Evaluation of Patients' Perspective on Dental Implants

Year 2021, Volume: 14 Issue: 2, 232 - 241, 25.08.2021

Ayşe Özcan Küçük , Aydın Keskinrüzgar , Hasan Onur Şimşek

https://doi.org/10.26559/mersinsbd.897845

Cited By: 2

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the awareness and knowledge of patients in a Turkish subpopulation about dental implant treatment. Method: The multiple-choice standardized questionnaire was applied to patients older than 18 years of age who applied to oral and maxillofacial surgery clinics of Mersin University, Adıyaman University and Aydın Adnan Menderes University, Faculty of Dentistry for any reason. The data were analysed with the SPSS program. Results: Out of 1354 participants, 1215 complete the survey. 599 of 1215 patients were male (49.3%) and 616 of them were female (50.7%). The majority of the participants were between the ages of 20-30 (34%) and most had university (43.5%) education levels. Only 60.5% of the participants were aware of dental implant treatment The source of information for the vast majority of these participants was dentists. Only 39.1% of the participants stated that they would prefer dental implant treatment, when they were asked which treatment they would prefer for their missing teeth. 6.9% of the participants believed that the dental implant would prevent MRI, 4% would prevent tomography and 7.7% would beep when passing through metal detector. Conclusion: This study showed that the level of awareness about dental implant treatment has increased in Turkish society, but it is still limited and detailed information is lacking. Therefore, more organized training programs are needed to correct misinformation and provide more information about dental implant treatment.

Keywords

Dental implant, awareness, knowledge, survey

Project Number

-

Hastaların dental implantlara bakış açısının değerlendirilmesi

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı bir Türk subpopulasyonundaki hastaların dental implant tedavisi ile ilgili farkındalıklarını ve bilgilerini değerlendirmektir. Yöntem: Bu anket çalışması 2019 yılında yapılmıştır. Çoktan seçmeli standardize edilmiş anket, Mersin Üniversitesi, Adıyaman Üniversitesi ve Aydın Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültelerinin Ağız, Diş ve Çene Cerrahisi kliniklerine herhangi bir nedenle başvuran 18 yaşından büyük hastalara uygulanmıştır. Elde edilen veriler SPSS programı ile analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular: 1354 katılımcıdan 1215’i anketi tamamladı. 1215 hastanın 599’si erkek (%49.3) ve 616’si kadındı (%50,7). Katılımcılar en fazla 20-30 yaş aralığındaydı (%34) ve çoğu üniversite düzeyinde (%43.5) eğitim seviyesine sahipti. Ankete katılan katılımcıların sadece %60.5’inin dental implant tedavisinden haberdar olduğu saptandı. Ankete katılan katılımcıların büyük çoğunluğunun bilgi kaynağının diş hekimleri olduğu belirlendi. Hastalara eksik dişleri için hangi tedaviyi tercih edecekleri sorulduğunda katılımcılardan sadece %39.1’inin dental implant tedavisini tercih edeceği saptandı. Dental implant uygulaması ile ilgili olarak katılımcıların %6.9’u dental implantların MR çekilmesine, %4’ü tomografi çekilmesine engel olacağını ve %7.7’si ise metal detektöründe öteceğini belirtti. Sonuç: Bu çalışma Türk toplumunda dental implant tedavisi ile ilgili farkındalık düzeyinin artmasına rağmen hala sınırlı olduğunu ve ayrıntılı bilgilerin ise eksik olduğunu göstermiştir. Bu nedenle dental implant uygulaması hakkında daha fazla bilgi sağlamak ve yanlış bilgileri düzeltmek için daha organize eğitim programlarının düzenlenmesi gereklidir.

Keywords

Dental implant, farkındalık, bilgi, anket

Supporting Institution

-

Project Number

-

Thanks

-

References

• 1. Naert I, Koutsikakis G, Duyck J, Quirynen M, Jacobs R, van Steenberghe D. Biologic outcome of implantsupported restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism. part I: a longitudinal clinical evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13(4):381-389.
• 2. Berge TI. Public awareness, information sources and evaluation of oral implant treatment in Norway. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11(5):401-408.
• 3. De Bruyn H, Collaert B, Lindén U, Björn AL. Patient's opinion and treatment outcome of fixed rehabilitation on Brånemark implants. A 3-year follow-up study in private dental practices. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8(4):265-271.
• 4. Grogono AL, Lancaster DM, Finger IM. Dental implants: a survey of patients' attitudes. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62(5):573-576.
• 5. Günay H, Veltmaat A, Schneller T, Neukam FW. Psychologische Aspekte bei Patienten nach Implantatversorgung [Psychological aspects of post-implant patients]. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1991;46(10):698-701.
• 6. Prabhu AG, Mundathaje M. Knowledge, attitude, and awareness of patients regarding dental implants: A cross-sectional study. J Int Oral Health 2018;10(6):278-282.
• 7. Khosya B, Devaraj CG. Awareness of dental implants as a treatment modality among people visiting Mahatma Gandhi Dental College and Hospital, Jaipur. Natl J Med Res 2015;5(1):61-63.
• 8. Satpathy A, Porwal A, Bhattacharya A, Sahu PK. Patient awareness, acceptance and perceived cost of dental Implants as a treatment modality for replacement of missing teeth: A survey in Bhubaneswar and Cuttack. Int J Public Health Dent 2011;2(1):1–7
• 9. Deeb G, Wheeler B, Jones M, Carrico C, Laskin D, Deeb JG. Public and Patient Knowledge About Dental Implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017;75(7):1387-1391.
• 10. Pommer B, Zechner W, Watzak G, Ulm C, Watzek G, Tepper G. Progress and trends in patients' mindset on dental implants. I: level of information, sources of information and need for patient information. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22(2):223-229.
• 11. Tepper G, Haas R, Mailath G, Teller C, Zechner W, Watzak G, Watzek G. Representative marketing-oriented study on implants in the Austrian population. I. Level of information, sources of information and need for patient information. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14(5):621-633.
• 12. Zimmer CM, Zimmer WM, Williams J, Liesener J. Public awareness and acceptance of dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7(2):228-232.
• 13. Al-Johany S, Al Zoman HA, Al Juhaini M, Al Refeai M. Dental patients' awareness and knowledge in using dental implants as an option in replacing missing teeth: A survey in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Saudi Dent J 2010;22(4):183-188.
• 14. Abullais SS, Al-Qahtani NA, Al-Ahmeri A, Al-Qahtani S, Bhatt MYS, Khan MA. Explore and Compare the Knowledge, Attitude, and Acceptance of Dental Implant as A Treatment Option Among Sub-Population of Saudi Arabia. Cumhuriyet Dent J 2019;22(2):241-248.
• 15. Assiry AA, Alshubrmi HR, ALShammary DH, AlFahhad HM, ALShammary AF, Alshammari TN. Knowledge and awareness about dental implant as an option for replacement of teeth: a survey among saudi adults. Ann Clin Anal Med 2019;10(6): 652-657.
• 16. Ozçakır Tomruk C, Ozkurt-Kayahan Z, Sençift K. Patients' knowledge and awareness of dental implants in a Turkish subpopulation. J Adv Prosthodont 2014;6(2):133-137.
• 17. Güngör H, Di̇keç E. Doğu Anadolu Bölgesinde İmplant Tedavisi Hakkında Hastaların Bilgi Düzeyinin Araştırılması. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2015; 25(2):205-212.
• 18. Maharjan A, Regmi S, Sagtani RA. Knowledge and Awareness Regarding Dental Implants among Patients Attending a Tertiary Care Center. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2018;56(210):578-581.
• 19. Eli I, Schwartz-Arad D, Baht R, Ben-Tuvim H. Effect of anxiety on the experience of pain in implant insertion. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14(1):115-118.
• 20. Alanazi SA, Alduaiji KTA, Al-Enazi AS, Assiri MY, Almaghnam KS, Alnwaihel AK. Knowledge, attitude, and awareness regarding dental implants among young patients visiting Al-Farabi Hospital. OHDM 2017;(16): 1-5.
• 21. Suwal P, Basnet BB, Shrestha B, Parajuli PK, Singh RK. Knowledge, attitude, and awareness regarding dental implants among patients visiting a university hospital and its teaching districts. J Dent Implant 2016;6(2):57-61.
• 22. Akagawa Y, Okane H, Kondo N, Tsuga K, Tsuru H. Comparative evaluation of chewing function with removable partial dentures and fixed prostheses supported by the single-crystal sapphire implant in the Kennedy Class II partially edentulous mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4(3):205-210.