Book Review
BibTex RIS Cite

Marxism and Philosophy of Language: A Reviev With Psychological Perspective

Year 2019, , 34 - 43, 26.06.2019
https://doi.org/10.33817/muhakeme.532846

Abstract

Volosinov’s, Marxizm and The Philosophy
of Langugae is discussed within this review in terms of his critical approach
towards psychology. With his text, Volosinov, offer a critic not only for
Marxist philosophy of language, but also for modern psychology of his era. His
critisim towards positivist psychology overlaps with the critisim of discursive
psyhology. These critisims are reviewed under the conscious, liguistic
ontology, context and discourse titles. It is argued that Volosinov’s ideas
regarding philosophy of language layed the theoretical groundwork for social
constructivism and critical discursive psychology to stand on in the coming
years.




References

  • Bayad, A., ve Alparslan, B. (2017). 20. yüzyıl bilim anlayışının psikolojiye mirası: Ulus, birey, kimlik, öznellik. Psikoloji ve Toplum, 1, 19-28.
  • Burr, V. (1995). An introduction to social constructionism. London: Taylor & Francis.
  • Burr, V. (1998). Overview: Realism, relativism, social constructionism and discourse. İçinde I. Parker (Ed.), Social constructionism, discourse and realism. London: SAGE. de Saussure, F. (2014). Genel dilbilim yazıları. (S. Bouquet, R. Engler, A. Weil, ve A. Öz, Ed., S. Kılıç, Çev.). İstanbul: İthaki.
  • Derrida, J. (1976). Of grammatology. (G. C. Spivak, Çev.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and cognition. London: SAGE.
  • Edwards, D. (2005). Discursive psychology. İçinde K. L. Fitch ve R. E. Sanders (Ed.), Handbook of language and social interaction (ss. 257-275). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Grbich, C. (2004). New approaches in social research. London: SAGE.
  • Guba, E. G., ve Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. İçinde N. K. Denzin ve Y. S. Lincoln (Ed.), Handbook of qualitative research (ss. 105-117). Thousand Oaks: SAGE
  • Harré, R., ve Langenhove, L. V. (1991). Varieties of positioning. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 21(4), 393-407.
  • Hepburn, A. (2002). An introduction to critical social psychology. London: SAGE.
  • Hilgard, E. R. (1980). Consciousness in contemporary psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 31(1), 1-28.
  • Holborow, M. (2006). Putting the social back into language: Marx, Vološinov and Vygotsky reexamined. Studies in Language & Capitalism, 1, 1-28.
  • Jørgensen, M., ve Phillips, L. (2002). Discourse analysis as theory and method. London: SAGE.
  • Lähteenmäki, M. (1998). On dynamics and stability: Saussure, Voloshinov, and Bakhtin. İçinde M. Lähteenmäki ve H. Dufva (Ed.), Dialogues on Bakhtin: Interdisciplinary readings. Jyväskylä: Univ. of Jyväskylä.
  • Potter, J. (1997). Discourse analysis as a way of analysing naturally occurring talk. İçinde D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice (ss. 144-160). London: SAGE.
  • te Molder, H. (2015). Discursive psychology. İçinde K. Tracy, T. Sandel ve C. Ilie (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of language and social interaction (ss. 1-11). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Tuffin, K. (2005). Understanding critical social psychology. London: SAGE Publications.
  • van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and context: A sociocognitive approach (Reprinted). Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
  • Volosinov, V. N. (2001). Markszim ve dil felsefesi. (M. Küçük, Çev.). İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
  • Wodak, R., ve Meyer, M. (Ed.). (2009). Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: SAGE.

Marksizim ve Dil Felsefesi: Psikoloji Çerçevesinde Bir İnceleme

Year 2019, , 34 - 43, 26.06.2019
https://doi.org/10.33817/muhakeme.532846

Abstract

Bu incelemede Volosinov’un Marksizm ve
Dil Felsefesi eseri, psikolojiye getirdiği eleştiriler bakımından
tartışılmıştır. Volosinov, Marksizm ve Dil Felsefesi kitabında her ne kadar
Marksist ideolojinin dil felsefesini eleştirme amaçlı bir metin sunmuş olsa da
dönemin psikolojik araştırmalarına ve yaklaşımlarına da çeşitli eleştiriler
getirmiştir. Volosinov’un eleştirileri kendisinden sonraki dönemde yükselecek
olan sosyal inşacılık yaklaşımının pozitivist psikolojiye getirdiği
eleştirilerle belli noktalarda örtüşmektedir. Bunlar, bilinç, dilsel ontoloji,
bağlam ve söylem başlıkları altında incelenmiştir. Volosinov’un dil felsefesi
hakkındaki düşüncelerinin, kendisinden sonra yükselecek olan sosyal inşacılık
ve söylemsel psikolojinin üzerinde yükseldiği zemini hazırladığı
savunulmaktadır.




References

  • Bayad, A., ve Alparslan, B. (2017). 20. yüzyıl bilim anlayışının psikolojiye mirası: Ulus, birey, kimlik, öznellik. Psikoloji ve Toplum, 1, 19-28.
  • Burr, V. (1995). An introduction to social constructionism. London: Taylor & Francis.
  • Burr, V. (1998). Overview: Realism, relativism, social constructionism and discourse. İçinde I. Parker (Ed.), Social constructionism, discourse and realism. London: SAGE. de Saussure, F. (2014). Genel dilbilim yazıları. (S. Bouquet, R. Engler, A. Weil, ve A. Öz, Ed., S. Kılıç, Çev.). İstanbul: İthaki.
  • Derrida, J. (1976). Of grammatology. (G. C. Spivak, Çev.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and cognition. London: SAGE.
  • Edwards, D. (2005). Discursive psychology. İçinde K. L. Fitch ve R. E. Sanders (Ed.), Handbook of language and social interaction (ss. 257-275). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Grbich, C. (2004). New approaches in social research. London: SAGE.
  • Guba, E. G., ve Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. İçinde N. K. Denzin ve Y. S. Lincoln (Ed.), Handbook of qualitative research (ss. 105-117). Thousand Oaks: SAGE
  • Harré, R., ve Langenhove, L. V. (1991). Varieties of positioning. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 21(4), 393-407.
  • Hepburn, A. (2002). An introduction to critical social psychology. London: SAGE.
  • Hilgard, E. R. (1980). Consciousness in contemporary psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 31(1), 1-28.
  • Holborow, M. (2006). Putting the social back into language: Marx, Vološinov and Vygotsky reexamined. Studies in Language & Capitalism, 1, 1-28.
  • Jørgensen, M., ve Phillips, L. (2002). Discourse analysis as theory and method. London: SAGE.
  • Lähteenmäki, M. (1998). On dynamics and stability: Saussure, Voloshinov, and Bakhtin. İçinde M. Lähteenmäki ve H. Dufva (Ed.), Dialogues on Bakhtin: Interdisciplinary readings. Jyväskylä: Univ. of Jyväskylä.
  • Potter, J. (1997). Discourse analysis as a way of analysing naturally occurring talk. İçinde D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice (ss. 144-160). London: SAGE.
  • te Molder, H. (2015). Discursive psychology. İçinde K. Tracy, T. Sandel ve C. Ilie (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of language and social interaction (ss. 1-11). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Tuffin, K. (2005). Understanding critical social psychology. London: SAGE Publications.
  • van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and context: A sociocognitive approach (Reprinted). Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
  • Volosinov, V. N. (2001). Markszim ve dil felsefesi. (M. Küçük, Çev.). İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
  • Wodak, R., ve Meyer, M. (Ed.). (2009). Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: SAGE.
There are 20 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Psychology
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Büşra Alparslan 0000-0002-1994-4824

Publication Date June 26, 2019
Submission Date February 26, 2019
Acceptance Date April 4, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019

Cite

APA Alparslan, B. (2019). Marksizim ve Dil Felsefesi: Psikoloji Çerçevesinde Bir İnceleme. Muhakeme Journal, 2(1), 34-43. https://doi.org/10.33817/muhakeme.532846

13282     13284  13286132881328913290  13291   13293 13295