Effect Of Air-Abrasion And Er:Yag Laser On The Bond Strength Between The Metal Housing Of An Overdenture Attachment System And The Hard Relining Material

Year 2024, Volume: 25 Issue: 1, 51 - 56, 05.07.2024

Hüseyin Şeker Yener Okutan , Göknil Alkan Demetoğlu

https://doi.org/10.69601/meandrosmdj.1508347

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Objective. This study investigated the effect of air-abrasion and erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG) laser treatments on push-out bond strength (PBS) between hard relining material and metal housing of an overdenture attachment system.

Material and Methods. A total of 36 metal housings were randomly divided into 3 subgroups according to surface pretreatments (n=12): Control (no surface treatment; C), air-abrasion (A), and Er:YAG laser (L). Surface roughness (Ra) of specimens was determined using a profilometer. One additional specimen per group was evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The hard relining material was bonded to metal housings, and a PBS test was performed using a universal testing machine. Data were statistically analyzed using 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD), and Tamhane’s T2 tests (α=.05).

Results. C and L groups showed the lowest and highest Ra values, respectively. The mean Ra of the A group was statistically different from the mean values of the C and L groups (P<.001). The L group showed higher PBS values than the C group (P<.05), whereas the A group exhibited statistically similar PBS values to both C and L groups (P>.05).

Conclusions. Air-abrasion did not significantly increase the bond strength between the metal housing and hard relining material. Er:YAG laser irradiation noticeably improved the PBS but caused surface microcracks.

Keywords

Air-abrasion, Er:YAG laser, hard relining material, metal housing, overdenture attachment system, push-out bond strength

References

• 1. Karabuda C, Yaltirik M, Bayraktar M. A clinical comparison of prosthetic complications of implant-supported overdentures with different attachment systems. Implant Dent 2008; 17: 74-81.
• 2. Thomason JM, Kelly SA, Bendkowski A, Ellis JS. Two implant retained overdentures--a review of the literature supporting the McGill and York consensus statements. J Dent 2012; 40: 22-34.
• 3. Alvarez-Arenal A, Gonzalez-Gonzalez I, deLlanos-Lanchares H, Martin-Fernandez E, Brizuela-Velasco A, Ellacuria-Echebarria J. Effect of implant- and occlusal load location on stress distribution in Locator attachments of mandibular overdenture. A finite element study. J Adv Prosthodont 2017; 9: 371-80.
• 4. Alsiyabi AS, Felton DA, Cooper LF. The role of abutment-attachment selection in resolving inadequate interarch distance: a clinical report. J Prosthodont 2005; 14: 184-90.
• 5. Tehini G, Baba NZ, Berberi A, Majzoub Z, Bassal H, Rifai K. Effect of Simulated Mastication on the Retention of Locator Attachments for Implant-Supported Overdentures: An In Vitro Pilot Study. J Prosthodont 2020; 29: 74-9.
• 6. Nissan J, Oz-Ari B, Gross O, Ghelfan O, Chaushu G. Long-term prosthetic aftercare of direct vs. indirect attachment incorporation techniques to mandibular implant-supported overdenture. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22: 627-30.
• 7. Ozkir SE, Yilmaz B, Kurkcuoglu I, Culhaoglu A, Unal SM. Surface roughness and adaptation of different materials to secure implant attachment housings. J Prosthet Dent 2017; 117: 87-92.
• 8. Kunt GE, Güler AU, Ceylan G, Duran I, Ozkan P, Kirtiloğlu T. Effects of Er:YAG laser treatments on surface roughness of base metal alloys. Lasers Med Sci 2012; 27: 47-51.
• 9. Raeisosadat F, Ghoveizi R, Eskandarion S, Beyabanaki E, Tavakolizadeh S. Influence of Different Surface Treatments on the Shear Bond Strength of Resin Cement to Base Metal Alloys. J Lasers Med Sci 2020; 11: 45-9.
• 10. Castillo-Oyagüe R, Osorio R, Osorio E, Sánchez-Aguilera F, Toledano M. The effect of surface treatments on the microroughness of laser-sintered and vacuum-cast base metal alloys for dental prosthetic frameworks. Microsc Res Tech 2012; 75: 1206-12.
• 11. Kawaguchi T, Shimizu H, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK, Takahashi Y. Effect of surface preparation on the bond strength of heat-polymerized denture base resin to commercially pure titanium and cobalt-chromium alloy. Dent Mater J 2011; 30: 143-50.
• 12. Nakhaei M, Dashti H, Baghbani A, Ahmadi Z. Bond strength of locator housing attached to denture base resin secured with different retaining materials. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2020; 17: 34-9.
• 13. Duran İ, Ural Ç, Sarı ME, Yüzbaşıoğlu E, Yılmaz B, Kavut İ. Effect of Er-YAG laser application on shear bond strength of polymethyl methacrylate to Cr-Co alloy. Selcuk Dent J 2016; 3: 87-91.
• 14. Venkat G, Krishnan M, Srinivasan S, Balasubramanian M. Evaluation of Bond Strength between Grooved Titanium Alloy Implant Abutments and Provisional Veneering Materials after Surface Treatment of the Abutments: An In vitro Study. Contemp Clin Dent 2017; 8: 395-9.
• 15. Alfadda SA. Effect of Alumina Particle Size on the Bond Strength between Autopolymerized Acrylic Resin and Commercially Pure Titanium. J Prosthodont 2019; 28: 466-70.
• 16. Fonseca RG, Haneda IG, Almeida-Júnior AA, de Oliveira Abi-Rached F, Adabo GL. Efficacy of air-abrasion technique and additional surface treatment at titanium/resin cement interface. J Adhes Dent 2012; 14: 453-9.
• 17. Ishii T, Koizumi H, Tanoue N, Naito K, Yamashita M, Matsumura H. Effect of alumina air-abrasion on mechanical bonding between an acrylic resin and casting alloys. J Oral Sci 2009; 51: 161-6.
• 18. Korkmaz FM, Aycan S. Effect of Fiber Laser Irradiation on the Shear Bond Strength between Acrylic Resin and Titanium. Scanning. 2019; 2019: 5452919.
• 19. Tanoue N, Matsuda Y, Yanagida H, Matsumura H, Sawase T. Factors affecting the bond strength of denture base and reline acrylic resins to base metal materials. J Appl Oral Sci 2013; 21: 320-6.
• 20. Matsuda Y, Yanagida H, Ide T, Matsumura H, Tanoue N. Bond strength of poly(methyl methacrylate) denture base material to cast titanium and cobalt-chromium alloy. J Adhes Dent 2010; 12: 223-9.