Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Kronik lenfositik lösemide tedavi yaklaşımları: Gerçek yaşam verisi

Year 2022, Volume: 15 Issue: 1, 50 - 55, 30.04.2022
https://doi.org/10.26559/mersinsbd.962931

Abstract

Amaç: Son yıllarda kronik lenfositik lösemili hastaların yönetiminde pek çok yeni ajan yer almaya başlamıştır. CD20’ye karşı geliştirilen antikorlara; ibrutinib, idelalisib ve venetoclax gibi farklı hedeflere yönelik yeni moleküllerin de eklenmesi ile tedavi algoritmaları hızla değişmiştir. Bu çalışmada, koronavirüs pandemisi öncesi merkezimizdeki kronik lenfositik lösemi tedavi yaklaşımlarının tespit edilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Yöntem: Merkezimizde 01 Ekim 2018 ile 31 Aralık 2019 tarihleri arasında kronik lenfositik lösemi tanısı ile takip edilmiş olan hastalar retrospektif olarak incelenmiştir. Takip ve tedavi verisine ulaşılabilen, 18 yaş ve üzerindeki tüm hastalar çalışmaya dahil edilmiştir. Tanısı kesinleşmemiş olgular, takibi merkezimiz dışında yapılanlar, takip ve tedavi verisine ulaşılamayan olgular ve tedavisi çalışma aralığından önce başlanmış olan hastalar çalışma dışı bırakılmıştır. Tüm datalar hastanemizde hasta takibi için kullanılmakta olan elektronik veri tabanından alınmıştır. Bulgular: Toplam 138 (85 erkek, 53 kadın) hasta çalışmaya dahil edilmiştir. Olguların yaş ortalaması 65 (35-88)’dir. Tedavi almış olan 28 olgu için ileri analizler yapılmıştır. Hastaların %64’ünde birinci basamak tedavi uygulanırken, %32’sinin relaps/refrakter kronik lenfositik lösemi nedeni ile tedavi almakta olduğu görülmüştür. Birinci basamakta en sık uygulanan protokoller bendamustin, rituximab (%39) ve fludarabin, siklofosfamid, rituximab (%33)’ dır. Relaps/refrakter hastalık için tedavi uygulanan hastalarda ise ibrutinib (%78) ve venetoclax (%22) kullanıldığı görülmüştür. Sonuç: Kronik lenfositik lösemili hastalarda birinci basamakta öncelikle rituximab içeren bir kemoimmunoterapi protokolünün tercih edildiği, relaps/refrakter hastaların tamamında ise hedefe yönelik yeni moleküllerin uygulandığı görülmüştür. Mevcut klinik pratiğimiz güncel kılavuzlara paralel olup, yeni moleküllerin geri ödeme koşullarının uygun olduğu tüm hastalarda tercih edilmiş olması, ilerleyen yıllarda kronik lenfositik lösemi tedavi protokollerimizde hedefe yönelik moleküllerin kemoterapinin yerini alacağını düşündürmektedir.

Supporting Institution

Bu çalışma herhangi bir kurum yada kuruluş tarafından desteklenmemiştir.

References

  • Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394-424.
  • Hallek M, Cheson BD, Catovsky D, et al. iwCLL guidelines for diagnosis, indications for treatment, response assessment, and supportive management of CLL. Blood. 2018;131(25):2745-2760.
  • Rai KR, Sawitsky A, Cronkite EP, Chanana AD, Levy RN, Pasternack BS. Clinical staging of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 1975;46(2):219-234.
  • Binet JL, Auquier A, Dighiero G, et al. A new prognostic classification of chronic lymphocytic leukemia derived from a multivariate survival analysis. Cancer. 1981;48(1):198-206.
  • Döhner H, Stilgenbauer S, Benner A, et al. Genomic aberrations and survival in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(26):1910-1916.
  • Byrd JC, Furman RR, Coutre SE, et al. Ibrutinib Treatment for First-Line and Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Final Analysis of the Pivotal Phase Ib/II PCYC-1102 Study. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26(15):3918-3927.
  • Burger JA, O'Brien S. Evolution of CLL treatment - from chemoimmunotherapy to targeted and individualized therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018;15(8):510-527.
  • Scarfò L, Ferreri AJ, Ghia P. Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2016; 104:169-182.
  • Hallek M, Fischer K, Fingerle-Rowson G, et al. German Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia Study Group. Addition of rituximab to fludarabine and cyclophosphamide in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2010;376(9747):1164-1174.
  • Eichhorst B, Fink AM, Bahlo J, et al. German CLL Study Group (GCLLSG). First-line chemoimmunotherapy with bendamustine and rituximab versus fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab in patients with advanced chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL10): an international, open-label, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(7):928-942.
  • Wierda WG, Byrd JC, Abramson JS, et al. Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma, Version 4.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2020;18(2):185-217.
  • Harkins RA, Patel SP, Flowers CR. Cost-effectiveness of New Targeted Agents in the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Cancer J. 2019;25(6):418-427.
  • Shanafelt TD, Wang XV, Kay NE, et al. Ibrutinib-Rituximab or Chemoimmunotherapy for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(5):432-443.
  • Burger JA, Barr PM, Robak T, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of first-line ibrutinib treatment for patients with CLL/SLL: 5 years of follow-up from the phase 3 RESONATE-2 study. Leukemia. 2020;34(3):787-798.
  • Byrd JC, Furman RR, Coutre SE, et al. Ibrutinib Treatment for First-Line and Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Final Analysis of the Pivotal Phase Ib/II PCYC-1102 Study. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26(15):3918-3927.
  • Ghia P, Pluta A, Wach M, et al. ASCEND: Phase III, Randomized Trial of Acalabrutinib Versus Idelalisib Plus Rituximab or Bendamustine Plus Rituximab in Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(25):2849-2861.
  • Sharman JP, Egyed M, Jurczak W, et al. Acalabrutinib with or without obinutuzumab versus chlorambucil and obinutuzmab for treatment-naive chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (ELEVATE TN): a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2020;395(10232):1278-1291.
  • Tam CS, Trotman J, Opat S, et al. Phase 1 study of the selective BTK inhibitor zanubrutinib in B-cell malignancies and safety and efficacy evaluation in CLL. Blood. 2019;134(11):851-859.
  • Roberts AW, Davids MS, Pagel JM, et al. Targeting BCL2 with Venetoclax in Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(4):311-322.
  • Seymour JF, Kipps TJ, Eichhorst B, et al. Venetoclax-Rituximab in Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(12):1107-1120.
  • Jones JA, Mato AR, Wierda WG, et al. Venetoclax for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia progressing after ibrutinib: an interim analysis of a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(1):65-75.
  • Hallek M. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia: 2020 update on diagnosis, risk stratification and treatment. Am J Hematol. 2019;94(11):1266-1287.

Treatment approaches in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: Real life data

Year 2022, Volume: 15 Issue: 1, 50 - 55, 30.04.2022
https://doi.org/10.26559/mersinsbd.962931

Abstract

Aim: Many new agents have started to take place in the management of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia in recent years. Following the antibodies developed against CD20 and the new targeting molecules such as ibrutinib, idelalisib and venetoclax, treatment algorithms have changed rapidly. In this study, it was aimed to determine chronic lymphocytic leukemia treatment approaches in our center before the coronavirus pandemic. Method: Patients who were followed up with a diagnosis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia between October 01, 2018 and December 31, 2019 were analyzed retrospectively in our center. All adult patients aged 18 years and over, whose follow-up and treatment data were available, were included in the study. Patients, whose diagnosis was not confirmed, treatment was initiated before the study interval and who were followed at an external center, were excluded. All data were gathered from the electronic database used for patient follow-up in our hospital. Results: A total of 138 (85 men, 53 women) patients were included in the study. The mean age of the cases was 65 (35-88) years. Further analyzes were made for 28 cases who received treatment. Among these patients, 64% received first-line treatment, while 32% were treated for relapse/refractory disease. The most common protocols used in the first line were bendamustine, rituximab (39%) and fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, rituximab (33%). Considering relapsed /refractory disease ibrutinib (%78) and venetoclax (22%) were the drugs used. Conclusion: It was observed that a chemoimmunotherapy protocol containing rituximab was primarily preferred in the first line treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia and targeted new molecules were applied in all relapsed/refractory patients. Our algorithms were in line with the current guidelines. As the new molecules were preferred in all patients with suitable reimbursement conditions, we think that targeted molecules will replace chemotherapy in further time.

References

  • Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394-424.
  • Hallek M, Cheson BD, Catovsky D, et al. iwCLL guidelines for diagnosis, indications for treatment, response assessment, and supportive management of CLL. Blood. 2018;131(25):2745-2760.
  • Rai KR, Sawitsky A, Cronkite EP, Chanana AD, Levy RN, Pasternack BS. Clinical staging of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 1975;46(2):219-234.
  • Binet JL, Auquier A, Dighiero G, et al. A new prognostic classification of chronic lymphocytic leukemia derived from a multivariate survival analysis. Cancer. 1981;48(1):198-206.
  • Döhner H, Stilgenbauer S, Benner A, et al. Genomic aberrations and survival in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(26):1910-1916.
  • Byrd JC, Furman RR, Coutre SE, et al. Ibrutinib Treatment for First-Line and Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Final Analysis of the Pivotal Phase Ib/II PCYC-1102 Study. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26(15):3918-3927.
  • Burger JA, O'Brien S. Evolution of CLL treatment - from chemoimmunotherapy to targeted and individualized therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018;15(8):510-527.
  • Scarfò L, Ferreri AJ, Ghia P. Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2016; 104:169-182.
  • Hallek M, Fischer K, Fingerle-Rowson G, et al. German Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia Study Group. Addition of rituximab to fludarabine and cyclophosphamide in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2010;376(9747):1164-1174.
  • Eichhorst B, Fink AM, Bahlo J, et al. German CLL Study Group (GCLLSG). First-line chemoimmunotherapy with bendamustine and rituximab versus fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab in patients with advanced chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL10): an international, open-label, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(7):928-942.
  • Wierda WG, Byrd JC, Abramson JS, et al. Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma, Version 4.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2020;18(2):185-217.
  • Harkins RA, Patel SP, Flowers CR. Cost-effectiveness of New Targeted Agents in the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Cancer J. 2019;25(6):418-427.
  • Shanafelt TD, Wang XV, Kay NE, et al. Ibrutinib-Rituximab or Chemoimmunotherapy for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(5):432-443.
  • Burger JA, Barr PM, Robak T, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of first-line ibrutinib treatment for patients with CLL/SLL: 5 years of follow-up from the phase 3 RESONATE-2 study. Leukemia. 2020;34(3):787-798.
  • Byrd JC, Furman RR, Coutre SE, et al. Ibrutinib Treatment for First-Line and Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Final Analysis of the Pivotal Phase Ib/II PCYC-1102 Study. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26(15):3918-3927.
  • Ghia P, Pluta A, Wach M, et al. ASCEND: Phase III, Randomized Trial of Acalabrutinib Versus Idelalisib Plus Rituximab or Bendamustine Plus Rituximab in Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(25):2849-2861.
  • Sharman JP, Egyed M, Jurczak W, et al. Acalabrutinib with or without obinutuzumab versus chlorambucil and obinutuzmab for treatment-naive chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (ELEVATE TN): a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2020;395(10232):1278-1291.
  • Tam CS, Trotman J, Opat S, et al. Phase 1 study of the selective BTK inhibitor zanubrutinib in B-cell malignancies and safety and efficacy evaluation in CLL. Blood. 2019;134(11):851-859.
  • Roberts AW, Davids MS, Pagel JM, et al. Targeting BCL2 with Venetoclax in Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(4):311-322.
  • Seymour JF, Kipps TJ, Eichhorst B, et al. Venetoclax-Rituximab in Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(12):1107-1120.
  • Jones JA, Mato AR, Wierda WG, et al. Venetoclax for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia progressing after ibrutinib: an interim analysis of a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(1):65-75.
  • Hallek M. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia: 2020 update on diagnosis, risk stratification and treatment. Am J Hematol. 2019;94(11):1266-1287.
There are 22 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Health Care Administration
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Mehmet Bankir 0000-0003-3284-2838

Funda Pepedil Tanrikulu 0000-0003-1878-1872

Didar Yanardağ Açık 0000-0001-7282-0188

Publication Date April 30, 2022
Submission Date July 5, 2021
Acceptance Date September 16, 2021
Published in Issue Year 2022 Volume: 15 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Bankir, M., Pepedil Tanrikulu, F., & Yanardağ Açık, D. (2022). Kronik lenfositik lösemide tedavi yaklaşımları: Gerçek yaşam verisi. Mersin Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 15(1), 50-55. https://doi.org/10.26559/mersinsbd.962931
AMA Bankir M, Pepedil Tanrikulu F, Yanardağ Açık D. Kronik lenfositik lösemide tedavi yaklaşımları: Gerçek yaşam verisi. Mersin Univ Saglık Bilim derg. April 2022;15(1):50-55. doi:10.26559/mersinsbd.962931
Chicago Bankir, Mehmet, Funda Pepedil Tanrikulu, and Didar Yanardağ Açık. “Kronik Lenfositik lösemide Tedavi yaklaşımları: Gerçek yaşam Verisi”. Mersin Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 15, no. 1 (April 2022): 50-55. https://doi.org/10.26559/mersinsbd.962931.
EndNote Bankir M, Pepedil Tanrikulu F, Yanardağ Açık D (April 1, 2022) Kronik lenfositik lösemide tedavi yaklaşımları: Gerçek yaşam verisi. Mersin Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 15 1 50–55.
IEEE M. Bankir, F. Pepedil Tanrikulu, and D. Yanardağ Açık, “Kronik lenfositik lösemide tedavi yaklaşımları: Gerçek yaşam verisi”, Mersin Univ Saglık Bilim derg, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 50–55, 2022, doi: 10.26559/mersinsbd.962931.
ISNAD Bankir, Mehmet et al. “Kronik Lenfositik lösemide Tedavi yaklaşımları: Gerçek yaşam Verisi”. Mersin Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 15/1 (April 2022), 50-55. https://doi.org/10.26559/mersinsbd.962931.
JAMA Bankir M, Pepedil Tanrikulu F, Yanardağ Açık D. Kronik lenfositik lösemide tedavi yaklaşımları: Gerçek yaşam verisi. Mersin Univ Saglık Bilim derg. 2022;15:50–55.
MLA Bankir, Mehmet et al. “Kronik Lenfositik lösemide Tedavi yaklaşımları: Gerçek yaşam Verisi”. Mersin Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 15, no. 1, 2022, pp. 50-55, doi:10.26559/mersinsbd.962931.
Vancouver Bankir M, Pepedil Tanrikulu F, Yanardağ Açık D. Kronik lenfositik lösemide tedavi yaklaşımları: Gerçek yaşam verisi. Mersin Univ Saglık Bilim derg. 2022;15(1):50-5.

MEU Journal of Health Sciences Assoc was began to the publishing process in 2008 under the supervision of Assoc. Prof. Gönül Aslan, Editor-in-Chief, and affiliated to Mersin University Institute of Health Sciences. In March 2015, Prof. Dr. Caferi Tayyar Şaşmaz undertook the Editor-in Chief position and since then he has been in charge.

Publishing in three issues per year (April - August - December), it is a multisectoral refereed scientific journal. In addition to research articles, scientific articles such as reviews, case reports and letters to the editor are published in the journal. Our journal, which has been published via e-mail since its inception, has been published both online and in print. Following the Participation Agreement signed with TÜBİTAK-ULAKBİM Dergi Park in April 2015, it has started to accept and evaluate online publications.

Mersin University Journal of Health Sciences have been indexed by Turkey Citation Index since November 16, 2011.

Mersin University Journal of Health Sciences have been indexed by ULAKBIM Medical Database from the first issue of 2016.

Mersin University Journal of Health Sciences have been indexed by DOAJ since October 02, 2019.

Article Publishing Charge Policy: Our journal has adopted an open access policy and there is no fee for article application, evaluation, and publication in our journal. All the articles published in our journal can be accessed from the Archive free of charge.

154561545815459

Creative Commons Lisansı
This work is licensed with Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International.