Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2023, Volume: 5 Issue: 3, 603 - 7, 18.09.2023
https://doi.org/10.37990/medr.1318386

Abstract

References

  • 1. Akkoç RF, Aksu F, Kavaklı A, Ögetürk M. Anatomy education from the perspective of clinician: questionnaire study. Firat Med J. 2021;26:234-8.
  • 2. Dinsmore CE, Daugherty S, Zeitz HJ. Teaching and learning gross anatomy: dissection, prosection, or “both of the above?”. Clin Anat. 1999;12:110-4.
  • 3. Karabilgin ÖS, Şahin H. Student ratings in evaluation of teaching effectiveness and educational program. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası. 2006;21:27-33.
  • 4. Ari I, İrgil E, Kafa İM, Şendemir E. A questionnaire study: anatomy education and student's views. Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi. 2003;29:15-8.
  • 5. Yavuz F, Ertekin T, Elmalı F, Ülger H. Attitudes of pre-clinical and clinical stage medical school students toward using cadaver in anatomy education. Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2017;26:227-32.
  • 6. Uygur R, Çağlar V, Topçu B, Aktaş S, Oğuz Ö. The assessment of the students’ opinions about anatomy education. Int J Basic Clin Med. 2013;1:94-106.
  • 7. Sindel M, Şenol Y, Gürpınar E. Evaluation of anatomy education by students in Akdeniz University school of medicine. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası. 2008;28:31-6.
  • 8. Acuner AM, Yalçın M, Ersoy M, et al. Ankara üniversitesi tıp fakültesi anatomi dersine ilişkin öğretme-öğrenme sürecinin değerlendirilmesi. 1999;52:211-8.
  • 9. Topal AD, Ocak MA. Harmanlanmış öğrenme ortamı ile hazırlanan anatomi dersinin öğrencilerin akademik başarıları üzerindeki etkisi. Educational Technology Theory and Practice. 2014;4:48-62.
  • 10. Ulucam E, Gokce N, Mesut R. Turkish anatomy education from the foundation of the first modern medical school to today. JISHIM. 2003;2:50-2.
  • 11. Kulik JA. Student ratings: validity, utility, and controversy. New Directions for Institutional Research. 2002:2001:9-25.
  • 12. Çan MA. Metaphors for anatomy lesson of students who received anatomy education in faculty of medicine and faculty of dentistry. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası. 2022;21:118-27.
  • 13. Telli SG, Altun D. The indispensability of online learning after earthquake in Turkiye. Journal of University Research. 2023;6:125-36.
  • 14. Singal A, Bansal A, Chaudhary P, et al. Anatomy education of medical and dental students during COVID-19 pandemic: a reality check. Surg Radiol Anat. 2021;43:515-21.
  • 15. Kelsey AH, McCulloch V, Gillingwater TH, et al. Anatomical sciences at the University of Edinburgh: initial experiences of teaching anatomy online. Translational Research in Anatomy. 2020;19:100065.
  • 16. Turhan B, Yakut Y. The opinions of physiotherapy students on online anatomy education during COVID-19 pandemic. Anatomy. 2020;14:134-8.
  • 17. Pamay A, Büyükertan M, Balcıoğlu HA. An investigation on the anatomy education at dental faculties in European and North American universities. 2017;13:29:33.

Investigation of the Opinions of the First-Year Students of Dentistry Who Go to Online Education on Anatomy Education After the Kahramanmaraş Earthquake

Year 2023, Volume: 5 Issue: 3, 603 - 7, 18.09.2023
https://doi.org/10.37990/medr.1318386

Abstract

Aim: The aim of the study was to examine the opinions of first-year dentistry students who switched to online education after the Kahramanmaraş earthquake on anatomy education.
Material and Methods: A total of 82 students, 38 males and 44 females, participated in the study. The questionnaire consisting of 14 questions was applied online. The questionnaire was Likert-type and calculated as flat coded questions (completely disagree 1 point, disagree 2 points, no idea 3 points, agree 4 points, completely agree 5 points). The questions were calculated as reverse coded because they expressed negativity. There were 13 questions in the questionnaire, except for the open-ended and gender-reporting question, and the highest score was 65 and the lowest score was 13.
Results: The expected frequency of completely agree is 15.3 (40.2%), while the observed frequency is 21 (55.3%). Statistically, there is a difference between expected and observed values (p<0.05). In the question "I participated in anatomy courses taught online", the expected frequency of completely agree was 1 (2.3%) while the observed frequency was 0 (0%). Statistically, there is a difference between expected and observed values (p<0.05).
Conclusion: Since the anatomy course has too many subjects, the subject contents are difficult to learn, and it is also a basic course, it is important to conduct theoretical and practical lessons face-to-face instead of online.

References

  • 1. Akkoç RF, Aksu F, Kavaklı A, Ögetürk M. Anatomy education from the perspective of clinician: questionnaire study. Firat Med J. 2021;26:234-8.
  • 2. Dinsmore CE, Daugherty S, Zeitz HJ. Teaching and learning gross anatomy: dissection, prosection, or “both of the above?”. Clin Anat. 1999;12:110-4.
  • 3. Karabilgin ÖS, Şahin H. Student ratings in evaluation of teaching effectiveness and educational program. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası. 2006;21:27-33.
  • 4. Ari I, İrgil E, Kafa İM, Şendemir E. A questionnaire study: anatomy education and student's views. Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi. 2003;29:15-8.
  • 5. Yavuz F, Ertekin T, Elmalı F, Ülger H. Attitudes of pre-clinical and clinical stage medical school students toward using cadaver in anatomy education. Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2017;26:227-32.
  • 6. Uygur R, Çağlar V, Topçu B, Aktaş S, Oğuz Ö. The assessment of the students’ opinions about anatomy education. Int J Basic Clin Med. 2013;1:94-106.
  • 7. Sindel M, Şenol Y, Gürpınar E. Evaluation of anatomy education by students in Akdeniz University school of medicine. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası. 2008;28:31-6.
  • 8. Acuner AM, Yalçın M, Ersoy M, et al. Ankara üniversitesi tıp fakültesi anatomi dersine ilişkin öğretme-öğrenme sürecinin değerlendirilmesi. 1999;52:211-8.
  • 9. Topal AD, Ocak MA. Harmanlanmış öğrenme ortamı ile hazırlanan anatomi dersinin öğrencilerin akademik başarıları üzerindeki etkisi. Educational Technology Theory and Practice. 2014;4:48-62.
  • 10. Ulucam E, Gokce N, Mesut R. Turkish anatomy education from the foundation of the first modern medical school to today. JISHIM. 2003;2:50-2.
  • 11. Kulik JA. Student ratings: validity, utility, and controversy. New Directions for Institutional Research. 2002:2001:9-25.
  • 12. Çan MA. Metaphors for anatomy lesson of students who received anatomy education in faculty of medicine and faculty of dentistry. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası. 2022;21:118-27.
  • 13. Telli SG, Altun D. The indispensability of online learning after earthquake in Turkiye. Journal of University Research. 2023;6:125-36.
  • 14. Singal A, Bansal A, Chaudhary P, et al. Anatomy education of medical and dental students during COVID-19 pandemic: a reality check. Surg Radiol Anat. 2021;43:515-21.
  • 15. Kelsey AH, McCulloch V, Gillingwater TH, et al. Anatomical sciences at the University of Edinburgh: initial experiences of teaching anatomy online. Translational Research in Anatomy. 2020;19:100065.
  • 16. Turhan B, Yakut Y. The opinions of physiotherapy students on online anatomy education during COVID-19 pandemic. Anatomy. 2020;14:134-8.
  • 17. Pamay A, Büyükertan M, Balcıoğlu HA. An investigation on the anatomy education at dental faculties in European and North American universities. 2017;13:29:33.
There are 17 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Anatomy
Journal Section Original Articles
Authors

Adem Tokpınar 0000-0001-7661-9588

Selen Yılmaz 0000-0002-5637-2642

Halil Yılmaz 0000-0002-8234-4901

Muhammet Değermenci 0000-0002-4751-6202

Early Pub Date August 23, 2023
Publication Date September 18, 2023
Acceptance Date July 23, 2023
Published in Issue Year 2023 Volume: 5 Issue: 3

Cite

AMA Tokpınar A, Yılmaz S, Yılmaz H, Değermenci M. Investigation of the Opinions of the First-Year Students of Dentistry Who Go to Online Education on Anatomy Education After the Kahramanmaraş Earthquake. Med Records. September 2023;5(3):603-7. doi:10.37990/medr.1318386

17741

Chief Editors

Assoc. Prof. Zülal Öner
İzmir Bakırçay University, Department of Anatomy, İzmir, Türkiye

Assoc. Prof. Deniz Şenol
Düzce University, Department of Anatomy, Düzce, Türkiye

Editors
Assoc. Prof. Serkan Öner
İzmir Bakırçay University, Department of Radiology, İzmir, Türkiye
 
E-mail: medrecsjournal@gmail.com

Publisher:
Medical Records Association (Tıbbi Kayıtlar Derneği)
Address: Orhangazi Neighborhood, 440th Street,
Green Life Complex, Block B, Floor 3, No. 69
Düzce, Türkiye
Web: www.tibbikayitlar.org.tr

Publication Support:
Effect Publishing & Agency
Phone: + 90 (540) 035 44 35
E-mail:
info@effectpublishing.com
Address: Akdeniz Neighborhood, Şehit Fethi Bey Street,
No: 66/B, Ground floor, 35210 Konak/İzmir, Türkiye
web: www.effectpublishing.com