SOCIAL MEDIA-BASED COMMUNICATION RESEARCH: PRIMARY TOPICS, THEORIES, METHODOLOGIES

Year 2020, , 173 - 201, 31.12.2020

Nurcan Törenli Zafer Kıyan

https://doi.org/10.17572/mj2020.2.173201

Cited By: 2

Abstract

Today, social media research occupies an important place in the communication discipline. The most likely reason for this is that with the increasing prevalence of social media, communication scholars have turned their attention to this area. This study focuses on social media research in the communication discipline. The aim of the study is to reveal research trends and patterns of social media-based communication research. To achieve this, the study analyzes 120 articles published between 2011 and 2020 in academic journals indexed in Web of Science and with a high number of citations. By using qualitative content analysis technique, each article was examined and coded under six categories: (i). primary topic of the study, (ii). use of theories or theoretical models, (iii). types of sample, (iv). research methods, (v). social media platform, (vi). research area/locations. The findings help to understand general research trends and patterns in social media research conducted in the communication discipline.

Keywords

Communication research, social media, theory, methodology, research trend

SOSYAL MEDYA EKSENLİ İLETİŞİM ARAŞTIRMALARI: KONULAR, KURAMLAR, YÖNTEMLER

Abstract

Günümüzde sosyal medya araştırmaları iletişim disiplini içinde önemli bir yer işgal etmektedir. Bunun nedeni sosyal medyanın giderek yaygınlaşması ve iletişim araştırmacılarının dikkatlerini bu alana yöneltmesidir. Bir literatür incelemesi niteliğindeki bu çalışma, iletişim yönelimli sosyal medya araştırmalarını analiz ederek bu çalışmalarda kendisini gösteren araştırma eğilimlerini ve örüntülerini açığa çıkarmayı hedeflemektedir. Çalışmada, bu hedefe ulaşmak için Web of Science kataloğunda taranan dergilerde 2011-2020 arasında yayınlanmış, atıf sayısı yüksek iletişim yönelimli 120 makale niteliksel içerik analiz tekniği kullanılarak altı başlık altında incelenip kodlanmıştır. Kodlama başlıkları sırasıyla (i). incelenen araştırma konusu, (ii). kullanılan kuramsal çerçeve/model, (iii). odaklanılan örneklem/analiz birimi, (iv). benimsenen yöntem, (v) kullanılan sosyal medya platformu ve (vi). araştırma uzamı şeklindedir. Elde edilen bulgular, iletişim disiplini içinde yer alan sosyal medya araştırmalarındaki genel araştırma eğilimini anlamaya yardımcı olmaktadır.

Keywords

İletişim araştırmaları, sosyal medya, kuram, yöntem, araştırma eğilimi

References

• Abidin, C. (2016). ‘Aren’t these just young, rich women doing vain things online?’: Influencer selfies as subversive frivolity. Social Media + Society, 2(2), 1-17. doi:10.1177/2056305116641342
• Aksnes, D. W., Langfeldt, L. ve Wouters, P. (2019). Citations, citation indicators, and research quality. Sage Open, 9(1), 1-17. doi:10.1177/2158244019829575
• Alencar, A. (2018). Refugee integration and social media. Information, Communication & Society, 21(11), 1588-1603. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2017.1340500
• Alhabash, S. ve Ma, M. (2017). A tale of four platforms: Motivations and uses of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat among college students? Social Media + Society. 3(1), 1-13. doi:10.1177/2056305117691544
• Assarroudi, A., Nabavi, F. H., Armat, M. R., Ebadi, A. ve Vaismoradi, M. (2018). Directed qualitative content analysis. Journal of Research in Nursing, 23(1), 42-55. doi:10.1177/1744987117741667
• Ausserhofer, J. ve Maireder, A. (2013). National politics on Twitter. Information, Communication & Society, 16(3), 291-314. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.756050
• Aziz, A. (2006). Dünyada ve Türkiye’de iletişim araştırmaları. Kültür ve İletişim, 9(1), 9-31.
• Bayer, J. B., Ellison, N. B., Schoenebeck, S. Y. ve Falk, E. B. (2016). Sharing the small moments: Ephemeral social interaction on Snapchat. Information, Communication & Society, 19(7), 956-977. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2015.1084349
• Bazarova, N. N. ve Choi, Y. H. (2014). Self-disclosure in social media. Journal of Communication, 64(4) 635-657. doi:10.1111/jcom.12106
• Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, 2, 8-14. doi:10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001
• Bennett, W. L. ve Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739-768. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
• Boczkowski, P. J., Mitchelstein, E. ve Matassi, M. (2018). ‘News comes across when I’m in a moment of leisure’: Understanding the practices of incidental news consumption on social media. New Media & Society, 20(10), 3523-3539. doi:10.1177/1461444817750396
• Bode, L. (2016) Political news in the news feed. Mass Communication and Society, 19(1), 24-48. doi:10.1080/15205436.2015.1045149
• Bode, L. ve Vraga, E. K. (2015). In related news, that was wrong: The correction of misinformation through related stories functionality in social media. Journal of Communication, 65(4), 619-638. doi:10.1111/jcom.12166
• Bode, L. ve Vraga, E. K. (2018). See something, say something: Correction of global health misinformation on social media. Health Communication, 33(9), 1131-1140. doi:10.1080/10410236.2017.1331312
• Bossetta, M. (2018). The digital architectures of social media: Comparing political campaigning on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat in the 2016 U.S. election. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(2), 471-496. doi:10.1177/1077699018763307
• Boulianne, S. (2015). Social media use and participation. Information, Communication & Society, 18(5), 524-538. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2015.1008542
• Boulianne, S. (2019). Revolution in the making? Social media effects across the globe. Information, Communication & Society, 22(1), 39-54. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2017.1353641
• boyd, d. ve Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662-679. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878
• Briones, R. L., Kuch, B., Liu, B. F. ve Jin, Y. (2011). Keeping up with the digital age: How the American Red Cross uses social media to build relationships. Public Relations Review, 37(1), 37-43. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.12.006
• Carlson, M. (2018). Facebook in the news. Digital Journalism, 6(1), 4-20. doi:10.1080/21670811.2017.1298044
• Carlson, M. (2020). Fake news as an informational moral panic. Information, Communication & Society, 23(3), 374-388. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2018.1505934
• Castells, M. (2013). Enformasyon çağı: Ekonomi, toplum ve kültür-ağ toplumunun yükselişi. (E. Kılıç, Çev.). İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları
• Çelenk, S. (Der.), (2008). Kırılmalar ve uzlaşmalar. Ankara: De Ki.
• Ceron, A., Curini, L., Iacus, S. M. ve Porro, G. (2014). Every tweet counts? How sentiment analysis of social media can improve our knowledge of citizens’ political preferences with an application to Italy and France. New Media & Society, 16(2), 340-358. doi:10.1177/1461444813480466
• Chu, S. C. ve Kim, Y. (2011). Determinants of consumer engagement in electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) in social networking sites. International Journal of Advertising, 30(1), 47-75. doi:10.2501/IJA-30-1-047-075
• Chu, S. C., Lien, C. H. ve Cao, Y. (2019). Electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) on WeChat. International Journal of Advertising, 38(1), 26-49. doi:10.1080/02650487.2018.1470917
• Cohen, N. S. (2019). At work in the digital newsroom. Digital Journalism, 7(5), 571-591. doi:10.1080/21670811.2017.1419821
• Cohen, R., Fardouly, J., Newton-John, T. ve Slater, A. (2019). #BoPo on Instagram: An experimental investigation of the effects of viewing body positive content on young women’s mood and body image. New Media & Society, 21(7), 1546-1564. doi:10.1177/1461444819826530
• Cotter, K. (2019). Playing the visibility game: How digital influencers and algorithms negotiate influence on Instagram. New Media & Society, 21(4), 895-913. doi:10.1177/1461444818815684
• Crawford, K. ve Gillespie, T. (2016). What is a flag for? Social media reporting tools and the vocabulary of complaint. New Media & Society, 18(3), 410-428. doi:10.1177/1461444814543163
• De Veirman, M. ve Hudders, L. (2020). Disclosing sponsored Instagram posts: The role of material connection with the brand and message-sidedness when disclosing covert advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 39(1), 94-130. doi:10.1080/02650487.2019.1575108
• De Veirman, M., Cauberghe, V. ve Hudders, L. (2017). Marketing through Instagram influencers. International Journal of Advertising, 36(5), 798-828. doi:10.1080/02650487.2017.1348035
• Dekker, R., Engbersen, G., Klaver, J. ve Vonk, H. (2018). Smart refugees: How Syrian asylum migrants use social media information in migration decision-making. Social Media + Society, 4(1), 1-11. doi:10.1177/2056305118764439
• Dimitrova, D. V., Shehata, A., Strömbäck, J. ve Nord, L. W. (2014). The effects of digital media on political knowledge and participation in election campaigns. Communication Research, 41(1), 95-118. doi:10.1177/0093650211426004
• Duffy, B. E. ve Hund, E. (2015). ‘Having it all’ on social media: Entrepreneurial femininity and self-branding among fashion bloggers. Social Media + Society, 1(2), 1-11. doi:10.1177/2056305115604337
• Duguay, S., Burgess, J. ve Suzor, N. (2020). Queer women’s experiences of patchwork platform governance on Tinder, Instagram, and Vine. Convergence, 26(2), 237-252. doi:10.1177/1354856518781530
• Ekström, M, Westlund, O. (2019). The dislocation of news journalism. Media and Communication, 7, 259-270. doi:10.17645/mac.v7i1.1763
• Engesser, S., Ernst, N., Esser, F. ve Büchel, F. (2017) Populism and social media. Information, Communication & Society, 20(8), 1109-1126. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2016.1207697
• Enli, G. (2017). Twitter as arena for the authentic outsider. European Journal of Communication, 32(1), 50-61. doi:10.1177/0267323116682802
• Enli, G. S. ve Skogerbø, E. (2013). Personalized campaigns in party-centered politics. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5), 757-774. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.782330
• Ernst, N., Engesser, S., Büchel, F., Blassnig, S. ve Esser, F. (2017). Extreme parties and populism: An analysis of Facebook and Twitter across six countries. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1347-1364. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2017.1329333
• Ferrer-Conill, R. ve Tandoc, E. C. (2018). The audience-oriented editor. Digital Journalism, 6(4), 436-453. doi:10.1080/21670811.2018.1440972
• Fletcher, R. ve Nielsen, R. K. (2018). Are people incidentally exposed to news on social media? New Media & Society, 20(7), 2450-2468. doi:10.1177/1461444817724170
• Fletcher, R. ve Park, S. (2017). The impact of trust in the news media on online news consumption and participation. Digital Journalism, 5(10), 1281-1299. doi:10.1080/21670811.2017.1279979
• Freelon, D., McIlwain, C. ve Clark, M. (2018). Quantifying the power and consequences of social media protest. New Media & Society, 20(3), 990-1011. doi:10.1177/1461444816676646
• Gibbs, M., Meese, J., Arnold, M., Nansen, B. ve Carter, M. (2015) #Funeral and Instagram: Death, social media, and platform vernacular. Information, Communication & Society, 18(3), 255-268. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2014.987152
• Gil de Zúñiga, H. ve Diehl, T. (2019). News finds me perception and democracy. New Media & Society, 21(6), 1253-1271. doi:10.1177/1461444818817548
• Gil de Zúñiga, H., Jung, N. ve Valenzuela, S. (2012) Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 319-336. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01574.x
• Gil de Zúñiga, H., Molyneux, L. ve Zheng, P. (2014). Social media, political expression, and political participation. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 612-634. doi:10.1111/jcom.12103
• Gil de Zúñiga, H., Weeks, B. E. ve Ardévol-Abreu, A. (2017). Effects of the news-finds-me perception in communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(3), 105-123. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12185
• Graham, T., Broersma, M., Hazelhoff, K. ve van 't Haar, G. (2013). Between broadcasting political messages and interacting with voters. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5), 692-716. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.785581
• Graham, T., Jackson, D. ve Broersma, M. (2016). New platform, old habits? Candidates’ use of Twitter during the 2010 British and Dutch general election campaigns. New Media & Society, 18(5), 765-783. doi:10.1177/1461444814546728
• Groshek, J. ve Koc-Michalska, K. (2017). Helping populism win? Social media use, filter bubbles, and support for populist presidential candidates in the 2016 US election campaign. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1389-1407. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2017.1329334
• Haller, A. ve Holt, K. (2019). Paradoxical populism: How PEGIDA relates to mainstream and alternative media, Information. Communication & Society, 22(12), 1665-1680. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2018.1449882
• Hanusch, F. ve Tandoc, E. C. (2019). Comments, analytics, and social media: The impact of audience feedback on journalists’ market orientation. Journalism, 20(6), 695-713. doi:10.1177/1464884917720305
• Harcup, T. ve O’Neill, D. (2017). What is News?. Journalism Studies, 18(12), 1470-1488. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2016.1150193
• Harlow, S. (2012). Social media and social movements. New Media & Society, 14(2), 225-243. doi:10.1177/1461444811410408
• Haro-de-Rosario, A., Sáez-Martín, A. ve del Carmen Caba-Pérez, M. (2018). Using social media to enhance citizen engagement with local government. New Media & Society, 20(1), 29-49. doi:10.1177/1461444816645652
• Heiss, R., Schmuck, D. ve Matthes, J. (2019). What drives interaction in political actors’ Facebook posts? Profile and content predictors of user engagement and political actors’ reactions. Information Communication & Society, 22(10), 1497-1513. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2018.1445273
• Helmond, A. (2015). The platformization of the web: Making web data platform ready. Social Media + Society, 1(2), 1-11. doi:10.1177/2056305115603080
• Hermida, A. (2013) #Journalism: Reconfiguring journalism research about Twitter, one tweet at a time. Digital Journalism, 1(3), 295-313. doi:10.1080/21670811.2013.808456
• Hermida, A., Fletcher, F., Korell, D. ve Logan, D. (2012). Share, like, recommend. Journalism Studies, 13(5-6), 815-824. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2012.664430
• Hermida, A., Lewis, S. C. ve Zamith, R. (2014). Sourcing the Arab Spring: A case study of Andy Carvin’s sources on Twitter during the Tunisian and Egyptian Revolutions. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19(3), 479-99. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12074.
• Himelboim, I., McCreery, S. ve Smith, M. (2013). Birds of a feather tweet together. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 18(2) 154-174. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12001
• Howard, P. N., Woolley, S. ve Calo, R. (2018). Algorithms, bots, and political communication in the US 2016 election. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 15(2), 81-93. doi:10.1080/19331681.2018.1448735
• Internet Live Stats. Erişim: 15 Eylül 2020, https://www.internetlivestats.com/
• Jackson, S. J. ve Welles, B. F. (2016). #Ferguson is everywhere: Initiators in emerging counterpublic networks. Information, Communication & Society, 19(3), 397-418. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2015.1106571
• Jin, Y., Liu, B. F. ve Austin, L. L. (2014). Examining the role of social media in effective crisis management. Communication Research, 41(1), 74-94. doi:10.1177/0093650211423918
• Kavada, A. (2015). Creating the collective: Social media, the Occupy Movement and its constitution as a collective actor. Information, Communication & Society, 18(8), 872-886. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2015.1043318
• Kim C. ve Yang S-U. (2017). Like, comment, and share on Facebook: How each behavior differs from the other. Public Relations Review, 43(2), 441-449. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.02.006
• Kim, Y., Hsu, S‐H. ve de Zúñiga, H. G. (2013). Influence of social media use on discussion network heterogeneity and civic engagement. Journal of Communication, 63(3), 498-516. doi:10.1111/jcom.12034.
• Kim, Y., Kim, B., Kim, Y. ve Wang, Y. (2017). Mobile communication research in communication journals from 1999 to 2014. New Media & Society, 19(10), 1668-1691. doi:10.1177/1461444817718162
• Klinger, U. ve Svensson, J. (2015) The emergence of network media logic in political communication. New Media & Society, 17(8), 1241-1257. doi:10.1177/1461444814522952.
• Knoll, J. (2016). Advertising in social media. International Journal of Advertising, 35(2), 266-300. doi:10.1080/02650487.2015.1021898
• Knoll, J., Matthes, J. ve Heiss, R. (2020). The social media political participation model. Convergence, 26(1), 135-156. doi:10.1177/1354856517750366
• Kreiss, D. (2016). Seizing the moment: The presidential campaigns’ use of Twitter during the 2012 electoral cycle. New Media & Society, 18(8), 1473-1490. doi:10.1177/1461444814562445
• Kreiss, D. ve McGregor, S. C. (2018). Technology firms shape political communication. Political Communication, 35(2), 155-177. doi:10.1080/10584609.2017.1364814
• Kreiss, D., Lawrence, R. G. ve McGregor, S. C. (2018). In their own words: Political practitioner accounts of candidates, audiences, affordances, genres, and timing in strategic social media use. Political Communication, 35(1), 8-31. doi:10.1080/10584609.2017.1334727
• Kümpel, A. S. (2019). The issue takes it all? Digital Journalism, 7(2), 165-186. doi:10.1080/21670811.2018.1465831
• Lang, K. (2005), İletişim araştırmaları: Kökenler ve gelişmesi. Erol Mutlu (Der.), içinde, Kitle iletişim kuramları (s. 27-41). Ankara: Ütopya.
• Larsson, A. O. ve Moe, H. (2012). Studying political microblogging: Twitter users in the 2010 Swedish election campaign. New Media & Society, 14(5), 729-747. doi:10.1177/1461444811422894
• Lasorsa, D. L., Lewis, S. C. ve Holton, A. E. (2012). Normalizing Twitter. Journalism Studies, 13(1), 19-36. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2011.571825
• Lecheler, S. ve Kruikemeier, S. (2016). Re-evaluating journalistic routines in a digital age: A review of research on the use of online sources. New Media & Society, 18(1), 156-171. doi:10.1177/1461444815600412
• Leonardi, P., Huysman, M. ve Steinfield, C. (2013). Enterprise social media: Definition, history, and prospects for the study of social technologies in organizations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(1), 1-19. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12029
• Lewis, S. C., Zamith, R. ve Hermida, A. (2013). Content analysis in an era of big data. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57(1), 34-52. doi:10.1080/08838151.2012.761702
• Lim, M. (2012). Clicks, cabs, and coffee houses: Social media and oppositional movements in Egypt, 2004–2011. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 231-48. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01628.x
• Litt, E. (2012). Knock, knock. Who's there? The imagined audience. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(3), 330-345. doi:10.1080/08838151.2012.705195
• Litt, E. ve Hargittai, E. (2016). The imagined audience on social network sites. Social Media + Society, 2(1), 1-12. doi:10.1177/2056305116633482
• Lovejoy, K. ve Saxton, G. D. (2012). Information, community, and action: How nonprofit organizations use social media. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 17(3), 337-353. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01576.x
• Lovejoy, K., Waters, R. D. ve Saxton, G. D. (2012). Engaging stakeholders through Twitter. Public Relations Review, 38(2), 313-318. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.01.005
• Lowery, S. A. ve De Fleur, M. L. (1988). Milestones in mass communication research: Media effects. London: Longman.
• Maares, P. ve Hanusch, F. (2020). Exploring the boundaries of journalism: Instagram micro-bloggers in the twilight zone of lifestyle journalism. Journalism, 21(2), 262–278. doi:10.1177/1464884918801400
• Majchrzak, A., Faraj, S., Kane, G. C. ve Azad, B. (2013). The contradictory influence of social media affordances on online communal knowledge sharing. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19(1), 38-55. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12030
• Marwick, A. E. ve boyd, d. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114-133. doi:10.1177/1461444810365313
• Marwick, A. E. ve boyd, d. (2014). Networked privacy: How teenagers negotiate context in social media. New Media & Society, 16(7), 1051-1067. doi:10.1177/1461444814543995
• Meraz, S. ve Papacharissi, Z. (2013). Networked gatekeeping and networked framing on #Egypt. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(2), 138-166. doi:10.1177/1940161212474472
• Messing, S. ve Westwood, S. J. (2014). Selective exposure in the age of social media. Communication Research, 41(8), 1042-1063. doi:10.1177/0093650212466406
• Muntinga, D. G., Moorman, M. ve Smit, E. G. (2011). Introducing COBRAs: Exploring motivations for brand-related social media use. International Journal of Advertising, 30(1), 13-46. doi:10.2501/IJA-30-1-013-046
• Nekmat, E., Gower, K. K., Zhou, S. ve Metzger, M. (2019). Connective-collective action on social media. Communication Research, 46(1), 62-87. doi:10.1177/0093650215609676
• Nieborg, D. B. ve Helmond, A. (2019). The political economy of Facebook’s platformization in the mobile ecosystem. Media, Culture & Society, 41(2), 196-218. doi:10.1177/0163443718818384
• Nielsen, K. R. ve Ganter, S. A. (2018). Dealing with digital intermediaries: A case study of the relations between publishers and platforms. New Media & Society, 20(4), 1600-1617. doi:10.1177/1461444817701318
• Obar, J. A. ve Oeldorf-Hirsch, A. (2020). The biggest lie on the Internet: Ignoring the privacy policies and terms of service policies of social networking services. Information, Communication & Society, 23(1), 128-147. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2018.1486870
• Oeldorf-Hirsch, A. (2018). The role of engagement in learning from active and incidental news exposure on social media. Mass Communication and Society, 21(2), 225-247. doi:10.1080/15205436.2017.1384022
• Özçetin, B. (2018). Kitle iletişim kuramları: Kavramlar, okullar, modeller. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
• Papacharissi, Z. (2016). Affective publics and structures of storytelling. Information, Communication & Society, 19(3), 307-324. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2015.1109697
• Pearce, W., Özkula, S. M., Greene, A. K, Teeling, L., Bansard, J. S., Omena, J. J. ve Rabello, E. T. (2020). Visual cross-platform analysis: digital methods to research social media images. Information, Communication & Society, 23(2), 161-180. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2018.1486871
• Scannell, P. (2007). Media and communication. London: Sage.
• Schreier, M. (2014). Qualitative content analysis. Uwe Flick (Der.), içinde, The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis (s. 170-183). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
• Schultz, F., Utz, S. ve Göritz, A. (2011). Is the medium the message? Perceptions of and reactions to crisis communication via Twitter, blogs and traditional media. Public Relations Review, 37(1), 20-27. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.12.001
• Shin, J. ve Thorson, K. (2017). Partisan selective sharing: The biased diffusion of fact-checking messages on social media. Journal of Communication, 67(2), 233-255. doi:10.1111/jcom.12284
• Simpson, C. C. ve Mazzeo, S. E. (2017). Skinny is not enough: A content analysis of fitspiration on Pinterest. Health Communication, 32(5), 560-567. doi:10.1080/10410236.2016.1140273
• Skoric, M. M., Zhu, Q., Goh, D. ve Pang, N. (2016). Social media and citizen engagement: A meta-analytic review. New Media & Society, 18(9), 1817-1839. doi:10.1177/1461444815616221
• Smith, N. ve Graham, T. (2019). Mapping the anti-vaccination movement on Facebook. Information, Communication & Society, 22(9), 1310-1327. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2017.1418406
• Swart, J., Peters, C. ve Broersma, M. (2019). Sharing and discussing news in private social media groups. Digital Journalism, 7(2), 187-205. doi:10.1080/21670811.2018.1465351
• Taipale, S. & Fortunati, L. (2014). Capturing methodological trends in mobile communication studies. Information, Communication & Society, 17(5), 627-642. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.862562
• Tandoc, E. C., Lim, Z. W. ve Ling, R. (2018). Defining ‘fake news’. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 137-153. doi:10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143
• Theocharis, Y., Lowe, W., van Deth, J. W. ve García-Albacete, G. (2015) Using Twitter to mobilize protest action. Information, Communication & Society, 18(2), 202-220. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2014.948035
• Trilling, D., Tolochko, P. ve Burscher, B. (2017). From newsworthiness to shareworthiness: How to Predict News Sharing Based on Article Characteristics. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94(1), 38-60. doi:10.1177/1077699016654682
• Tufecki, Z. and Wilson, C. (2012). Social media and the decision to participate in political protest. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 363-379. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01629.x
• Turcotte, J., York, C., Irving, J., Scholl, R. M. ve Pingree, R. J. (2015). News recommendations from social media opinion leaders. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(5), 520-535. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12127
• Twenge, J. M., Spitzberg, B. H. ve Campbell, W. K. (2019). Less in-person social interaction with peers among U.S. adolescents in the 21st century and links to loneliness. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(6), 1892-1913. doi:10.1177/0265407519836170
• Utz, S., Schultz, F. ve Glocka, S. (2013). Crisis communication online. Public Relations Review, 39(1), 40-46. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.09.010
• Valenzuela, S., Arriagada, A. ve Scherman, A. (2012). The social media basis of youth protest behavior. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 99-314. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01635.x
• Valenzuela, S., Correa, T. ve Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2018). Ties, likes, and tweets: Using strong and weak ties to explain differences in protest participation across Facebook and Twitter use. Political Communication, 35(1), 117-134. doi:10.1080/10584609.2017.1334726
• Valeriani, A. ve Vaccari, C. (2016). Accidental exposure to politics on social media as online participation equalizer in Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom. New Media & Society, 18(9), 1857-1874. doi:10.1177/1461444815616223
• van Dijck, J. (2013). ‘You have one identity’: Performing the self on Facebook and LinkedIn. Media, Culture & Society, 35(2), 199-215. doi:10.1177/0163443712468605
• Vis, F. (2013). Twitter as a reporting tool for breaking news. Digital Journalism, 1(1), 27-47. doi:10.1080/21670811.2012.741316
• Vraga, E. K. ve Bode, L. (2018). I do not believe you: How providing a source corrects health misperceptions across social media platforms. Information, Communication & Society, 21(10), 1337-1353. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2017.1313883
• Waddell, T. F. (2020). The authentic (and angry) audience. Digital Journalism, 8(2), 249-266. doi:10.1080/21670811.2018.1490656
• Waterloo, S. F., Baumgartner, S. E., Peter, J. ve Valkenburg, P. M. (2018). Norms of online expressions of emotion: Comparing Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and WhatsApp. New Media & Society, 20(5), 1813-1831. doi:10.1177/1461444817707349
• We Are Social – Digital in 2020. Erişim tarihi: 15 Eylül 2020, https://wearesocial.com/digital-2020
• Web of Science. Erişim: 15 Eylül 2020, https://clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/solutions/web-of-science/
• Weeks, B. E., Ardèvol-Abreu, A. ve Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2017). Online influence? Social media use, opinion leadership, and political persuasion. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 29(2), 214-239. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edv050
• Weeks, B. E., Lane, D. S., Kim, D. H., Lee, S. S. ve Kwak, N. (2017). Incidental exposure, selective exposure, and political information sharing. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(6), 363-379. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12199
• Westerman, D., Spence P. R. ve Van Der Heide, B. (2014). Social media as information source. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 19(2), 171-183. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12041
• Xenos, M., Vromen, A. ve Loader, B. D. (2014). The great equalizer? Patterns of social media use and youth political engagement in three advanced democracies. Information, Communication & Society, 17(2), 151-167. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.871318
• Xu, S., Yang, H. H., MacLeod, J. ve Zhu, S. (2019). Social media competence and digital citizenship among college students. Convergence, 25(4), 735-752. doi:10.1177/1354856517751390
• Zephora - The top 20 valuable Facebook statistics. Erişim: 15 Eylül 2020, https://zephoria.com/top-15-valuable-facebook-statistics/
• Zheng, P. ve Shahin, S. (2020). Live tweeting live debates. Information, Communication & Society, 23(3), 337-357. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2018.1503697