ÇİLEKLERDE (Fragaria) ÇİÇEKLENME İLE FOTOPERİYOT ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİLER

Year 2012, Volume: 27 Issue: 2, 110 - 119, 24.01.2012

Leyla Demirsoy , Ahmet Öztürk , Sedat Serçe

https://doi.org/10.7161/anajas.2012.272.110

Cited By: 1

Abstract

ÖZET: Çilekler fotoperiyot isteklerine göre kısa gün, uzun gün ve gün-nötr çilekleri olarak sınıflandırılırlar. Günümüz modern çilek çeşitlerinin çoğu kısa gün çeşitleridir. Ancak derim periyodunu uzatmadaki önemleri nedeniyle son yıllarda gün-nötr çeşitlerinin de ticari yetiştiricilikte kullanımı artmaya başlamıştır. Kültür çileklerinin karmaşık çiçeklenme karakterleri bunların çiçeklenme fizyolojisinin öğrenilmesini geciktirmiş, bu konu günümüzde bile halen merak edilen ve üzerinde durulan bir konu olmuştur. Kısa, uzun ve gün-nötr çileklerinin çiçeklenme fizyolojilerinin ve buna etki eden faktörlerin iyi bilinmesi bunların yetiştiriciliklerindeki başarıyı artıracak, çilek yetiştiriciliğinin gelişimine katkıda bulunacaktır.

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PHOTOPERIOD AND FLOWERING IN STRAWBERRIES (Fragaria)

Based on photoperiodic requirements for flower induction, strawberries are classified as short-day, long-day and day-neutral. Currently, most cultivated strawberries are short-day cultivars. In recent years, utilization of day-neutral cultivars increased in commercial strawberry growing because of their importance for extending production season length. Complex flowering habits of the cultivated strawberries delayed to obtain knowledge on their flowering physiology. Some aspects of flowering physiology of strawberries still remain unclear. Therefore, even today this subject is being emphasized. Comprehensive knowledge on flowering physiology of short-day, long-day and day-neutral strawberries and factors affecting flowering physiology will increase growing achievement of them and make important contribution to the development of strawberry production.

Keywords

Çilek, Fragaria, Fotoperiyot, Sıcaklık, Çiçeklenme, Vegetatif Büyüme

ÇİLEKLERDE (Fragaria) ÇİÇEKLENME İLE FOTOPERİYOT ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİLER

Abstract

Çilekler fotoperiyot isteklerine göre kısa gün, uzun gün ve gün-nötr çilekleri olarak sınıflandırılırlar. Günümüz modern çilek çeşitlerinin çoğu kısa gün çeşitleridir. Ancak derim periyodunu uzatmadaki önemleri nedeniyle son yıllarda gün-nötr çeşitlerinin de ticari yetiştiricilikte kullanımı artmaya başlamıştır. Kültür çileklerinin karmaşık çiçeklenme karakterleri bunların çiçeklenme fizyolojisinin öğrenilmesini geciktirmiş, bu konu günümüzde bile halen merak edilen ve üzerinde durulan bir konu olmuştur. Kısa, uzun ve gün-nötr çileklerinin çiçeklenme fizyolojilerinin ve buna etki eden faktörlerin iyi bilinmesi bunların yetiştiriciliklerindeki başarıyı artıracak, çilek yetiştiriciliğinin gelişimine katkıda bulunacaktır

Keywords

Çilek, Fragaria, fotoperiyot, sıcaklık, çiçeklenme, vegetatif büyüme

References

• Ahmadi, H., Bringhurst, R.S., Voth, V. 1990. Modes of inheritance of photoperiodism in Fragaria. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 115: 146-152.
• Ceulemans, R., Baets, W., Vanderbruggen, M., Impens, I. 1986. Effects of supplemental irradiation with HID lamps, and NFT gutter size on gas exchange, plant morphology and yield of strawberry plants. Sci. Hort. 28: 71-83.
• Chabot, B.F. 1978. Environmental influences on photosynthesis and growth in Fragaria vesca. New Phytol. 80: 87-98.
• Dale, A., Hancock, J.F., Luby, J.J. 2002. Breeding dayneutral strawberries for Northern North America. Acta Hort. 567: 133-136.
• Darnell, R.L., Cantliffe, D.J., Kirchbaum, D.S., Chandler, C.K. 2003. The physiology of flowering strawberry (edt. J., Janick) Hort. Rev. 28: 325-349.
• Darrow, G.M. 1936. Interrelation of temperature and photoperiodism in the production of fruit-buds on runners in the strawberry. Proc. Amer. Hort. Sci. 34:360-363.
• Darrow, G.M. 1966. The strawberry. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
• Darrow, G.M., Waldo, G.F. 1934. Responses of strawberry varieties and species to the duration of the daily light period. USDA Tech. Bul. 453.
• Demirsoy, L., Demirsoy, H., Uzun, S., Öztürk, A. 2007. The effects of different periods of shading on growth and yield in ‘Sweet Charlie’ Strawberry. Europ. J. Hort. Sci., 72. S. 26–31.
• Dennis, F.G., Lipecki, J.Jr., Kiang, C.L. 1970. Effects of photoperiod and other factors upon flowering and runner development of three strawberry cultivars. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 95: 750-754.
• Downs, R.J., Piringer, A.A. 1955. Differences in photoperiodic responses of everbearing and Junebearing strawberries. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 66:234-236.
• Durner, E.F., Barden, J.A., Himelrick, D.G.,Poling, E.B. 1984. Photoperiod and temperature effects on flower and runner development in day-neutral, Junebearing and everbearing strawberries. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 109:396-400.
• Durner, E.F., Poling, E.B. 1987. Flower bud induction, initiation, differentiation and development in the ‘Earliglow’ strawberry. Sci. Hort. 31: 61-69.
• Ferree, D.C., Stang, E.J. 1988. Seasonal plant shading, growth and fruiting in ‘Earliglow’ strawberry. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 113: 322-327.
• Galletta, G.J., Bringhurst, R.S. 1990. Strawberry management. In: Galletta, G.J., Himelrick, D. (eds.), Small Fruit Crop Management. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
• Guttridge, C.G. 1969. Fragaria, p. 247-267. In: L.T. Evans (ed.). The induction of flowering. Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, New York.
• Guttridge, C.G. 1985. Fragaria ×ananassa, p. 16-33. In: A. H.Halevy (ed.). Handbook of flowering. Vol. III. CRC Pres, Boca Raton, FL.
• Hancock, J. F., Luby, J. J., Dale, A., Callow, P. W., Serce, S., El-Shiek, A. 2002. Utilizing wild Fragaria virginiana in strawberry cultivar development: Inheritance of photoperiod sensitivity, fruit size, gender, female fertility and disease resistance. Euphytica 126:177–184.
• Hancock, J.F. 1999. Strawberries. New York: CABI Publishing.
• Hancock, J.F., Callow, P.W., Dale, A., Luby, J.J., Finn, C.E., Hokanson, S.C., Hummer, K.E. 2001. From the Andes to the Rockies: Native strawberry collection and utilization. Hort. Sci. 36: 221–225.
• Hancock, J.F., Sjulin, T.M., Lobos, G.A. 2008. Strawberries. In: James F. Hancock (Edt.). Temperate Fruit Crop Breeding: Germplasm to Genomics. p: 393-438.
• Hartmann, H.T. 1947a. The influence of temperature on the photoperiodic response of several strawberry varieties grown under controlled environment conditions. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 50: 243-245.
• Hartmann, H.T. 1947b. Some effects of temperature and photoperiod on flower formation and runner production in the strawberry. Plant Physiol. 22: 407-420.
• Heide, O. 1977. Photoperiod and temperature interactions in growth and flowering of strawberry. Physiol. Plant. 40:21-26.
• Ito, H., Saito, T. 1962. Studies on the flower formation in the strawberry plants. I. Effects of temperature and photoperiod on the flower formation. Tahoku J. Agri. Res. 13: 191-203.
• Izhar, S. 1997. Infra short-day strawberry types. Acta Hort. 439: 155–160
• Jonkers, H. 1965. On the flower formation, the dormancy and the early forcing of strawberries. Meded. Landbouwhogesch. Wageningen 65-6: 1-59.
• Kamdan-Zahavi, A., Ephart, E. 1974. Opposite response groups of short-day plants to spectral composition of the main light period and end-of-day red and far red irradiation. Plant Cell Physiol. 15: 693-699.
• Kawakami, T., Aoki, H., Toki, T. 1990. Method of early fruit maturing using low night temperatures and shortday conditions during the propagation of strawberries. Bul. China Pref. Agri. Expt. Sta. 31: 55-72.
• Kono, H., Tsunematsu, S. 1990. Studies on cultivation type of everbearing strawberry. 1. Effect of lighting on flower budding and yield in annual plant. J. Japan soc. Hort. Sci. 59: 438-439.
• Konsin, M., Voipio, I., Palonen, P. 2001. Influence of photoperiod and duration of short-day treatment on vegetative growth and flowering of strawberry (Fragaria ×ananassa Duch.). J. Hort. Sci. Biotechn. 76:77-82.
• Kronenberg, H.G., Wassenaar, L.M. 1972. Dormancy and chilling requirement of strawberry varieties for early forcing. Euphytica 21: 454-459.
• Kumakura, H., Shishido, Y. 1995. Effect of temperature and light condition on flower initiation and fruit development in strawberry. Jarq- Jpn. Agr. Res. Q. 29:241-250.
• Ledesma, N.A., Nakata, M,. Sugiyama, N. 2008. Effect of high temperature stress on reproductive growth of strawberry cvs. ‘Nyoho’and ‘Toyonoka. Sci. Hort. 116:186–193.
• Lieten, F. 1997. Effects of chilling and night-break treatment on greenhouse production of ‘Elsanta’. .Acta Hort. .439:633-639.
• Moore, J.N., Hough, L.F. 1962. Relationships between auxin levels, time of floral induction and vegetative growth of the strawberry. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 81: 255-264.
• Nestby, R. 1989. Forcing of 18 strawberry cv. related to two cold storage periods. Acta Hort. 265: 393-398.
• Nicoll, M.F., Galletta, G.J. 1987. Variation in growth and flowering habits of Junebearing and everbearing strawberries. J. Am. Soc. Hort Sci. 112: 872-880.
• Nishiyama, M. Ohkawa W., Kanayama, Y., Kanahama K. 2006. Critical photoperiod for flower bud initiation in everbearing strawberry ‘Summerberry’ plants grown at high temperatures. Tohoku J. Agri. Res. 56: 1-8.
• Nishiyama, M., Kanahama, K. 2002. Effect of temperature and photoperiod on flower bud initiation of day-neutral and everbearing strawberries. Acta Hort. 567: 253- 255.
• Nishiyama, M., Ohkawa, W., Kanahama, K. 1998. Induction of reproductive growth of everbearing strawberry plants in dormant condition controlled by temperature and photoperiod. J. Japan. Soc. Hort. Sci. 67: 228-235.
• Nishiyama, M., Ohkawa, W., Kanahama, K. 1999. Interaction between temperature and photoperiod on inflorescences in everbearing strawberry ‘Summerberry’ plants grown at high temperature. J. Japan. Soc. Hort. Sci. 68: 192-194.
• Nishiyama, M., Ohkawa, W., Kanahama, K. 2003. Effect of photoperiod on the development of inflorescences in everbearing strawberry ‘Summerberry’ plants grown at high temperature. Tohoku J. Agri. Res. 53: 43-52.
• Nishizawa, T., Ito, A., Shishido, Y. 1999. Effects of light intervals on flower-bud formation, leaf growth, and chlorophyll and carbohydrate concentrations in ‘Nyoho’ strawberry runner plants during storage under cool conditions. Environ. Control Biol. 37: 43–48.
• Nishizawa, T., Shishido, Y., Kudo, M., Kumakura, H., Hamamoto, H. 1998. Petiole length, chlorophyll and carbohydrate levels, and photosynthetic rates of Junebearing strawberry plants as influenced by red-light irradiation during storage under cool conditions. Sci. Hort. 72: 25-33.
• Oda, Y., Yanagi, T. 1990. Studies on propagation by using runner apex tissue culture in everbearing strawberry. Abstr. 23rd Inter. Hort. Congress, 1:143.
• Okimura, M., Igarashi, I. 1997. Effects of photoperiod and temperature on flowering in everbearing strawberry seedlings. Acta Hort. 439:605-607.
• Öztürk, A., Demirsoy, L. 2004. Değişik gölgeleme uygulamalarının Camarosa çilek çeşidinde verim ve büyüme üzerine etkileri. Bahçe 33: 39–49.
• Paydaş, S., Kaşka, N. 1991. Sıcaklık ve gün uzunluğunun çileklerde çiçek tomurcuğu oluşumuna etkileri. Çukurova Üniv. Zir. Fak. Dergisi 6: 1-16.
• Robert, F., Risser, G., Petel, G. 1999. Photoperiod and temperature effect on growth of strawberry plant (Fragaria ×ananassa Duch.): development of a morphological test to assess the dormancy induction. Sci. Hort. 80: 217-226.
• Sakin, M., Hancock, J.F., Luby, J.J. 1997. Identifying new sources of genes that determine cyclic flowering in rocky mountain populations of Fragaria virginiana ssp. glauca Staudt. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 122: 205–210.
• Salisbury, F. B., Ross, C. W. 1992. Plant Physiology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co.
• Serce, S., Hancock, J.F., 2003. Assessment of day-neutrality scoring methods in strawberry families grown in greenhouse and fields environments. Tur. J. Agric. For. 27:191-198.
• Serce, S., Hancock, J.F. 2005a. Inheritance of day-neutrality in octoploid species of Fragaria. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 130: 580–584.
• Serce, S., Hancock, J.F. 2005b. The temperature and photoperiod regulation of flowering and rendering in the strawberries, Fragaria chiloensis, F.virginiana, and F. ×ananassa. Sci. Hort. 103: 167–177.
• Shaw, D. V., ve Famula, T.R. 2005. Complex segregation analysis of dayneutrality in domestic strawberry (Fragaria ×ananassa Duch.). Euphytica 145: 331–338.
• Shishido, Y., Kumakura, H., Arab, K. 1990. Studies on flower bud formation and fruit development in strawberry, I. Effects of continuous dark and short-day on flower bud formation and development during low temperature treatment. Bulletin of The National Research Institute of Vegetables, Ornamental Plants and Tea Series C No. 1p. 45-61.
• Smeets, L. 1955. Runner formation on strawberry plants in autumn and winter. II. Influence of the light intensity on the photoperiodical behavior. Euphytica 4: 240-244.
• Smeets, L. 1976. Effects of light intensity on stamen development in the strawberry cultivar “Glasa”. Sci. Hort. 4: 255-260.
• Smeets, L. 1979. Effects of temperature and day-length on flower initiation and runner formation in two everbearing strawberry cultivars. Sci. Hort. 12: 19-26.
• Smeets, L., Kronenberg, H.G., 1955. Runner formation on strawberry plants in autumn and winter. Euphytica 4:53-57.
• Sonsteby, A., Heide, O.M. 2006. Dormancy relations and flowering of the strawberry cultivars Korona and Elsanta as influenced by photoperiod and temperature. Sci. Hort. 110: 57-67
• Sonsteby, A., Heide, O.M. 2007a. Quantitative long-day flowering response in the perpetual-flowering F1 strawberry cultivar Elan. J. Hort. Sci. Biotech. 82: 266-274.
• Sønsteby, A., Heide, O.M. 2007b. Long-day control of flowering in everbearing strawberries. J. Hort. Sci. Biotech. 82: 875-884.
• Sønsteby, A., Heide, O.M. 2008. Temperature responses, flowering and fruit yield of the June-bearing strawberry cultivars Florence, Frida and Korona. Sci. Hort. 118: 49-54.
• Stewart, P.J., Folta, K.M. 2010. A review of photoperiodic flowering research in strawberry (Fragaria spp.). Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 29:1-13.
• Taimatsu, T. 1993. Horticultural characteristics and cultivation of everbearing strawberries for different harvest period. Spec. Ress. Bull. Nara Agric. Exp. Stat.1-206.
• Verheul, M.J., Sønsteby, A., Grimstad, S.O. 2007. Influences of day and night temperatures on flowering of Fragaria x ananassa Duch., cvs. Korona and Elsanta. Sci. Hort. 112: 200–206.
• Vince-Prue, D., Guttridge, C.G. 1973. Floral initiation in strawberry: spectral evidence for the regulation of flowering by long-day inhibition. Planta 110: 165-172.
• Wagstaffe, A., Battey, N.H. 2006. The optimum temperature for long-season cropping in the everbearing strawberry ‘Everest’. Acta Hort. 708: 45-49.
• Went, F.W., 1957. Environmental control of plant growth. Chron. Bot., Waltham, MA.
• Wiseman N.J., Turnbull, C.G.N. 1999. Effects of photoperiod and paclobutrazol on growth dynamics of petioles in strawberry (Fragaria ×ananassa). Australian J. Plant Physiol. 26: 353-358.
• Wright, C.J., Sandrang, A.K. 1995. Efficiency and light utilization in the strawberry (Fragaria ×ananassa) cv. ‘Hapil’. J. Hort. Sci. 70: 705-711.
• Yanagi, T., Yachi, T., Okuda, N., Okamoto, K. 2006. Light quality of continuous illuminating at night to induce floral initiation of Fragaria chiloensis. Chi-24–1. Sci. Hort. 109: 309-314.
• Zhang, X., Himelrick, D.G., Woods, F.M., Ebel, R.C. 2000. Effect of temperature, photoperiod and pretreatment growing condition on floral induction in springbearing strawberry. Small Fruits Review 1: 113-123.