Bu çalışmanın amacı, muhasebe meslek mensuplarına verilen meslekten çıkarma cezalarına karşı idari yargıda açılan iptal ve tam yargı davalarını farklı kategorilerde değerlendirilerek elde edilen araştırma sonuçları üzerinden görüş ve önerilerde bulunmaktır. Belirlenen amaç doğrultusunda Ulusal Yargı Ağı Bilişim Sistemi (UYAP)’nde yapılan taramada 141 (yüz kırk bir) mahkeme kararına erişilmiş olup bu kararlardan 91 (doksan bir)’i araştırmaya dâhil edilmiştir. Araştırmada yöntem olarak doküman analiz yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda; disiplin soruşturmalarında odalar tarafından gerekli dikkat ve özenin gösterilmediği, bazı meslek mensuplarına savunma sürelerinin verilmediği, meslek kanunu ile disiplin yönetmeliğinde yer alan meslekten çıkarma disiplin cezasına ilişkin düzenlemenin üst hukuk normuna aykırılık teşkil ettiği gibi hususlar tespit edilmiştir.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the annulment and full remedy lawsuits filed in administrative jurisdiction against dismissal penalties given to professional accountants in different categories and to give opinions and suggestions based on the results of the research. In line with the determined purpose, 141 (one hundred and forty-one) court decisions were reached in the search made in the National Judicial Network Information System (UYAP). 91 (ninety-one) of these decisions were included in the research. Document analysis method was used as a method in the research. As a result of the research; it has been observed that the necessary attention and care is not shown by the chambers in the disciplinary investigations, and that some members of the profession are not given defense periods. It has been determined that the regulation on the penalty of dismissal in the professional law and the disciplinary regulation constitutes a violation of the upper legal norm.
Primary Language | Turkish |
---|---|
Subjects | Business Administration |
Journal Section | MAIN SECTION |
Authors | |
Publication Date | March 31, 2023 |
Submission Date | April 25, 2022 |
Published in Issue | Year 2023 Volume: 25 Issue: 1 |
Authorship
MBDD follows the guidelines in COPE Authorship Guideline to ensure fair recognition of contributions to a research paper (https://publicationethics.org/guidance/discussion-document/authorship ). Authorship carries both credit and responsibility, and it is essential that all listed authors have made significant contributions to the research.
For multi-author studies, the Contributions of Authors must be declared after the conclusion and before the bibliography of the paper. The authors' initials and last names should be used to indicate which author contributed to which part of the manuscript. Details can be found by clicking the “Article Submission Checklist” button. The authors can acknowledge contributions that do not merit authorship.
The author(s) should disclose the use of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) and AI-assisted tools in design and implementation of the research. Such use need to be disclosed within the methodology section of the manuscript. Use of AI does not preclude the manuscript from publication, rather provides a transparent picture of the research.