Investigation of the lawsuits regarding Down syndrome

Year 2022, , 293 - 296, 31.10.2022

Hande Kaymakcalan

https://doi.org/10.5472/marumj.1195921

Abstract

Objective: To examine the number of cases filed about Down syndrome in terms of its numbers, causes and consequences, to provide
an overview of what doctors should pay attention to when informing and consulting patients and during follow-up and recommend
solutions for decreasing the number of malpractice cases. (Discussing the legal aspect of the decisions is beyond the scope of this
research.)
Materials and Methods: ‘Down’, ‘Down sendromu’ ‘Down’s, ‘trizomi 21 ‘, ‘trisomi 21’ and ‘trisomy 21’ was written to ‘ https://
karararama.yargitay.gov.tr/ ‘ and ‘https://karararama.danistay.gov.tr/’ web addresses search engines and the data was examined with
Microsoft Excel or with R version 4.0.5 ( 2021-03-31) for bias and frequency table was used and the results were examined.
Results: A total of 53 cases were found. 49 supreme court and 4 Council of State court decisions are found. The cases are from
27.10.2009 to 13.10.2021.
Conclusion: A total of 39 different Down syndrome cases were examined, as 6 of the 53 cases were related to the same cases and 8
of them were cases not related to Down syndrome. 28 cases are “doctor negligence”, 5 are “reckless killing”, 1 “material mixing in the
genetic center”, 1 “unauthorized use of the child’s photo”, 1 “stealing money from the child”, 1 “intentionally injuring the child”, 1
‘inheritance request for the child’ and 1 on ‘guardianship’.

Keywords

Down syndrome, Prenatal screening, Prenatal diagnosis, Malpractice, Lawsuit

References

• Canfield MA, Honein MA, Yuskiv N, et al. National estimates and race/ethnic-specific variation of selected birth defects in the United States, 1999-2001. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2006;76:747-56. doi:10.1002/bdra.20294
• Sherman SL, Allen EG, Bean LH, Freeman SB. Epidemiology of Down syndrome. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev 2007;13:221-27. doi:10.1002/mrdd.20157
• Daunhauer LA, Fidler DJ, Hahn L, Will E, Lee NR, Hepburn S. Profiles of everyday executive functioning in young children with down syndrome. Am J Intellect Dev Disabil 2014;119:303-18. doi:10.1352/1944-7558-119.4.303
• Bull MJ. Down Syndrome. N Engl J Med 2020;382:2344-52. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1706537
• Morris JK, Mutton DE, Alberman E. Revised estimates of the maternal age specific live birth prevalence of Down’s syndrome. J Med Screen 2002;9:2-6. doi:10.1136/jms.9.1.2
• https://data.tuik.gov.tr/ Kategori/GetKategori?p=Saglik-ve- Sosyal-Koruma-10. Accessed on 24.05.2022
• https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/ #kanunlar Accessed on 24.05.2022
• Salomon LJ, Sotiriadis A, Wulff CB, Odibo A, Akolekar R. Risk of miscarriage following amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling: systematic review of literature and updated meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019;54:442-51. doi:10.1002/uog.20353
• O’Connor C, Moore R, McParland P, et al. The natural history of trisomy 21: outcome data from a large tertiary referral centre. Fetal Diagn Ther 2021;48:575-81. doi:10.1159/000517729
• Çalış P, Bayram M. Techniques, complications and difficulties of prenatal ınvasive diagnosis. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Genet- Special Topics 2018;3:38-43
• https://hsgm.saglik.gov.tr/depo/birimler/Kadin_ve_ Ureme_Sagligi_Db/dokumanlar/rehbler/ dogum_oncesi_ bakim_08-01-2019_1.pdf Accessed on 21.05.2022
• Dolen I. How should a fetus with down syndrome be diagnosed in prenatal care? Turk J Womens Health Neanotol 2021; 3: 39- 49. doi: 10.46969/ezh.839710
• Alberry MS, Aziz E, Ahmed SR, Abdel-Fattah S. Non invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for common aneuploidies and beyond. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2021; 258:424-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.01.008
• Huang T, Gibbons C, Rashid S, et al. Prenatal screening for trisomy 21: a comparative performance and cost analysis of different screening strategies. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020;20:713. doi:10.1186/s12884.020.03394
• Dikmen U, Özbaş C, Özkan S. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Genet- Special Topics. 2018;3:131-4.