Black Data, White Algorithms: Is It Possible to Reject Data Colonizer’s Model of World and Decolonize Data?

Year 2023, Volume: 47 Issue: 6, 1469 - 1504, 15.12.2023

Haktan Kalır

Abstract

This article sheds critical light on the growing literature on data colonialism in recent years. departing from the observation that the existing scholarship hardly reserves any room for a discussion that is informed by the critiques of political philosophy and political theory, this study underlines the following questions: Is it possible to talk about global data colonialism as a form of neo-colonialism? Is it possible to decolonize data in the face of such extensive colonialism? To answer these questions, the first part of the article focuses on the colonization of data. By means of drawing attention to the concepts of data, data capitalism and data inequality, this section provides varying definitions of data colonialism. The second part of the article then explicates the two main contexts of data colonialism: (i) Colonial platform technicalism as a belief that assumes that life can be ruled by technical knowledge and a rejection of both multiplicity and politics; (ii) Data capitalism, which, as a re-colonial partnership, has led to the overpowering of private companies, where the partnership of the colonial state and private companies has now changed sides. The second part of the article turns to an explanation of the basic concepts of data colonialism, their colonial contacts and what makes them both similar and different as a neocolonialism is provided. Then, by way of a focus on the decolonization of data, first, a critique based on the political philosophy of knowledge, which is more often than not missing in the present literature, is provided as an alternative data imagination. Second, alongside examples of decolonized data with counter-data methods as well as the question of how data can be transformed by politicized technologies from terrestrial re-publication open to different languages is discussed. This involves the politicization, socialization, and terastallization and of data. The original contribution of this article lies in its perspective informed by ontological and epistemological political philosophy and its argument that it is possible to construct new data imaginations in an open and plural way that is informed by subaltern voices in the face of data colonialism. Likewise, this can be called the subaltern criticism of the data.

Keywords

data colonialism, digital capitalism, technicism, decolonization, colonizer's model of the world

Siyah Veri, Beyaz Algoritmalar: Veri Sömürgecisinin Dünya Modelini Reddetmek ve Veriyi Sömürgesizleştirmek Mümkün Mü?

Abstract

Bu makale, son yıllarda veri sömürgeciliği (data colonialism) üzerine gelişmekte olan literatüre eleştirel bir bakış sunmaya çalışacaktır. Siyaset felsefesi ve siyaset kuramı eleştirilerine zayıf bir şekilde yer verildiği gözleminden hareketle bu literatürü inceleyen bu makalenin dikkat çektiği sorular şudur: Bir yeni-sömürgecilik biçimi olarak küresel bir veri sömürgeciliğinden söz edilebilir mi? Böylesi bir sömürgecilik karşısında verinin sömürgesizleştirilmesi mümkün müdür? Bu sorulara yanı verebilmek için makalenin birinci bölümü verilerin sömürgeleştirilmesine odaklanmaktadır. Bu bölümde veri, veri kapitalizmi ve veri eşitsizliği kavramlarına bakılarak veri sömürgeciliklerinin tanımları sunulacaktır. Bunu takiben bu bölümde veri sömürgeciliklerinin temel iki içeriği de izah edilecektir: (i) Yaşamın teknik bilgiler tarafından yönetilebileceğine dair bir çokluk ve siyaset reddi olarak sömürgeci platform teknikçiliği; (ii) Bir yeniden sömürgeci ortaklığı olarak özel şirketlerin devlet iştiraklarıyla aşırı güçlenmesine yol açan veri kapitalizmi. Böylece veri sömürgeciliklerinin ana tezleri, temel kavramları ve onun sömürgecilikle farklı yahut ortak olan yanları işlenecektir. Makalenin ikinci bölümü verinin sömürgesizleştirilmesi meselesine dikkat çekmektedir. Bu bölüm alternatif bir verinin tahayyül edilip edilemeyeceği sorusuna odaklanacaktır. Mevcut veri sömürgeciliği literatüründe oldukça zayıf bir şekilde bulunan siyaset felsefesi bu sorgu için ana izlek olacaktır. Verinin epistemolojik eleştirisini takiben doğrudan siyasal eleştirisine geçilecektir. Burada veri sömürgeciliklerini zayıflatabilmek için kurgulanabilecek karşı-verilerden söz edilecektir. Verinin egemen diller dışında dillerde temsil edilebilmesi, somut dünyadaki sömürülerden azade kılınan soyutlaştırılmasının reddedilmesi, tekrar kamusal bir tartışmaya konu edilmesi gibi eleştiriler sıralanacaktır. Bu verinin kamusallaştırılması, karasallaştırılması ve siyasileştirilmesidir. Makale, veri sömürgeciliği literatüründe zayıf bir şekilde bulunan siyaset felsefesi ve siyaset kuramının tartışmaya dahil edilmesi vasıtasıyla sömürülen verinin işlenişine dair bir bilgi, verinin temsiline dair ise bir varlık eleştirisi getirmeyi ummaktadır. Buna verinin madun eleştirisi de denilebilir.

Keywords

veri sömürgecilikleri, dijital kapitalizm, sömürgecinin dünya modeli, teknikçilik, sömürgesizleştirme

Thanks

Sayın Metin Yüksel'e bu makalenin ortaya çıkmasındaki incelikli emeği için teşekkür ederim.

References

• Acemoğlu D (2003). Root Causes: A Historical Approach to Assessing the Role of Institutions in Economic Development. Finance & Development, 40(2), 27-30. doi:10.5089/9781451952926.022.A009
• Arora P (2019). Decolonizing Privacy Studies. Television & New Media, 20(4), 366-378. doi:10.1177/1527476418806092
• Bauman Z, Bigo D, Esteves P, Guild E, Jabri V, Lyon D ve Walker R B (2014). After Snowden: Rethinking the impact of surveillance. International Political Sociology, 8(2), 121-144. doi:10.1111/ips.12048
• Beer D (2016). The social power of algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 1-13. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2016.1216147
• Bhambra G K (2020). Colonial global economy: towards a theoretical reorientation of political economy. Review of International Political Economy, 28(3), 307-322. doi:10.1080/09692290.2020.1830831
• Birhane A (2020). Algorithmic Colonization of Africa. SCRIPTed, 17(2), 389-409. doi:10.2966/scrip.170220.389
• Blaut J M (2012). Sömürgeciliğin Dünya Modeli: Coğrafi Yayılmacılık ve Avrupa-merkezci Tarih. Çev. S Behçet, İstanbul: Dergâh Yayınları.
• Boltanski L ve Chiapello E (2005). The New Spirit of Capitalism. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 18(3/4), 161-188. doi:10.1007/s10767-006-9006-9
• boyd d ve Crawford K (2012). Critical questions for Big Data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662-679. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878
• Calzati S (2021). Decolonising “Data Colonialism” Propositions for Investigating the Realpolitik of Today’s Networked Ecology. Television & New Media, 22 (8), 914-929. doi:10.1177/1527476420957267
• Calzati S (2022). ‘Data sovereignty’ or ‘Data colonialism’? Exploring the Chinese involvement in Africa’s ICTs: a document review on Kenya. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 40(2), 270-285. doi:10.1080/02589001.2022.2027351
• Chakrabarty D (1995). Radical Histories and Question of Enlightenment Rationalism: Some Recent Critiques of "Subaltern Studies". Economic and Political Weekly, 30(14), 751-759.
• Chakrabarty D (2000). Subaltern Studies and Postcolonial Historiography. Nepantla: Views from South, 1(1), 9-32.
• Chenou J-M ve Cepeda-Másmela C (2019). #NiUnaMenos: Data Activism From the Global South. Television & New Media, 20(4), 396-411. doi:10.1177/1527476419828995
• Coleman D (2019). Digital Colonialism: The 21st Century Scramble for Africa through the Extraction and Control of User Data and the Limitations of Data Protection Laws. Michigan Journal Michigan Journal of Race and of Race and Law, 24(2), 417-439. https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjrl/vol24/iss2/6. Son erişim tarihi: 14.01.2023.
• Couldry N (2020). The Emerging Social Order of Data Colonialism: Why Critical Social Theory Still Matters! Keio Communication Review, 42(3), 5-16 . https://koara.lib.keio.ac.jp/xoonips/modules/xoonips/detail.php?koara_id=AA002 66091-20200300-0005. Son erişim tarihi: 14.01.2023.
• Couldry N ve Mejias U A (2018). Data Colonialism: Rethinking Big Data’s Relation to the Contemporary Subject. Television & New Media, 20(4), 336-349. doi:10.1177/1527476418796632
• Couldry N ve Mejias U A (2019). Making data colonialism liveable: how might data’s social order be regulated? Internet Policy Review, 8(2). doi:10.14763/2019.2.1411
• Couldry N ve Mejias U A (2021). The decolonial turn in data and technology research: what is at stake and where is it heading? Information, Communication & Society. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2021.1986102
• Crooks R ve Currie M (2021). Numbers will not save us: Agonistic data practices. The Information Society, 37(4), 201-213. doi:10.1080/01972243.2021.1920081
• Davidson K (2017). Is the Americanisation of the Internet a Form of Semiotic Colonialism? İçinde: A Daubarienė, S Stano ve U. Varankai (der), Cross-Inter-Multi-Trans-: Proceedings of the 13th World Congress of the International Association for Semiotic Studies (IASS/AIS), Kaunas: International Semiotics Institute ve Kaunas University of Technology, 738-744.
• de Certau M (2009). Gündelik Hayatın Keşfi - I: Eylem, Uygulama, Üretim Sanatları. Çev. L. A. Özcan, Ankara: Dost Kitabevi Yayınları.
• de Saussure F (1959). Course in General Linguistics. Çev. W. Baskin, New York: The Philosophical Library.
• Deleuze G (2001). Denetim Toplumları Konusunda Bir Ek. Birikim Dergisi: https://birikimdergisi.com/dergiler/birikim/1/sayi-142-143-subat-mart-2001/2334/denetim-toplumlari-konusunda-bir-ek/4382. Son erişim tarihi: 14.01.2023.
• Dencik L, Hintz A, Redden J ve Treré E (2019). Exploring Data Justice: Conceptions, Applications and Directions. Information, Communication & Society, 22(7), 873-881. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2019.1606268
• Dirlik A (1991). “Like a Song Gone Silent”: The Political Ecology of Barbarism and Civilization in Waiting for the Barbarians and The Legend of the Thousand Bulls. Diaspora: A Journal of Transnational Studies, 1(3), 321-352. doi:10.1353/dsp.1991.0017
• Estrada M S ve Lehuedé S (2022). Towards a Terrestrial Internet: re-imagining digital networks from the ground up. Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society, 5(1). doi:10.1080/25729861.2022.2139913
• Fanon F (2016). Siyah Deri Beyaz Maskeler. Çev. C Koytak, İstanbul: Encore Yayınları.
• Foucault M (1991). Governmentality. İçinde: G Burchell, C Gordon ve P Miller (der), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 87-104.
• Foucault M (2012). Doğruyu Söylemek. Çev. K Eksen, İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
• Foucault M (2020). Toplumu Savunmak Gerekir. Çev. Ş Aktaş, İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
• Fraser A (2019). Curating digital geographies in an era of data colonialism. Geoforum, 104, 193-200. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.04.027
• Fuchs C (2015). Against Divisiveness: Digital Workers of the World Unite! A Rejoinder to César Bolaño and Eloy Vieira. Television & New Media, 16(1), 62-71. doi:10.1177/1527476414528053
• Fung K C, Aminian N, Fu X M ve Tung C Y (2018). Digital silk road, Silicon Valley and connectivity. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 16(3), 313-336. doi:10.1080/14765284.2018.1491679
• Gelvin J L (2015). The Arap Uprisings: What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Gilley B (2017). The Case for Colonialism. Third World Quarterly. doi:10.1080/01436597.2017.1369037
• Goel D (6.5.2021). The global digital divide is reminiscent of colonialism. Ocak 14, 2023 tarihinde LSE Brexit: https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/brexit/2021/05/06/the-global-digital-divide-is-reminiscent-of-colonialism. Son erişim tarihi: 14.01.2023.
• Gran A-B, Booth P ve Bucher T (2020). To be or not to be algorithm aware: a question of a new digital divide? Information, Communication & Society,, 24(12), 1779-1796. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2020.1736124
• Grossi T ve Lepratti L (2021). Data colonialism: the census, the map, and the software. From the European South, 8, 47-61. https://www.fesjournal.eu/numeri/maps-mappings-and-cartographic-imaginings/#data-colonialism-the-census-the-map-and-the-software_417. Son erişim tarihi: 14.01.2023.
• Guerrero M A (2003). “Patriarchal Colonialism” and Indigenism: Implications for Native Feminist Spirituality and Native Womanism. Hypatia, 18(2), 58-69. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2003.tb00801.x
• Halberstam J (2011). The Queer Art of Failure. Durham: Duke University Press.
• Hodgson M G (2018). Dünya Tarihini Yeniden Düşünmek: Dünya, Avrupa ve İslam Tarihi Üzerine Makaleler. Çev. A Kanlıdere ve A Aydoğan, İstanbul: Vadi Yayıncılık.
• Hoffmann A L (2019). Where fairness fails: data, algorithms, and the limits of antidiscrimination discourse. Information, Communication & Society, 22(7), 900-915. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2019.1573912
• Howson P (2020). Climate Crises and Crypto-Colonialism: Conjuring Value on the Blockchain Frontiers of the Global South. Frontiers in Blockchain, 3(22). doi:10.3389/fbloc.2020.00022
• Kelly J (2019). Silicon Valley's Online Slave Market. BBC. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2IdII_n28e0. Son erişim tarihi: 25.10.2023.
• Keyes O, Hitzig Z ve Blell M (2021). Truth from the machine: artificial intelligence and the materialization of identity. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 46(1-2), 158-175. doi:10.1080/03080188.2020.1840224
• Kwet M (2019). Digital colonialism: US empire and the new imperialism in the Global South. Race ve Class, 60(4), 3-26. doi:10.1177/0306396818823172
• Kwet M (7.7.2022). Digital Colonialism and Infrastructure-as-Debt. University of Bayreuth African Studies Online(9), 65-77. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4004594. Son erişim tarihi: 14.01.2023.
• Langley P ve Leyshon A (2022). Neo-colonial credit: FinTech platforms in Africa. Journal of Cultural Economy, 15(4), 401-415. doi:10.1080/17530350.2022.2028652
• Lazzarato M (2014). Signs and Machines: Capitalism and the Production of Subjectivity. (J. D. Jordan, Çev.) Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).
• Lehuedé S (2022). Territories of data: ontological divergences in the growth of data infrastructure. Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society, 5(1). doi:10.1080/25729861.2022.2035936
• Loomba A (2005). Colonialism/Postcolonialism. Londra: Routledge.
• López-Cleries G ve Helle S H (2020). The Unreal: Imaginaries of Techno-colonialism. MAST: The Journal of Media Art Study and Theory, 1(2), 46-56. https://www.mast-journal.org/vol-1-no-2-2020-the-unreal-imaginaries-of-techno-colonialism. Son erişim tarihi: 14.01.2023.
• Lundahl O (2020). Algorithmic meta-capital: Bourdieusian analysis of social power through algorithms in media consumption. Information, Communication & Society, 25(10), 1440-1455. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2020.1864006
• Ly B (2020). Challenge and perspective for Digital Silk Road. Cogent Business ve Management, 7(1). doi:10.1080/23311975.2020.1804180
• Madianou M (2019). Technocolonialism: Digital Innovation and Data Practices in the Humanitarian Response to Refugee Crises. Social Media + Society, 5(3). doi:10.1177/2056305119863146
• Magalhães J C ve Couldry N (2021). Giving by Taking Away: Big Tech, Data Colonialism, and the Reconfiguration of Social Good. International Journal of Communication, 15, 343-362. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/15995. Son erişim tarihi: 14.01.2023.
• Mann M ve Daly A (2019). (Big) Data and the North-in-South: Australia’s Informational Imperialism and Digital Colonialism. Television & New Media, 20(4), 379-395. doi:10.1177/1527476418806091
• McLeod J (2010). Beginning Postcolonialism. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
• Mignolo W D (2011). Geopolitics of sensing and knowing: on (de)coloniality, border thinking and epistemic disobedience. Postcolonial Studies, 14(3), 273-283. doi:10.1080/13688790.2011.613105
• Milan S ve Treré E (2019). Big Data from the South(s): Beyond Data Universalism. Television & New Media, 20(4), 319-335. doi:10.1177/1527476419837739
• Mills C W (2008). White Ignorance. İçinde: R N Proctor, ve L. Schiebinger (der), Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 231-250.
• Mitchell T (2001). Mısır'ın Sömürgeleştirilmesi. Çev. Z. Altok,İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
• Moretti F (2015). Tarih ile Edebiyat Arasında: Burjuva. Çev. E. Buğlalılar, İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
• Morozov E (29.06.2014). The rise of data and the death of politics. The Guardian: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jul/20/rise-of-data-death-of-politics-evgeny-morozov-algorithmic-regulation. Son erişim tarihi: 14.01.2023.
• Mukosi L (2022). Extraction of Personal Data: A New Form of Colonialism or Continuation of a Colonial Practice? Adult Native American Adoptees Resist Assimilation and Rebuild Erased Identities. American Indian Law Journal, 10(2). https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/ailj/vol10/iss2/4. Son erişim tarihi: 14.01.2023.
• Nietzsche F W (1998). Ahlakdışı Anlamda Doğruluk ve Yalan Üzerine. Cogito (16), 55-66.
• Osterhammel J (1996). Colonialism: a Theoretical Overview. Çev. S. L. Frisch, Princeton: Markus Wiener Publishers.
• Platon (2010). Devlet. Çev. S. Eyüboğlu ve M. A. Cimcoz, İstanbul: İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları.
• Pearce T (2013). "So it really is a series of tubes." Google’s data centers, noo-politics and the architecture of hegemony in cyberspace. Enquiry The ARCC Journal for Architectural Research, 10(1), 43-53. doi:10.17831/enq:arcc.v10i1.163
• Pierri P (2022). Sovereign Imaginaries: How Corporate Digital Imaginaries are endangering our Political Practices. İçinde: B Herlo, D Irrgang, G Joost ve A Unteidig (der), Practicing Sovereignty: Digital Involvement in Times of Crises, Verlag: Transcript, 199-211. doi:10.1515/9783839457603-011
• Quijano A (2007). Coloniality and Modernity/Rationality. Cultural Studies, 21(2-3), 168-178. doi:10.1080/09502380601164353
• Ramge T (2022). Postdigital. İçinde: B Herlo, D Irrgang, G Joost ve A Unteidig (der), Practicing Sovereignty: Digital Involvement in Times of Crises. Verlag: Transcript, 231-244. doi:10.1515/9783839457603-013
• Ricaurte P (2019). Data Epistemologies, The Coloniality of Power, and Resistance. Television & New Media, 20(4), 350-365. doi:10.1177/1527476419831640
• Romele A ve Rodighiero D (2020). Digital Habitus or Personalization Without Personality. HUMANA.MENTE Journal of Philosophical Studies, 13(37), 98-126. http://www.humanamente.eu/index.php/HM/article/view/318. Son erişim tarihi: 14.01.2023.
• Rouvroy A (27.5.2020). Algorithmic Governmentality and the Death of Politics. (Green European Journal, Röportaj Yapan) https://www.greeneuropeanjournal.eu/algorithmic-governmentality-and-the-death-of-politics. Son erişim tarihi: 14.01.2023.
• Sadowski J (2019). When data is capital: Datafication, accumulation, and extraction. Big Data ve Society, 6(1), 1-12. doi:10.1177/2053951718820549
• Said E W (2003). Orientalism. New York: Penguin Books.
• Scasserra S ve Martinez C (2021). Digital Colonialism: Analysis of Europe's trade agenda. Amsterdam: Transnational Institute.
• Schneider A (2003). Decentralization: Conceptualization and measurement. Studies in Comparative International Development, 38(3), 32-56. doi:10.1007/bf02686198
• Scott J C (2008). Devlet Gibi Görmek: İnsanlık Durumunu Geliştirmeye Yönelik Projeler Nasıl Başarısız Oldu?. Çev. N Erdoğan, İstanbul: Versus Kitap.
• Segura M S ve Waisbord S (2019). Between Data Capitalism and Data Citizenship. Television & New Media, 20(4), 412-419. doi:10.1177/1527476419834519
• Spivak G C (2010). Can the Subaltern Speak? İçinde: R C Morris (der), Can the Subaltern Speak? Reflections on the History of an Idea, New York: Columbia University Press, 21-78.
• Srinivasan R ve Bloom P (2022). Tech Barons Dream of a Better World – Without the Rest of Us. İçinde: B Herlo, D Irrgang, G Joost ve A Unteidig (der), Practicing Sovereignty: Digital Involvement in Times of Crises, Verlag: Transcript, 23-45. doi:10.1515/9783839457603-002
• Stiegler B (2011). The Decadence of Industrial Democracies. Çev. D Ross ve S Arnold, Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Stiegler B (2019). For a Neganthropology of Automatic Society. İçinde: T Pringle, G Koch, ve B Stiegler (der), Machine, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 25-47. doi:10.14619/1488
• Stürmer M, Nussbaume J ve Stöckli P (2021). Security implications of digitalization: The dangers of data colonialism and the way towards sustainable and sovereign management of environmental data. Bern: University of Bern. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.24791.80807
• Tait M M, dos Reis Peron A E ve Suárez M (2022). Terrestrial politics and body-territory: two concepts to make sense of digital colonialism in Latin America. Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society, 5(1). doi:10.1080/25729861.2022.2090485
• Terranova T (2000). Free Labor: Producing Culture for the Digital Economy. Social Text, 18(2), 33-58. doi:10.1215/01642472-18-2_63-33
• Terranova T (2014). Red Stack Attack! Algorithms, Capital and the Automation of the Common. İçinde: R Mackay, ve A Avanessian (der), #Accelerate: The Accelerationist Reader, Falmouth: Urbanomic, 379-399.
• Thatcher J, O’Sullivan D ve Mahmoudi D (2016). Data colonialism through accumulation by dispossession: New metaphors for daily data. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 34(6), 990-1006. doi:10.1177/0263775816633195
• Thompson N C, Greenewald K, Lee K ve Manso G F (2020). The computational limits of deep learning. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.05558. Son erişim tarihi: 14.01.2023.
• Thorat D (2019). Colonial Topographies of Internet Infrastructure: The Sedimented and Linked Networks of the Telegraph and Submarine Fiber Optic Internet. South Asian Review, 40(3), 252-267. doi:10.1080/02759527.2019.1599563
• Trouillot M-R (2015). Geçmişi Susturmak: Tarihin Üretilmesi ve İktidar. Çev. S O Zeybek, İstanbul: İthaki Yayınları.
• Vattimo G ve Zabala S (2011). Hermeneutic Communism: From Heidegger to Marx. New York: Columbia University Press.
• Vignola, P (2016). Nietzsche in the Amazon. For a Nomadology Beyond Algorithmic Governmentality. Etica ve Politica, 18(3), 269-285. http://hdl.handle.net/10077/13515. Son erişim tarihi: 14.01.2023.
• wa Thiong'o N (1994). Decolonising the Mind: The Politics of Language in African Literature. Harare: Zimbabwe Publishing House.
• Williams E (2014). Kapitalizm ve Kölelik. Çev. A Tarar, Ankara: Dipnot Yayınları.
• Young J C (2019). The new knowledge politics of digital colonialism. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 51(7), 1424-1441. doi:10.1177/0308518X19858998
• Young, R J (2016). Postcolonialism: An Historical Introduction. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.