the lifespan. Journal of Vocational Behvaior, 117, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.103324.
• IMF (2021). World Economic Outlook Database. Erişim Linki: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/weo-database/2021/October/ Erişim Tarihi: 08.12.2022.
• Kim, J., Park, J., Sohn, Y. ve Lim, J. (2021). Perceived overqualification, boredom, and extra-role behaviors: Testing a moderated mediation model. Journal of Career Development, 48(4), 400-414.
• Kossek, E. E. ve Ollier-Malaterre, A. (2020). Desperately seeking sustainable careers: Redesigning professional jobs for the collaborative crafting of reduced-load work. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 117, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.06.003.
• Newman, K. L. (2011). Sustainable careers: Lifecycle engagement in work. Organizational Dynamics, 40, 136-143. doi:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2011.01.008.
• Özdevecioğlu, M. (2002). Kamu ve özel sektör yöneticileri arasındaki davranışsal çalışma koşulları ve kişilik farklılıklarının belirlenmesine yönelik bir araştırma. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 19 (Temmuz-Aralık), 115-134.
• Özkanan, A. (2019). Algılanan aşırı niteliklilik: Üretkenliğe karşı durgunluk. Aydın Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 6 (2), 42-57.
• Randstad, Global Report Work Monitor Q4 Report (2018). Erişim adresi https://www.randstad.com.tr/s3fs-media/tr/public/2022-08/randstad-workmonitor-q4-2018-digitalization-at-work.pdf.
• Randstad, Work Monitor Report (2022). Erişim adresi https://www.randstad.com.tr/s3fs-media/tr/public/2022-08/randstad-workmonitor-2022_1.pdf.
• Richardson, J., Jogulu, U. ve Renschler, R. (2017). Passion or people? Social capital and career sustainability in arts management. Personnel Review, 46(8), 1835-1851.
• Richardson, J. ve McKenna, S. (2020). An exploration of career sustainability in and after professional sport. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 117, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.06.002.
• Rizwan, A., Serbaya, S. H., Saleem, M., Alsulami, H., Karras, D. A. ve Alamgir, Z. (2021). A preliminary analysis of the perception gap between employers and vocational students for career sustainability. Sustainability, 13, 11327. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011327.
• Sanchez-Cardona, I., Vera, M., Martinez-Lugo, M., Rodriguez-Montalban, R. ve Marrero-Centeno, J. (2019). When the job does not fit: the moderating role of job crafting and meaningful work in the relation between employees’ perceived overqualification and job boredom. Journal of Career Assessment, 28(2), 257-276.
• Tabachnick, B. G. ve Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston: Pearson
• Tims, M. ve Bakker, A. B. (2010). Job crafting: Towards a new model of individual job redesign. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 36(2), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v36i2.841
• Tordera, N., Peiro, J. M., Ayala, Y., Villajos, E. ve Truxillo, D. (2020). The lagged influence of organizations' human resources practices on employees' career sustainability: The moderating role of age. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 120, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103444.
• TÜİK (2022, Aralık). İşgücü İstatistikleri, III. Çeyrek: Temmuz-Eylül 2022.[Basın bülteni]. Erişim adresi https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Isgucu-Istatistikleri-III.-Ceyrek:-Temmuz-Eylul-2022-45656.
• Udayar, S., Canzio, L. I., Urbanaviciute, I., Masdonati, J. ve Rossier, J. (2021). Significant life events and career sustainability: A three-wave study. Sustainability, 13, 13129. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su132313129.
• Yaşlıoğlu, M. M. (2017). Sosyal bilimlerde faktör analizi ve geçerlilik: Keşfedici ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizlerinin kullanılması. Istanbul University Journal of the School of Business, 46 (Special Issue), 74-85.
• Zhang, W., Chin, T., Li, F., Lin, C., Shan, Y. ve Ventimiglia, F. (2022a). The impact of career competence on career sustainability among Chinese expatriate managers amid digital transformation in Vietnam: The role of lifelong learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.791636.
• Zhang, W., Chin, T., Peng, J., Shan, Y. ve Agbanyo, G. K. (2022b). The moderating effect of occupational burnout on the link of career competencies to career sustainability amid the covid-19 pandemic: A mixed method study. Front. Psychol. 13:916669. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.916669