Perception of Individualized Care and Satisfaction With Nursing Care of Women Who Give Birth by Cesarean Section

Year 2021, Volume: 7 Issue: 3, 366 - 377, 31.12.2021

Ezgi Yıldız , Nilüfer Tuğut

https://doi.org/10.19127/mbsjohs.979794

Abstract

Objective: This descriptive cross-sectional study aims to determine the perception of individualized care and satisfaction with the nursing of women who underwent cesarean section.
Methods: The population of this study consists of women undergoing cesarean section in a university hospital between 15 August and 15 December 2018 (N=260). The sample consists of 156 women giving birth by cesarean section who have agreed to participate in this study. The data have been collected by using the Personal Information Form and the Individualized Care Scale (ICS) and the Newcastle Satisfaction with Nursing Scale (NSNS).
Results: It has been found that the women who gave birth by cesarean section have good ICSA (3.50±0.99), ICSB (3.82±1.18), and NSNS (70.53±16.27) mean scores. There is a significant, positive, and moderate relationship between the ICS and NSNS scores. It has been found that there is a statistically significant difference between the place of residence and the level of satisfaction with nursing. It has been determined that the women whose income is higher than their expenses are more satisfied with nursing care, and their individualized care perception is higher.
Conclusion: It has been determined that women who gave birth by cesarean section have a good level of individualized care perception and nursing satisfaction. It has been found that women’s satisfaction with nursing increases.

Keywords

Individualized care, cesarean section, satisfaction with nursing care

References

• 1. Bulut H, Tashan ST. Determination of Levels of Satisfaction Nursing Care of Women with Cesarean Section. Inonu University Journal of Health Sciences 2017;6(1):1-6.
• 2. Gozukara F, Eroglu K. A Way to Prevent the Increase in Cesarean Birth: Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Instead of “Once a Cesarean Always a Cesarean” Approach and the Roles of Nurse. Faculty of Health Sciences Journal of Nursing 2011;18(2):89-100. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/hunhemsire/issue/7837/103244.
• 3. Izbizky G, Minig, L, Sebastiani M. Otan˜o L. The effect of early versus delayed postcesarean feeding on women’s satisfaction: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG 2008; 115: 332–338.
• 4. Baskaya Y, Sayiner FD. Evidence-Based Midwifery Practices to Reduce Cesarean Rate. HSP 2018;5(1):113-119. doi: 10.17681/hsp.335472. 5. Yanikkerem E, Cimen E. Delivery methods of nurses and perspectives on vaginal delivery after cesarean. MCBU- Journal of Health Sciences Institute 2017;4(1):533-541.
• 6. Celik AS, Turkoglu N, Pasinlioglu T. Determining the postpartum life quality of mothers. Anatolian Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences 2014;17(3):151-157.
• 7. Bagci S, Altintug K. Problems experienced by mothers in postpartum period and their associations with quality of life. Journal of Human Sciences 2016;13(2):3266-3279. doi:10.14687/jhs.v13i2.3884.
• 8. Ceylan B. Individualized care in nursing. Ege University Journal of Nursing Faculty 2014; 30(3): 59-67.
• 9. Tugut N, Golbasi Z. Nursing Service Satisfaction Level of Patients At Gynecology And Obstetrics Unit of A University Hospital And Some Affecting Factors. Journal of Education and Research in Nursing 2013; 10(2):38-44.
• 10. Kayrakci F, Ozsaker E. Determination of The Surgical Patients’ Saticfaction Levels from Nursing Care. FNNJ 2014; 22(2): 105-113. doi:10.17672/fnhd.64060.
• 11. Akin S, Erdogan S. The Turkish version of the Newcastle satisfaction with nursing care used on medical and surgical patients. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2007; 16(4): 646-653. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01583.x.
• 12. Sise S. Patient satisfaction with nursing services. Kocatepe Medical Journal 2013; 14(2): 69-75.
• 13. Simsek C, Esencan TY. Nursing Care During the Postpartum Period. Zeynep Kamil Medical Bulletin 2017; 48(4): 183-189. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.16948/zktipb.267263.
• 14. Suhonen R, Leino-Kilpi H, Valimaki M. Development and psyhometric properties of the individualized care scale. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2005;11(1): 7-10.
• 15. Acaroglu R, Sendir M. The Scales for Assessment of Individualized Care. IUFNNJ 2012;20(1):10-16.
• 16. Thomas LH, McColl E, Priest J, Bond S, Boys RJ. Newcastle satisfaction with nursing scales: an instrument for quality assessments of nursing care. Quality in Health Care 1996; 5:67-72. 17. Ceylan B, Eser I. Assessment of individualized nursing care in hospitalized patients in a university hospital in Turkey. Journal of Nursing Management 2016;24(7): 954–61. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12400.
• 18. Rasooli AS, Zamanzadeh V, Rahmani A, Shahbazpoor M. Patients' point of view about nurses' support of individualized nursing care in training hospitals affiliated with Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. Journal of Caring Sciences 2013;2(3):203-209. doi: 10.5681/jcs.2013.025.
• 19. Alici CB, Koc Z. Quality of life and satisfaction affect individualized nursing care perceptions in intensive care. Psychology, Health & Medicine 2020; 25(2): 148-159.
• 20. Ogut D., Uyar Hazar H. Women's perception and satisfaction levels of postpartum individualized care. Aydin Adnan Menderes University Institute of Health Sciences Master’s Thesis, 2019.
• 21. Celik Durmus S, Yildirim A. Cooperation between nurses. Journal of Health and Nursing Management 2018;5(3):210-216. doi:10.5222/SHYD.2018.210.
• 22. Ulgen T, Zeybekci S, Ugur O. Hospitals on a University Hospital Oncology Clinic Nursing Satisfaction and Affecting of Effective Variables. Turkiye Clinics J Nurs Sci 2018; 10(1):18-27. doi: 10.5336/nurses.2017-56254.
• 23. Yanik S, Ates S. Identification of nursing care satisfaction levels and relatied factors of in-patients at internal medcine clinics. International Refereed Journal of Nursing Research 2018;14,24-43. doi:10.17371/UHD.2018.3.7
• 24. Kersu O, Mert Boga S, Kosgeroglu N, Aydin Sayilan A, İlter G, Baydemir C. Determination of The Relationship Between Perception of Nursing Quality and Satisfaction Status of Patiens Hospitalized in Surgical Services. Journal of Education and Research in Nursing 2020; 17(1): 32-39. doi:10.5222/HEAD.2020.032
• 25. Karabulutlu O, Yavuz C. Evaluation of Satisfaction Levels of Mothers’ Midwifery/Nursing Care Given in The Postpartum Period. Caucasian Journal of Science 2019;6(2):182-199. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/cjo/issue/51152/633149. 26. Arslan Gurcuoglu E, Vural G. Satisfaction of Mothers with Midwifery/Nursing Care Given in the Postpartum Period in Hospital. Gazi Medical Journal 2018;29(1):34-40.
• 27. Pinar G, Dogan, N, Algier L, Kaya N, Cakmak F. Factors that affecting mothers’ postnatal comfort. Dicle Medical Journal 2009;36(3):184-190.
• 28. Abdelati, IH, Saadoon Om Hashim M, Ahmed Mostafa Amal R. Quality of cesarean section nursing care and its reflection up-on women's satisfaction with labor experience. International Journal of Advanced Nursing Studies 2019;8(1):11-18. doi: 10.14419/ijans.v8i1.27149
• 29. Kaya A, Vural G. Mothers hospitalized in the post-cesarean delivery service to determine the level of satisfaction with the nursing care they receive. Selcuk University Institute of Health Sciences Master’s Thesis, 2011.
• 30. Lee HJ, Jang SG, Choi JE, Lee W, Pyo J, Ock M, et al. Assessment of Public Perception Regarding Patient Engagement for Patient Safety in Korea. Journal of Patient Safety 2021;17(1):44-50. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000565.
• 31. Temizyurek Yavuz M, Basaran Acil S. Examination of the patients' participation in nursing care and their satisfaction with nursing. Hacettepe University Institute of Health Sciences. Master’s Thesis. 2019.
• 32. Singla N, Mamta Taneja A, Kaur J. Study on Satisfaction Regarding Intrapartum and postpartum Nursing Care among Women. International Journal of Current Research 2015;7(3):13373-13375.
• 33. Coban Gİ, Kasikci M. Validity and reliability study of the scale of the patient's perception of nursing care Ataturk University Institute of Health Sciences. Master’s Thesis. 2006.
• 34. Alan H. Patient Satisfaction with the Nursing Services in a University Hospital. Journal of Education and Research in Nursing 2018; 15(2): 81-87.
• 35. Christiaens W, Bracke P. Place of birth and satisfaction with childbirth in Belgium and the Netherlands. Midwifery 2009;25(2):11-19. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2007.02.001.
• 36. Acaroglu R, Sendir M., Kaya H, Sosyal E. The Effect of Individualized Nursing Care on the Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life. Florence Nightingale Journal of Nursing 2007;15(59):61-67. 37. Tekin F, Yildiz Findik U. Level of Perception of individualized care and satisfaction with nursing in orthopaedic surgery patients. Orthopaedic Nursing 2015;34(6):371-374. doi: 10.1097/NOR.0000000000000194.
• 38. Snyder H, Engstrom J. The antecedents, forms and consequences of patient involvement: A narrative review of the literature. International Journal of Nursing Studie 2016; 53:351-378 doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.09.008.
• 39. Prey JE, Woollen J, Wilcox L, Sackeim AD, Hripcsak G, Bakken S, et al. Patient engagement in the inpatient setting: a systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2013; 21(4): 742-750. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002141.
• 40. Tambuyzer E, Van Audenhove C. Is perceived patient involvement in mental health care associated with satisfaction and empowerment? Health Expectations 2015;18(4):516-526. doi: 10.1111/hex.12052.