BibTex RIS Cite

-

Year 2013, Volume: 25 Issue: 2, 65 - 74, 04.07.2013

Abstract

The increase rate of change in the economic, political and social environments of business today has led to growing competitiveness, uncertainties and risks. These circumstances have led to a dramatic increase in attention given to strategic planning of all kinds. Planning of production method has itself received a good deal of attention in recent years. Under such circumstances, a firm would have a better chance of success and survival by a judicious spread of its resource and investments achieved through production method selection. In this study, information about selection process used for many industrial production areas will be given. After selecting criteria, an expert survey will be implemented to determine the importance of the criteria. Results showed that technical specifications are much more important than general specifications and specification of the suppliers.

References

  • Kentli, A. & Ucak, G. (2011). AHP Applications on Machine Selection Problems.
  • Proceedings of 1st International Symposium and 10th Balkan Conference on Operational Research, Thessalonike, Greece, 22-24 September,   Hellenic Operational Research Society. Hanumaiah, N., Ravi, B. & Mukherjee, N.P. (2006). Rapid hard tooling process selection using QFD-AHP methodology. J. Manuf. Technol. Manage., 17(3), 332-350.
  • Iç, Y.T. & Yurdakul, M. (2007). İşleme şartları ve iş parçası özelliklerine uygun CNC
  • Takım Tezgah Seçimini hedefleyen bir karar destek sistemi. Mühendis ve Makina, 48(570), 3 Tsai, J.P., Cheng, H.Y., Wang, S.Y., Kao, Y.C. (2010). Multi-Criteria Decision Making
  • Method for Selection of Machine Tool. Proceedings of International Symposium on Computer Communication Control and Automation, Tainan, China, 5-7 May. Yurdakul, M. (2004). Selection of computer-integrated manufacturing technologies using a combined analytic hierarchy process and goal programming model. Rob. Comput. Integr. Manuf., 20(4), 329–340.
  • Ayağ, Z. & Özdemir, R.G. (2011). An intelligent approach to machine tool selection through fuzzy analytic network process. J. Intell. Manuf., 22(2), 163–177.
  • Qi, J. (2010). Machine Tool Selection Model Based on Fuzzy MCDM Approach.
  • Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligent Control and Information Processing, Dalian, China, 12-15 August. Sun, B., Chen, H., Du, L. & Fang, Y. (2008). Machine Tools Selection Technology for
  • Networked Manufacturing. Proceedings of Second International Symposium on Intelligent Information Technology Application, Shanghai, China, 21-22 December. Dağdeviren, M. (2008). Decision making in equipment selection: an integrated approach with AHP and PROMETHEE. J. Intell. Manuf., 19(4), 397-406.
  • Rao, R.V. (2008). Evaluating flexible manufacturing systems using a combined multiple attribute decision making method. Int. J. Prod. Res., 46(7), 1975-1989.
  • Wang, J., Yao, C. & Zhang, Z. (2010). A fuzzy-AHP comprehensive evaluation method for optimization design of machine tool. Proceedings of International Conference on
  • Mechanic Automation and Control Engineering, Wuhan, China, 26-28 June. Herişçakar, E. (1999). Gemi ana makina seçiminde çok kriterli karar verme yöntemleri
  • AHP ve SMART Uygulaması. Gemi İnşaatı ve Deniz Teknolojisi Teknik Kongresi, İTÜ, İstanbul, 2-3 December, Yapım Matbaacılık Ltd.. Fixed Barrier Guard on a Power Press , http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Power_press_animation.gif , (February 2006).
  • Uçak, G. (2012). Selection of Machine Stations and Lines via Multi-Criteria Decision
  • Making Techniques and a Case Study in Automotive Industry, MSc Thesis, Marmara University, Turkey.

Determining Selection Criteria and Their Importance of Press Lines in Automotive Industry

Year 2013, Volume: 25 Issue: 2, 65 - 74, 04.07.2013

Abstract

The increase rate of change in the economic, political and social environments of business today has led to growing competitiveness, uncertainties and risks. These circumstances have led to a dramatic increase in attention given to strategic planning of all kinds. Planning of production method has itself received a good deal of attention in recent years. Under such circumstances, a firm would have a better chance of success and survival by a judicious spread of its resource and investments achieved through production method selection. In this study, information about selection process used for many industrial production areas will be given. After selecting criteria, an expert survey will be implemented to determine the importance of the criteria. Results showed that technical specifications are much more important than general specifications and specification of the suppliers.

References

  • Kentli, A. & Ucak, G. (2011). AHP Applications on Machine Selection Problems.
  • Proceedings of 1st International Symposium and 10th Balkan Conference on Operational Research, Thessalonike, Greece, 22-24 September,   Hellenic Operational Research Society. Hanumaiah, N., Ravi, B. & Mukherjee, N.P. (2006). Rapid hard tooling process selection using QFD-AHP methodology. J. Manuf. Technol. Manage., 17(3), 332-350.
  • Iç, Y.T. & Yurdakul, M. (2007). İşleme şartları ve iş parçası özelliklerine uygun CNC
  • Takım Tezgah Seçimini hedefleyen bir karar destek sistemi. Mühendis ve Makina, 48(570), 3 Tsai, J.P., Cheng, H.Y., Wang, S.Y., Kao, Y.C. (2010). Multi-Criteria Decision Making
  • Method for Selection of Machine Tool. Proceedings of International Symposium on Computer Communication Control and Automation, Tainan, China, 5-7 May. Yurdakul, M. (2004). Selection of computer-integrated manufacturing technologies using a combined analytic hierarchy process and goal programming model. Rob. Comput. Integr. Manuf., 20(4), 329–340.
  • Ayağ, Z. & Özdemir, R.G. (2011). An intelligent approach to machine tool selection through fuzzy analytic network process. J. Intell. Manuf., 22(2), 163–177.
  • Qi, J. (2010). Machine Tool Selection Model Based on Fuzzy MCDM Approach.
  • Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligent Control and Information Processing, Dalian, China, 12-15 August. Sun, B., Chen, H., Du, L. & Fang, Y. (2008). Machine Tools Selection Technology for
  • Networked Manufacturing. Proceedings of Second International Symposium on Intelligent Information Technology Application, Shanghai, China, 21-22 December. Dağdeviren, M. (2008). Decision making in equipment selection: an integrated approach with AHP and PROMETHEE. J. Intell. Manuf., 19(4), 397-406.
  • Rao, R.V. (2008). Evaluating flexible manufacturing systems using a combined multiple attribute decision making method. Int. J. Prod. Res., 46(7), 1975-1989.
  • Wang, J., Yao, C. & Zhang, Z. (2010). A fuzzy-AHP comprehensive evaluation method for optimization design of machine tool. Proceedings of International Conference on
  • Mechanic Automation and Control Engineering, Wuhan, China, 26-28 June. Herişçakar, E. (1999). Gemi ana makina seçiminde çok kriterli karar verme yöntemleri
  • AHP ve SMART Uygulaması. Gemi İnşaatı ve Deniz Teknolojisi Teknik Kongresi, İTÜ, İstanbul, 2-3 December, Yapım Matbaacılık Ltd.. Fixed Barrier Guard on a Power Press , http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Power_press_animation.gif , (February 2006).
  • Uçak, G. (2012). Selection of Machine Stations and Lines via Multi-Criteria Decision
  • Making Techniques and a Case Study in Automotive Industry, MSc Thesis, Marmara University, Turkey.
There are 15 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Aykut Kentli

Güçlü Uçak This is me

Publication Date July 4, 2013
Published in Issue Year 2013 Volume: 25 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Kentli, A., & Uçak, G. (2013). Determining Selection Criteria and Their Importance of Press Lines in Automotive Industry. Marmara Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 25(2), 65-74. https://doi.org/10.7240/mufbed.v25i2.065
AMA Kentli A, Uçak G. Determining Selection Criteria and Their Importance of Press Lines in Automotive Industry. MFBD. July 2013;25(2):65-74. doi:10.7240/mufbed.v25i2.065
Chicago Kentli, Aykut, and Güçlü Uçak. “Determining Selection Criteria and Their Importance of Press Lines in Automotive Industry”. Marmara Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 25, no. 2 (July 2013): 65-74. https://doi.org/10.7240/mufbed.v25i2.065.
EndNote Kentli A, Uçak G (July 1, 2013) Determining Selection Criteria and Their Importance of Press Lines in Automotive Industry. Marmara Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 25 2 65–74.
IEEE A. Kentli and G. Uçak, “Determining Selection Criteria and Their Importance of Press Lines in Automotive Industry”, MFBD, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 65–74, 2013, doi: 10.7240/mufbed.v25i2.065.
ISNAD Kentli, Aykut - Uçak, Güçlü. “Determining Selection Criteria and Their Importance of Press Lines in Automotive Industry”. Marmara Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 25/2 (July 2013), 65-74. https://doi.org/10.7240/mufbed.v25i2.065.
JAMA Kentli A, Uçak G. Determining Selection Criteria and Their Importance of Press Lines in Automotive Industry. MFBD. 2013;25:65–74.
MLA Kentli, Aykut and Güçlü Uçak. “Determining Selection Criteria and Their Importance of Press Lines in Automotive Industry”. Marmara Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 25, no. 2, 2013, pp. 65-74, doi:10.7240/mufbed.v25i2.065.
Vancouver Kentli A, Uçak G. Determining Selection Criteria and Their Importance of Press Lines in Automotive Industry. MFBD. 2013;25(2):65-74.

Marmara Fen Bilimleri Dergisi

e-ISSN : 2146-5150

 

 

MU Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü

Göztepe Yerleşkesi, 34722 Kadıköy, İstanbul
E-posta: fbedergi@marmara.edu.tr