Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Year 1992, , 271 - 286, 29.12.1992

Marmara Üniversitesi Avrupa Topluluğu Enstitüsü

https://doi.org/10.29228/mjes.370

Abstract

Although article 222 of the EEC Treaty provides that the national systems of property law shall not be affected, intellectual property rights, rooted in the national systems, have suffered under the double impact of the free movement of goods and the competition policy. In brief, whilst the existence of such rights is guaranteed, their exercise is limited in so far as they cannot be used in order to defeat the objective of the Treaty enshrined in the rules governing trade between Member States and competition in the common market. Such conclusion has been reached by the ECJ in numerous cases despite the derogation in favour of intellectual property rights inscribed in Article 36 of the Treaty. In order to compensate for the erosion of such rights under the impact of the fundamental rules and, indeed, to maintain the protection of proRerty which is the fruit of intellect or human genius the Community had to legislate on this subject.

Keywords

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY provides

References

  • -

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Year 1992, , 271 - 286, 29.12.1992

Marmara Üniversitesi Avrupa Topluluğu Enstitüsü

https://doi.org/10.29228/mjes.370

Abstract

Although article 222 of the EEC Treaty provides that the national systems of property law shall not be affected, intellectual property rights, rooted in the national systems, have suffered under the double impact of the free movement of goods and the competition policy. In brief, whilst the existence of such rights is guaranteed, their exercise is limited in so far as they cannot be used in order to defeat the objective of the Treaty enshrined in the rules governing trade between Member States and competition in the common market. Such conclusion has been reached by the ECJ in numerous cases despite the derogation in favour of intellectual property rights inscribed in Article 36 of the Treaty. In order to compensate for the erosion of such rights under the impact of the fundamental rules and, indeed, to maintain the protection of proRerty which is the fruit of intellect or human genius the Community had to legislate on this subject. 

Keywords

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY provides

References

  • -
There are 1 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Marmara Üniversitesi Avrupa Topluluğu Enstitüsü This is me

Publication Date December 29, 1992
Published in Issue Year 1992

Cite

APA Avrupa Topluluğu Enstitüsü, M. Ü. (1992). INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY. Marmara Üniversitesi Avrupa Araştırmaları Enstitüsü Avrupa Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(1&2), 271-286. https://doi.org/10.29228/mjes.370
AMA Avrupa Topluluğu Enstitüsü MÜ. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY. MJES. December 1992;2(1&2):271-286. doi:10.29228/mjes.370
Chicago Avrupa Topluluğu Enstitüsü, Marmara Üniversitesi. “INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY”. Marmara Üniversitesi Avrupa Araştırmaları Enstitüsü Avrupa Araştırmaları Dergisi 2, no. 1&2 (December 1992): 271-86. https://doi.org/10.29228/mjes.370.
EndNote Avrupa Topluluğu Enstitüsü MÜ (December 1, 1992) INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY. Marmara Üniversitesi Avrupa Araştırmaları Enstitüsü Avrupa Araştırmaları Dergisi 2 1&2 271–286.
IEEE M. Ü. Avrupa Topluluğu Enstitüsü, “INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY”, MJES, vol. 2, no. 1 & 2, pp. 271–286, 1992, doi: 10.29228/mjes.370.
ISNAD Avrupa Topluluğu Enstitüsü, Marmara Üniversitesi. “INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY”. Marmara Üniversitesi Avrupa Araştırmaları Enstitüsü Avrupa Araştırmaları Dergisi 2/1 & 2 (December 1992), 271-286. https://doi.org/10.29228/mjes.370.
JAMA Avrupa Topluluğu Enstitüsü MÜ. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY. MJES. 1992;2:271–286.
MLA Avrupa Topluluğu Enstitüsü, Marmara Üniversitesi. “INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY”. Marmara Üniversitesi Avrupa Araştırmaları Enstitüsü Avrupa Araştırmaları Dergisi, vol. 2, no. 1&2, 1992, pp. 271-86, doi:10.29228/mjes.370.
Vancouver Avrupa Topluluğu Enstitüsü MÜ. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY. MJES. 1992;2(1&2):271-86.