Zorunlu bağımsız denetimin gerekliliği ve kapsamı, fayda-maliyet değerlendirmeleri ile tartışılagelen bir konudur. Talep eden firmaların özellikleri de söz konusu değerlendirmeler kapsamında dikkate değer bir boyuttur. Bu çalışma ile zorunlu bağımsız denetim ve bağımsız denetim talebi eksenindeki tartışmalara Türkiye'den örnekle katkı sağlamak amaçlanmaktadır.
Çalışmada deneysel olmayan bir araştırma tasarımı kullanılmış olup, bağımsız denetimi talep eden firmaların farklılaşan özellikleri ortaya konulmaya çalışılmıştır. Bağımsız denetim talebi ile şirketlerin büyüklükleri, finansman ilişkileri ve mülkiyet yapıları arasındaki ilişki konusunda literatürle paralel olarak destekleyici kanıtlar elde edilmiştir. Ayrıca bulgular, denetim talebi ile Ar-Ge yatırımları, uluslararasılaşma ve yasal düzene ilişkin algı arasındaki öngörülen ilişkileri desteklemektedir.
The necessity and scope of mandatory audit is an issue discussed alongside benefit-cost evaluations. The characteristics of companies demanding audits are noteworthy in this respect. This study aims to contribute to the discussions on audit demand and mandatory audit, with evidence from Turkey. A non-experimental research approach is employed to identify the distinctive characteristics of SMEs that demand audit. Evidence supporting previous studies is obtained on the relationship between audit demand and size, financing relationships and ownership structure. Furthermore, the results also significantly support the hypothesized association between audit demand and internationalization, R&D, and legal system perception.
"We thank the Enterprise Analysis Unit of the Development Economics Global Indicators Department of the World Bank Group for making the data available."
Primary Language | English |
---|---|
Subjects | Business Administration |
Journal Section | MAIN SECTION |
Authors | |
Early Pub Date | December 23, 2023 |
Publication Date | December 31, 2023 |
Submission Date | March 30, 2023 |
Published in Issue | Year 2023 Volume: 25 Issue: 4 |
Authorship
MBDD follows the guidelines in COPE Authorship Guideline to ensure fair recognition of contributions to a research paper (https://publicationethics.org/guidance/discussion-document/authorship ). Authorship carries both credit and responsibility, and it is essential that all listed authors have made significant contributions to the research.
For multi-author studies, the Contributions of Authors must be declared after the conclusion and before the bibliography of the paper. The authors' initials and last names should be used to indicate which author contributed to which part of the manuscript. Details can be found by clicking the “Article Submission Checklist” button. The authors can acknowledge contributions that do not merit authorship.
The author(s) should disclose the use of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) and AI-assisted tools in design and implementation of the research. Such use need to be disclosed within the methodology section of the manuscript. Use of AI does not preclude the manuscript from publication, rather provides a transparent picture of the research.