Effectiveness and Impact of Artificial Reef Project in Tigbauan, Iloilo, Philippines: A case study

Year 2021, Volume: 7 Issue: 2, 77 - 89, 29.12.2021

Maria Liza Torıng-farquerabao , Eddie Domingo , Albaris Tahıluddın

Abstract

Artificial reefs (ARs) are one of the popular and important management approaches to enhance fishery production, especially in overfishing areas. In this paper, a case study was conducted to determine the effectiveness and impact of the AR project in Tigbauan, Iloilo, Philippines, through a qualitative field survey research approach. Findings revealed that while other fishers reported that AR improved longline catch, gill net – a major fishing gear used in the area, did not experience any catch changes; rather, it sometimes entangled and damaged their nets. Despite initial monitoring showing the presence of benthic organisms like sponges and soft corals after 6 months of installation and gradually attracting fish to aggregate, lack of follow-ups to the present date brings the AR project impact imperative. While most respondents claimed that water quality in the installed site was maintained after 4 years, the targeted objective to increase fish species abundance was not achieved. Furthermore, some respondents reported that installed ARs were buried due to natural calamities. This study suggests that the AR project in the installed site did not meet the expected output due to a lack of monitoring and poor site selection.

Keywords

Artificial reef, effectiveness, impact, Philippines

Effectiveness and Impact of Artificial Reef Project in Tigbauan, Iloilo, Philippines: A case study

Abstract

Yapay resifler (AR'ler), özellikle aşırı avlanma alanlarında balıkçılık üretimini artırmak için popüler ve önemli yönetim yaklaşımlarından biridir. Bu bildiride, Tigbauan, Iloilo, Filipinler'deki AR projesinin etkinliğini ve etkisini belirlemek için nitel bir alan araştırması araştırması yaklaşımıyla bir vaka çalışması yapılmıştır. Bulgular, diğer balıkçılar AR'nin parakete avını iyileştirdiğini bildirirken, bölgede kullanılan önemli bir av aracı olan solungaç ağının herhangi bir av değişikliği yaşamadığını; daha doğrusu, bazen ağlarını dolaştırdı ve zarar verdi. 6 aylık kurulumdan sonra süngerler ve yumuşak mercanlar gibi bentik organizmaların varlığını gösteren ve yavaş yavaş balıkları toplamaya çeken ilk izlemelere rağmen, bugüne kadar takiplerin olmaması AR projesinin etkisini zorunlu kılmaktadır. Ankete katılanların çoğu, kurulum yerindeki su kalitesinin 4 yıl sonra korunduğunu iddia ederken, balık türlerinin bolluğunu artırma hedeflenen hedefe ulaşılamadı. Ayrıca, bazı katılımcılar doğal afetler nedeniyle kurulu AR'lerin gömüldüğünü bildirdi. Bu çalışma, kurulu sahadaki AR projesinin, izleme eksikliği ve kötü saha seçimi nedeniyle beklenen çıktıyı karşılamadığını göstermektedir.

Keywords

Yapay resif, etkinlik, etki, Filipinler

References

• Becker, A., Taylor, M. D., & Lowry, M. B. (2017). Monitoring of reef associated and pelagic fish communities on Australia’s first purpose built offshore artificial reef. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 74(1), 277-285.
• Becker, A., Taylor, M. D., Folpp, H., & Lowry, M. B. (2018). Managing the development of artificial reef systems: The need for quantitative goals. Fish and Fisheries, 19(4), 740-752.
• Bohnsack, J. A., & Sutherland, D. L. (1985). Artificial reef research: a review with recommendations for future priorities. Bulletin of marine science, 37(1), 11-39.
• Bohnsack, J. A., Harper, D. E., McClellan, D. B., & Hulsbeck, M. (1994). Effects of reef size on colonization and assemblage structure of fishes at artificial reefs off southeastern Florida, USA. Bulletin of Marine Science, 55(2-3), 796-823.
• Brickhill, M. J., Lee, S. Y., & Connolly, R. M. (2005). Fishes associated with artificial reefs: attributing changes to attraction or production using novel approaches. Journal of Fish Biology, 67, 53-71.
• Clark, S., & Edwards, A. J. (1994). Use of artificial reef structures to rehabilitate reef flats degraded by coral mining in the Maldives. Bulletin of Marine Science, 55(2-3), 724-744.
• EEPSEA. 2017. How Do Marine Protected Areas Affect the Welfare of Local Fishing Communities? A Study from the Philippines.
• Espectato, L. N., Napata, R. P., & Baylon, C. C. (2016). The Value of Marine Protected Areas: Through the Eyes of Community Members. Gender in Aquaculture and Fisheries: Engendering Security in Fisheries and Aquaculture, 163.
• Fabi, G., & Fiorentini, L. (1994). Comparison between an artificial reef and a control site in the Adriatic Sea: analysis of four years of monitoring. Bulletin of Marine Science, 55(2-3), 538-558.
• Fabi, G., Scarcella, G., Spagnolo, A., Bortone, S. A., Charbonnel, E., Goutayer, J. J., & Trommelen, M. (2015). Practical guidelines for the use of artificial reefs in the Mediterranean and the Black Sea. General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean. Studies and Reviews, (96), I.
• Fabi, G., Spagnolo, A., Bellan-Santini, D., Charbonnel, E., Çiçek, B. A., García, J. J. G., ... & Santos, M. N. D. (2011). Overview on artificial reefs in Europe. Brazilian journal of oceanography, 59(spe1), 155-166. FAO. (2015). Practical guidelines for the use of artificial reefs in the Mediterranean and the Black Sea. Studies and Reviews. General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean. No. 96. Rome, Italy.
• Fisheries Research Agency (FRA). (2010). The FRA-SEAFDEC Joint International Workshop on Artificial Reefs for Fisheries Resource Recovery. Nov. 11, Minato, Tokyo, Japan. pp. 1-120.
• Florisson, J. H., Tweedley, J. R., Walker, T. H., & Chaplin, J. A. (2018). Reef vision: A citizen science program for monitoring the fish faunas of artificial reefs. Fisheries Research, 206, 296-308.
• Jebreen, E. (2005). An investigation into the effects of artificial reefs on fish stocks. Queensland Department of Primary Industries. Retrieved from http://www.dpi.qld.gov.au/far/9279.htm.
• Joint Department of Environment and Natural Resources-Department of Agriculture-Department of Interior and Local Government-Department of National Defense (DENR-DA-DILG-DND) Memorandum Order No. 1 Series of 2000. Retrieved from http://policy.denr.gov.ph/2000/JT_MO_DENR_DA_DILG_DND_2000_01.pdf.
• Komyakova, V., Chamberlain, D., Jones, G. P., & Swearer, S. E. (2019). Assessing the performance of artificial reefs as substitute habitat for temperate reef fishes: Implications for reef design and placement. Science of the total environment, 668, 139-152.
• Lee, M. O., Otake, S., & Kim, J. K. (2018). Transition of artificial reefs (ARs) research and its prospects. Ocean & Coastal Management, 154, 55-65.
• Lemoine, H. R., Paxton, A. B., Anisfeld, S. C., Rosemond, R. C., & Peterson, C. H. (2019). Selecting the optimal artificial reefs to achieve fish habitat enhancement goals. Biological Conservation, 238, 108200.
• Lokesha, N., Sundar, V., & Sannasiraj, S. (2013). Artificial reefs: a review. Int J Ocean Clim Syst, 4, 117-124.
• McManus, J. W. (1995). Future prospects for artificial reefs in the Philippines. In ICLARM Conference Proceedings (Philippines). ICLARM.
• Miller, J. R., & Hobbs, R. J. (2007). Habitat restoration—do we know what we’re doing?. Restoration Ecology, 15(3), 382-390.
• Munro, J. L., & Balgos, M. C. (Eds.). (1995). Artificial reefs in the Philippines (Vol. 49). WorldFish.
• Pickering, H., Whitmarsh, D., & Jensen, A. (1999). Artificial reefs as a tool to aid rehabilitation of coastal ecosystems: investigating the potential. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 37(8-12), 505-514.
• Pitcher, T. J., & Seaman Jr, W. (2000). Petrarch’s Principle: how protected human‐made reefs can help the reconstruction of fisheries and marine ecosystems. Fish and fisheries, 1(1), 73-81.
• Santos, M. N., & Monteiro, C. C. (1997). The Olhao artificial reef system (south Portugal): fish assemblages and fishing yield. Fisheries Research, 30(1-2), 33-41.
• Seaman, W. (2000). Artificial reef evaluation: with application to natural marine habitats. CRC press. Spalding, M., McIvor, A., Tonneijck, F., Tol, S., & Eijk, P. V. (2014). Mangroves for coastal defence. Guidelines for coastal managers & policy makers. Published by Wetlands International and The Nature Conservancy. 42 p
• Svane, I. B., & Petersen, J. K. (2001). On the problems of epibioses, fouling and artificial reefs, a review. Marine ecology, 22(3), 169-188.
• Tynyakov, J., Rousseau, M., Chen, M., Figus, O., Belhassen, Y., & Shashar, N. (2017). Artificial reefs as a means of spreading diving pressure in a coral reef environment. Ocean & Coastal Management, 149, 159-164.
• Waltemath, M., & Schirm, B. (1995). Effects and management of artificial reefs, including experiences outside the Philippines. In ICLARM Conference Proceedings (Philippines). ICLARM.
• Wu, Z., Tweedley, J. R., Loneragan, N. R., & Zhang, X. (2019). Artificial reefs can mimic natural habitats for fish and macroinvertebrates in temperate coastal waters of the Yellow Sea. Ecological Engineering, 139, 105579.
• Yang, X., Lin, C., Song, X., Xu, M., & Yang, H. (2019). Effects of artificial reefs on the meiofaunal community and benthic environment-A case study in Bohai Sea, China. Marine pollution bulletin, 140, 179-187.