İyi Yönetişim, Haklar ve Devlet: İdare Hukuku Nereye Gidiyor?

Year 2022, , 622 - 635, 31.12.2022

Onur Kaplan

https://doi.org/10.33712/mana.1174475

Abstract

Artan küreselleşme olgusu ve sanayileşme ile birlikte, ekonomik ve sosyal bakımdan pek çok değişikliğin meydana gelmesi, devletin faaliyetlerinde açıklık, şeffaflık ve hesap verebilirlik gibi ilkelere uygun hareket etmesi gerektiği fikrini gündeme getirmiştir. Bu doğrultuda yönetişim kavramı, devletin karar verme süreçlerinde bireylerin dahil olmasını, işlem ve eylemlerinde şeffaflığın sağlanmasını gözeten bir kavram olarak son yıllarda önem kazanmıştır. Özellikle devletin faaliyetlerinde yaşanan genişlemeye bağlı olarak yönetişim kavramı, keyfiliğin önüne geçilmesi ve temel hak ve özgürlüklerin koruma alanına riayet edilmesi bakımından pozitif hukuk metinlerinde de kabul görmüştür. Bu bağlamda, devletin anayasa ve kanunlarla verilen görevleri yerine getirirken iyi yönetişim kavramına uygun biçimde hareket etmesi, hukuk devleti ilkesinin gerçekleşmesinde önemli rol oynamaktadır. Bu kapsamda devletin icra edeceği faaliyetler bakımından iyi yönetişim kavramının Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi kararlarında ne şekilde ele alındığı ve niteliğinin belirlenmesi hukuk devleti ilkesi açısından elzemdir.

Keywords

Yönetişim, Hukuk Devleti, Şeffaflık, Hesap Verebilirlik, İdare

Good Governance, Rights and State: Quo Vadis Administrative Law?

Abstract

With the increasing globalization phenomenon and industrialization, many changes in economic and social aspects have brought the idea that the state should act in accordance with the principles such as openness, transparency and accountability in its activities. In this context, the concept of governance has gained importance in recent years as a concept that considers the inclusion of individuals in the decision-making processes of the state and ensures transparency in its operations and actions. In particular, due to the expansion in the activities of the state, the concept of governance has been accepted in positive legal texts to prevent arbitrariness and to respect the area of protection of fundamental rights and freedoms. In this context, the fact that the state acts in accordance with the concept of good governance while carrying out the duties given by the constitution and laws plays an important role in the realization of the principle of the rule of law. In this context, the state of good governance is dealt with in the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights in terms of the activities to be carried out by the state and determining the quality is essential for the rule of law.

Keywords

Governance, Rule of Law, Transparency, Accountability, Administration

References

• ABRAHAMSEN, Rita (2012), “The Seductiveness of Good Governance”, Is Good Governance Good for Development? (Eds. Jomo Kwame Sundaram, Anis Chowdhury), Bloomsbury Academic Press, London (UK), pp.29-52.
• ADDINK, Henk (2017), “Good Governance: Importance in Practice, Theories and Definitions”, Halu Oleo Law Review, S.1(1), pp.1-32.
• ADDINK, Henk (2019), Good Governance Concept and Context, Oxford University Press, Oxford (UK).
• AKILLIOĞLU, Tekin (1981), “Bireyin Yönetsel İşlemler Karşısında Korunması ve Yönetim Hukukumuz”, Amme İdaresi Dergisi, S.14(3), pp.37-56.
• ALFREDSSON, Gudmundur (2002), “The Usefulness of Human Rights for Democracy and Good Governance”, Human Rights and Good Governance: Building Bridges (Eds. Hans Otto Sano, Gudmundur Alfredsson, Robin Clapp), Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, New York (US), pp.19-29.
• ANDREEVSKA, Elena and RAICEVIC, Lidija (2018), “Anti-corruption Initiatives, Good Governance and Human Rights: The Republic of Macedonia”, Lex ET Scientia International Journal, S.25(1), pp.112-126.
• AZRAK, Ali Ülkü (1964), “Umumi İdari Usulün Teorik Esasları ve Çeşitli Hukuk Sistemlerinde Gelişimi”, Unpublished PhD Thesis, Istanbul University, Istanbul.
• BALA, Adisa (2017), “Role of Public Administration in Good Governance and Local Development”, International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, S.5(5), pp.593-601.
• BARAK-EREZ, Daphne (2005), “The Doctrine of Legitimate Expectations and the Distinction between the Reliance and Expectation Interests”, European Public Law, S.11(4), pp.583-602.
• BATALLI, Mirlinda and FEJZULLAHU, Artan M. (2018), “Principles of Good Administration under the European Code of Good Administrative Behavior”, Pécs Journal of International and European Law, S.2018(1), pp.26-35.
• BERISHA, Fejzulla and BERISHA, Blerim (2019), “Legal Effects of Acts of State Power in the State of Law”, Acta Universitatis Danubius Juridica, S.2019(1), pp.18-33.
• BODA, Zsolt (2013), “Some Notes on Fairness, Trust and Good Governance”, Iustum Aequum Salutare, S.9(2), pp.9-20.
• BRADLEY, Anthony W. and EWING, Keith D. (2007), Constitutional and Administrative Law, Pearson-Longman Publisher, Malaysia, 14th Edition.
• CIBORRA, Claudio and NAVARRA, Diego D. (2003), “Good Governance and Development Aid: Risks and Challenges of E-Government in Jordan”, Organizational Information Systems in the Context of Globalization (Eds. Mikko Korpela, Ramiro Montealegre, Angeliki Poulymenakou), Springer Publisher, New York (US), pp.387-402.
• COSTA, Pietro (2007), “The Rule of Law: A Historical Introduction”, The Rule of Law: History, Theory and Criticism (Eds. Pietro Costa, Danilo Zolo), Springer Publisher, Cham, pp.73-152.
• CRAIG, P. Paul (1996), “Substantive Legitimate Expectations in Domestic and Community Law”, The Cambridge Law Journal, S.55(2), pp.289-312.
• DE BURCA, Grainne (2008), “Developing Democracy Beyond the State”, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, S.46(2), pp.101-158.
• DOORNBOS, Martin (2001), “Good Governance: The Rise and Decline of a Policy Metaphor?”, Journal of Development Studies, S.37(6), pp.93-108.
• ESTY, Daniel C. (2006), “Good Governance at the Supranational Scale: Globalizing Administrative Law”, The Yale Law Journal, S.115(7), pp.1490-1562.
• ESTY, Daniel C. (2007), “Good Governance at the WTO”, Journal of International Economic Law, S.10(3), pp.509-527.
• FERREIRA, Gerrit M. (2008), “Good Governance and the Failed State”, Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa, S.41(3), pp.428-448.
• FINKELSTEIN, Lawrence S. (1995), “What is Global Governance?”, Global Governance, S.1(3), pp.367-372.
• FITZPATRICK, Jody, GOGGIN, Malcolm, HEIKKILA, Tanya and KLINGNER, Donald E. (2011), “A New Look at Comparative Public Administration: Trends in Research and an Agenda for the Future”, Public Administration Review, S.71(6), pp.821-830.
• FOUGNER, Tore (2008), “Neoliberal Governance of States: The Role of Competitiveness Indexing and Country Benchmarking”, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, S.37(2), pp.303-326.
• GILL, Graeme (2003), The Nature and Development of the Modern State, Palgrave Macmillan Publisher, New York (US).
• GONOD, Pascal (2003), “À Propos de la Responsabilité Administrative”, Mouvements, S.29, pp.30-35.
• GONZÁLEZ FUSTER, Gloria (2014), The Emergence of Personal Data Protection as a Fundamental Right of the EU, Springer Publisher, Cham.
• GOULD, David M. and GRUBEN, William C. (1996), “The Role of Intellectual Property Rights in Economic Growth”, Journal of Development Economics, S.48(2), pp.323-350.
• GRIMHEDEN, Jonas and TOGGENBURG, Gabriel N. (2016), “The Right to Good Administration in the Multilevel System of the European Union-A ‘Newish’ Right Strengthening the Administrative Culture”, Human Rights and Good Governance (Eds. Gudmundur Alfredsson, Zhang Wei), Brill Publisher, Leiden, pp.109-116.
• GRINDLE, Merilee (2007), “Good Enough Governance Revisited”, Development Policy Review, S.25(5), pp.553-574.
• GRINDLE, Merilee (2012), “Good Governance: The Inflation of Idea”, Planning Ideas That Matter: Livability, Territoriality, Governance and Reflective Practice (Eds. Bishwapriya Sanyal, J. Vale Lawrence, Christina D. Rosan), MIT Press, Cambridge (UK), pp.259-282.
• GUTMANN, Daniel (2009), “The European Convention on Human Rights, a Tool to Ensure the Efficiency of EC Law”, Legal Remedies in European Tax Law (Ed. Pasquale Pistone), International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation, Amsterdam, pp.487-494.
• HOOD, Christopher (2006), “Transparency in Historical Perspective”, Transparency: The Key to Better Governance? (Eds. Christopher Hood, David Heald), Oxford University Press, Oxford (UK), pp.2-23.
• IRVIN, A. Renee and STANSBURY, John (2004), “Citizen Participation in Decision Making: Is it Worth the Effort?”, Public Administration Review, S.64(1), pp.55-65.
• JAIN, Anshu (2012), “Good Governance and Right to Information: A Perspective”, Journal of the Indian Law Institute, S.54(4), pp.506-519.
• KARPEN, Ulrich (2010), “Good Governance”, European Journal of Law Reform, S.12(1-2), pp.16-31.
• KAYA, Cemil (2011), Assessing the Transfer of Personal Data in the European Union in the Light of the Data Protection Directive, On İki Levha Publishing, Istanbul.
• KESIM, H. Kutay and PETEK, Ali (2005), “Avrupa Komisyonunca Belirlenen İyi Yönetişimin İlkeleri Çerçevesinde Türk Kamu Reformunun Bir Eleştirisi”, Amme İdaresi Dergisi, S.38(4), pp.39-58.
• KINGSBURY, Benedict, KRISCH, Nico and STEWART, Richard B. (2005), “The Emergence of Global Administrative Law”, Law and Contemporary Problems, S.68, pp.14-61.
• KOOIMAN, Jan (1993), “Governance and Governability: Using Complexity, Dynamics and Diversity”, Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions (Ed. Jan Kooiman), Sage Publications, London (UK), pp.35-48.
• KOOIMAN, Jan (2003), Governing as Governance, Sage Publications, London (UK).
• LEFTWICH, Adrian (1993), “Governance, Democracy and Development in Third World”, Third World Quarterly, S.14(3), pp.605-624.
• LEGRAND, André and WIENER, Céline (2017), Le Droit Public, La Documentation Français, Paris.
• LIVIOARA, Gina (2009), “Good Governance in the EU”, Acta Universitatis Danubius, S.5(1), pp.173-181.
• LONG, Marceau, WEIL, Prosper, BRAIBANT, Guy, DELVOLVÉ, Pierre and GENEVOIS, Bruno (2015), Grands Arrêts de la Jurisprudence Administrative, Dalloz Publisher, Paris, 21st Edition.
• LOR, Peter J. and BRITZ, Johannes J. (2007), “Is a Knowledge Society Possible Without Freedom of Access to Information?”, Journal of Information Science, S.33(4), pp.387-397.
• MAGNETTE, Paul (2003), “European Governance and Civic Participation: Beyond Elitist Citizenship?”, Political Studies, S.51, pp.144-160.
• MAZEAUD, Denis (2006), “La Confiance Légitime et L’estoppel”, Revue Internationale de Droit Comparé, S.58(2), pp.363-392.
• McCANN, Adam (2018), “Regressive Liberalism and Principles of Good Governance”, European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance, S.5(2), pp.115-118.
• McDERMOTT, Yvonne (2017), “Conceptualising the Right to Data Protection in an Era of Big Data”, Big Data & Society, S.4(1), pp.1-7.
• MOURÈS, Yves (1957), Éléments de Droit Public et Administratif, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.
• NIBLOCK, Tim (1998), “Democratization: A Theoretical and Practical Debate”, British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, S.25(2), pp.221-233.
• PONCE, Juli (2005), “Good Administration and Administrative Procedures”, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, S.12(2), pp.551-588.
• POTO, Margherita P. and FORNABAIO, Lara (2017), “Participation as the Essence of Good Governance”, Arctic Review on Law and Politics, S.8, pp.139-159.
• POULET, Naine and GIBOT, Leclerc (2007), Droit Administratif: Sources, Moyens, Contrôles, Bréal Éditions, Paris, 3rd Edition.
• REIF, Linda C. (2004), The Ombudsman, Good Governance, and the International Human Rights System, Springer Publisher, Leiden.
• RHODES, Roderick A. W. (1996), “The New Governance: Governing Without Government”, Political Studies, S.44(4), pp.652-667.
• RICCI, Jean-Claude (2004), Droit administratif, Hachette Publisher, Paris, 4th Edition.
• ROUSSET, Michel (1960), L’Idée de Puissance Publique en Droit Administratif, Librairie Dalloz Publisher, Paris.
• SALE, Hillary A. (2013), “Public Governance”, The George Washington Law Review, S.81(3), pp.1012-1035.
• SANGITA, Satyanarayana N. (2002), “Administrative Reforms for Good Governance”, The Indian Journal of Political Science, S.63(4), pp.325-350.
• SANO, Hans Otto (2015), “Social Accountability in the World Bank: How does it Overlap with Human Rights?”, Closing the Rights Gap: From Human Rights to Social Transformation (Eds. La Dawn Haglund, Robin Stryker), University of California Press, California (US), pp.219-239.
• SEVER, Tina (2017), “Liability and Compensation for Damages in Case of Violation of the Principles of Accountability and Good Governance”, International Public Administration Review, S.15(3-4), pp.59-74.
• SEVER, Tina (2018), “Procedural Safeguards under the European Convention on Human Rights in Public (Administrative) Law Matters”, DANUBE: Law, Economics and Social Issues Review, S.9(2), pp.97-116.
• SINGH, Deepali, ANSARI, Nafees A. and SINGH, Shaifali (2009), “Good Governance & Implementation in Era of Globalization”, The Indian Journal of Political Science, S.70(4), pp.1109-1120.
• SINHA, Manoj Kumar (2006), “Human Rights and Good Governance”, Indian Journal of International Law, S.46(1), pp.539-555.
• SKAANING, Svend-Erik (2010), “Measuring the Rule of Law”, Political Research Quarterly, S.63(2), pp.449-460.
• SMITH, Brian C. (2007), Good Governance and Development, Palgrave Macmillan Publisher, New York.
• STOKER, Gerry (1998), “Governance as Theory: Five Propositions”, International Social Science Journal, S.50(155), pp.17-28.
• THIRKELL-WHITE, Ben (2003), “The IMF, Good Governance and Middle-Income Countries”, European Journal of Development Research, S.15(1), pp.99-125.
• TRUCHET, Didier (2014), Droit administratif, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.
• UNESCAP (2009), “What is Good Governance?”, Unescap corporate Web Page, www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/good-governance.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 20.06.2022).
• VÁCZI, Péter (2022), “Fair and Effective Public Administration”, Institutiones Administrationis-Journal of Administrative Sciences, S.2(1), pp.161-170.
• WEISS, Friedl and STEINER, Silke (2006), “Transparency as an Element of Good Governance in the Practice of the EU and the WTO: Overview and Comparison”, Fordham International Law Journal, S.30(5), pp.1545-1586.
• WEISS, Thomas G. (2000), “Governance, Good Governance and Global Governance: Conceptual and Actual Challenges”, Third World Quarterly, S.21(5), pp.795-814.
• WOODS, Ngaire (1999), “Good Governance in International Organizations”, Global Governance, S.5(1), pp.39-61.
• YOUNG, J. Hardin (1998), “Administrative Procedure Act of USA”, İdari Usul Kanunu Hazırlığı Uluslararası Sempozyumu Bildiriler Kitabı, T.C. Başbakanlık Basımevi, Ankara, pp.19-25.
• YOUROW, Howard C. (1987), “The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the Dynamics of European Human Rights Jurisprudence”, Connecticut Journal of International Law, S.3, pp.111-159.
• List of Cases: European Court of Human Rights
• Antoni Lewandowski v. Poland, App. No: 38459/03, (ECtHR, 16 July 2012).
• Bărbulescu v. Romania, App. No: 61496/08, (ECtHR, 5 September 2017).
• Beinarovič and Others v. Lithuania, App. Nos: 70520/10, 21920/10, 41876/11, (ECtHR, 12 June 2018).
• Berger-Krall and Others v. Slovenia, App. No: 14717/04, (ECtHR, 12 June 2014).
• Bogdel v. Lithuania, App. No: 41248/06, (ECtHR, 26 November 2013).
• Czaja v. Poland, App. No: 5744/05, (ECtHR, 2 October 2012).
• Ekholm v. Finland, App. No: 68050/01, (ECtHR, 24 July 2007).
• Gaina v. Lithuania, App. No: 42910/08, (ECtHR, 11 October 2016).
• Gasus Dosier- und Fördertechnik GmbH v. The Netherlands, App. No: 15375/89, (ECtHR, 23 February 1995).
• Grigolovič v. Lithuania, App. No: 54882/10, (ECtHR, 10 October 2017).
• Hadri-Vionnet v. Switzerland, App. No: 55525/00, (ECtHR, 14 February 2008).
• Krstić v. Serbia, App. No: 45394/06, (ECtHR, 10 December 2013).
• Kryvenkyy v. Ukraine, App. No: 43768/07, (ECtHR, 16 February 2017).
• Kula v. Turkey, App. No: 20233/06, (ECtHR, 19 June 2018).
• Leander v. Sweden, App. No: 9248/81, (ECtHR, 26 March 1987).
• Magyar Helsinki Bizottság v. Hungary, App. No: 18030/11, (ECtHR, 8 November 2016).
• Megadat.com Srl. v. Moldova, App. No: 21151/04, (ECtHR, 8 April 2008).
• Moskal v. Poland, App. No: 10373/05, (ECtHR, 15 September 2009).
• National Federation of Sportspersons’ Associations and Unions (FNASS) and Others v. France, App. Nos: 48151/11, 77769/13, (ECtHR, 18 January 2018).
• Nekvedavičius v. Lithuania, App. No: 1471/05, (ECtHR, 10 December 2013)
• Riener v. Bulgaria, App. No: 46343/99, (ECtHR, 23 May 2006).
• Rysovskyy v. Ukraine, App. No: 29979/04, (ECtHR, 20 October 2011).
• Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden, App. Nos: 7151/75, 7152/75, (ECtHR, 23 September 1982).