Do Teacher Characteristics Matter for Facebook Use? Evidence from Classroom Teachers in Turkey

Year 2014, Volume: 10 Issue: 1, 0 - , 11.03.2014

Evren Şumuer , Soner Yıldırım

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine classroom teachers’ Facebook use in terms of their individual characteristics such as gender, age, teaching experience, computer use, and internet use. Data were collected from 295 classroom teachers who have an active Facebook account through an online questionnaire. Findings showed that classroom teachers’ intensity of Facebook use was associated with age, years of teaching experience, and the amount of computer and internet use. However, there was no difference in the intensity of Facebook use between male and female classroom teachers. Implications, limitations, and further studies were discussed.

Keywords

classroom teachers, Facebook use, teacher characteristics

References

• Archambault, A., & Grudin, J. (2012). A longitudinal study of Facebook, LinkedIn, & Twitter use. The Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (pp. 2741-2750). Austin, TX.
• Asterhan, C., Rosenberg, H., Schwarz, B., & Solomon, L. (2013). Secondary school teacher-student communication in Facebook: Potential and pitfalls. In Y. Eshet-Alkalai, A. Caspi, S. Eden, N. Geri, Y. Kalman, & Y. Yair (Ed.), Chairs Conference on Instructional Technology Research 2013: Learning in the Technological Era (pp. 1-5). Raanana: The Open University of Israel. Aydin, S. (2012). A review of research on Facebook as an educational environment. Education Technology Research and Development, 60(6), 1093-1106.
• Bang, E., & Luft, J. A. (2012). Secondary science teachers' use of technology in the classroom during their first 5 years. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 29(4), 118-126. boyd, d. m., & Ellison, N. B. (2008). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x Bumgarner, B. A. (2007). You have been poked: Exploring the uses and gratifications of Facebook among emerging adults. First Monday, 12(11).
• Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook "Friends:" Social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143-1168. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x
• Facebook. (2013). Key Facts. Retrieved December 5, 2013, from http://newsroom.fb.com/Key-Facts
• Fewkes, A. M., & McCabe, M. (2012). Facebook: Learning tool or distraction? Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 28(3), 92-98.
• Field, A. P. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
• Hampton, K. N., Goulet, L. S., Rainie, L., & Purcell, K. (2011). Social networking sites and our lives: How people's trust, personal relationships, and civic and political involvement are connected to their use of social networking sites and other technologies. Washington, DC: Pew Research Centre.
• Hargittai, E. (2008). Whose space? Differences among users and non-users of social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 276–297.
• Hew, K. F. (2011). Students' and teachers' use of Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 6626 doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.11.020
• Inan, F. A., & Lowther, D. L. (2010). Factors affecting technology integration in K-12 classrooms: A path model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(2), 137-154.
• Joinson, A. N. (2008). Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people? Motives and use of Facebook. The Twenty-sixth Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1027– 10 Florence.
• Kittinger, R., Correia, C. J., & Irons, J. G. (2012). Relationship between Facebook use and problematic internet use among college students. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(6), 324-3
• Lewis, K., Kaufman, J., & Christakis, N. (2008). The taste for privacy: An analysis of college student privacy settings in an online social network. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(1), 79–100.
• Mazman, G. S., & Usluel, Y. K. (2011). Gender differences in using social networks. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(2), 133-139.
• MMS Education. (2012). 2012 Survey of K-12 Educators on Social Networking, Online Communities, and Web 0 Tools. Retrieved December 20, 2013, from http://www.mmseducation.com/Educators-andSocialNetworking_FinalReport_MMSEducation.pdf
• Muscanell, N. L., & Guadagno, R. E. (2012). Make new friends or keep the old: Gender and personality differences in social networking use. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 107–112.
• Neely, L. S. P. (2011). An analysis of Facebook intensity and privacy management practices of public school educators in the United States. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Mercer University, Atlanta: GA.
• Pempek, T. A., Yermolayeva, Y. A., & Calvert, S. L. (2009). College students' social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30(3), 227-238.
• Rosen, L. D., Whaling, K., Carrier, L. M., Cheever, N. A., & Rokkum, J. (2013). The media and technology usage and attitudes scale: An empirical investigation. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2501–2511.
• Russell, M., Babell, D., O'Dwyer, L., & O'Connor, K. (2003). Examining teacher technology use: Implications for preservice and inservice teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(4), 297-310.
• Rutherford, C. (2010). Facebook as a source of informal teacher professional development. In Education, 16(1), 60-74.
• Sheldon, P. (2008). Students favorite: Facebook and motives for its use. Southwestern Mass Communication Journal, 23(2), 39-53. doi:10.1080/03634520216511
• Sheldon, P. (2013). Examining gender differences in self-disclosure on Facebook versus face-to-face. The Journal of Social Media in Society, 2(1), 88-105.
• Smock, A. D., Ellison, N. B., Lampe, C., & Wohn, D. Y. (2011). Facebook as a toolkit: A uses and gratification approach to unbundling feature use. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 232223
• Staudt, D., Clair, N., & Martinez, E. E. (2013). Using Facebook to support novice teachers. The New Educator, 9(2), 152-163.
• Tezci, E. (2009). Teachers’ effect on ICT use in education: The Turkey sample. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(2009), 1285–1294.
• Tufekci, Z. (2008). Gender, social capital and social network(ing) sites: Woman bonding, men searching. The American Sociological Association Annual Meeting. Boston.
• Turkish Statistical Institute (2013, August 22). Use Of Information And Communication Technology And Media By Children Aged 06-15, 2013 [Press release]. Retrieved from http://www.turkstat.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=15866. van Braak, J., Tondeur, J., & Valcke, M. (2004). Explaining different types of computer use among primary school teachers. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 19(4), 407-422.
• Weeden, S., Cooke, B., & McVey, M. (2013). Underage children and social networking. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45(3), 249-262.
• Wilson, R. E., Gosling, S. D., Graham, L. T. (2012). A review of Facebook research in the social sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(3), 203-220.
• Wozney, L., Venkatesh, V., & Abrami, P. C. (2006). Implementing computer technologies: Teachers' perceptions and practices. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(1), 173-207.
• Yuen, A. H., & Ma, W. W. (2002). Gender differences in teacher computer acceptance. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(3), 365-382.