The value of non-invasive tests for risk stratification in patients with compensated cirrhosis

Year 2016, , 55 - 58, 01.08.2016

Juan Abraldes

https://doi.org/10.5472/MMJsi.2901.11

Abstract

Liver cirrhosis is characterized by a long compensatedphase, with a median survival from diagnosis of around12 years. When decompensation occurs (variceal bleeding,jaundice, hepatic encephalopathy or ascites) the expectedmedian survival is around two years [1,2]. Whereas there area number of well-validated scores for prognosis predictionand risk stratification in patients with decompensatedcirrhosis, these are very limited in the case of compensatedcirrhosis [1]. The two most widely validated prognosticfactors in compensated cirrhosis are the presence of clinicallysignificant portal hypertension (CSPH) [3], defined asa hepatic venous pressure gradient ≥10 mmHg, and thepresence of esophageal varices [1]. The gold standard teststo assess CSPH and varices are hepatic vein catheterismand endoscopy, respectively [4]. However, these tests,especially hepatic vein catheterism, are relatively invasiveand impractical for the frequent follow-up of these patients.This has fostered the interest in the use of non-invasive toolsfor the assessment of patients with compensated cirrhosis.

References

• D’Amico G, Garcia-Tsao G, Pagliaro L. Natural history and
• prognostic indicators of survival in cirrhosis: a systematic
• review of 118 studies. J Hepatol 2006;44:217-31.
• D’Amico G, Pasta L, Morabito A, et al. Competing risks
• and prognostic stages of cirrhosis: a 25-year inception cohort
• study of 494 patients. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2014;39:1180-
• Ripoll C, Groszmann R, Garcia-Tsao G, et al. Hepatic venous
• pressure gradient predicts clinical decompensation in patients
• with compensated cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 2007;133:481-
• Abraldes JG, Araujo IK, Turon F, Berzigotti A. Diagnosing
• and monitoring cirrhosis: Liver biopsy, hepatic venous
• pressure gradient and elastography. Gastroenterol Hepatol
• 35:488-95.
• Groszmann RJ, Garcia-Tsao G, Bosch J, et al. Beta-blockers
• to prevent gastroesophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis. N Engl J Med 2005;353:2254-61.
• Ripoll C, Groszmann RJ, Garcia-Tsao G, et al. Hepatic venous
• pressure gradient predicts development of hepatocellular
• carcinoma independently of severity of cirrhosis. J Hepatol
• 50:923-8.
• Garcia-Tsao G, Groszmann RJ, Fisher RL, Conn HO
• Atterbury CE, Glickman M. Portal pressure, presence of
• gastroesophageal varices and variceal bleeding. Hepatology
• 5:419-24.
• Berzigotti A, Seijo S, Reverter E, Bosch J. Assessing portal
• hypertension in liver diseases. Expert Rev Gastroenterol
• Hepatol 2013;7:141-55.
• Rosselli M, MacNaughtan J, Jalan R, Pinzani M. Beyond
• scoring: a modern interpretation of disease progression in
• chronic liver disease. Gut 2013;62:1234-41.
• Castera L, Vergniol J, Foucher J, et al. Prospective
• comparison of transient elastography, Fibrotest, APRI, and
• liver biopsy for the assessment of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis
• C. Gastroenterology 2005;128:343-50.
• Castera L, Foucher J, Bernard PH, et al. Pitfalls of liver
• stiffness measurement: a 5-year prospective study of 13,369
• examinations. Hepatology 2010;51:828-35.
• European Association for Study of L, Asociacion
• Latinoamericana para el Estudio del H. EASL-ALEH Clinical
• Practice Guidelines: Non-invasive tests for evaluation of liver
• disease severity and prognosis. J Hepatol 2015;63:237-64.
• Myers RP, Pomier-Layrargues G, Kirsch R, et al.
• Discordance in fibrosis staging between liver biopsy and
• transient elastography using the FibroScan XL probe. J
• Hepatol 2012;56:564-70.
• Myers RP, Pomier-Layrargues G, Kirsch R, et al. Feasibility
• and diagnostic performance of the FibroScan XL probe for
• liver stiffness measurement in overweight and obese patients.
• Hepatology 2012;55:199-208.
• Vizzutti F, Arena U, Romanelli RG, et al. Liver stiffness
• measurement predicts severe portal hypertension in patients
• with HCV-related cirrhosis. Hepatology 2007;45:1290-97.
• Groszmann RJ, Abraldes JG. Portal hypertension: from
• bedside to bench. J Clin Gastroenterol 2005;39:S215.
• Shi KQ, Fan YC, Pan ZZ, et al. Transient elastography: a
• meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy in evaluation of portal
• hypertension in chronic liver disease. Liver Int 2013;33:62-
• Berzigotti A, Seijo S, Arena U, et al. Elastography, spleen
• size, and platelet count identify portal hypertension in patients
• with compensated cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 2013;144:102-
• e101.
• Augustin S, Millan L, Gonzalez A, et al. Detection of early
• portal hypertension with routine data and liver stiffness in
• patients with asymptomatic liver disease: a prospective study.
• J Hepatol 2014;60:561-9.
• de Franchis R, Baveno VIF. Expanding consensus in
• portal hypertension: Report of the Baveno VI Consensus
• Workshop: Stratifying risk and individualizing care for portal
• hypertension. J Hepatol 2015;63:743-52.
• Takuma Y, Nouso K, Morimoto Y, et al. Measurement
• of spleen stiffness by acoustic radiation force impulse
• imaging identifies cirrhotic patients with esophageal varices.
• Gastroenterology 2013;144:92-101.
• Procopet B, Berzigotti A, Abraldes JG, et al. Real-time shearwave
• elastography: applicability, reliability and accuracy
• for clinically significant portal hypertension. J Hepatol
• 62:1068-75.
• Colecchia A, Montrone L, Scaioli E, et al. Measurement
• of spleen stiffness to evaluate portal hypertension and the
• presence of esophageal varices in patients with HCV-related
• cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 2012;143:646-54.
• Robic MA, Procopet B, Metivier S, et al. Liver stiffness
• accurately predicts portal hypertension related complications
• in patients with chronic liver disease: a prospective study.
• J.Hepatol 2011;55:1017-24.
• de Franchis R. Revising consensus in portal hypertension
• report of the Baveno V consensus workshop on methodology
• of diagnosis and therapy in portal hypertension. J Hepatol
• 53:762-8.
• Sherman M, Bilodeau M, Cooper C, et al. Liver Disease in
• Canada: A Crisis in the Making. In; 2013:1-70.
• D’Amico G. Natural History and Stages of Cirrhosis. In
• de Franchis R, Dell’Era A, eds. Variceal Hemorrhage: New
• York: Springer, 2014.
• Abraldes JG(1), Bureau C(2), Stefanescu H(3), Augustin S(4)
• Ney M(5), Blasco H(2), Procopet B(3,)(6), Bosch J(6,)(7)
• Genesca J(4), Berzigotti A(8,)(9); Anticipate Investigators.
• Non-invasive tools and risk of clinically significant portal
• hypertension and varices in compensated cirrhosis: The
• “Anticipate” study. Hepatology. 2016 Sep 17. doi: 10.1002/
• hep.28824.
• Kim BK, Han KH, Park JY, et al. A liver stiffness
• measurement-based, noninvasive prediction model for
• high-risk esophageal varices in B-viral liver cirrhosis. Am J
• Gastroenterol 2010;105:1382-90.
• Calvaruso V, Bronte F, Conte E, Simone F, Craxi A, Di
• Marco V. Modified spleen stiffness measurement by transient
• elastography is associated with presence of large oesophageal
• varices in patients with compensated hepatitis C virus
• cirrhosis. J Viral Hepat 2013;20:867-74.
• Villanueva C, Albillos A, Genesca J, et al. Development of
• hyperdynamic circulation and response to beta-blockers in
• compensated cirrhosis with portal hypertension. Hepatology
• 63:197-206.
• Reiberger T, Ferlitsch A, Payer BA, et al. Noninvasive
• screening for liver fibrosis and portal hypertension by
• transient elastography--a large single center experience.
• Wien Klin Wochenschr 2012;124:395-402.
• Berzigotti A, Seijo S, Arena U, et al. Elastography, spleen
• size, and platelet count identify portal hypertension in patients
• with compensated cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 2013;144:102-
• Kitson MT, Roberts SK, Colman JC, Paul E, Button P, Kemp
• W. Liver stiffness and the prediction of clinically significant
• portal hypertension and portal hypertensive complications.
• Scand J Gastroenterol 2015;50:462-9.