Comparative Study of The Kinetics of Biogas Yield from The Codigestion of Poultry Droppings With Waterleaf and Poultry Droppings with Elephant Grass

Year 2020, Volume: 15 Issue: 3, 139 - 150, 19.07.2020

Aniekan Ikpe , Thelma Akhihiero Peter Esekhaigbe

Abstract

        This study was carried out to produce biogas from two sets of feedstock poultry droppings with waterleaf (Talinum triangulare) and poultry droppings with elephant grass (Pennisetum Purpureum S.). Two 25 litre-plastic drums were modified and used as bio-digesters. One digester was used to digest poultry droppings with waterleaf while the other was used to digest poultry droppings with elephant grass. A fixed mass (8kg) of the feedstock and distilled water (4kg) were anaerobically digested in the ratio of 2:1 in each digester and their derivable energy were measured for biogas. The feed materials where sourced locally. It was observed that the pH for each set of feedstock was stable and within the optimal range of 6.5-7.5 indicating that the by-product obtained from the digester can be used as organic fertilizer after biogas recovery. Biogas production started on the 18th day for the poultry droppings with waterleaf, whereas, it started on the 26th day for poultry droppings with elephant grass. The cumulative mass of gas produced was 2600g for poultry droppings with waterleaf; and 1300g for poultry droppings with elephant grass. The average temperature range in the bio-digester during this study was between 37-40℃ for poultry droppings with waterleaf and 35-40℃ for poultry droppings with elephant grass. Hence, this study has shown that biogas can be produced from poultry droppings with lignocellulosic materials like elephant grass and waterleaf, but using waterleaf as co-digestate gives higher biogas energy potential than elephant grass, thus, waterleaf is a better seeding agent. 

Keywords

Anaerobic Digestion, Biogas Yield, Temperature, Waterleaf, Elephant Grass

References

• [1] Alvarez, M., (2000). Anaerobic Digestion of Organic Solid Wastes. An Overview of Research Achievements and Perspectives. Bioresource Technology, 74(1):3-16.
• [2] Aremu, M.O. and Agarry, S.E., (2012). Comparison of Biogas Production from Cow Dung and Pig Dung Under Mesophilic Condition. International Reffered Journal of Engineering and Science, 1(4):16-21.
• [3] Etuk, E.M., Ikpe, A.E., and Adoh, U.A., (2020). Design and Analysis of Displacement Models for Modular Horizontal Wind Turbine Blade Structure. Nigerian Journal of Technology, 39(1):121-130.
• [4] Oyedepo, S.O., (2012) Energy and Sustainable Development in Nigeria: The Way Forward. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 2(15):1-17.
• [5] Ekkaand, R., Sharma, V., and Kumar, A., (2016). Study of Biogas Production from Poultry Droppings Waste. International Journal of Interisciplinary Research Center, 2(2):90-96.
• [6] Ikpe, A.E., Etuk, E.M., and Aruwa, U., (2019a). Evaluation of the Performance of a Locally Fabricated Biomass Stove Using some Nigerian Woods. Nigerian Research Journal of Engineering and Environmental Sciences, 4(2):776-788.
• [7] Ikpe, A.E., Ndon, A.E., and Etim, P.J., (2020). Assessment of the Waste Management System and Its Implication in Benin City Metropolis, Nigeria. Journal of Applied Research on Industrial Engineering, 7(1):79-91.
• [8] Ikpe, A.E., Ebunilo, P.O., Okovido, J., (2018). Geotechnical Evaluation of Bentonite Clay for Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Lining Membrane. Applied Journal of Environmental Engineering Science 4(3):337-351.
• [9] Ikpe, A.E., Ebunilo, P.O., Sadjere, G.E., (2019). Effects of waste dumpsites on geotechnical properties of the underlying soils in wet season. Environmental Engineering Research, 24(2):289-297.
• [10] Adamu, A.A., (2014) Effect Of Substrate On Biogas Yield. Global Journal of Engineering Research,13, 35-39.
• [11] Ikpe, A.E., Imonitie, D.I., and Ndon, A.E., (2019). Investigation of biogas Energy Derivation from Anaerobic Digestion of Different Local Food Wastes in Nigeria. Academic Platform Journal of Engineering and Science, 7(2):332-340.
• [12] Kunal, A., Prashanth, B., Ghosh, A., and Hemanth, G., (2017). A Review on Production of Biogas from Slaughter House Waste and Poultry Litter. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 4(4):2188–2192.
• [13] Ebunilo, P.O., Okovido, J., and Ikpe, A.E., (2018). Investigation of the Energy (biogas) Production from Co-digestion of Organic Waste Materials. International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies, 5(2):68-75.
• [14] Ebunilo, P.O., Okovido, J., and Ikpe, A.E., (2018). Anaerobic Digestion of Food Substrates for Biogas Production. Nigerian Research Journal of Engineering and Environmental Sciences 3(1):236-245.
• [15] Toma, L., Voicu, G., Ferdes, M., and Dinca, M., (2016). Animal Manure as Substrate for Biogas Production. Engineering for Rural Development, 25-27(5):629-634.
• [16] Ebunilo, P.O., Owunna, I.B., Sadgere, E.G., Ukwagba, S.I., and Orhorhoro, E.K., (2016). Investigation into the Suitability of Talinum Triangulare (Water Leaf) as a Seeding Agent for Domestic Wastes in Nigeria. International Journal of Engineering and Technology Sciences, 3(6):408-413.
• [17] Moran, J., (2011). Improving the Utilisation of Napier Grass by Dairy Cows Through Fractionationg the Stems into Juice and Fibrous Residue. In: Successes and Failures with Animal Nutrition Practices and Technologies in Developing Countries, FAO Anim. Prod. and Health Proceedings, 11:97-100.
• [18] Singh, B.P., Singh, H.P., and Obeng, E., (2013). Elephantgrass. Fort Valley State University, Georgia, USA, 271-291.
• [19] Minmunin, J., Limpitipanich, P., and Promwungkwa, A., (2015). Delignification of Elephant Grass for Production of Cellulosic Intermediate. Energy Procedia, 79:220-225.
• [20] Saleh, I., Aziz, S.A., and Andarwulan, N., (2015). Shoot Production and Metabolite Content of Waterleaf with Organic Fertilizer. Indonesian Journal of Argronomy, 42(3):210-214.
• [21] Deepanraj, B., Sivasubramanian, V., and Jayaraj, S., (2014) Biogas Generation through Anaerobic Digestion Process:An Overview. Research Journal of Chemistry and Environment, 18(5):80-93.