Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, yönetim muhasebesi/stratejik yönetim muhasebesi araçları kullanımının işletmelerin finansal performansı, finansal olmayan performansı ve genel performansı üzerine etkisinin incelenmesidir. Ayrıca çalışmada işletmelerin demografik özellikleri ve yönetim muhasebesi/stratejik yönetim muhasebesi araçları kullanımı arasındaki fark da incelenmektedir. Araştırmada Borsa İstanbul’a kote olmuş işletmelerden ve Türkiye’nin sanayi yoğun çeşitli şehirlerinde faaliyet gösteren işletmelerden anket yoluyla veri elde edilmiştir. Analiz sonuçlarına göre stratejik yönetim muhasebesi araçları kullanımı belirli bir düzeydedir ancak geleneksel yönetim muhasebesi araçları hala daha yaygın biçimde kullanılmaktadır. 17 yönetim muhasebesi/stratejik yönetim muhasebesi aracının kullanımının performans üzerinde etkili olduğu bulgulanmıştır. Bunun yanısıra, demografik özellikler ve yönetim muhasebesi/stratejik yönetim muhasebesi araçları kullanımı 53 araçtan 19’u için farklılaşmaktadır.
This study aims to examine the effects of the use of management accounting/strategic management accounting tools on the financial performance, non-financial performance, and the overall performance of the businesses. Besides, the difference between the demographic characteristics of the businesses and the use of management accounting/strategic management accounting tools are also examined. In the research, the data were obtained with a questionnaire from the businesses listed on Borsa Istanbul and businesses operating in various cities of Turkey's intensive industries. According to the results of the analysis, the use of strategic management accounting tools is at a certain level, but traditional management accounting tools are still in use more widely. It is found that the use of 17 management accounting/strategic management accounting tools affects the performance of businesses. Also, the demographic characteristics and the use of management accounting/strategic management accounting tools differ for 19 tools out of 53.
Primary Language | English |
---|---|
Subjects | Business Administration |
Journal Section | MAIN SECTION |
Authors | |
Publication Date | December 31, 2020 |
Submission Date | October 17, 2019 |
Published in Issue | Year 2020 Volume: 22 Issue: 4 |
Authorship
MBDD follows the guidelines in COPE Authorship Guideline to ensure fair recognition of contributions to a research paper (https://publicationethics.org/guidance/discussion-document/authorship ). Authorship carries both credit and responsibility, and it is essential that all listed authors have made significant contributions to the research.
For multi-author studies, the Contributions of Authors must be declared after the conclusion and before the bibliography of the paper. The authors' initials and last names should be used to indicate which author contributed to which part of the manuscript. Details can be found by clicking the “Article Submission Checklist” button. The authors can acknowledge contributions that do not merit authorship.
The author(s) should disclose the use of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) and AI-assisted tools in design and implementation of the research. Such use need to be disclosed within the methodology section of the manuscript. Use of AI does not preclude the manuscript from publication, rather provides a transparent picture of the research.