Çalışmada; “Acaba Türkiye’de yaşanan e-Dönüşüm sürecindeki elektronik muhasebe ve denetim uygulamalarının teorik ve felsefi boyutu açısından hangi aşamadayız?”, “Türkiye’de e-Uygulamalarla e-Dönüşüme hazır mıyız?” sorularına cevap aranmıştır. Bu amaçla, Türkiye’deki elektronik muhasebe ve denetim uygulamaları ontolojisinde dijital paradigmalar teorik ve felsefi açıdan pragmatik yaklaşımla ele alınmıştır. E-dönüşümün parçası olarak güncel tüm elektronik muhasebe belgeleri ve defterler ile düzeni incelenmiştir. Çalışma konusuna ilişkin web tabanlı araştırmanın yanı sıra nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden odak grup görüşmesinden yararlanılarak uygulamacıların görüşlerine de yer verilmiştir. Ontolojinin ışığında dijital paradigma olarak e-dönüşümün ütopya olmadığı açıkça ortaya çıkmıştır.
e-Dönüşüm e-Uygulamalar Muhasebe ve Denetim Ontolojisi Dijital Paradigma Pragmatik Yaklaşım
In the study, the answers are tried to be found to these questions: “In which level are we in the e-transformation process taking place in Turkey in the view of theoretical and philosophical dimension of accounting and auditing practices?”, “In Turkey are we ready to e-transformation with e-practices?”. With this aim, the digital paradigm in electronic accounting and auditing practices ontology in Turkey, are studied with pragmatic approach by theoretical and philosophical dimension. As a part of e-transformation, all current electronic accounting documents, journal & ledgers and system is considered. Relative to the topic of the study web based research and one of the qualitative survey methods which are focus group interview is done. With the view of ontology, as a digital paradigm it is discovered that e-transformation is not a utopia.
E-Transformation E-Practices Accounting and Auditing Ontology Digital Paradigm Pragmatic Approach
Primary Language | Turkish |
---|---|
Journal Section | MAIN SECTION |
Authors | |
Publication Date | December 27, 2018 |
Submission Date | June 17, 2018 |
Published in Issue | Year 2018 Volume: 20 - Special Issue of MODAV 15. International Conference on Accounting |
Authorship
MBDD follows the guidelines in COPE Authorship Guideline to ensure fair recognition of contributions to a research paper (https://publicationethics.org/guidance/discussion-document/authorship ). Authorship carries both credit and responsibility, and it is essential that all listed authors have made significant contributions to the research.
For multi-author studies, the Contributions of Authors must be declared after the conclusion and before the bibliography of the paper. The authors' initials and last names should be used to indicate which author contributed to which part of the manuscript. Details can be found by clicking the “Article Submission Checklist” button. The authors can acknowledge contributions that do not merit authorship.
The author(s) should disclose the use of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) and AI-assisted tools in design and implementation of the research. Such use need to be disclosed within the methodology section of the manuscript. Use of AI does not preclude the manuscript from publication, rather provides a transparent picture of the research.