Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

FARKLI KİŞİLİK TİPLERİNE SAHİP BİREYLER ARASINDA İŞ SEÇİM KARARINI ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLERE VERİLEN ÖNEM AÇISINDAN ANLAMLI BİR FARK VAR MIDIR? GÖRGÜL BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Year 2017, Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 169 - 182, 06.12.2017

Abstract

Bu araştırma, farklı kişilik tiplerine sahip bireyler arasında iş seçim kararını etkileyen faktörlere verilen önem açısından anlamlı bir farkın olup olmadığını incelemek amacını taşımaktadır. Bu amaçla, Marmara Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesine kayıtlı lisans öğrencileri üzerine görgül bir saha araştırması tasarlanmış ve hayata geçirilmiştir. Sonuç olarak A-Tipi Kişilik Örüntüsüne sahip öğrencilerin, B-Tipi Kişilik Örüntüsüne sahip öğrencilere kıyasla iş seçim kararlarını etkileyen bazı faktörlere istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede daha çok önem vermekte oldukları tespit edilmiştir. Araştırmanın sonuç kısmında söz konusu faktörlerin neler olduğu ve neden A-Tipi Kişilik örüntüsünde bulunan öğrencilerin bu faktörlere daha çok önem verdikleri tartışılmıştır.

References

  • Aycan Z. and Fikret-Pasa S., 2003. Career Choices, Job Selection Criteria, and Leadership Preferences in a Transitional Nation: The Case of Turkey. Journal of Career Development, Vol.30, No.2, pp.129-144.
  • Baltaş, Z. and Baltaş A., 2012. Stres ve Başa çıkma Yolları. Istanbul: Remzi Publications.
  • Bartkus, K.R., Peterson, M.F. and Bellenger, D.N., 1989. Type A Behavior, Experience, and Salesperson Performance. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, Vol.IX, pp.11-18.
  • Begley, T.M. and Boyd, D.P., 1987. A Comparison of Entrepreneurs and Managers of Small Business Firms. Journal of Management, Vol.13, No.1, pp.99-108.
  • Billing, T.K. and Steverson, P., 2013. Moderating role of Type-A personality on stress-outcome relationships. Management Decision, Vol. 51, No. 9, pp. 1893-1904.
  • Byrne, D.G. and Reinhart, M.I., 1989. Work characteristics, occupational achievement and the Type A behaviour pattern. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 62, pp.123-134.
  • Corrigall, E.A., 2008. Welfare states, families, job attribute preferences, and work. Cross Cultural Management, Vol.15, No.2, pp.144-161.
  • Erden, N.S., Toplu, D. and Yaşlıoğlu, M.M., 2013. Mediating Effects of Job Demands on the Relationship Between Type A Personality and Workaholism: A Study on Turkish Workers. The IUP Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol.XII, No.2, pp.7-19.
  • Eren, E., 2000. Örgütsel Davranış ve Yönetim Psikolojisi, 6th ed. Istanbul: Beta Publications.
  • Fisher, R.A., 1971. The Design of Experiments. 8th ed. New York: Hafner Publishing Company.
  • Fisher, R.T., 2001. Role Stress, the Type A Behavior Pattern, and External Auditor Job Satisfaction and Performance. Behavioral Research In Accounting, Vol.13, pp.143-170.
  • Hanif, A. and Sultan, S., 2011. Type A-B Personality and Locus of Control: A Combined Factor Determining Job Satisfaction. IBA Business Review, Vol.6, No.2, pp.90-96.
  • Kanungo R.N. and Hartwick, J., 1987. An Alternative to the Intrinsic-Extrinsic Dichotomy of Work Rewards. Journal of Management, Vol.13, No.4, pp.751-766.
  • Kulkarni, M. and Nithyanand, S., 2013. Social influence and job choice decisions. Employee Relations, Vol.35, No.2, pp.139-156.
  • Lee, C., Jamieson, L.F., Earley, P.C., 1996. Beliefs and fears and Type A behavior: Implications for academic performance and psychiatric health disorder symptoms. Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol.17, pp.151-177.
  • Lind, D.A., Marchal, W.G., Wathen, S.A., 2005. Statistical Techniques in Business and Economics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Nahavandi, A. Mizzi, P.J. and Malekzadeh, A.R., 1992. Executives' Type A Personality as a Determinant of Environmental Perception and Firm Strategy. Journal of Social Psychology, Vol.132, Issue.1, pp.59-67.
  • Robbins, S. P., 1998. Organizational Behavior: Concepts, Controversies, Applications, 8th ed. Prentice Hall.
  • Rosenman, R.H. and Friedman, M., 1961. Association of Specific Behavior Pattern in Women with Blood and Cardiovascular Findings. Circulation, Vol.XXIV, pp.1173-1184.
  • Sager, J.K., 1991. Type A Behavior Pattern (TABP) Among Salespeople And Its Relationship to Job Stress. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, Vol.XI, No.2, pp.1-14.
  • Sameen, S. and Burhan, M., 2014. Creativity and Its Link with Personality Type A/B in Students. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, Vol.6, No.1, pp.156-166.
  • Shahbaba, B., 2012. Biostatistics with R: An Introduction to Statistics Through Biological Data. New York: Springer.
  • Stewart-Belle S. and Lust, J.A., 1999. Career Movement of Female Employees Holding Lower-Level Positions: An Analysis of The Impact of The Type A Behavior Pattern. Journal of Business and Psychology, Vol.14, No.1, pp.187-197.
  • Watson, W.E., Minzenmayer, T. and Bowler, M., 2006. Type A Personality Characteristics and the Effect on Individual and Team Academic Performance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 5, pp.1110–1128.

IS THERE A DIFFERENCE IN TERMS OF THE GIVEN IMPORTANCE OF MOTIVATORS THAT AFFECT JOB SELECTION DECISIONS BETWEEN DIFFERENT PERSONALITY TYPES? AN EMPIRICAL RESEARCH

Year 2017, Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 169 - 182, 06.12.2017

Abstract

This study explores whether the given importance of motivators that effect potential job selection decisions of university students changed depending on their personality type. An empirical research was conducted in order to answer this research question. All participants were Bachelor students in the Faculty of Business Administration of Marmara University, Turkey. Data collection was accomplished through a three-part questionnaire. The first part of the questionnaire was the demographic variables, the second part was related with Type-A and Type-B personality types and the last part was related with the motivators that effect students’ potential job selection decisions. As a result, it was found that students with Type-A Behavior Pattern tended to give more importance to some motivators which effect their potential job selection decisions.

This study
explores whether the given importance of motivators that effect potential job
selection decisions of university students changed depending on their
personality type. An empirical research was conducted in order to answer this
research question. All participants were Bachelor students in the Faculty of
Business Administration of Marmara University, Turkey. Data collection was
accomplished through a three-part questionnaire. The first part of the
questionnaire was the demographic variables, the second part was related with
Type-A and Type-B personality types and the last part was related with the
motivators that effect students’ potential job selection decisions. As a
result, it was found that students with Type-A Behavior Pattern tended to give
more importance to some motivators which effect their potential job selection
decisions.


References

  • Aycan Z. and Fikret-Pasa S., 2003. Career Choices, Job Selection Criteria, and Leadership Preferences in a Transitional Nation: The Case of Turkey. Journal of Career Development, Vol.30, No.2, pp.129-144.
  • Baltaş, Z. and Baltaş A., 2012. Stres ve Başa çıkma Yolları. Istanbul: Remzi Publications.
  • Bartkus, K.R., Peterson, M.F. and Bellenger, D.N., 1989. Type A Behavior, Experience, and Salesperson Performance. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, Vol.IX, pp.11-18.
  • Begley, T.M. and Boyd, D.P., 1987. A Comparison of Entrepreneurs and Managers of Small Business Firms. Journal of Management, Vol.13, No.1, pp.99-108.
  • Billing, T.K. and Steverson, P., 2013. Moderating role of Type-A personality on stress-outcome relationships. Management Decision, Vol. 51, No. 9, pp. 1893-1904.
  • Byrne, D.G. and Reinhart, M.I., 1989. Work characteristics, occupational achievement and the Type A behaviour pattern. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 62, pp.123-134.
  • Corrigall, E.A., 2008. Welfare states, families, job attribute preferences, and work. Cross Cultural Management, Vol.15, No.2, pp.144-161.
  • Erden, N.S., Toplu, D. and Yaşlıoğlu, M.M., 2013. Mediating Effects of Job Demands on the Relationship Between Type A Personality and Workaholism: A Study on Turkish Workers. The IUP Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol.XII, No.2, pp.7-19.
  • Eren, E., 2000. Örgütsel Davranış ve Yönetim Psikolojisi, 6th ed. Istanbul: Beta Publications.
  • Fisher, R.A., 1971. The Design of Experiments. 8th ed. New York: Hafner Publishing Company.
  • Fisher, R.T., 2001. Role Stress, the Type A Behavior Pattern, and External Auditor Job Satisfaction and Performance. Behavioral Research In Accounting, Vol.13, pp.143-170.
  • Hanif, A. and Sultan, S., 2011. Type A-B Personality and Locus of Control: A Combined Factor Determining Job Satisfaction. IBA Business Review, Vol.6, No.2, pp.90-96.
  • Kanungo R.N. and Hartwick, J., 1987. An Alternative to the Intrinsic-Extrinsic Dichotomy of Work Rewards. Journal of Management, Vol.13, No.4, pp.751-766.
  • Kulkarni, M. and Nithyanand, S., 2013. Social influence and job choice decisions. Employee Relations, Vol.35, No.2, pp.139-156.
  • Lee, C., Jamieson, L.F., Earley, P.C., 1996. Beliefs and fears and Type A behavior: Implications for academic performance and psychiatric health disorder symptoms. Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol.17, pp.151-177.
  • Lind, D.A., Marchal, W.G., Wathen, S.A., 2005. Statistical Techniques in Business and Economics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Nahavandi, A. Mizzi, P.J. and Malekzadeh, A.R., 1992. Executives' Type A Personality as a Determinant of Environmental Perception and Firm Strategy. Journal of Social Psychology, Vol.132, Issue.1, pp.59-67.
  • Robbins, S. P., 1998. Organizational Behavior: Concepts, Controversies, Applications, 8th ed. Prentice Hall.
  • Rosenman, R.H. and Friedman, M., 1961. Association of Specific Behavior Pattern in Women with Blood and Cardiovascular Findings. Circulation, Vol.XXIV, pp.1173-1184.
  • Sager, J.K., 1991. Type A Behavior Pattern (TABP) Among Salespeople And Its Relationship to Job Stress. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, Vol.XI, No.2, pp.1-14.
  • Sameen, S. and Burhan, M., 2014. Creativity and Its Link with Personality Type A/B in Students. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, Vol.6, No.1, pp.156-166.
  • Shahbaba, B., 2012. Biostatistics with R: An Introduction to Statistics Through Biological Data. New York: Springer.
  • Stewart-Belle S. and Lust, J.A., 1999. Career Movement of Female Employees Holding Lower-Level Positions: An Analysis of The Impact of The Type A Behavior Pattern. Journal of Business and Psychology, Vol.14, No.1, pp.187-197.
  • Watson, W.E., Minzenmayer, T. and Bowler, M., 2006. Type A Personality Characteristics and the Effect on Individual and Team Academic Performance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 5, pp.1110–1128.
There are 24 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Mehmet Nuri İnel

Volkan Türker

Publication Date December 6, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2017 Volume: 2 Issue: 2

Cite

APA İnel, M. N., & Türker, V. (2017). IS THERE A DIFFERENCE IN TERMS OF THE GIVEN IMPORTANCE OF MOTIVATORS THAT AFFECT JOB SELECTION DECISIONS BETWEEN DIFFERENT PERSONALITY TYPES? AN EMPIRICAL RESEARCH. Marmara Business Review, 2(2), 169-182.
AMA İnel MN, Türker V. IS THERE A DIFFERENCE IN TERMS OF THE GIVEN IMPORTANCE OF MOTIVATORS THAT AFFECT JOB SELECTION DECISIONS BETWEEN DIFFERENT PERSONALITY TYPES? AN EMPIRICAL RESEARCH. Marmara Bus. Rev. December 2017;2(2):169-182.
Chicago İnel, Mehmet Nuri, and Volkan Türker. “IS THERE A DIFFERENCE IN TERMS OF THE GIVEN IMPORTANCE OF MOTIVATORS THAT AFFECT JOB SELECTION DECISIONS BETWEEN DIFFERENT PERSONALITY TYPES? AN EMPIRICAL RESEARCH”. Marmara Business Review 2, no. 2 (December 2017): 169-82.
EndNote İnel MN, Türker V (December 1, 2017) IS THERE A DIFFERENCE IN TERMS OF THE GIVEN IMPORTANCE OF MOTIVATORS THAT AFFECT JOB SELECTION DECISIONS BETWEEN DIFFERENT PERSONALITY TYPES? AN EMPIRICAL RESEARCH. Marmara Business Review 2 2 169–182.
IEEE M. N. İnel and V. Türker, “IS THERE A DIFFERENCE IN TERMS OF THE GIVEN IMPORTANCE OF MOTIVATORS THAT AFFECT JOB SELECTION DECISIONS BETWEEN DIFFERENT PERSONALITY TYPES? AN EMPIRICAL RESEARCH”, Marmara Bus. Rev., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 169–182, 2017.
ISNAD İnel, Mehmet Nuri - Türker, Volkan. “IS THERE A DIFFERENCE IN TERMS OF THE GIVEN IMPORTANCE OF MOTIVATORS THAT AFFECT JOB SELECTION DECISIONS BETWEEN DIFFERENT PERSONALITY TYPES? AN EMPIRICAL RESEARCH”. Marmara Business Review 2/2 (December 2017), 169-182.
JAMA İnel MN, Türker V. IS THERE A DIFFERENCE IN TERMS OF THE GIVEN IMPORTANCE OF MOTIVATORS THAT AFFECT JOB SELECTION DECISIONS BETWEEN DIFFERENT PERSONALITY TYPES? AN EMPIRICAL RESEARCH. Marmara Bus. Rev. 2017;2:169–182.
MLA İnel, Mehmet Nuri and Volkan Türker. “IS THERE A DIFFERENCE IN TERMS OF THE GIVEN IMPORTANCE OF MOTIVATORS THAT AFFECT JOB SELECTION DECISIONS BETWEEN DIFFERENT PERSONALITY TYPES? AN EMPIRICAL RESEARCH”. Marmara Business Review, vol. 2, no. 2, 2017, pp. 169-82.
Vancouver İnel MN, Türker V. IS THERE A DIFFERENCE IN TERMS OF THE GIVEN IMPORTANCE OF MOTIVATORS THAT AFFECT JOB SELECTION DECISIONS BETWEEN DIFFERENT PERSONALITY TYPES? AN EMPIRICAL RESEARCH. Marmara Bus. Rev. 2017;2(2):169-82.