Eğlence ve medya sektöründe üretilen prodüksiyon ürünleri genel veya özel müşterilerine sunulmaktadır. Prodüksiyon ürünün stok olup olmadığı, duran varlık olarak değerlendirilip değerlendirilemeyeceği, katlanılan maliyetlerin hangi hesaplarda izleneceği, maliyet unsurlarına hangi kalemlerin dahil edileceği, aynı ürünün kopyalanarak satılması durumunda kopyalanan ürünün maliyetinin ne olacağı, hasılat-gider eşleştirmesi gibi sorularla karşılaşılmaktadır. Çalışmada Kavramsal Çerçeve, TMS-2; TMS-37, TMS-38 ve TFRS-15 ve “Genel Kabul Görmüş Muhasebe İlkeleri” çerçevesindeki sorunların tartışılarak açıklığa kavuşturulması amaçlanmıştır. Mevcut haliyle prodüksiyon ürünlerinin muhasebeleştirilmesi süreci anomaliye neden olmaktadır. Bu anomalik etkinin muhasebeye farklı bir bakış açısı gerektirip gerektirmediği tartışılmıştır.
Companies which are located in the entertainment and media sector, offer products such as film, advertising and music etc. to their general or private customers. There are many questions such as whether the production product is a stock or not, whether it can be evaluated as a fixed asset or not, the costs incurred will be followed in which account, which items will be included in the cost elements, what will be the cost of the copied product if the same product is copied and sold, revenue-expense matching. In this study, the above mentioned problems are aimed to be discussed and clarified within the framework of the Conceptual Framework, TMS-2, TMS-37, TMS-38 and TFRS-15 and “Generally Accepted Accounting Principles”. The process of accounting for production products causes anomalies in its current state. Whether this anomalous effect requires a different perspective on accounting is discussed.
Primary Language | Turkish |
---|---|
Journal Section | MAIN SECTION |
Authors | |
Publication Date | December 27, 2018 |
Submission Date | June 19, 2018 |
Published in Issue | Year 2018 Volume: 20 - Special Issue of MODAV 15. International Conference on Accounting |
Authorship
MBDD follows the guidelines in COPE Authorship Guideline to ensure fair recognition of contributions to a research paper (https://publicationethics.org/guidance/discussion-document/authorship ). Authorship carries both credit and responsibility, and it is essential that all listed authors have made significant contributions to the research.
For multi-author studies, the Contributions of Authors must be declared after the conclusion and before the bibliography of the paper. The authors' initials and last names should be used to indicate which author contributed to which part of the manuscript. Details can be found by clicking the “Article Submission Checklist” button. The authors can acknowledge contributions that do not merit authorship.
The author(s) should disclose the use of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) and AI-assisted tools in design and implementation of the research. Such use need to be disclosed within the methodology section of the manuscript. Use of AI does not preclude the manuscript from publication, rather provides a transparent picture of the research.