Review
BibTex RIS Cite

Blockchain Technology and Its Applications in Supply Chain Managements

Year 2019, Volume: 11 Issue: 18, 2847 - 2877, 30.06.2019
https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.563240

Abstract

Although there is any clear definition of the
concept of block chain; it can be defined as “the as a chain of information
blocks, which data for each activity in the process are stored in an encrypted
format, periodically, chronologically and that each block contains the
information of the previous block in succession”
(Mattila, 2016,p.6;
Tian, 2016)
At the beginning,
it is used in order to ensure the security of the electronic currency bitcoin
system, the block chain technology, has been begun to use not only various
financial areas but also different various areas nowadays
(Hackius
& Petersen, 2017,p.5)
. One of these areas is the supply chains management
because of its insufficient knowledge and nontransparent processes. To solve
the imbalance caused by the supply chain, to ensure transparency, sustainable
traceability and security increase in the entire chain from suppliers to
customers
(Badzar, 2016); blockchain
technology is used thought supply chain management. The main purpose of this
study is to provide information on blockchain technology and its applications
to develop management processes at the logistics area. For this purpose, to
understand the benefits of blockchain technologies on the supply chain
management in theoretically; literature review from sources such as
international literature, books, magazines, theses, Internet resources etc. was
made.

References

  • Akben, İ. ve Çinar, S. (2018). Lojistik ve tedarik zinciri yönetiminde Blockchain: Vaatler, uygulamalar ve engeller. Anadolu I. Uluslararasi Multidisipliner Çalişmalar kongresi, 2018, Diyarbakır.
  • Altunbaşak, T. A. (2018). Blok zincir (Blockchain) teknolojisi ile vergilendirme. Maliye Dergisi, 174, 360-371.
  • Anish Dev, J. (2014). Bitcoin mining acceleration and performance quantification. In Proceedings (1–6), IEEE 27th Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering. 4-7 May, Toronto, Canada.
  • Archa, B. Alangot ve Achuthan, K. (2018). Trace and track: Enhanced pharma supply chain infrastructure to prevent fraud, Lect. Notes Inst. Comput. Sci. Soc.-Inform. Telecommun. Eng. LNICST, 218, 189–195.
  • Avunduk, H. ve Aşan, H. (2018). Blok zinciri (Blockchain) teknolojisi ve işletme uygulamaları: Genel bir değerlendirme. Dokuz Eylul Universitesi Iktisadi ve Idari Bilimler Dergisi, 33(1), 369-384. doi:10.24988/deuiibf.2018331746
  • Babacan, M. (2003). Lojistik sektörünün ülkemizdeki gelişimi ve rekabet vizyonu. Ege Akademik Bakış, 3(1), 8-15.
  • Back,A. G., Maxwell, M., Corallo, M., Friedenbach,İsim. and L. Dashjr.(2014). Enabling blockchain innovations with pegged sidechains. URL: http://www. opensciencereview. com/papers/123/enablingblockchain-innovations-with-pegged-sidechains, 72.
  • Badzar, A. (2016). Blockchain for securing sustainable transport contracts and supply chain transparency:An explorative study of blockchain technology in logistics. Department of Service Management and Service Studies. Lund University, Department of Service Management and Service Studies, SMMM20, Masters Thesis, Helsingborg, Sweden
  • Bakan, İ., ve Şekkeli, Z. H. (2017). Lojistik yönetimi. İstanbul: BETA yayınevi, 1. basım.
  • Barkatullah, J. ve Hanke, T. (2015). Goldstrike 1: CoinTerra’s first‐generation cryptocurrency mining processor for Bitcoin. IEEE, 35, 68–76.
  • Barutçu, S. (2007). İnternet tabanlı tedarik zinciri yönetimi:Denizli tekstil işletmelerinin internet tabanlı tedarik zinciri yönetiminden yararlanma durumuna yönelik bir araştırma. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 18, 133-150.
  • Bilginer, N., Kayabaşı, A. ve Sezici, E. (2008). Lojistik faaliyetlerin süreçsel etkinliğine etki eden faktörlerin değerlendirilmesi üzerine ampirik bir çalışma. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 22, 277-295.
  • Bitcoin Theft. (2013). Massive Bitcoin thefts and seizures leave many users nervous and poorer. Computer Fraud & Security, 12, 3.
  • Bocek, T., Rodrigues, B.B., Strasser T., and Stiller B., (2017). Blockchains everywhere - A use-case of blockchains in the pharma supply-chain, in the Proceedings (772–777) .IM 2017 - 2017 IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network and Service Management, 8-12 May, Lisbon, Portugal.
  • Bowersox, D. J., Closs, D. J., ve Cooper, M. B. (2002). Supply chain logistics management, McGraw-Hill New York, NY.
  • Bradbury, D. (2014). Anonymity and privacy: A guide for the perplexed. Network Security, 10, 10–14.
  • Coeckelbergh, M., ve Reijers, W. (2015). Cryptocurrencies as narrative technologies. ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society – Special Issue on Ethicomp, 45(3), 172–178.
  • Coşkun, E., ve Tiryaki, E. N. (2011). Tartışmacı metin yapısı ve öğretimi. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(16), 63-73.
  • Crosby, M. (2015). Google, Nachiappan, Yahoo, Pradhan Pattanayak, Yahoo, Sanjeev Verma, Samsung Research America & Vignesh Kalyanaraman, Fairchild Semiconductor, BlockChain Technology Beyond Bitcoin. Sutardja Center for Entrepreneurship & Technology Technical Report.
  • Çelenk, B. V., (2017). Akıllı sözleşmeler (Smart Contracts) nedir?, 22 Aralık 2018 tarihinde https://startuphukuku.com/akilli-sozlesmeler-smart-contracts-nedir/ adresinden erişildi .
  • DeWaal, G., ve Dempsey, G. (2015). New York BitLicense regulations virtually certain to significantly impact transactions in virtual currencies. Journal of Investment Compliance, 16(4), 59–65.
  • DiBattista, G., Di Donato, V., Patrignani, M., Pizzonia, M., ve Roselli, V. (2015). Bitcoinview: Visualization of flows in the Bitcoin transaction graph. InProceedings (1–8) IEEE Symposium on Visualization for Cyber Security, 31 May, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Dik, A. (2015). Peer to peer (P2P) ağlar nedir ve nasıl çalışır?, 15 Eylül 2018 tarihinde https://www.elektrikport.com/makale-detay/peer-to-peer-(p2p)-aglar-nedir-ve-nasil-calisir/15406#ad-image-0 adresinden erişildi.
  • Doruk, A. M. B. ve Özen, Ü. (2018). Blok zinciri ile gerçek zamanlı doğrulanabilir eğitim belgeleri. İktisadi Yenilik Dergisi, 5(2), 75-82.
  • Dönmezgel E., Corda: Açık Kaynak Özel Dağıtık Defter; 22 Mart 2018 tarihinde https://blockchaindanismanlik.com/corda-acik-kaynak-ozel-dagitik-defter/ adresinden erişildi.
  • Dönmezgel E., Hayatımızı Değiştirecek Blockchain Uygulamaları; 22 Mart 2018 tarihinde https://bitcoinlerim.com/blockchain-uygulamalari-kullanim-alanlari/ adresinden erişildi.
  • Durğay, Z. ve Karaarslan, E. (2018). Blokzinciri Teknolojisinin E-Devlet Uygulamalarında Kullanımı: Ön İnceleme. Akademik Bilişim Konferansı, Karabük.
  • Edwards, C. (2015). Finance – Bitcoin price crash finds new victims. Engineering and Technology, 10, 19.
  • Ekin, A. ve Ünay, D. (2018). Blockchain applications in healthcare.26th Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU). IEEE, 2-5 May, İzmir, 2018.
  • Eyal, A. E. Gencer, E. G. Sirer, ve Van Renesse R. Bitcoin-NG: A scalable blockchain protocol In 13th {USENIX} Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation ({NSDI} 16) (pp. 45-59).
  • Feld, S., Schonfeld, M., ve Werner, M. (2014). Analysing the deployment of Bitcoin’s P2P network under as AS‐level perspective. Procedia Computer Science, 32, 1121–1126.
  • Francis, J. (2018). Closing The Hall Of Mirrors, How Blockchain Will Simplify And Transform The Suppy Chain. Accenture Consulting.
  • Francisco, K. & Swanson, D. (2018)., The supply chain has no clothes: Technology adoption of Blockchain for supply chain transparency, Logistics, 2(1), 2.
  • Gipp, B., Kosti, J. ve Breitinger, C. (2016, September). Securing video integrity using decentralized trusted timestamping on the Bitcoin Blockchain. Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems (51). http://aisel.aisnet.org/mcis2016
  • Greebel, E. L., Moriarty, K., Callaway, C. ve Xethalis, G. (2014). Recent key Bitcoin and virtual currency regulatory and law enforcement developments.Journal of Investment Compliance, 16(1), 13–18.
  • Hackius, N., ve Petersen, M. (2017). Blockchain in logistics and supply chain: Trick or treat, In Proceedings (8-13). Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), 112-13 October, Hamburg.
  • Hofmann, U. M. S., and Bosia, N. (2018) Why to pay attention on Blockchain-driven supply chain finance?, Supply Chain Finance and Blockchain Technology, Springer, 1–6.
  • Imeri, A. ve Khadraoui, D. (2018). The security and traceability of shared information in the process of transportation of dangerous goods,in 9th IFIP International Conference on New Technologies, Mobility and Security (NTMS), (1–5), 2018, 02 April, Paris.
  • İslamoğlu, A. H., ve Alnıaçık, Ü. (2014). Sosyal bilimlerde araştirma yöntemleri. Içinde (511). İstanbul: Beta Yayınevi.
  • Jabbar, K. ve Bjørn,P. (2018).Infrastructural grind: Introducing Blockchain technology in the shipping domain, in Proceedings (297–308), ACM Conference on Supporting Groupwork, 2018, New York, NY, USA,
  • Jacobovitz, O. (2016). Blockchain for identity management. Technical Report, The Lynne and William Frankel Center for Computer Science Department of Computer Science, Ben-Gurion University, Beer Sheva, Israel.
  • Karaarslan, E., ve Akbaş, M. F. (2017). Blok zinciri tabanlı siber güvenlik sistemleri, Uluslararasi Bilgi Güvenliği Mühendisliği Dergisi, 3(2) 16-21.
  • Kırbaş, İ. (2018). Blokzinciri teknolojisi ve yakın gelecekteki uygulama alanları. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(1), 75-82.
  • Kim, H. M. ve Laskowski, M. (2018). Toward an ontology‐driven blockchain design for supply‐chain provenance. Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, 25(1), 18-27.
  • Kishigami, J., Fukimura, S., Watanabe, H., Nakadaira, A. ve Akutsu, A.(2015). The blockchain‐based digital content distribution system.In Proceedings (187–190) IEEE 5th International Conference on Big Data and Cloud Computing, 26-28 August, Dalian, China.
  • Kshetri, N. (2018). 1 Blockchain’s roles in meeting key supply chain management objectives, Int. J. Inf. Management, 39, 80–89,
  • Kushch, S. ve Prieto Castrillo, F. (2017). A review of the applications of the Block-chain technology in smart devices and dis-tributed renewable energy grids. ADCAIJ: Advances in Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence Journal, 6(3), 75. doi:10.14201/adcaij2017637584
  • Kuzuloğlu, S. (2016). Blok zinciri (Blockchain) nedir?, 15 Ocak 2012 tarihinde https://bkm.com.tr/blok-zinciri-blockchain-nedir/ adresinden erişildi
  • Lai, K.H. ve Cheng, T. E. (2016). Just-in-time logistics, Routledge.
  • Li, H., Wu, B., King, Z. B., Miled, J., Wassick, J.. ve Tazelaar, J. (2017). On the integration of event-based and transaction-based architectures for supply chains, in Proceedings (pp. 376-382), IEEE 37th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, 5-8 June, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  • Liu, S. S., Zhu, Mundie, T., ve Krieger, U., (2017). Advanced block-chain architecture for e-health systems, in proceedings (1–6), 2017 IEEE 19th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services (Healthcom), 2017, Dalian, China.
  • Lu, Q. ve Xu, X. (2017). Adaptable Blockchain-based systems: A case study for product traceability, IEEE Software,34, 6, 21–27.
  • Luu, L., Teutsch, J., Kulkarni, R., ve Saxena, P. (2015). Demystifying incentives in the consensus computer. CCS ‘15: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSAC Conference, October 12 - 16, Denver, Colorado, USA .
  • Mackey, T. K. ve Nayyar, G. (2017). A review of existing and emerging digital technologies to combat the global trade in fake medicines. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety 16(5), 587–602.
  • Madhwal, Y. ve Panfilov, P. (2017). Blockchain And Supply Chain Management: Aircrafts’ Parts’ Business Case. In Proceedings (1051-1056), 28th DAAAM International Symposium, Vienna, Austria, 23 – 26 October. doi:10.2507/28th.daaam.proceedings.146
  • Markets ve Markets (2016), Blockchain market by provider, application (payments, exchanges, smart contracts, documentation, digital identity, clearing and settlement), organization size, vertical, and region: Global forecast to 2021, Market Report, 01.02.2019. tarihinde www.MarketsandMarkets.com adresinden erişildi.
  • Mattila, J. (2016). The blockchain phenomenon- the disruptive potential of distributed consensus architectures. ETLA Working Papers ,38, 15 Ocak 2018 tarihinde http://pub.etla.fi/ETLA-Working-Papers-38.pdf. adresinden erişildi
  • Maxwell, D., Speed, C. ve Campbell, D. (2015). ‘Effing’ the ineffable: Opening up understandings of the blockchain. In British HCI ‘15: Proceedings (208–209) , British HCI Conference, 2015, Lincoln, Lincolnshire, United Kingdom.
  • Mermer, G. B. (2018). Blok zincir teknolojilerine genel bir bakış prensibi, fırsatları ve zorlukları. 26th Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU). IEEE, 2018, İzmir.
  • Moser, M., Bohme, R., ve Breuker, D. (2013). An inquiry into money laundering tools in the Bitcoin ecosystem. eCrime Researchers Summit, 1–14.
  • Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system, accessed 12 August 2017: https://bitcoin.org/en/bitcoin-paper
  • Network Security (2013). In brief network security, 11, 3.
  • Ølnes, S. (2016, September). Beyond bitcoin enabling smart government using blockchain technology. In International Conference on Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective (253-264). Springer, Cham.
  • Omohundro, S. (2014). Cryptocurrencies, smart contracts, and artificial intelligence. AI Matters, 1, 19–21. ACM New York, NY, USA
  • Petersen, M., Hackius, N., ve Von See, B. (2018). Mapping the sea of opportunities: Blockchain in supply chain and logistics it, Information Technology, 60(5-6), 263-271. doi:10.1515/itit-2017-0031
  • Rodrigue, J.-P. (2018). Efficiency and sustainability in multimodal supply chains, International Transport Forum Discussion Paper, No. 2018-17, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), International Transport Forum, Paris, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/12f93f71-en
  • Roth, N. (2015). An architectural assessment of Bitcoin: Using the systems modelling language. Procedia Computer Science, 44, 527–536.
  • Ruta, F., Scioscia, S., Ieva, G., Capurso, E., Di Sciascio, F. (2017).Supply chain object discovery with semantic-enhanced Blockchain, in Proceedings (60:1–60:2) 15th ACM Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems, 2017, New York, NY, USA.
  • Serdar (2018). Blockchain ve Bitcoin, Ethereum Ripple Farkı, 15 Nisan 2018 tarihinde https://sirazduvari.com/blockchain-ve-bitcoin-ethereum-ripple-farki/ adresinden erişildi
  • Smetana, S., Seebold, C. ve Heinz, V. (2018). Neural network, blockchain, and modular complex system: The evolution of cyber-physical systems for material flow analysis and life cycle assessment,Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 133, 229–230.
  • Swan, M. (2015). Blockchain thinking: The brain as a decentralized autonomous corporation. Technology and Society Magazine, 34(4), 41–52.
  • Swanson, D., Goel, L., Francisco, K., ve Stock, J. (2017). Applying theories from other disciplines to logistics and supply chain management: a systematic literature review. Transportation Journal, 56(3), 299-356.
  • Tian, F. (2016). An agri-food supply chain traceability system for china based on RFID & Blockchain technology. Service Systems and Service Management (ICSSSM), 13th International Conference on. IEEE, 24-26 June, Kunming, China.
  • Treiblmaier, H. (2018), Optimal levels of (de)centralizationfor resilient supply chains, The International Journal of Logistics Management, 29 (1), 435-455.
  • Tribis, Y., El Bouchti, A., Bouayad, H., ve El Ghazi, H. (2018). Supply chain management based on Blockchain: A systematic mapping study. MATEC Web of Conferences, vol. 200, p. 20 doi:10.1051/matecconf/201820000020
  • Tse,D., Zhang, B. , Yang,Y., Cheng, C. ve Mu, H. (2018). Blockchain application in food supply information security, in proceedings (1357–1361) the IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2017-December, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Tsukerman, M. (2015). The block is hot: A survey of the state of bitcoin regulation and suggestions for the future. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 30, 1127–1169.
  • TUBİTAK (2017). Blokzincir teknolojiler, 15 Ocak 2019 tarihinde http://blokzincir.tubitak.gov.tr/blok-zincir.html adresinden erişildi.
  • UK Government (2016). Distributed ledger technology:Beyond block chain, Report by the UK Government Chief Scientific Advisor, GovernmentOffice for Science, London.
  • Underwood S., (2016). Blockchain beyond bitcoin. Commun ACM 59, 11 , 15–17
  • Ungan, M. C. (2011). En iyi tedarik zinciri uygulamaları ve bir saha çalışması. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(2), 307 - 322.
  • Ünsal, E., ve Kocaoğlu, Ö. (2018). Blok zinciri teknolojisi: Kullanım alanları, açık noktaları ve gelecek beklentileri. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 13, 54-64. doi:10.31590/ejosat.423676)
  • Van den Hooff, J., Kaashoek, M. F., ve Zeldovich, N. (2014). VerSum: Verificable computations over large public logs. In CCS ‘14: Proceedings (1304–1316). ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 2014, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
  • Voronchenko, K. (2017). Do you need a Blockchain? Supervised by Ivo Kubjas. 22 Ocak 2019 tarihinde https://courses-.cs.ut.ee/MTAT.07.022/2017_fall/uploads/Main/kyrylo-report-f17.pdf adresinden erişildi .
  • Wörner, D., Von Bomhard, T., Schreier, Y. P., ve Bilgeri, D. (2016). The Bitcoin ecosystem: Disruption beyond financial services?
  • Wu, Z. Li, B. King, Z. B. Miled, J. Wassick, J. Tazelaar,(2017). A distributed ledger for supply chain physical distribution visibility, Inf. Switz., 8(4), 1-18.
  • Wüst, K., ve Gervais, A. (2017). Do you need a Blockchain? ACR Cryptology ePrint Archive.
  • Yıldırım, F. (2015). Kripto paralar, blok zinciri teknolojisi ve uluslararasi ilişkilere muhtemel etkileri. Medeniyet Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2 (4), 81-97.
  • Yıldırım, H. (2018). Açık ve uzaktan öğrenmede Blok zincir teknolojisinin kullanımı. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(3), 142-153.
  • Yıldız, R. Ö., ve Baştuğ, S. (2018). Blok zincir teknolojisi kapsamında elektronik konşimento. 14.03.2019 tarinde www.researchgate.net Adresinden erişildi.
  • Yıldız, A. (2018). Endüstri 4.0 İle bütünleştirilmiş dijital tedarik zinciri. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 6(4), 1215-1230.
  • Zhang, Y., ve Wen, J. (2015). An IoT electric business model based on the protocol of Bitcoin. In Proceedings (184–191) . 18th International Conference on Intelligence in Next Generation Networks, 17-19 February, Paris, France.
  • Ziegeldorf, J. H., Grossman, F., Henze, M., Inden, N., ve Wehrle, K. (2015). CoinParty: Secure multi‐party mixing of Bitcoins. In CODASPY ‘15: Proceedings (75–86) 5th ACM Conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy, March 02 - 04, NY, USA.
  • Zu, X., ve Kaynak, H. (2012). An agency theory perspective on supply chain quality management, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 32(4), 423-446.
  • Zyskind, G., Nathan, O., Pentland, A. (2015). Decentralizing privacy: Using blockchain to protect personal data. IEEE CS Security Workshops, 180–184. 21-22 May, San Jose, CA, USA

Blok Zincir Teknolojisi ve Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimindeki Uygulamaları

Year 2019, Volume: 11 Issue: 18, 2847 - 2877, 30.06.2019
https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.563240

Abstract

Net bir tanımı bulunmamakla birlikte blok zincir kavramını;
“süreçte yapılan her bir faaliyete ilişkin verilerin, şifreli bir biçimde,
belirli aralıklarla ve kronolojik olarak kaydedildiği ve her bir bloğun bir
önceki bloğun bilgilerini de içerdiği bilgi bloklarının art arda gelerek
oluşturduğu zincir” olarak tanımlamak mümkündür
(Mattila,
2016,s.6-7; Tian, 2016)
. Elektronik para
birimi Bitcoin sisteminin güvenliğini sağlamak amacıyla ortaya konan blok
zincir teknolojisi, son zamanlarda finansal alanların dışında çeşitli alanlarda
da yer bulmaya başlamıştır
(Hackius
& Petersen, 2017,s.5)
. Bunlardan bir
tanesi de yetersiz bilgiye sahip olan ve şeffaf olmayan tedarik zinciri yönetim
süreçlerdir. Tedarik zincirinin neden olduğu dengesizliği çözmesi,
tedarikçilerden müşterilere kadar tüm zincirde şeffaflığın, sürdürülebilir
izlenebilirliğin ve güvenliğin artırılmasını sağlaması
(Badzar, 2016)  nedeniyle blok zinciri teknolojisinin;
tedarik zinciri yönetimine de oldukça pozitif bir katkı sağlayacağı
düşünülmektedir
(Hackius
& Petersen, 2017)
.  Bu çalışmanın temel amacı blok
zincir teknolojisi ve bu teknolojinin tedarik zinciri yönetim alanındaki
uygulamaları hakkında bilgi sunmak; bu yolla tedarik zinciri süreçlerine
yönelik araştırmalara katkı sağlamaktır. Bu amaçla uluslararası literatürde bu
konuda kitaplar, dergiler, tezler, internet kaynakları gibi kaynaklardan
literatür incelemesi yapılarak, blok zincir teknolojilerinin tedarik zinciri
yönetim uygulamalarına sunacağı faydalar teorik açıdan açıklanmıştır.

References

  • Akben, İ. ve Çinar, S. (2018). Lojistik ve tedarik zinciri yönetiminde Blockchain: Vaatler, uygulamalar ve engeller. Anadolu I. Uluslararasi Multidisipliner Çalişmalar kongresi, 2018, Diyarbakır.
  • Altunbaşak, T. A. (2018). Blok zincir (Blockchain) teknolojisi ile vergilendirme. Maliye Dergisi, 174, 360-371.
  • Anish Dev, J. (2014). Bitcoin mining acceleration and performance quantification. In Proceedings (1–6), IEEE 27th Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering. 4-7 May, Toronto, Canada.
  • Archa, B. Alangot ve Achuthan, K. (2018). Trace and track: Enhanced pharma supply chain infrastructure to prevent fraud, Lect. Notes Inst. Comput. Sci. Soc.-Inform. Telecommun. Eng. LNICST, 218, 189–195.
  • Avunduk, H. ve Aşan, H. (2018). Blok zinciri (Blockchain) teknolojisi ve işletme uygulamaları: Genel bir değerlendirme. Dokuz Eylul Universitesi Iktisadi ve Idari Bilimler Dergisi, 33(1), 369-384. doi:10.24988/deuiibf.2018331746
  • Babacan, M. (2003). Lojistik sektörünün ülkemizdeki gelişimi ve rekabet vizyonu. Ege Akademik Bakış, 3(1), 8-15.
  • Back,A. G., Maxwell, M., Corallo, M., Friedenbach,İsim. and L. Dashjr.(2014). Enabling blockchain innovations with pegged sidechains. URL: http://www. opensciencereview. com/papers/123/enablingblockchain-innovations-with-pegged-sidechains, 72.
  • Badzar, A. (2016). Blockchain for securing sustainable transport contracts and supply chain transparency:An explorative study of blockchain technology in logistics. Department of Service Management and Service Studies. Lund University, Department of Service Management and Service Studies, SMMM20, Masters Thesis, Helsingborg, Sweden
  • Bakan, İ., ve Şekkeli, Z. H. (2017). Lojistik yönetimi. İstanbul: BETA yayınevi, 1. basım.
  • Barkatullah, J. ve Hanke, T. (2015). Goldstrike 1: CoinTerra’s first‐generation cryptocurrency mining processor for Bitcoin. IEEE, 35, 68–76.
  • Barutçu, S. (2007). İnternet tabanlı tedarik zinciri yönetimi:Denizli tekstil işletmelerinin internet tabanlı tedarik zinciri yönetiminden yararlanma durumuna yönelik bir araştırma. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 18, 133-150.
  • Bilginer, N., Kayabaşı, A. ve Sezici, E. (2008). Lojistik faaliyetlerin süreçsel etkinliğine etki eden faktörlerin değerlendirilmesi üzerine ampirik bir çalışma. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 22, 277-295.
  • Bitcoin Theft. (2013). Massive Bitcoin thefts and seizures leave many users nervous and poorer. Computer Fraud & Security, 12, 3.
  • Bocek, T., Rodrigues, B.B., Strasser T., and Stiller B., (2017). Blockchains everywhere - A use-case of blockchains in the pharma supply-chain, in the Proceedings (772–777) .IM 2017 - 2017 IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network and Service Management, 8-12 May, Lisbon, Portugal.
  • Bowersox, D. J., Closs, D. J., ve Cooper, M. B. (2002). Supply chain logistics management, McGraw-Hill New York, NY.
  • Bradbury, D. (2014). Anonymity and privacy: A guide for the perplexed. Network Security, 10, 10–14.
  • Coeckelbergh, M., ve Reijers, W. (2015). Cryptocurrencies as narrative technologies. ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society – Special Issue on Ethicomp, 45(3), 172–178.
  • Coşkun, E., ve Tiryaki, E. N. (2011). Tartışmacı metin yapısı ve öğretimi. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(16), 63-73.
  • Crosby, M. (2015). Google, Nachiappan, Yahoo, Pradhan Pattanayak, Yahoo, Sanjeev Verma, Samsung Research America & Vignesh Kalyanaraman, Fairchild Semiconductor, BlockChain Technology Beyond Bitcoin. Sutardja Center for Entrepreneurship & Technology Technical Report.
  • Çelenk, B. V., (2017). Akıllı sözleşmeler (Smart Contracts) nedir?, 22 Aralık 2018 tarihinde https://startuphukuku.com/akilli-sozlesmeler-smart-contracts-nedir/ adresinden erişildi .
  • DeWaal, G., ve Dempsey, G. (2015). New York BitLicense regulations virtually certain to significantly impact transactions in virtual currencies. Journal of Investment Compliance, 16(4), 59–65.
  • DiBattista, G., Di Donato, V., Patrignani, M., Pizzonia, M., ve Roselli, V. (2015). Bitcoinview: Visualization of flows in the Bitcoin transaction graph. InProceedings (1–8) IEEE Symposium on Visualization for Cyber Security, 31 May, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Dik, A. (2015). Peer to peer (P2P) ağlar nedir ve nasıl çalışır?, 15 Eylül 2018 tarihinde https://www.elektrikport.com/makale-detay/peer-to-peer-(p2p)-aglar-nedir-ve-nasil-calisir/15406#ad-image-0 adresinden erişildi.
  • Doruk, A. M. B. ve Özen, Ü. (2018). Blok zinciri ile gerçek zamanlı doğrulanabilir eğitim belgeleri. İktisadi Yenilik Dergisi, 5(2), 75-82.
  • Dönmezgel E., Corda: Açık Kaynak Özel Dağıtık Defter; 22 Mart 2018 tarihinde https://blockchaindanismanlik.com/corda-acik-kaynak-ozel-dagitik-defter/ adresinden erişildi.
  • Dönmezgel E., Hayatımızı Değiştirecek Blockchain Uygulamaları; 22 Mart 2018 tarihinde https://bitcoinlerim.com/blockchain-uygulamalari-kullanim-alanlari/ adresinden erişildi.
  • Durğay, Z. ve Karaarslan, E. (2018). Blokzinciri Teknolojisinin E-Devlet Uygulamalarında Kullanımı: Ön İnceleme. Akademik Bilişim Konferansı, Karabük.
  • Edwards, C. (2015). Finance – Bitcoin price crash finds new victims. Engineering and Technology, 10, 19.
  • Ekin, A. ve Ünay, D. (2018). Blockchain applications in healthcare.26th Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU). IEEE, 2-5 May, İzmir, 2018.
  • Eyal, A. E. Gencer, E. G. Sirer, ve Van Renesse R. Bitcoin-NG: A scalable blockchain protocol In 13th {USENIX} Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation ({NSDI} 16) (pp. 45-59).
  • Feld, S., Schonfeld, M., ve Werner, M. (2014). Analysing the deployment of Bitcoin’s P2P network under as AS‐level perspective. Procedia Computer Science, 32, 1121–1126.
  • Francis, J. (2018). Closing The Hall Of Mirrors, How Blockchain Will Simplify And Transform The Suppy Chain. Accenture Consulting.
  • Francisco, K. & Swanson, D. (2018)., The supply chain has no clothes: Technology adoption of Blockchain for supply chain transparency, Logistics, 2(1), 2.
  • Gipp, B., Kosti, J. ve Breitinger, C. (2016, September). Securing video integrity using decentralized trusted timestamping on the Bitcoin Blockchain. Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems (51). http://aisel.aisnet.org/mcis2016
  • Greebel, E. L., Moriarty, K., Callaway, C. ve Xethalis, G. (2014). Recent key Bitcoin and virtual currency regulatory and law enforcement developments.Journal of Investment Compliance, 16(1), 13–18.
  • Hackius, N., ve Petersen, M. (2017). Blockchain in logistics and supply chain: Trick or treat, In Proceedings (8-13). Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), 112-13 October, Hamburg.
  • Hofmann, U. M. S., and Bosia, N. (2018) Why to pay attention on Blockchain-driven supply chain finance?, Supply Chain Finance and Blockchain Technology, Springer, 1–6.
  • Imeri, A. ve Khadraoui, D. (2018). The security and traceability of shared information in the process of transportation of dangerous goods,in 9th IFIP International Conference on New Technologies, Mobility and Security (NTMS), (1–5), 2018, 02 April, Paris.
  • İslamoğlu, A. H., ve Alnıaçık, Ü. (2014). Sosyal bilimlerde araştirma yöntemleri. Içinde (511). İstanbul: Beta Yayınevi.
  • Jabbar, K. ve Bjørn,P. (2018).Infrastructural grind: Introducing Blockchain technology in the shipping domain, in Proceedings (297–308), ACM Conference on Supporting Groupwork, 2018, New York, NY, USA,
  • Jacobovitz, O. (2016). Blockchain for identity management. Technical Report, The Lynne and William Frankel Center for Computer Science Department of Computer Science, Ben-Gurion University, Beer Sheva, Israel.
  • Karaarslan, E., ve Akbaş, M. F. (2017). Blok zinciri tabanlı siber güvenlik sistemleri, Uluslararasi Bilgi Güvenliği Mühendisliği Dergisi, 3(2) 16-21.
  • Kırbaş, İ. (2018). Blokzinciri teknolojisi ve yakın gelecekteki uygulama alanları. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(1), 75-82.
  • Kim, H. M. ve Laskowski, M. (2018). Toward an ontology‐driven blockchain design for supply‐chain provenance. Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, 25(1), 18-27.
  • Kishigami, J., Fukimura, S., Watanabe, H., Nakadaira, A. ve Akutsu, A.(2015). The blockchain‐based digital content distribution system.In Proceedings (187–190) IEEE 5th International Conference on Big Data and Cloud Computing, 26-28 August, Dalian, China.
  • Kshetri, N. (2018). 1 Blockchain’s roles in meeting key supply chain management objectives, Int. J. Inf. Management, 39, 80–89,
  • Kushch, S. ve Prieto Castrillo, F. (2017). A review of the applications of the Block-chain technology in smart devices and dis-tributed renewable energy grids. ADCAIJ: Advances in Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence Journal, 6(3), 75. doi:10.14201/adcaij2017637584
  • Kuzuloğlu, S. (2016). Blok zinciri (Blockchain) nedir?, 15 Ocak 2012 tarihinde https://bkm.com.tr/blok-zinciri-blockchain-nedir/ adresinden erişildi
  • Lai, K.H. ve Cheng, T. E. (2016). Just-in-time logistics, Routledge.
  • Li, H., Wu, B., King, Z. B., Miled, J., Wassick, J.. ve Tazelaar, J. (2017). On the integration of event-based and transaction-based architectures for supply chains, in Proceedings (pp. 376-382), IEEE 37th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, 5-8 June, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  • Liu, S. S., Zhu, Mundie, T., ve Krieger, U., (2017). Advanced block-chain architecture for e-health systems, in proceedings (1–6), 2017 IEEE 19th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services (Healthcom), 2017, Dalian, China.
  • Lu, Q. ve Xu, X. (2017). Adaptable Blockchain-based systems: A case study for product traceability, IEEE Software,34, 6, 21–27.
  • Luu, L., Teutsch, J., Kulkarni, R., ve Saxena, P. (2015). Demystifying incentives in the consensus computer. CCS ‘15: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSAC Conference, October 12 - 16, Denver, Colorado, USA .
  • Mackey, T. K. ve Nayyar, G. (2017). A review of existing and emerging digital technologies to combat the global trade in fake medicines. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety 16(5), 587–602.
  • Madhwal, Y. ve Panfilov, P. (2017). Blockchain And Supply Chain Management: Aircrafts’ Parts’ Business Case. In Proceedings (1051-1056), 28th DAAAM International Symposium, Vienna, Austria, 23 – 26 October. doi:10.2507/28th.daaam.proceedings.146
  • Markets ve Markets (2016), Blockchain market by provider, application (payments, exchanges, smart contracts, documentation, digital identity, clearing and settlement), organization size, vertical, and region: Global forecast to 2021, Market Report, 01.02.2019. tarihinde www.MarketsandMarkets.com adresinden erişildi.
  • Mattila, J. (2016). The blockchain phenomenon- the disruptive potential of distributed consensus architectures. ETLA Working Papers ,38, 15 Ocak 2018 tarihinde http://pub.etla.fi/ETLA-Working-Papers-38.pdf. adresinden erişildi
  • Maxwell, D., Speed, C. ve Campbell, D. (2015). ‘Effing’ the ineffable: Opening up understandings of the blockchain. In British HCI ‘15: Proceedings (208–209) , British HCI Conference, 2015, Lincoln, Lincolnshire, United Kingdom.
  • Mermer, G. B. (2018). Blok zincir teknolojilerine genel bir bakış prensibi, fırsatları ve zorlukları. 26th Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU). IEEE, 2018, İzmir.
  • Moser, M., Bohme, R., ve Breuker, D. (2013). An inquiry into money laundering tools in the Bitcoin ecosystem. eCrime Researchers Summit, 1–14.
  • Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system, accessed 12 August 2017: https://bitcoin.org/en/bitcoin-paper
  • Network Security (2013). In brief network security, 11, 3.
  • Ølnes, S. (2016, September). Beyond bitcoin enabling smart government using blockchain technology. In International Conference on Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective (253-264). Springer, Cham.
  • Omohundro, S. (2014). Cryptocurrencies, smart contracts, and artificial intelligence. AI Matters, 1, 19–21. ACM New York, NY, USA
  • Petersen, M., Hackius, N., ve Von See, B. (2018). Mapping the sea of opportunities: Blockchain in supply chain and logistics it, Information Technology, 60(5-6), 263-271. doi:10.1515/itit-2017-0031
  • Rodrigue, J.-P. (2018). Efficiency and sustainability in multimodal supply chains, International Transport Forum Discussion Paper, No. 2018-17, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), International Transport Forum, Paris, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/12f93f71-en
  • Roth, N. (2015). An architectural assessment of Bitcoin: Using the systems modelling language. Procedia Computer Science, 44, 527–536.
  • Ruta, F., Scioscia, S., Ieva, G., Capurso, E., Di Sciascio, F. (2017).Supply chain object discovery with semantic-enhanced Blockchain, in Proceedings (60:1–60:2) 15th ACM Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems, 2017, New York, NY, USA.
  • Serdar (2018). Blockchain ve Bitcoin, Ethereum Ripple Farkı, 15 Nisan 2018 tarihinde https://sirazduvari.com/blockchain-ve-bitcoin-ethereum-ripple-farki/ adresinden erişildi
  • Smetana, S., Seebold, C. ve Heinz, V. (2018). Neural network, blockchain, and modular complex system: The evolution of cyber-physical systems for material flow analysis and life cycle assessment,Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 133, 229–230.
  • Swan, M. (2015). Blockchain thinking: The brain as a decentralized autonomous corporation. Technology and Society Magazine, 34(4), 41–52.
  • Swanson, D., Goel, L., Francisco, K., ve Stock, J. (2017). Applying theories from other disciplines to logistics and supply chain management: a systematic literature review. Transportation Journal, 56(3), 299-356.
  • Tian, F. (2016). An agri-food supply chain traceability system for china based on RFID & Blockchain technology. Service Systems and Service Management (ICSSSM), 13th International Conference on. IEEE, 24-26 June, Kunming, China.
  • Treiblmaier, H. (2018), Optimal levels of (de)centralizationfor resilient supply chains, The International Journal of Logistics Management, 29 (1), 435-455.
  • Tribis, Y., El Bouchti, A., Bouayad, H., ve El Ghazi, H. (2018). Supply chain management based on Blockchain: A systematic mapping study. MATEC Web of Conferences, vol. 200, p. 20 doi:10.1051/matecconf/201820000020
  • Tse,D., Zhang, B. , Yang,Y., Cheng, C. ve Mu, H. (2018). Blockchain application in food supply information security, in proceedings (1357–1361) the IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2017-December, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Tsukerman, M. (2015). The block is hot: A survey of the state of bitcoin regulation and suggestions for the future. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 30, 1127–1169.
  • TUBİTAK (2017). Blokzincir teknolojiler, 15 Ocak 2019 tarihinde http://blokzincir.tubitak.gov.tr/blok-zincir.html adresinden erişildi.
  • UK Government (2016). Distributed ledger technology:Beyond block chain, Report by the UK Government Chief Scientific Advisor, GovernmentOffice for Science, London.
  • Underwood S., (2016). Blockchain beyond bitcoin. Commun ACM 59, 11 , 15–17
  • Ungan, M. C. (2011). En iyi tedarik zinciri uygulamaları ve bir saha çalışması. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(2), 307 - 322.
  • Ünsal, E., ve Kocaoğlu, Ö. (2018). Blok zinciri teknolojisi: Kullanım alanları, açık noktaları ve gelecek beklentileri. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 13, 54-64. doi:10.31590/ejosat.423676)
  • Van den Hooff, J., Kaashoek, M. F., ve Zeldovich, N. (2014). VerSum: Verificable computations over large public logs. In CCS ‘14: Proceedings (1304–1316). ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 2014, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
  • Voronchenko, K. (2017). Do you need a Blockchain? Supervised by Ivo Kubjas. 22 Ocak 2019 tarihinde https://courses-.cs.ut.ee/MTAT.07.022/2017_fall/uploads/Main/kyrylo-report-f17.pdf adresinden erişildi .
  • Wörner, D., Von Bomhard, T., Schreier, Y. P., ve Bilgeri, D. (2016). The Bitcoin ecosystem: Disruption beyond financial services?
  • Wu, Z. Li, B. King, Z. B. Miled, J. Wassick, J. Tazelaar,(2017). A distributed ledger for supply chain physical distribution visibility, Inf. Switz., 8(4), 1-18.
  • Wüst, K., ve Gervais, A. (2017). Do you need a Blockchain? ACR Cryptology ePrint Archive.
  • Yıldırım, F. (2015). Kripto paralar, blok zinciri teknolojisi ve uluslararasi ilişkilere muhtemel etkileri. Medeniyet Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2 (4), 81-97.
  • Yıldırım, H. (2018). Açık ve uzaktan öğrenmede Blok zincir teknolojisinin kullanımı. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(3), 142-153.
  • Yıldız, R. Ö., ve Baştuğ, S. (2018). Blok zincir teknolojisi kapsamında elektronik konşimento. 14.03.2019 tarinde www.researchgate.net Adresinden erişildi.
  • Yıldız, A. (2018). Endüstri 4.0 İle bütünleştirilmiş dijital tedarik zinciri. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 6(4), 1215-1230.
  • Zhang, Y., ve Wen, J. (2015). An IoT electric business model based on the protocol of Bitcoin. In Proceedings (184–191) . 18th International Conference on Intelligence in Next Generation Networks, 17-19 February, Paris, France.
  • Ziegeldorf, J. H., Grossman, F., Henze, M., Inden, N., ve Wehrle, K. (2015). CoinParty: Secure multi‐party mixing of Bitcoins. In CODASPY ‘15: Proceedings (75–86) 5th ACM Conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy, March 02 - 04, NY, USA.
  • Zu, X., ve Kaynak, H. (2012). An agency theory perspective on supply chain quality management, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 32(4), 423-446.
  • Zyskind, G., Nathan, O., Pentland, A. (2015). Decentralizing privacy: Using blockchain to protect personal data. IEEE CS Security Workshops, 180–184. 21-22 May, San Jose, CA, USA
There are 95 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

İsmail Bakan 0000-0001-8644-8778

Zümrüt Hatice Şekkeli 0000-0001-5090-4372

Publication Date June 30, 2019
Acceptance Date June 11, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019 Volume: 11 Issue: 18

Cite

APA Bakan, İ., & Şekkeli, Z. H. (2019). Blok Zincir Teknolojisi ve Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimindeki Uygulamaları. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 11(18), 2847-2877. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.563240