Yönetim Alanında Güncel Konuların Disiplinlerarası Görünümü: Bibliyometrik Bir Analiz

Year 2022, Volume: 23 Issue: 1, 107 - 129, 01.06.2022

Özüm Eğilmez

https://doi.org/10.17494/ogusbd.1084324

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı akademisyenlere ve işletmecilik dünyasındaki uygulamacılara yönetim konularının interdisipliner evrimi hakkında, akademi ve iş dünyasındaki hızlı değişimi yansıtan literatürden yola çıkılarak öngörüler sunmaktır. Mevcut durumun yansımasını, geçmişten bu yana akademiye ve uygulama dünyasına şekil veren akademik yayınlar ve konu kategorilerini inceleyerek Web of Science veritabanı üzerinden bibliyometrik analiz gerçekleştirilmiştir. Analiz temelinde yönetim literatüründeki konularının güncel ve disiplinlerarası evrimi; (i) yıllık yayımlanan yayın sayısı, (ii) yön veren dergi ve en çok atıf alan yayınlar, (iii) yıllara göre çalışılan konular, (iv) anahtar kelimelerin geçmişten günümüze evrimi ve etkileşimi bağlamında araştırılmıştır. Analiz 1975-2022 yılları arasını kapsamakta olup, literatürdeki değişimin belirli periyotlarda nasıl değiştiği 748 araştırma ile gösterilmiştir. Analiz bulguları yönetim konularının interdisipliner bir görünüm aldığı ve özellikle yönetim kökenli dergilerde ise farklı yöntemlerin kullanılarak interdisipliner özelliği yansıttığı söylenebilir.

Keywords

Yönetimde Güncel Konular, Bibliyometrik Analiz, Tematik Evrim

Supporting Institution

YOK

Project Number

YOK

Thanks

YOK

An Interdisciplinary View of Current Issues in Management: A Bibliometric Analysis

Abstract

The aim of this study is to present insights to academics and practitioners in the business world on the interdisciplinary evolution of management issues, based on the literature reflecting the rapid change in academia and business. A bibliometric analysis was carried out on the Web of Science database by examining the reflection of the current situation, the academic publications and subject categories that have shaped the academy and the world of practice since the past. The current and interdisciplinary evolution of issues in the management literature is examined through the context of; (i) the number of publications published annually, (ii) the most leading journals and cited publications, (iii) the topics studied by years, (iv) the evolution and interaction of keywords from past to present. The analysis covers the years 1975-2022 via 748 research. Findings of the analysis reveal the interdisciplinary view of management issues and reflect the interdisciplinary feature by using different methods, especially in management-based journals.

Keywords

Current Issues in Management, Bibliometric Analysis, Thematic Evolution, R, Current Issues in Management, Bibliometric Analysis, Thematic Evolution, R

Project Number

YOK

References

• Adams, R. J., Smart, P. ve Huff, A. S. (2017). Shades of grey: guidelines for working with the grey literature in systematic reviews for management and organizational studies. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(4), 432-454.
• Al Amosh, H. ve Mansor, N. (2021). Disclosure of integrated reporting elements by industrial companies: evidence from Jordan. Journal of Management and Governance, 25(1), 121-145.
• Altman, Y. ve Shortland, S. (2008). Women and international assignments: Taking stock—a 25‐year review. Human resource management: Published in cooperation with the School of Business Administration, The University of Michigan and in alliance with the Society of Human Resources Management, 47(2), 199-216.
• Akbari, M. ve Do, T. N. A. (2021). A systematic review of machine learning in logistics and supply chain management: current trends and future directions. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 28(10), 2977-3005.
• Asian-Chaves, R., Buitrago, E. M., Masero-Moreno, I. ve Yñiguez, R. (2021). Advanced mathematics: An advantage for business and management administration students. The International Journal of Management Education, 19(2), 100498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100498
• Bag, S., Telukdarie, A., Pretorius, J. C. ve Gupta, S. (2021). Industry 4.0 and supply chain sustainability: framework and future research directions. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 28(5), 1410-1450.
• Bazerman, M. H., Morgan, K. P. ve Loewenstein, G. F. (1997). The impossibility of auditor independence. Sloan Management Review, 38, 89-94.
• Cash, K. C. ve Gray, G. R. (2000). A framework for accommodating religion and spirituality in the workplace. Academy of Management Perspectives, 14(3), 124-133.
• Carlson, K. D. ve Wu, J. (2012). The illusion of statistical control: Control variable practice in management research. Organizational Research Methods, 15(3), 413-435.
• Cegarra‐Navarro, J. G., Vătămănescu, E. M. ve Martínez‐Martínez, A. (2021). A context‐driven approach on coping with COVID‐19: From hiding knowledge toward citizen engagement. Knowledge and Process Management, 28(2), 134-140.
• Cegarra-Navarro, J. G., Jiménez-Jiménez, D. ve García-Pérez, A. (2019). An integrative view of knowledge processes and a learning culture for ambidexterity: Toward improved organizational performance in the banking sector. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 68(2), 408-417.
• Chaudhuri, R., Chavan, G., Vadalkar, S., Vrontis, D. ve Pereira, V. (2020). Two-decade bibliometric overview of publications in the Journal of Knowledge Management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(6), 1550-1574.
• Chamorro, A., Rubio, S. ve Miranda, F. J. (2009). Characteristics of research on green marketing. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18(4), 223-239.
• Coculova, J. ve Tomcikova, L. (2021). Innovative Human Resource Management practices for the Talent Management Implementation. Marketing and Management of Innovations, Issue 4, https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2021.4-04
• Croucher, S. M., Kelly, S., Chen, H. ve Ashwell, D. (2020). Examining the relationships between face concerns and dissent. International Journal of Conflict Management, 32(1), 20-38.
• De Bakker, F. G., Groenewegen, P. ve Den Hond, F. (2005). A bibliometric analysis of 30 years of research and theory on corporate social responsibility and corporate social performance. Business & Society, 44(3), 283-317.
• De Vaujany, F. X., Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, A., Munro, I., Nama, Y. ve Holt, R. (2021). Control and surveillance in work practice: cultivating paradox in ‘new’modes of organizing. Organization Studies, 42(5), 675-695.
• Díez-Martín, F., Blanco-González, A. ve Prado-Román, C. (2021). The intellectual structure of organizational legitimacy research: a co-citation analysis in business journals. Review of Managerial Science, 15(4), 1007-1043.
• Duque Oliva, E. J., Cervera Taulet, A. ve Rodríguez Romero, C. (2006). A bibliometric analysis of models measuring the concept of perceived quality inproviding internet service. Innovar, 16(28), 223-243.
• Ehnert, I. ve Harry, W. (2012). Recent developments and future prospects on sustainable human resource management: Introduction to the special issue. Management Revue, 221-238.
• Ellegaard, O. (2018). The application of bibliometric analysis: disciplinary and user aspects. Scientometrics, 116(1), 181-202.
• Ellegaard, O. ve Wallin, J. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact?. Scientometrics, 105(3), 1809-1831.
• Escobar, O., Schiavone, F., Khvatova, T. ve Maalaoui, A. (2021). Lead user innovation and entrepreneurship: Analyzing the current state of research. Journal of Small Business Management, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2021.1955126
• Farquharson, N., Mageto, J. ve Makan, H. (2021). Effect of internet of things on road freight industry. Journal of Transport and Supply Chain Management, 15, 11. https://doi.org/10.4102/jtscm.v15i0.581
• Gatzert, N., Martin, A., Schmidt, M., Seith, B. ve Vogl, N. (2021). Portfolio optimization with irreversible long-term investments in renewable energy under policy risk: A mixed-integer multistage stochastic model and a moving-horizon approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 290(2), 734-748.
• Gernsheimer, O., Kanbach, D. K. ve Gast, J. (2021). Coopetition research-A systematic literature review on recent accomplishments and trajectories. Industrial Marketing Management, 96, 113-134.
• Gomes, S. F., Jorge, S. ve Eugénio, T. (2020). Teaching sustainable development in business sciences degrees: evidence from Portugal. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 12(3), 611-634.
• Hall, C. M. ve Page, S. J. (2009). Progress in Tourism Management: From the geography of tourism to geographies of tourism–A review. Tourism Management, 30(1), 3-16.
• Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569-16572.
• Hochbaum, D. S. ve Levin, A. (2006). Methodologies and algorithms for group-rankings decision. Management Science, 52(9), 1394-1408.
• Hollinshead, K. (1999). Surveillance of the worlds of tourism: Foucault and the eye-of-power. Tourism Management, 20(1), 7-23.
• Hundal, G. S., Thiyagarajan, S., Alduraibi, M., Laux, C. M., Furterer, S. L., Cudney, E. A. ve Antony, J. (2021). Lean Six Sigma as an organizational resilience mechanism in health care during the era of COVID-19. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 12(4), 762-783.
• Kearns, G. S. ve Lederer, A. L. (2000). The effect of strategic alignment on the use of IS-based resources for competitive advantage. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9(4), 265-293.
• Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic Coupling Between Scientific Papers. American Documentation, 14(1):10-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090140103
• Kilduff, M. ve Brass, D. J. (2010). Organizational social network research: Core ideas and key debates. Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 317-357.
• Lee, D. M., Trauth, E. M. ve Farwell, D. (1995). Critical skills and knowledge requirements of IS professionals: A joint academic/industry investigation. MIS Quarterly, 313-340.
• Levinthal, D. A. ve March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14(S2), 95-112.
• Love, J. H., Roper, S. ve Vahter, P. (2014). Learning from openness: The dynamics of breadth in external innovation linkages. Strategic Management Journal, 35(11), 1703-1716.
• Merigó, J. M., Mas-Tur, A., Roig-Tierno, N. ve Ribeiro-Soriano, D. (2015). A bibliometric overview of the Journal of Business Research between 1973 and 2014. Journal of Business Research, 68(12), 2645-2653.
• Meyer, K. E., Van Witteloostuijn, A. ve Beugelsdijk, S. (2017). What’s in ap? Reassessing best practices for conducting and reporting hypothesis-testing research. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(5), 535-551.
• Miocevic, D., Brecic, R. ve Zdravkovic, S. (2021). Exploring the chain of effects between local identity and expatriate consumers’ preference for local food brands. Journal of Product & Brand Management ,19(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100498
• Mishra, S., Jain, S. ve Malhotra, G. (2020). The anatomy of circular economy transition in the fashion industry. Social Responsibility Journal, 17(4), 524-542.
• Ng, T. W., Hsu, D. Y. ve Parker, S. K. (2021). Received respect and constructive voice: The roles of proactive motivation and perspective taking. Journal of Management, 47(2), 399-429.
• Nunes, M. P. ve Pereira, R. D. V. (2021). Business model innovation and business performance in an innovative environment. International Journal of Innovation Management, 25(03), https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919621500365
• Proost, K., Germeys, F. ve Vanderstukken, A. (2021). Applicants’ pre-test reactions towards video interviews: the role of expected chances to demonstrate potential and to use nonverbal cues. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 30(2), 265-273.
• Ragab, M. A. ve Arisha, A. (2013). Knowledge management and measurement: a critical review. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(6), 873-901.
• Ratten, V. ve Jones, P. (2021). Entrepreneurship and management education: Exploring trends and gaps. The International Journal of Management Education, 19(1), 100431.
• Rodgers, B., Antony, J., Edgeman, R. ve Cudney, E. A. (2021). Lean Six Sigma in the public sector: yesterday, today and tomorrow. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 32(5-6), 528-540.
• Roth, S. (2021). Draw your organization! A solution-focused theory-method for business school challenges and change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 34(4), 713-728.
• Sarens, G. ve De Beelde, I. (2006). The relationship between internal audit and senior management: A qualitative analysis of expectations and perceptions. International Journal of Auditing, 10(3), 219-241.
• Sharma, V., Raut, R. D., Mangla, S. K., Narkhede, B. E., Luthra, S. ve Gokhale, R. (2021). A systematic literature review to integrate lean, agile, resilient, green and sustainable paradigms in the supply chain management. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(2), 1191-1212.
• Stevens, R.E. (1953). Characteristics of Subject Literatures, Chicago: American College and Research Library Monography Series 7.
• Tam, K. Y. (1998). The impact of information technology investments on firm performance and evaluation: evidence from newly industrialized economies. Information Systems Research, 9(1), 85-98.
• Wu, L., Yue, X., Jin, A. ve Yen, D. C. (2016). Smart supply chain management: a review and implications for future research. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 27(2), 395-417.
• Zenone, A. C., Cezar, B. B. ve de Hoyos Guevara, A. (2021). Integrating Cultural Diversity in Organizations: Recruitment and Selection. Journal on Innovation and Sustainability RISUS, 12(2), 83-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.23925/2179-3565.2021v12i2p83-90 RISU