ÖRGÜTSEL PERFORMANS KAVRAMI VE GELİŞİMİ

Year 2001, , 39 - 45, 15.01.2001

Efika Bakoğlu

https://doi.org/10.14783/maruoneri.735488

Cited By: 10

Abstract

This study reviews the organizational performance concept in the research context as it has been as a popular variable of practical signifıcance recently in especially strategic management fıeld. The concept will be covered by trying to understand it in research contexts looking at its past, preseni and future. The landmark studies in organizational performance are to be reviewed and iııterpreted, and some suggestions for future studies are to be offerecL

Keywords

örgütsel performans, işletme

References

• [1] Aktan, C.C., 2000'li Yıllarda Yeni Yönetim Teknikleri, Türkiye Genç İşadamları Derneği yayını. Nisan 1999.
• [2] Bourgeois. L.J.; Eisenhardt, K.M.. "Strategic Decision Process in High Velocity Environments: Four Cases in The Microcomputer Industry,” Management Science, C.34. S.7, Temmuz 1988, ss.820-2 1.
• [3} Eisenhardt, K. M., "Making Fast Strategic Decisions in High-Velocity Environments." Academy of Management Journal. C.32. S.3. 1989, ss.543-576.
• [4] Fredrickson. J. W.; Mittchell. T.R., "Strategic Decision Process: Comprehensiveness and Performance in an Industry with an Unstable Environment." Academy of Management Journal. C.27. S.2. 1984. ss.399-423.
• [5] Fredrickson. J .W., "The Comprehensiveness of Strategic Decision Process: Observations, Future Directions," Academy of Management Journal, C.27. S.3, 1984, ss.445-466.
• [6] Fredrickson. J.W„ "Strategic Process Research: Questions and Recommendations."’ Academy of Management Revie\v, Vol.8. No.4. 1983, ss.565- 575.
• [7] Singh, J.V., "Performance, Slack, and Risk Taking in Organizational Decision Making,” Academy of Management Journal, C.29, S.3, 1986, ss.562- 585.
• [8] Prahalad, C.K.; A. Bettis, Richard; "The Dominant Logic: a New Linkâge Betvveen Diversity and Performance,” Strategic Management Journal.
• C.7, 1986, ss.485-501. [9] Miller, D., "Strategy making and Structure: Analysis and Implications for Performance,” Academy of Management Journal, C.30, S.l, 1987, ss.7- 32.
• [10] Snow. C.C.; Hrebiniak, L.G., "Strategy. Distinctive Competence, and Organizational Performance,” Administrative Science Quarterly, C.25, Haziran 1980, s.317-336.
• [11] Weir, C., "Organizational Structure and Corporate Performance: An Analysis of Medium and Large UK Finns”, Management Decision, C:33, S:l, 1995, ss.24-32.
• [14] Bourgeois, L.J., “Performance and Consensus,” Strategic Management Journal, C.l, 1980, ss.227-248.
• [13] G. Dess, Gre gory, "Consensus on Strategy Formulation and Organizational Performance: Competitors in a Fragmented Industry,” Strategic Management Journal, C:8, 1987, ss.259-277.
• [14] Thor, C. G., The Measure of Success: Creating a High Performing Organizatioıı, John Wailey and Sons, Nevv York, 1994, ss.53-54.
• [15] Venkatraman. N.: Ramanujam. V.. "Masurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research: A Comparison of Approaches,” Academy of Management Revievv, C: 11, S:4, 1986, ss.801- 814.
• [16] Chakravarthy. B.S.. "Measuring Strategic Performance,” Strategic Management Journal, C.7. 1986. ss.437-458.
• [17] Chakravarthy, B.S., "Adaptation: A Promising Metaphor for Strategic Management,” Academy of Management Revietv. C.7, S.l, 1982. ss.35- 44.
• [18] Dess. G.G.; Robinson, R.B., "Measuring Organizational Performance in the Absence of Objective Measures: The Case of the Privately- held Firm and Conglomerate Business Unit.” Strategic Management Journal, Vol.5, 1984, ss.265-273.