Üzerinden beş yüz geçmesine rağmen Çaldıran
Savaşı (1514) sonuçları itibarıyla hala tartışılmaktadır. Osmanlı kaynakları bu
savaştan kesin bir galibiyet olarak bahsederken Safevi kaynakları bunu bir
mağlubiyet olarak görmezler. Taktik icabı geri çekiliş olarak telakki eden
Safevi kaynakları, buna uygun çeşitli gerekçeler öne sürerler. Bu makalede
modern tarihyazımında oldukça ihmal edilen Safevi kaynaklarından hareketle
Safevilerin bu savaşı nasıl algıladıklarına değinilecektir. Her iki tarafın
kaynaklarının okunması meselenin daha iyi anlaşılmasını sağlayacaktır.
Although five centuries passed since the Ottoman’s
Chāldirān victory (1514), the consequences of this battle are still a disputed
issue. While Ottoman chronicles present the result of this battle as a decisive
victory, Safavid sources refrain from announcing it as a defeat. Safavid
sources interpret it as a tactical withdrawal on their part, and attempt to
justify their claims though various explanations. Based on Safavid chronicles,
which have been neglected by modern historiography, this article aims to discuss
the perception and interpretation of the Battle of Chāldirān by the
contemporary Safavid chronics. The appraisal of both Ottoman and Safavid
sources will enable a better understanding of the issue.
Primary Language | Turkish |
---|---|
Journal Section | Research Articles |
Authors | |
Publication Date | April 15, 2019 |
Submission Date | January 2, 2019 |
Acceptance Date | February 26, 2019 |
Published in Issue | Year 2019 Volume: 5 Issue: 8 - APRIL |
Indexes
SCOPUS, TÜBİTAK/ULAKBİM TR DİZİN [SBVT]
INDEX COPERNİCUS [ICI], ISAM, SOBIAD and Scilit.
Unless otherwise stated, the articles published in our magazine are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. All authors and translators who submit texts for publication in the journal are expected to be the sole copyright holders of the submitted text or to have obtained the necessary permissions. By submitting texts to the journal, authors and translators implicitly accept that these texts will be licensed under CC BY 4.0 unless explicitly stated otherwise to the editors at the outset.