Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

YATIRIM FONLARININ MALİ TABLOLARINA İLİŞKİN DENETÇİ GÖRÜŞLERİ İLE DENETÇİ ROTASYONU ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ

Year 2017, Volume: 19 Issue: 3, 671 - 695, 30.09.2017

İklim Elif Umut

Abstract

Denetçi rotasyonu uygulaması, özünde denetim kalitesinin arttırılmasına yönelik bir uygulama olarak ortaya çıkmıştır. Araştırma yapan yazarların bir bölümü rotasyon uygulamasını desteklemiş ve bu uygulamanın müşteri şirket ile denetçi arasında gelişmesi istenmeyen yakın ilişkiyi ortadan kaldırmak suretiyle denetçinin bağımsız davranabilmesine imkan sağlayacağı yönünde sonuçlara ulaşmış, diğer bir grup yazar ise rotasyon uygulamasının tamamen karşısında yer almışlardır. 

Bu çalışma kapsamında yatırım fonlarında alınmış olan denetim görüşünün denetçiyi değiştirme kararı üzerindeki etkisi belirlenmeye çalışılmıştır. Çalışmanın bulguları Türkiye’deki yatırım fonlarının yapılan bağımsız denetim sonucunda almış oldukları denetim görüşleri, hangi denetim şirketi ile çalıştıkları ve gözlem dönemi boyunca çalıştıkları denetim şirketinin ya da sorumlu ortağın değişip değişmediği ya da kaç kez değiştiği hakkında bilgi sağlamaktadır.


Keywords

Türkiye yatırım fonları denetim şirketleri

References

  • Barton, Marquita Toinette. 2002 Analysis of the Mandatory Auditor Rotation Debate University of Tennessee Honors ThesisProjects http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj/512, p.8
  • Behn, B., J., Choi, H., Kang, T. 2008 Audit Quality and Properties of Analyst Earnings Forecas. Accounting Review, 83(2): 329-330
  • Bowlin, K., Hobson, J., Piercey, M. D. 2015. The Effects of Auditor Rotation, Professional Skepticism, and Interactions with Managers on Audit Quality. The Accounting Review, 90(4) ,1363-1393
  • Burton, J,. Roberts, W. 1967. A Study of Auditor Changes. Journal of Accountancy. April :31-36
  • Carcello, J. V. , Nagy, A. L. 2004. Client size, Auditor Specialization and Fraudulent Financial Reporting. Managerial Auditing Journal. 19(5):651 – 668
  • Carey, P., and R. Simnett. 2006. Audit partner Tenure and Audit Quality. The Accounting Review 81(3): 677–712.
  • Chadegani, A., A. 2011. Review of Studies on Audit Quality. International Conference on Humanities, Society and Culture, IPEDR, 20: 312-317
  • Chow, W. C., Rice, S. Y. 1982. Qualified Audit Opinion and Auditor Switching. The Accounting Review. 57: 326-335
  • Citron, D.B., Taffler, R.J. 1992. The Audit Report Under Going Concern Uncertainties: An Emprical Analysis. Accounting and Business Research .22(88): 337-345
  • Craswell, A.T. 1998. The Association Between Qualified Opinions and Auditor Switches. Accounting and Business Research. 19(73): 23-31.
  • De Angelo, L.E. 1982. Mandated Successful Efforts and Auditor Choice. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 4: 171-203.
  • DeAngelo, L., E. 1981. Auditor Size and Audit Quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 3:185-186
  • Dehkordi, H., F., Makarem, N. 2011. The Effect of Size and Type of Auditor on Audit Quality. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics. 80: 121-137
  • Dunn, K., A., Mayhew, B. 2004. Auditor Industry Specialization and Client Disclosure Quality. Review of Accounting Studies. 9(1): 35-58
  • Ewelt-Knauer, C., Gold, A., Pott., C. 2012. What Do We Know About the Mandatory Audit Firm Rotation. Research Committee of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland (ICAS), p.6-7
  • Florio, C., Gotti, G., Mastrolia . 2015. Audit Firm Rotation, Audit Fees and Audit Quality : The Experience of Italian Public Companies. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation. 25: 44-66
  • Fontaine, R., Letaifa, S.B., Herda, D. 2013. An Interview Study to Understand the Reasons Clients Change Audit Firms and the Client’s Perceived Value of the Audit Service. Current Issues in Auditing. 7 (1): A1-A14
  • Francis, J., Wilson, E. 1988. Auditor changes: A Joint Test of Theories Relating to Agency Costs and Auditor Differentiation. The Accounting Review. 63(4): 664-667
  • Geiger, M., Rama, V.D. 2006 Audit Firm Size and Going-Concern Reporting Accuracy. Accounting Horizons. 20(1):1-17
  • Gietzmann, M. B., and P. K. Sen 2002. Improving Auditor Independence Through Selective Mandatory Rotation. International Journal of Auditing. 6: 183–210.
  • Gökgöz, A. 2013. Diğer Kapsamlı Gelirler ve Muhasebeleştirilmesi. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, Ocak: 23-38
  • Gramillion, L. 2005. Mutual Fund Industry Handbook, A Comprehensive Guide For Investment Professionals, Boston Institue of Finance. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Hoboken. New Jersey.
  • Gregory, A., Collier, P. 1996. Audit Fees and Auditor Change: An Investigation of the Persistence of Fee Reduction by Type of Change . Journal of Business Finance and Accounting. 23(1) : 13-28
  • Haskins, M. E., Williams, D. D. 1990. A Contingent Model of Intra-Big Eight Auditor Changes. Auditing: A Journal of Practice &Theory. 9(3) :55-74
  • Hoşgör, Ş. 2012. Araştırma Yöntemleri Ders Notları
  • Hudaib, M., Cooke T., E. 2005. Qualified Audit Opinion and Auditor Swithching. Working Paper. Paper number: 02/05 University of Exeter, p. 6-10 https://business-school.exeter.ac.uk/documents/papers/accounting/2002/0205.pdf, Erişim tarihi: 10 Ekim 2016
  • Krishnan, G.V., Ma, M., Yan, W. 2016. Do Auditors With a Deep Pocket Provide a High Quality Audit? UTS Australian Summer Accounting Conference. https://www.uts.edu.au/sites/default/files/Gopal%20Krishnan_2016%20Summer%20Conference.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 3 Temmuz 2016
  • Krishnan, J., Krishnan, J., & Stephens, R.G.1996. The Simultaneous Relation between Auditor Switching and Audit Opinion: An Empirical Analysis. Accounting and Business Research. 26(3) :224-236.
  • Lai, K. 2013. Audit Reporting of Big 4 Versus Non-Big 4 Auditors: The Case of Ex-Andersen Clients. The International Journal of Accounting. 48(4): 495–524
  • Li, C., Song, F.M., Wong, S.M.L. 2008. A Continuous Relation Between Audit Firm Size and Audit Opinions: Evidence from China. International Journal of Auditing. 12:111-127
  • Owhoso, V. E., Messier, Jr., W. F., & Lynch, Jr., J. G. 2002. Error Detection by Industry- Specialized Teams during Sequential Audit Review. Journal of Accounting Research. 40(3): 883-900.
  • Raiborn, C., Schorg, C., A., Massoud, M. 2006. Should Auditor Rotation Be Mandatory? The Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance, 17(4): 37-49
  • Salleh, K., Jasmani, H. 2014 Audit Rotation and Audit Report: Emprical Evidence from Malaysian PLCs Over the Period of ten Years, Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 145: 40-50
  • Schwartz, K. B., Menon, K. 1985. Auditor Switches by Failing Firms. The Accounting Review. 60(2): 248-261
  • Stanisic, N., Radojevic, T., Stanic, N., Rajin, D. 2015. The Association Between Auditor Switching and Audit Opinion in the Rebuplic of Serbia, Finiz Conference, Belgrade, http://ssrn.com/abstract=2704642, Erişim tarihi: 26 Haziran 2016
  • Suyono, E., Yi, F., Riswan, M.M. 2013. Determinant Factors Affecting The Auditor Switching: An Indonesian Case. Global Review of Accounting and Finance. 4(2): 103-116
  • Şenyiğit, B., Zeytinoğlu, E. 2014. Zorunlu Denetçi Rotasyonunun Denetim Kalitesi Üzerindeki Etkileri: Literatür Araştırması. İ. Ü. İşletme Fakültesi İşletme İktisadı Enstitüsü Yönetim Dergisi. 77: 79-98
  • Thorndike R.M. Cunningham G.K., Thorndike R.L., Hagen E.P. 1991. Measurement and Evaluation in Psychology and Education. 5 th Ed. New York: MacMillan Publishing Company, 1991: 126, 142, 145, 212, 225-233, 239-241, 249, 251.
  • Vanstralen, A. 2003. Going Concern Opinions, Auditor Switching, and the Self Fulfilling Prophecy Effect Examined in the Regulatory Context of Belgium. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance. 18(2): 231-254
  • Woo, E., Koh, H. C.. 2001. Factors Associated with Auditor Changes: A Singapore Study. Accounting and Business Research. 31(2): 133-144

Year 2017, Volume: 19 Issue: 3, 671 - 695, 30.09.2017

İklim Elif Umut

Abstract

References

  • Barton, Marquita Toinette. 2002 Analysis of the Mandatory Auditor Rotation Debate University of Tennessee Honors ThesisProjects http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj/512, p.8
  • Behn, B., J., Choi, H., Kang, T. 2008 Audit Quality and Properties of Analyst Earnings Forecas. Accounting Review, 83(2): 329-330
  • Bowlin, K., Hobson, J., Piercey, M. D. 2015. The Effects of Auditor Rotation, Professional Skepticism, and Interactions with Managers on Audit Quality. The Accounting Review, 90(4) ,1363-1393
  • Burton, J,. Roberts, W. 1967. A Study of Auditor Changes. Journal of Accountancy. April :31-36
  • Carcello, J. V. , Nagy, A. L. 2004. Client size, Auditor Specialization and Fraudulent Financial Reporting. Managerial Auditing Journal. 19(5):651 – 668
  • Carey, P., and R. Simnett. 2006. Audit partner Tenure and Audit Quality. The Accounting Review 81(3): 677–712.
  • Chadegani, A., A. 2011. Review of Studies on Audit Quality. International Conference on Humanities, Society and Culture, IPEDR, 20: 312-317
  • Chow, W. C., Rice, S. Y. 1982. Qualified Audit Opinion and Auditor Switching. The Accounting Review. 57: 326-335
  • Citron, D.B., Taffler, R.J. 1992. The Audit Report Under Going Concern Uncertainties: An Emprical Analysis. Accounting and Business Research .22(88): 337-345
  • Craswell, A.T. 1998. The Association Between Qualified Opinions and Auditor Switches. Accounting and Business Research. 19(73): 23-31.
  • De Angelo, L.E. 1982. Mandated Successful Efforts and Auditor Choice. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 4: 171-203.
  • DeAngelo, L., E. 1981. Auditor Size and Audit Quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 3:185-186
  • Dehkordi, H., F., Makarem, N. 2011. The Effect of Size and Type of Auditor on Audit Quality. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics. 80: 121-137
  • Dunn, K., A., Mayhew, B. 2004. Auditor Industry Specialization and Client Disclosure Quality. Review of Accounting Studies. 9(1): 35-58
  • Ewelt-Knauer, C., Gold, A., Pott., C. 2012. What Do We Know About the Mandatory Audit Firm Rotation. Research Committee of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland (ICAS), p.6-7
  • Florio, C., Gotti, G., Mastrolia . 2015. Audit Firm Rotation, Audit Fees and Audit Quality : The Experience of Italian Public Companies. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation. 25: 44-66
  • Fontaine, R., Letaifa, S.B., Herda, D. 2013. An Interview Study to Understand the Reasons Clients Change Audit Firms and the Client’s Perceived Value of the Audit Service. Current Issues in Auditing. 7 (1): A1-A14
  • Francis, J., Wilson, E. 1988. Auditor changes: A Joint Test of Theories Relating to Agency Costs and Auditor Differentiation. The Accounting Review. 63(4): 664-667
  • Geiger, M., Rama, V.D. 2006 Audit Firm Size and Going-Concern Reporting Accuracy. Accounting Horizons. 20(1):1-17
  • Gietzmann, M. B., and P. K. Sen 2002. Improving Auditor Independence Through Selective Mandatory Rotation. International Journal of Auditing. 6: 183–210.
  • Gökgöz, A. 2013. Diğer Kapsamlı Gelirler ve Muhasebeleştirilmesi. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, Ocak: 23-38
  • Gramillion, L. 2005. Mutual Fund Industry Handbook, A Comprehensive Guide For Investment Professionals, Boston Institue of Finance. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Hoboken. New Jersey.
  • Gregory, A., Collier, P. 1996. Audit Fees and Auditor Change: An Investigation of the Persistence of Fee Reduction by Type of Change . Journal of Business Finance and Accounting. 23(1) : 13-28
  • Haskins, M. E., Williams, D. D. 1990. A Contingent Model of Intra-Big Eight Auditor Changes. Auditing: A Journal of Practice &Theory. 9(3) :55-74
  • Hoşgör, Ş. 2012. Araştırma Yöntemleri Ders Notları
  • Hudaib, M., Cooke T., E. 2005. Qualified Audit Opinion and Auditor Swithching. Working Paper. Paper number: 02/05 University of Exeter, p. 6-10 https://business-school.exeter.ac.uk/documents/papers/accounting/2002/0205.pdf, Erişim tarihi: 10 Ekim 2016
  • Krishnan, G.V., Ma, M., Yan, W. 2016. Do Auditors With a Deep Pocket Provide a High Quality Audit? UTS Australian Summer Accounting Conference. https://www.uts.edu.au/sites/default/files/Gopal%20Krishnan_2016%20Summer%20Conference.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 3 Temmuz 2016
  • Krishnan, J., Krishnan, J., & Stephens, R.G.1996. The Simultaneous Relation between Auditor Switching and Audit Opinion: An Empirical Analysis. Accounting and Business Research. 26(3) :224-236.
  • Lai, K. 2013. Audit Reporting of Big 4 Versus Non-Big 4 Auditors: The Case of Ex-Andersen Clients. The International Journal of Accounting. 48(4): 495–524
  • Li, C., Song, F.M., Wong, S.M.L. 2008. A Continuous Relation Between Audit Firm Size and Audit Opinions: Evidence from China. International Journal of Auditing. 12:111-127
  • Owhoso, V. E., Messier, Jr., W. F., & Lynch, Jr., J. G. 2002. Error Detection by Industry- Specialized Teams during Sequential Audit Review. Journal of Accounting Research. 40(3): 883-900.
  • Raiborn, C., Schorg, C., A., Massoud, M. 2006. Should Auditor Rotation Be Mandatory? The Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance, 17(4): 37-49
  • Salleh, K., Jasmani, H. 2014 Audit Rotation and Audit Report: Emprical Evidence from Malaysian PLCs Over the Period of ten Years, Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 145: 40-50
  • Schwartz, K. B., Menon, K. 1985. Auditor Switches by Failing Firms. The Accounting Review. 60(2): 248-261
  • Stanisic, N., Radojevic, T., Stanic, N., Rajin, D. 2015. The Association Between Auditor Switching and Audit Opinion in the Rebuplic of Serbia, Finiz Conference, Belgrade, http://ssrn.com/abstract=2704642, Erişim tarihi: 26 Haziran 2016
  • Suyono, E., Yi, F., Riswan, M.M. 2013. Determinant Factors Affecting The Auditor Switching: An Indonesian Case. Global Review of Accounting and Finance. 4(2): 103-116
  • Şenyiğit, B., Zeytinoğlu, E. 2014. Zorunlu Denetçi Rotasyonunun Denetim Kalitesi Üzerindeki Etkileri: Literatür Araştırması. İ. Ü. İşletme Fakültesi İşletme İktisadı Enstitüsü Yönetim Dergisi. 77: 79-98
  • Thorndike R.M. Cunningham G.K., Thorndike R.L., Hagen E.P. 1991. Measurement and Evaluation in Psychology and Education. 5 th Ed. New York: MacMillan Publishing Company, 1991: 126, 142, 145, 212, 225-233, 239-241, 249, 251.
  • Vanstralen, A. 2003. Going Concern Opinions, Auditor Switching, and the Self Fulfilling Prophecy Effect Examined in the Regulatory Context of Belgium. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance. 18(2): 231-254
  • Woo, E., Koh, H. C.. 2001. Factors Associated with Auditor Changes: A Singapore Study. Accounting and Business Research. 31(2): 133-144
There are 40 citations in total.

Details

Subjects Business Administration
Journal Section MAIN SECTION
Authors

İklim Elif Umut

Publication Date September 30, 2017
Submission Date April 26, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2017 Volume: 19 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Umut, İ. E. (2017). YATIRIM FONLARININ MALİ TABLOLARINA İLİŞKİN DENETÇİ GÖRÜŞLERİ İLE DENETÇİ ROTASYONU ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi, 19(3), 671-695.
 Download Cover Image

Authorship
MBDD follows the guidelines in COPE Authorship Guideline to ensure fair recognition of contributions to a research paper (https://publicationethics.org/guidance/discussion-document/authorship ). Authorship carries both credit and responsibility, and it is essential that all listed authors have made significant contributions to the research.

For multi-author studies, the Contributions of Authors must be declared after the conclusion and before the bibliography of the paper. The authors' initials and last names should be used to indicate which author contributed to which part of the manuscript. Details can be found by clicking the “Article Submission Checklist” button. The authors can acknowledge contributions that do not merit authorship.


The author(s) should disclose the use of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) and AI-assisted tools in design and implementation of the research. Such use need to be disclosed within the methodology section of the manuscript. Use of AI does not preclude the manuscript from publication, rather provides a transparent picture of the research.