Investigation of the Effect of Denture Cleaning Solutions on Surface Hardness and Surface Roughness of Soft Lining Materials

Year 2024, Volume: 6 Issue: 1, 89 - 100, 30.04.2024

Zeynep Yeşil Duymuş , Ceren Çakar Güler

https://doi.org/10.51122/neudentj.2024.92

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of commercial and non-commercial agents used to clean dentures on the surface roughness and hardness of two soft lining materials.
Material and Methods: A total of 50 samples were used in this study. Samples were prepared from acrylic resin (Visco Gel) and silicone-based (Molloplast B) soft lining materials. The samples’ roughness and hardness values were measured. After the samples were kept in distilled water, white vinegar, denture cleanser tablet, 2% chlorhexidine gluconate, and 5% sodium hypochlorite for 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 45 minutes, 60 minutes, 2 hours, 8 hours, 24 hours, and 48 hours, roughness and hardness values were measured again. Statistical analysis was performed using the computer program SPSS Statistics 20.0 (SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, USA) at a 95% confidence interval and p=0.05 significance level. Three-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison tests were used for the statistical analysis of data.
Results: The analysis of variance determined that the material type and time had a very significant effect (p<.001) on surface roughness and hardness values, while the solutions in which samples were kept had an insignificant effect (p>.05).
Conclusion: The surface roughness and hardness of acrylic resin and silicone-based soft lining materials were affected by denture cleaning solutions to different extents.

Keywords

Denture cleaning solution, soft lining materials, surface roughness, surface hardness

Protez Temizleyici Solüsyonlarının Yumuşak Astar Maddelerinin Yüzey Sertliği ve Yüzey Pürüzlülüğüne Etkisinin İncelenmesi

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, protezlerin temizlenmesi amacıyla kullanılan ticari ve ticari olmayan ajanların iki farklı yumuşak astar materyalinin yüzey pürüzlülüğü ve sertliğine etkisinin incelenmesidir.
Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu çalışmada akrilik rezin (Visco Gel) ve silikon esaslı (Molloplast B) yumuşak astar materyallerinden toplam 50 adet örnek hazırlandı. Örneklerin pürüzlülük ve sertlik değerleri ölçüldü. Örnekler distile su, beyaz sirke, protez temizleyici tablet, %2 klorheksidin glukonat ve %5 sodyum hipoklorit te 15 dakika, 30 dakika, 45 dakika, 60 dakika, 2 saat, 8 saat, 24 saat ve 48 saat bekletildikten sonra pürüzlülük ve sertlik değerleri tekrar ölçüldü. İstatiksel analiz %95 güven aralığında ve p=0.05 anlamlılık düzeyinde SPSS Statistics 20.0 (SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, ABD) bilgisayar programı kullanılarak yapıldı. Verilerin istatiksel analizinde üç yönlü ANOVA ve Tukey çoklu karşılaştırma testleri kullanıldı.
Bulgular: Yapılan varyans analizleri sonucunda; yüzey pürüzlülük ve sertlik değerleri üzerinde materyal türünün ve zamanın çok anlamlı (p<.001), bekletilen solüsyonların anlamsız (p>.05) olduğu belirlendi.
Sonuç: Akrilik rezin ve silikon esaslı yumuşak astar materyallerinin yüzey pürüzlülüğü ve sertliği protez temizleme solüsyonlarından farklı miktarlarda etkilenmiştir.

Keywords

Protez temizleme solüsyonu, yumuşak astar maddeleri, yüzey pürüzlülüğü, yüzey sertliği

References

• 1. Atay A, Çal E. Farklı yumuşak ve sert astar materyallerinin protez kaidesiyle olan bağlantısının ve sertliklerinin incelenmesi. Ege Üniv. Diş Hekim. Fak. Derg. 2018;39:88-97.
• 2. Dede M, Demir A. Protez astar malzemeleri. Ankara: İksad Yayınevi; 2022;33-43.
• 3. Phillips RW, Anusavice KJ. Phillips’ Science of Dental Materials. 11th ed. St. Louis, Mo: Saunders; 2013;418-73.
• 4. Doğan OM. Yumuşak astar materyallerin klinik endikasyonlari . J Dent Fac Ataturk Univ. 2005;15:70-5.
• 5. Mese A, Guzel KG. Effect of storage duration on the hardness and tensile bond strength of silicone-and acrylic resin-based resilient denture liners to a processed denture base acrylic resin. J Prosthet Dent. 2008;99:153-9.
• 6. Çalıkkocaoğlu S, Tam Protezler. 3. Baskı. Istanbul: Profitez Akademisi ve Gnatoloji Derneği Yayını; 1998;89-105.
• 7. Nikawa H, Yamamoto T, Hayashi S, Nikawa Y, Hamada T. Growth and/or acid production of Candida albicans on soft lining materials in vitro. J Oral Rehabil. 1994;21:585-94.
• 8. Oliveira LV, Mesquita MF, Henriques GEP, Consani RLX, Fragoso WS. The compatibility of denture cleansers and resilient liners. J. Appl. Oral Sci. 2006;14:286-90.
• 9. Arendorf T, Walker D. Denture stomatitis: a review. J Oral Rehabil. 1987;14:217-27.
• 10. Sharma P, Garg S, Kalra NM. Effect of denture cleansers on surface roughness and flexural strength of heat cure denture base resin-an in vitro study. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2017;11 94-7.
• 11. Handa RK, Jagger DC, Vowles RW. Denture cleansers, soft lining materials and water temperature: what is the effect? Prim. dent. care. 2008;15:53-8.
• 12. Jagger D, Harrison A. Complete Dentures-problem solving. London: British Dental Association; 1999;17-20.
• 13. Yılmaz SK, Oğuz O, Ramoğlu S, Aktöre H, Hamiş A. Protez temizleyicilerinin yumuşak astar maddelerinin renk stabiliteleri üzerine etkisinin değerlendirilmesi. J Dent Fac Ataturk Univ. 2015;25:59-65.
• 14. Kürkcüoğlu I, Özkir SE, Köroğlu A, Sahin O, Yilmaz B. Effect of denture cleansing solutions on different retentive attachments. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;115:606-10.
• 15. Al‐Thobity AM, Gad M, ArRejaie A, Alnassar T, Al‐Khalifa KS. Impact of denture cleansing. solution immersion on some properties of different denture base materials: an in vitro study. J Prosthodont. 2019;28:913-9.
• 16. Khan MA, Dhaded S, Joshi S. Commercial and plant extract denture cleansers in prevention of Candida albicans growth on soft denture reliner: In vitro study. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2016;10:42-5.
• 17. Ragher M, Vinayakumar G, Patil S, Chatterjee A, Mallikarjuna D, Dandekeri S et al. Variations in flexural strength of heat-polymerized acrylic resin after the usage of denture cleansers. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016; 17:322-6.
• 18. Estrela C, Estrela CR, Barbin EL, Spanó JCE, Marchesan MA, Pécora JD. Mechanism of action of sodium hypochlorite. Braz. Dent. J. 2002;13:113-7.
• 19. Nikawa H, Hamada T, Yamashiro H, Kumagai H. A review of in vitro and in vivo methods to evaluate the efficacy of denture cleansers. Int J Prosthodont. 1999;12:153-9.
• 20. Jeyapalan K, Kumar JK, Azhagarasan N. Comparative evaluation of the effect of denture cleansers on the surface topography of denture base materials: An in-vitro study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci . 2015;7:548-53.
• 21. Da Silva FC, Kimpara ET, Mancini MNG, Balducci I, Jorge AOC, Koga‐Ito CY. Effectiveness of six different disinfectants on removing five microbial species and effects on the topographic characteristics of acrylic resin. J Prosthodont. 2008;17:627-33.
• 22. Yıldırım-Biçer A, Peker I, Akça G, Çelik I. In vitro antifungal evaluation of seven different disinfectants on acrylic resins. Biomed Res. Int. 2014:1-10.
• 23. Kutlu IU, Yanikoğlu ND, Kul E, Duymuş ZY, Sağsöz NP. Effect of sealer coating and storage methods on the surface roughness of soft liners. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2016;115:371-6.
• 24. International Standard. ISO 1567 for Dentistry—Denture base polymers. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization; 1999.
• 25. Paranhos HdFO, Peracini A, Pisan MX, Oliveira VdC, Souza RFd, Silva-Lovato CH. Color stability, surface roughness and flexural strength of an acrylic resin submitted to simulated overnight immersion in denture cleansers. Braz. Dent. J. 2013;24:152-6.
• 26. Mohammed HS, Singh S, Hari PA, Amarnath G, Kundapur V, Pasha N et al. Evaluate the effect of commercially available denture cleansers on surface hardness and roughness of denture liners at various time intervals. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2016;12:130-42.
• 27. Budtz-Jørgensen E. Materials and methods for cleaning dentures. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1979;42: 619-23.
• 28. Tan HK, Woo A, Kim S, Lamoureux M, Grace M. Effect of denture cleansers, surface finish, and temperature on Molloplast B resilient liner color, hardness, and texture. J Prosthodont. 2009;3:148-55.
• 29. Garcia RCR, Léon BL, Oliveira VM, Cury AADB. Effect of a denture cleanser on weight, surface roughness, and tensile bond strength of two resilient denture liners. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2003;89:489-94.
• 30. Wyatt C, Harrop T, MacEntee MA. Comparison of physical characteristics of six hard denture reline materials. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1986;55:343-6.
• 31. Gonçalves N. I., Pierre F. Z., Borges A. L. S., da Silva,J. M. F., Uemura E. S. Analyzing SHORE A hardness to assess the durability of soft denture lining materials. Braz. Dent. Sci. 2023;26.
• 32. Ueda T, Kubo K, Saito T, Obata T, Wada T, Yanagisawa K. Surface morphology of silicone soft relining material after mechanical and chemical cleaning. J Prosthodont Res. 2018; 62:422–5.
• 33. Mutluay MM, Tezvergil-Mutluay A. The influence of cyclic stress on surface properties of soft liners. Odontology. 2017;105:214–21.
• 34. Niarchou A, Ntala P, Pantopoulos A, Polyzois G, Frangou M. Effect of immersion cleansing in color stability and hardness of soft denture reliners J Craniofac Surg. 2012;23:426–9.
• 35. Rao AK, Kumar S, Reddy NA, Reddy NS. The effect of denture cleansers on resiliency of soft lining materials J Contemp Dent Pract. 2013; 14:65–70.